Is “bridles lashing about the horses” correct?












2















Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago
















2















Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar







share|improve this question














Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar




grammar






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









repomonsterrepomonster

855




855








  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago








1




1





There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

– Canadian Yankee
4 hours ago





There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

– Canadian Yankee
4 hours ago




1




1





@CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

– Jeff Morrow
3 hours ago





@CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

– Jeff Morrow
3 hours ago













Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

– Ed Grimm
1 hour ago





Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

– Ed Grimm
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



bridle



It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






share|improve this answer

































    1














    I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



    It’s not:




    The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




    where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



    Consider this definition from Wordnik:




    about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




    So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




    The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




    One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




    The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




    I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "481"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194499%2fis-bridles-lashing-about-the-horses-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



      bridle



      It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




      Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




      [Merriam-Webster]



      : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




      In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






      share|improve this answer






























        3














        Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



        bridle



        It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




        Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




        [Merriam-Webster]



        : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




        In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



          bridle



          It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




          Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




          [Merriam-Webster]



          : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




          In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






          share|improve this answer















          Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



          bridle



          It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




          Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




          [Merriam-Webster]



          : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




          In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago









          J.R.♦

          98.5k8127244




          98.5k8127244










          answered 4 hours ago









          Jason BassfordJason Bassford

          14.1k22136




          14.1k22136

























              1














              I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



              It’s not:




              The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




              where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



              Consider this definition from Wordnik:




              about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




              So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




              The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




              One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




              The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




              I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



                It’s not:




                The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




                where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



                Consider this definition from Wordnik:




                about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




                So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




                The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




                The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



                  It’s not:




                  The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




                  where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



                  Consider this definition from Wordnik:




                  about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




                  So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




                  The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




                  The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



                  It’s not:




                  The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




                  where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



                  Consider this definition from Wordnik:




                  about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




                  So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




                  The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




                  The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  J.R.♦J.R.

                  98.5k8127244




                  98.5k8127244






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194499%2fis-bridles-lashing-about-the-horses-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                      Image
                      0 The contact form does not work, and affects loading after one try. The chrome console shows the error message: POST http://example.com/wp-json/contact-form-7/v1/contact-forms/50/feedback 404 (Not Found) send @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:4 ajax @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:4 wpcf7.submit @ scripts.js?ver=5.0.3:346 (anonymous) @ scripts.js?ver=5.0.3:53 dispatch @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:3 r.handle @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:3 How to solve this issue? thanks in advance javascript wordpress contact-form-7 share | improve this question edited Jul 17 '18 at 5:39 Kiran Shahi 4,745 3 16 43
                      Read more

                      How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                      Image
                      1 I would like to know if and how is it possible to know if a AD user can login interactively (on a server) in a domain. I need to know if I can find it out using a LDAP search. Thanks. windows active-directory login user-permissions user-profile share | improve this question edited 1 hour ago yagmoth555 ♦ 11.6k 3 17 42 asked 1 hour ago Luigi Luigi 6 1 New contributor
                      Read more

                      TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'

                      Image
                      0 I am trying to do Feature Scaling in a dataset, but I get an error and have no idea how to proceed: > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "<ipython-input-10-71bea414b4d0>", line 22, in <module> > x_train = sc_X.fit_transform(x_train) > > TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X' and here is my code: import pandas as pd # Importing the dataset dataset = pd.read_csv('Data.csv') X = dataset.iloc[:, :-1].values y = dataset.iloc[:, 3].values # Taking care of missing data from sklearn.preprocessing import Imputer imputer = Imputer(missing_values="NaN", strategy="mean", axis=0) imputer = Imputer.fit(imputer,X[:,1:3]) X[:, 1:3] = Imputer.transform(imputer,X[
                      Read more