How to inject .net core EF into WPF application
I would like to inject my .NET Core EntityFramework DbContext
(sitting in a .net standard library) into my WPF app.
I tried this Unity approach:
OnStartup
var container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
var mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
base.OnStartup(e);
MainWindow
private ApplicationDbContext _db;
[Dependency]
public ApplicationDbContext Db
{
get
{
return _db;
}
set
{
_db = value;
}
}
public MainWindow()
{
//StandardDatabase.Commands.Test();
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
But I get this error at container.Resolve<MainWindow>()
:
The current type, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary`2[System.Type,Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure.IDbContextOptionsExtension], is an interface and cannot be constructed. Are you missing a type mapping?
Does anyone know if I'm doing something wrong? Any suggestions on a better way of doing this are welcome
ApplicationDbContext
public ApplicationDbContext() : base() { }
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
optionsBuilder
.UseLazyLoadingProxies()
.UseSqlServer("Server=L-TO-THE-APTOP\SQLEXPRESS;Database=Maloli;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true");
optionsBuilder.ConfigureWarnings(x => x.Ignore(CoreEventId.LazyLoadOnDisposedContextWarning));
}
As per Nkosi's suggestion, I removed the ApplicationDbContext(options)
ctor from the context, and that got rid of the error.However I am now checking the value of Db
here in MainWindow
:
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack
{
get
{
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = _db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
But it returns null
c# wpf entity-framework-core .net-standard
|
show 8 more comments
I would like to inject my .NET Core EntityFramework DbContext
(sitting in a .net standard library) into my WPF app.
I tried this Unity approach:
OnStartup
var container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
var mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
base.OnStartup(e);
MainWindow
private ApplicationDbContext _db;
[Dependency]
public ApplicationDbContext Db
{
get
{
return _db;
}
set
{
_db = value;
}
}
public MainWindow()
{
//StandardDatabase.Commands.Test();
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
But I get this error at container.Resolve<MainWindow>()
:
The current type, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary`2[System.Type,Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure.IDbContextOptionsExtension], is an interface and cannot be constructed. Are you missing a type mapping?
Does anyone know if I'm doing something wrong? Any suggestions on a better way of doing this are welcome
ApplicationDbContext
public ApplicationDbContext() : base() { }
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
optionsBuilder
.UseLazyLoadingProxies()
.UseSqlServer("Server=L-TO-THE-APTOP\SQLEXPRESS;Database=Maloli;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true");
optionsBuilder.ConfigureWarnings(x => x.Ignore(CoreEventId.LazyLoadOnDisposedContextWarning));
}
As per Nkosi's suggestion, I removed the ApplicationDbContext(options)
ctor from the context, and that got rid of the error.However I am now checking the value of Db
here in MainWindow
:
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack
{
get
{
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = _db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
But it returns null
c# wpf entity-framework-core .net-standard
Possible duplicate of Where is the composition root in a WPF MDI application?
– Crowcoder
Nov 24 '18 at 15:13
Did you properly configure theApplicationDbContext
with the container. It would appear you did not setup the context builder options for the DbContext
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:16
Remove the constructor with the options
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:19
@Nkosi That seems to have got rid of the error! However, inMainWindow
I can see thatDb
isnull
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 15:22
@Bassie that depends on when you are checking its value. If you check it before the container has had a chance to inject the dependency, like having a breakpoint in the constructor, it will definitely be null at that point in the initialization process
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:25
|
show 8 more comments
I would like to inject my .NET Core EntityFramework DbContext
(sitting in a .net standard library) into my WPF app.
I tried this Unity approach:
OnStartup
var container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
var mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
base.OnStartup(e);
MainWindow
private ApplicationDbContext _db;
[Dependency]
public ApplicationDbContext Db
{
get
{
return _db;
}
set
{
_db = value;
}
}
public MainWindow()
{
//StandardDatabase.Commands.Test();
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
But I get this error at container.Resolve<MainWindow>()
:
The current type, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary`2[System.Type,Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure.IDbContextOptionsExtension], is an interface and cannot be constructed. Are you missing a type mapping?
