Transfer between integrals and infinite sums
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
So I was watching a video on YouTube about how $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = frac{pi}{4}$$ (note that $chi(i) = 0$ for even numbers $i$, $1$ for $text{mod}(i, 4) = 1$, and $-1$ for $text{mod}(i,4) = 3$) and one of the proofs shown involved stating that $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = int_{0}^{1} sum_{i=0}^{infty}chi(i+1)x^{i}dx,.$$
My question is 1.) how is this done and 2.) how can this be replicated with different infinite sums. Thanks in advance!
calculus integration sequences-and-series summation power-series
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
So I was watching a video on YouTube about how $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = frac{pi}{4}$$ (note that $chi(i) = 0$ for even numbers $i$, $1$ for $text{mod}(i, 4) = 1$, and $-1$ for $text{mod}(i,4) = 3$) and one of the proofs shown involved stating that $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = int_{0}^{1} sum_{i=0}^{infty}chi(i+1)x^{i}dx,.$$
My question is 1.) how is this done and 2.) how can this be replicated with different infinite sums. Thanks in advance!
calculus integration sequences-and-series summation power-series
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
So I was watching a video on YouTube about how $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = frac{pi}{4}$$ (note that $chi(i) = 0$ for even numbers $i$, $1$ for $text{mod}(i, 4) = 1$, and $-1$ for $text{mod}(i,4) = 3$) and one of the proofs shown involved stating that $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = int_{0}^{1} sum_{i=0}^{infty}chi(i+1)x^{i}dx,.$$
My question is 1.) how is this done and 2.) how can this be replicated with different infinite sums. Thanks in advance!
calculus integration sequences-and-series summation power-series
New contributor
So I was watching a video on YouTube about how $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = frac{pi}{4}$$ (note that $chi(i) = 0$ for even numbers $i$, $1$ for $text{mod}(i, 4) = 1$, and $-1$ for $text{mod}(i,4) = 3$) and one of the proofs shown involved stating that $$sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} = int_{0}^{1} sum_{i=0}^{infty}chi(i+1)x^{i}dx,.$$
My question is 1.) how is this done and 2.) how can this be replicated with different infinite sums. Thanks in advance!
calculus integration sequences-and-series summation power-series
calculus integration sequences-and-series summation power-series
New contributor
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
Batominovski
31.3k23187
31.3k23187
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
connor lane
262
262
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Note that, for all $igeq 1$,
$$frac{1}{i} = int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx$$
(this is a "trick" worth knowing), and therefore
$$
sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} =
sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{k=0}^infty chi(k+1)x^{k} dx
$$
where the only part which would require justification is when we swap $int_0^1$ and $sum_{i=1}^infty$: this is Tonelli-Fubini.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
If you have a power series
$$f(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k$$
with radius of convergence $rgeq 1$ ($a_0,a_1,a_2,ldotsinmathbb{C}$), then $f_n|_{[0,1)}to f|_{[0,1)}$ uniformly on compact sets as $ntoinfty$, where $$f_n(x):=sum_{k=0}^n,a_kx^ktext{ for each }xinmathbb{C}text{ and }ninmathbb{Z}_{>0},.$$
This provides a justification for swapping the infinite sum and the integral, that is,
$$int_0^1,f(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,int_0^1,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{a_{k}}{k+1},.$$
In particular, the power series
$$g(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k$$
has radius of convergence $dfrac{1}{limsuplimits_{ktoinfty},sqrt[k]{big|chi(k+1)big|}}=1$. Therefore, you can swap the integral and the infinite sum to obtain
$$int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{chi(k+1)}{k+1}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
Note that $x^4,g(x)=g(x)-1+x^2$, so $$g(x)=frac{1-x^2}{1-x^4}=frac{1}{1+x^2}text{ for all }xinmathbb{C}text{ such that }|x|<1,.$$
That is,
$$sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k}=int_0^1,frac{1}{1+x^2},text{d}x=arctan(x)big|_{x=0}^{x=1}=frac{pi}{4},.$$
Alternatively, note that
$$chi(k)=frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i}}text{ for each }k=0,1,2,ldots,,$$
where $text{i}$ is the imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$. From the Taylor series of the principal branch of the natural logarithm function $$ln(1+z)=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k},z^k,,$$ we note that the series above converges for $z=pm text{i}$, yielding
