window.innerWidth - workaround for when it returns the wrong value












0












$begingroup$



  • Some JavaScript libraries relies on window innerWidth and innerHeight to do their calculations


  • window.innerWidth is not 100% reliable, which may lead to bugs


  • matchMedia().matches is 100% accurate but it returns a boolean value

  • come around: use matchMedia to verify window.innerWidth value; if it returns false use matchMedia to do a binary search until it finds the correct value


I faced that issue with some libs that relies on window.innerWidth. In cases where I had some media queries the return value of window.innerWidth used by the library would be off and that library would have issues with incorrect value.



I've seen that matchMedia().matches always return the correct value, but it returns a boolean value, not the width value. I've not seen a solution so far for that (maybe some of you know a better solution?), so I came up with a solution using matchMedia.



I created a function getCorrectDimension that performs a binary search around the window innerWidth (or innerHeight) to find the correct value if its value is wrong as you can see below:



const binarySearch = dim => function bin(start, end) {
const guess = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

// this checks if we have the correct value, if not it will keep calling itself until there's a match
if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches) {
return guess
}

// since it is not a match, then we need to recalibrate the range and call again.
// for that we check the boolean value using with min-width (height) rule.
return window.matchMedia(`(min-${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches
? bin(guess, end)
: bin(start, guess)
}

const getCorrectDimension = (dim = 'width', range = 300) => {
if(dim !== 'width' && dim !== 'height') {
throw Error('`getCorrectDimension` accepts "width" or "height" as parameter')
}

let prop = 'inner' + dim.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + dim.slice(1)

// here checks if the window.innerWidth or Height it's the correct one
if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${window[prop]}px)`).matches) {
return window[prop]
}

// here, since the value is wrong we use binarySearch to find its correct value
const start = window[prop] - range >= 0 ? window[prop] - range : 0
const end = window[prop] + range

return binarySearch(dim)(start, end)

}









share|improve this question









New contributor




buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    • Some JavaScript libraries relies on window innerWidth and innerHeight to do their calculations


    • window.innerWidth is not 100% reliable, which may lead to bugs


    • matchMedia().matches is 100% accurate but it returns a boolean value

    • come around: use matchMedia to verify window.innerWidth value; if it returns false use matchMedia to do a binary search until it finds the correct value


    I faced that issue with some libs that relies on window.innerWidth. In cases where I had some media queries the return value of window.innerWidth used by the library would be off and that library would have issues with incorrect value.



    I've seen that matchMedia().matches always return the correct value, but it returns a boolean value, not the width value. I've not seen a solution so far for that (maybe some of you know a better solution?), so I came up with a solution using matchMedia.



    I created a function getCorrectDimension that performs a binary search around the window innerWidth (or innerHeight) to find the correct value if its value is wrong as you can see below:



    const binarySearch = dim => function bin(start, end) {
    const guess = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

    // this checks if we have the correct value, if not it will keep calling itself until there's a match
    if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches) {
    return guess
    }

    // since it is not a match, then we need to recalibrate the range and call again.
    // for that we check the boolean value using with min-width (height) rule.
    return window.matchMedia(`(min-${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches
    ? bin(guess, end)
    : bin(start, guess)
    }

    const getCorrectDimension = (dim = 'width', range = 300) => {
    if(dim !== 'width' && dim !== 'height') {
    throw Error('`getCorrectDimension` accepts "width" or "height" as parameter')
    }

    let prop = 'inner' + dim.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + dim.slice(1)

    // here checks if the window.innerWidth or Height it's the correct one
    if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${window[prop]}px)`).matches) {
    return window[prop]
    }

    // here, since the value is wrong we use binarySearch to find its correct value
    const start = window[prop] - range >= 0 ? window[prop] - range : 0
    const end = window[prop] + range

    return binarySearch(dim)(start, end)

    }









    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      • Some JavaScript libraries relies on window innerWidth and innerHeight to do their calculations


      • window.innerWidth is not 100% reliable, which may lead to bugs


      • matchMedia().matches is 100% accurate but it returns a boolean value

      • come around: use matchMedia to verify window.innerWidth value; if it returns false use matchMedia to do a binary search until it finds the correct value


      I faced that issue with some libs that relies on window.innerWidth. In cases where I had some media queries the return value of window.innerWidth used by the library would be off and that library would have issues with incorrect value.