Does anyone know if I'm doing something wrong? Any suggestions on a better way of doing this are welcome
ApplicationDbContext
public ApplicationDbContext() : base() { }
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
optionsBuilder
.UseLazyLoadingProxies()
.UseSqlServer("Server=L-TO-THE-APTOP\SQLEXPRESS;Database=Maloli;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true");
optionsBuilder.ConfigureWarnings(x => x.Ignore(CoreEventId.LazyLoadOnDisposedContextWarning));
}
As per Nkosi's suggestion, I removed the ApplicationDbContext(options)
ctor from the context, and that got rid of the error.However I am now checking the value of Db
here in MainWindow
:
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack
{
get
{
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = _db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
But it returns null
c# wpf entity-framework-core .net-standard
I would like to inject my .NET Core EntityFramework DbContext
(sitting in a .net standard library) into my WPF app.
I tried this Unity approach:
OnStartup
var container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
var mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
base.OnStartup(e);
MainWindow
private ApplicationDbContext _db;
[Dependency]
public ApplicationDbContext Db
{
get
{
return _db;
}
set
{
_db = value;
}
}
public MainWindow()
{
//StandardDatabase.Commands.Test();
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
But I get this error at container.Resolve<MainWindow>()
:
The current type, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyDictionary`2[System.Type,Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure.IDbContextOptionsExtension], is an interface and cannot be constructed. Are you missing a type mapping?
Does anyone know if I'm doing something wrong? Any suggestions on a better way of doing this are welcome
ApplicationDbContext
public ApplicationDbContext() : base() { }
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
optionsBuilder
.UseLazyLoadingProxies()
.UseSqlServer("Server=L-TO-THE-APTOP\SQLEXPRESS;Database=Maloli;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true");
optionsBuilder.ConfigureWarnings(x => x.Ignore(CoreEventId.LazyLoadOnDisposedContextWarning));
}
As per Nkosi's suggestion, I removed the ApplicationDbContext(options)
ctor from the context, and that got rid of the error.However I am now checking the value of Db
here in MainWindow
:
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack
{
get
{
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = _db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
But it returns null
c# wpf entity-framework-core .net-standard
c# wpf entity-framework-core .net-standard
edited Nov 24 '18 at 15:29
Bassie
asked Nov 24 '18 at 15:07
BassieBassie
3,8921949
3,8921949
Possible duplicate of Where is the composition root in a WPF MDI application?
– Crowcoder
Nov 24 '18 at 15:13
Did you properly configure theApplicationDbContext
with the container. It would appear you did not setup the context builder options for the DbContext
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:16
Remove the constructor with the options
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:19
@Nkosi That seems to have got rid of the error! However, inMainWindow
I can see thatDb
isnull
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 15:22
@Bassie that depends on when you are checking its value. If you check it before the container has had a chance to inject the dependency, like having a breakpoint in the constructor, it will definitely be null at that point in the initialization process
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:25
|
show 8 more comments
Possible duplicate of Where is the composition root in a WPF MDI application?
– Crowcoder
Nov 24 '18 at 15:13
Did you properly configure theApplicationDbContext
with the container. It would appear you did not setup the context builder options for the DbContext
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:16
Remove the constructor with the options
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:19
@Nkosi That seems to have got rid of the error! However, inMainWindow
I can see thatDb
isnull
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 15:22
@Bassie that depends on when you are checking its value. If you check it before the container has had a chance to inject the dependency, like having a breakpoint in the constructor, it will definitely be null at that point in the initialization process
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:25
Possible duplicate of Where is the composition root in a WPF MDI application?
– Crowcoder
Nov 24 '18 at 15:13
Possible duplicate of Where is the composition root in a WPF MDI application?
– Crowcoder
Nov 24 '18 at 15:13
Did you properly configure the
ApplicationDbContext
with the container. It would appear you did not setup the context builder options for the DbContext– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:16
Did you properly configure the
ApplicationDbContext
with the container. It would appear you did not setup the context builder options for the DbContext– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:16
Remove the constructor with the options
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:19
Remove the constructor with the options
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:19
@Nkosi That seems to have got rid of the error! However, in
MainWindow
I can see that Db
is null
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 15:22
@Nkosi That seems to have got rid of the error! However, in
MainWindow
I can see that Db
is null
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 15:22
@Bassie that depends on when you are checking its value. If you check it before the container has had a chance to inject the dependency, like having a breakpoint in the constructor, it will definitely be null at that point in the initialization process
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:25
@Bassie that depends on when you are checking its value. If you check it before the container has had a chance to inject the dependency, like having a breakpoint in the constructor, it will definitely be null at that point in the initialization process
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:25
|
show 8 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The original error was because the container was selecting the constructor that expected DbContextOptionsBuilder
which the conateinr did not know how to resolve properly.