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)+text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1+text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-text{i})^k}{k}$$
and
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)-text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1-text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k}{k},.$$
Subtracting the two equations above and dividing the result by $2text{i}$ yields
$$frac{pi}{4}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i},k}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Note that, for all $igeq 1$,
$$frac{1}{i} = int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx$$
(this is a "trick" worth knowing), and therefore
$$
sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} =
sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{k=0}^infty chi(k+1)x^{k} dx
$$
where the only part which would require justification is when we swap $int_0^1$ and $sum_{i=1}^infty$: this is Tonelli-Fubini.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Note that, for all $igeq 1$,
$$frac{1}{i} = int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx$$
(this is a "trick" worth knowing), and therefore
$$
sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} =
sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{k=0}^infty chi(k+1)x^{k} dx
$$
where the only part which would require justification is when we swap $int_0^1$ and $sum_{i=1}^infty$: this is Tonelli-Fubini.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Note that, for all $igeq 1$,
$$frac{1}{i} = int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx$$
(this is a "trick" worth knowing), and therefore
$$
sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} =
sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{k=0}^infty chi(k+1)x^{k} dx
$$
where the only part which would require justification is when we swap $int_0^1$ and $sum_{i=1}^infty$: this is Tonelli-Fubini.
Note that, for all $igeq 1$,
$$frac{1}{i} = int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx$$
(this is a "trick" worth knowing), and therefore
$$
sum_{i=1}^infty frac{chi(i)}{i} =
sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)int_0^1 x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{i=1}^infty chi(i)x^{i-1} dx
=
int_0^1sum_{k=0}^infty chi(k+1)x^{k} dx
$$
where the only part which would require justification is when we swap $int_0^1$ and $sum_{i=1}^infty$: this is Tonelli-Fubini.
answered 8 hours ago
Clement C.
48.6k33784
48.6k33784
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
If you have a power series
$$f(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k$$
with radius of convergence $rgeq 1$ ($a_0,a_1,a_2,ldotsinmathbb{C}$), then $f_n|_{[0,1)}to f|_{[0,1)}$ uniformly on compact sets as $ntoinfty$, where $$f_n(x):=sum_{k=0}^n,a_kx^ktext{ for each }xinmathbb{C}text{ and }ninmathbb{Z}_{>0},.$$
This provides a justification for swapping the infinite sum and the integral, that is,
$$int_0^1,f(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,int_0^1,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{a_{k}}{k+1},.$$
In particular, the power series
$$g(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k$$
has radius of convergence $dfrac{1}{limsuplimits_{ktoinfty},sqrt[k]{big|chi(k+1)big|}}=1$. Therefore, you can swap the integral and the infinite sum to obtain
$$int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{chi(k+1)}{k+1}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
Note that $x^4,g(x)=g(x)-1+x^2$, so $$g(x)=frac{1-x^2}{1-x^4}=frac{1}{1+x^2}text{ for all }xinmathbb{C}text{ such that }|x|<1,.$$
That is,
$$sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k}=int_0^1,frac{1}{1+x^2},text{d}x=arctan(x)big|_{x=0}^{x=1}=frac{pi}{4},.$$
Alternatively, note that
$$chi(k)=frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i}}text{ for each }k=0,1,2,ldots,,$$
where $text{i}$ is the imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$. From the Taylor series of the principal branch of the natural logarithm function $$ln(1+z)=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k},z^k,,$$ we note that the series above converges for $z=pm text{i}$, yielding
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)+text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1+text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-text{i})^k}{k}$$
and
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)-text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1-text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k}{k},.$$
Subtracting the two equations above and dividing the result by $2text{i}$ yields