      I've seen that matchMedia().matches always return the correct value, but it returns a boolean value, not the width value. I've not seen a solution so far for that (maybe some of you know a better solution?), so I came up with a solution using matchMedia.



      I created a function getCorrectDimension that performs a binary search around the window innerWidth (or innerHeight) to find the correct value if its value is wrong as you can see below:



      const binarySearch = dim => function bin(start, end) {
      const guess = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

      // this checks if we have the correct value, if not it will keep calling itself until there's a match
      if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches) {
      return guess
      }

      // since it is not a match, then we need to recalibrate the range and call again.
      // for that we check the boolean value using with min-width (height) rule.
      return window.matchMedia(`(min-${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches
      ? bin(guess, end)
      : bin(start, guess)
      }

      const getCorrectDimension = (dim = 'width', range = 300) => {
      if(dim !== 'width' && dim !== 'height') {
      throw Error('`getCorrectDimension` accepts "width" or "height" as parameter')
      }

      let prop = 'inner' + dim.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + dim.slice(1)

      // here checks if the window.innerWidth or Height it's the correct one
      if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${window[prop]}px)`).matches) {
      return window[prop]
      }

      // here, since the value is wrong we use binarySearch to find its correct value
      const start = window[prop] - range >= 0 ? window[prop] - range : 0
      const end = window[prop] + range

      return binarySearch(dim)(start, end)

      }









      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$





      • Some JavaScript libraries relies on window innerWidth and innerHeight to do their calculations


      • window.innerWidth is not 100% reliable, which may lead to bugs


      • matchMedia().matches is 100% accurate but it returns a boolean value

      • come around: use matchMedia to verify window.innerWidth value; if it returns false use matchMedia to do a binary search until it finds the correct value


      I faced that issue with some libs that relies on window.innerWidth. In cases where I had some media queries the return value of window.innerWidth used by the library would be off and that library would have issues with incorrect value.



      I've seen that matchMedia().matches always return the correct value, but it returns a boolean value, not the width value. I've not seen a solution so far for that (maybe some of you know a better solution?), so I came up with a solution using matchMedia.



      I created a function getCorrectDimension that performs a binary search around the window innerWidth (or innerHeight) to find the correct value if its value is wrong as you can see below:



      const binarySearch = dim => function bin(start, end) {
      const guess = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

      // this checks if we have the correct value, if not it will keep calling itself until there's a match
      if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches) {
      return guess
      }

      // since it is not a match, then we need to recalibrate the range and call again.
      // for that we check the boolean value using with min-width (height) rule.
      return window.matchMedia(`(min-${dim}: ${guess}px)`).matches
      ? bin(guess, end)
      : bin(start, guess)
      }

      const getCorrectDimension = (dim = 'width', range = 300) => {
      if(dim !== 'width' && dim !== 'height') {
      throw Error('`getCorrectDimension` accepts "width" or "height" as parameter')
      }

      let prop = 'inner' + dim.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + dim.slice(1)

      // here checks if the window.innerWidth or Height it's the correct one
      if(window.matchMedia(`(${dim}: ${window[prop]}px)`).matches) {
      return window[prop]
      }

      // here, since the value is wrong we use binarySearch to find its correct value
      const start = window[prop] - range >= 0 ? window[prop] - range : 0
      const end = window[prop] + range

      return binarySearch(dim)(start, end)

      }






      javascript dom






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 mins ago









      Jamal

      30.3k11119227




      30.3k11119227






      New contributor




      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 5 hours ago









      buzattobuzatto

      1




      1




      New contributor




      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      buzatto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          buzatto is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213760%2fwindow-innerwidth-workaround-for-when-it-returns-the-wrong-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          buzatto is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          buzatto is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          buzatto is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          buzatto is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213760%2fwindow-innerwidth-workaround-for-when-it-returns-the-wrong-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

          How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

          TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'