Since the context is being configured within the OnConfiguring
override then there is no need for
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
Remove that constructor so the container resolve the context without errors.
Depending on the flow of dependency initialization and access to it, that context should really be explicitly injected into a view model and not directly on the View.
Following MVVM, have all the necessary dependencies and bindable properties in the view model
public class MainWindowViewModel : BaseViewModel {
private readonly ApplicationDbContext db;
public MainWindowViewModel(ApplicationDbContext db) {
this.db = db;
}
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack {
get {
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
}
Update the View to depend on the view model
public class MainWindow : Window {
[Dependency]
public MainWindowViewModel ViewModel {
set { DataContext = value; }
}
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
Loaded += OnLoaded;
}
void OnLoaded(object sender, EventArgs args) {
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
}
All that is left now is to make sure all dependencies are registered with container
public class App : Application {
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e) {
IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindowViewModel>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindow>();
MainWindow mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
mainWindow.Show();
}
}
Where ever possible, The Explicit Dependencies Principle via constructor injection should be preferred over property injection.
But since most views do not lend well to constructor injection the latter is usually applied. By making sure the view model has all the necessary dependencies before injecting it into the view you ensure that all required values are available when needed.
This works forMainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitlyDispose
theDbContext
?
– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53459473%2fhow-to-inject-net-core-ef-into-wpf-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The original error was because the container was selecting the constructor that expected DbContextOptionsBuilder
which the conateinr did not know how to resolve properly.
Since the context is being configured within the OnConfiguring
override then there is no need for
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
Remove that constructor so the container resolve the context without errors.
Depending on the flow of dependency initialization and access to it, that context should really be explicitly injected into a view model and not directly on the View.
Following MVVM, have all the necessary dependencies and bindable properties in the view model
public class MainWindowViewModel : BaseViewModel {
private readonly ApplicationDbContext db;
public MainWindowViewModel(ApplicationDbContext db) {
this.db = db;
}
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack {
get {
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
}
Update the View to depend on the view model
public class MainWindow : Window {
[Dependency]
public MainWindowViewModel ViewModel {
set { DataContext = value; }
}
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
Loaded += OnLoaded;
}
void OnLoaded(object sender, EventArgs args) {
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
}
All that is left now is to make sure all dependencies are registered with container
public class App : Application {
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e) {
IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindowViewModel>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindow>();
MainWindow mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
mainWindow.Show();
}
}
Where ever possible, The Explicit Dependencies Principle via constructor injection should be preferred over property injection.
But since most views do not lend well to constructor injection the latter is usually applied. By making sure the view model has all the necessary dependencies before injecting it into the view you ensure that all required values are available when needed.
This works forMainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitlyDispose
theDbContext
?
– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
add a comment |
The original error was because the container was selecting the constructor that expected DbContextOptionsBuilder
which the conateinr did not know how to resolve properly.
Since the context is being configured within the OnConfiguring
override then there is no need for
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
Remove that constructor so the container resolve the context without errors.
Depending on the flow of dependency initialization and access to it, that context should really be explicitly injected into a view model and not directly on the View.
Following MVVM, have all the necessary dependencies and bindable properties in the view model
public class MainWindowViewModel : BaseViewModel {
private readonly ApplicationDbContext db;
public MainWindowViewModel(ApplicationDbContext db) {
this.db = db;
}
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack {
get {
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
}
Update the View to depend on the view model
public class MainWindow : Window {
[Dependency]
public MainWindowViewModel ViewModel {
set { DataContext = value; }
}
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
Loaded += OnLoaded;
}
void OnLoaded(object sender, EventArgs args) {
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
}
All that is left now is to make sure all dependencies are registered with container
public class App : Application {
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e) {
IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindowViewModel>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindow>();
MainWindow mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
mainWindow.Show();
}
}
Where ever possible, The Explicit Dependencies Principle via constructor injection should be preferred over property injection.
But since most views do not lend well to constructor injection the latter is usually applied. By making sure the view model has all the necessary dependencies before injecting it into the view you ensure that all required values are available when needed.
This works forMainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitlyDispose
theDbContext
?
– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
add a comment |
The original error was because the container was selecting the constructor that expected DbContextOptionsBuilder
which the conateinr did not know how to resolve properly.
Since the context is being configured within the OnConfiguring
override then there is no need for
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
Remove that constructor so the container resolve the context without errors.
Depending on the flow of dependency initialization and access to it, that context should really be explicitly injected into a view model and not directly on the View.
Following MVVM, have all the necessary dependencies and bindable properties in the view model
public class MainWindowViewModel : BaseViewModel {
private readonly ApplicationDbContext db;
public MainWindowViewModel(ApplicationDbContext db) {
this.db = db;
}
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack {
get {
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
}
Update the View to depend on the view model
public class MainWindow : Window {
[Dependency]
public MainWindowViewModel ViewModel {
set { DataContext = value; }
}
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
Loaded += OnLoaded;
}
void OnLoaded(object sender, EventArgs args) {
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
}
All that is left now is to make sure all dependencies are registered with container
public class App : Application {
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e) {
IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindowViewModel>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindow>();
MainWindow mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
mainWindow.Show();
}
}
Where ever possible, The Explicit Dependencies Principle via constructor injection should be preferred over property injection.
But since most views do not lend well to constructor injection the latter is usually applied. By making sure the view model has all the necessary dependencies before injecting it into the view you ensure that all required values are available when needed.
The original error was because the container was selecting the constructor that expected DbContextOptionsBuilder
which the conateinr did not know how to resolve properly.
Since the context is being configured within the OnConfiguring
override then there is no need for
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{ }
Remove that constructor so the container resolve the context without errors.
Depending on the flow of dependency initialization and access to it, that context should really be explicitly injected into a view model and not directly on the View.
Following MVVM, have all the necessary dependencies and bindable properties in the view model
public class MainWindowViewModel : BaseViewModel {
private readonly ApplicationDbContext db;
public MainWindowViewModel(ApplicationDbContext db) {
this.db = db;
}
private ICommand goPack;
public ICommand GoPack {
get {
return goPack
?? (goPack = new ActionCommand(() =>
{
var c = db.Parts;
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}));
}
}
}
Update the View to depend on the view model
public class MainWindow : Window {
[Dependency]
public MainWindowViewModel ViewModel {
set { DataContext = value; }
}
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
Loaded += OnLoaded;
}
void OnLoaded(object sender, EventArgs args) {
FrameContent.Navigate(new PageConsignments());
}
}
All that is left now is to make sure all dependencies are registered with container
public class App : Application {
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e) {
IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ApplicationDbContext>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindowViewModel>();
container.RegisterType<MainWindow>();
MainWindow mainWindow = container.Resolve<MainWindow>();
mainWindow.Show();
}
}
Where ever possible, The Explicit Dependencies Principle via constructor injection should be preferred over property injection.
But since most views do not lend well to constructor injection the latter is usually applied. By making sure the view model has all the necessary dependencies before injecting it into the view you ensure that all required values are available when needed.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 15:55
answered Nov 24 '18 at 15:46
NkosiNkosi
115k16128193
115k16128193
This works forMainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitlyDispose
theDbContext
?
– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
add a comment |
This works forMainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitlyDispose
theDbContext
?
– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
This works for
MainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
This works for
MainWindow
but when trying to display other pages in that window they don't have the requied dependencies– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 16:27
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
That is just a matter of design choices. You can just as easily inject the necessary pages and pass them forward.
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 16:36
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitly
Dispose
the DbContext
?– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
@Nkosi With this approach, do I need to explicitly
Dispose
the DbContext
?– Paolo Go
Feb 13 at 2:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53459473%2fhow-to-inject-net-core-ef-into-wpf-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Possible duplicate of Where is the composition root in a WPF MDI application?
– Crowcoder
Nov 24 '18 at 15:13
Did you properly configure the
ApplicationDbContext
with the container. It would appear you did not setup the context builder options for the DbContext– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:16
Remove the constructor with the options
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:19
@Nkosi That seems to have got rid of the error! However, in
MainWindow
I can see thatDb
isnull
– Bassie
Nov 24 '18 at 15:22
@Bassie that depends on when you are checking its value. If you check it before the container has had a chance to inject the dependency, like having a breakpoint in the constructor, it will definitely be null at that point in the initialization process
– Nkosi
Nov 24 '18 at 15:25