$$frac{pi}{4}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i},k}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
If you have a power series
$$f(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k$$
with radius of convergence $rgeq 1$ ($a_0,a_1,a_2,ldotsinmathbb{C}$), then $f_n|_{[0,1)}to f|_{[0,1)}$ uniformly on compact sets as $ntoinfty$, where $$f_n(x):=sum_{k=0}^n,a_kx^ktext{ for each }xinmathbb{C}text{ and }ninmathbb{Z}_{>0},.$$
This provides a justification for swapping the infinite sum and the integral, that is,
$$int_0^1,f(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,int_0^1,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{a_{k}}{k+1},.$$
In particular, the power series
$$g(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k$$
has radius of convergence $dfrac{1}{limsuplimits_{ktoinfty},sqrt[k]{big|chi(k+1)big|}}=1$. Therefore, you can swap the integral and the infinite sum to obtain
$$int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{chi(k+1)}{k+1}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
Note that $x^4,g(x)=g(x)-1+x^2$, so $$g(x)=frac{1-x^2}{1-x^4}=frac{1}{1+x^2}text{ for all }xinmathbb{C}text{ such that }|x|<1,.$$
That is,
$$sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k}=int_0^1,frac{1}{1+x^2},text{d}x=arctan(x)big|_{x=0}^{x=1}=frac{pi}{4},.$$
Alternatively, note that
$$chi(k)=frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i}}text{ for each }k=0,1,2,ldots,,$$
where $text{i}$ is the imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$. From the Taylor series of the principal branch of the natural logarithm function $$ln(1+z)=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k},z^k,,$$ we note that the series above converges for $z=pm text{i}$, yielding
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)+text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1+text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-text{i})^k}{k}$$
and
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)-text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1-text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k}{k},.$$
Subtracting the two equations above and dividing the result by $2text{i}$ yields
$$frac{pi}{4}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i},k}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
If you have a power series
$$f(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k$$
with radius of convergence $rgeq 1$ ($a_0,a_1,a_2,ldotsinmathbb{C}$), then $f_n|_{[0,1)}to f|_{[0,1)}$ uniformly on compact sets as $ntoinfty$, where $$f_n(x):=sum_{k=0}^n,a_kx^ktext{ for each }xinmathbb{C}text{ and }ninmathbb{Z}_{>0},.$$
This provides a justification for swapping the infinite sum and the integral, that is,
$$int_0^1,f(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,int_0^1,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{a_{k}}{k+1},.$$
In particular, the power series
$$g(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k$$
has radius of convergence $dfrac{1}{limsuplimits_{ktoinfty},sqrt[k]{big|chi(k+1)big|}}=1$. Therefore, you can swap the integral and the infinite sum to obtain
$$int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{chi(k+1)}{k+1}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
Note that $x^4,g(x)=g(x)-1+x^2$, so $$g(x)=frac{1-x^2}{1-x^4}=frac{1}{1+x^2}text{ for all }xinmathbb{C}text{ such that }|x|<1,.$$
That is,
$$sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k}=int_0^1,frac{1}{1+x^2},text{d}x=arctan(x)big|_{x=0}^{x=1}=frac{pi}{4},.$$
Alternatively, note that
$$chi(k)=frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i}}text{ for each }k=0,1,2,ldots,,$$
where $text{i}$ is the imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$. From the Taylor series of the principal branch of the natural logarithm function $$ln(1+z)=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k},z^k,,$$ we note that the series above converges for $z=pm text{i}$, yielding
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)+text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1+text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-text{i})^k}{k}$$
and
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)-text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1-text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k}{k},.$$
Subtracting the two equations above and dividing the result by $2text{i}$ yields
$$frac{pi}{4}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i},k}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
If you have a power series
$$f(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k$$
with radius of convergence $rgeq 1$ ($a_0,a_1,a_2,ldotsinmathbb{C}$), then $f_n|_{[0,1)}to f|_{[0,1)}$ uniformly on compact sets as $ntoinfty$, where $$f_n(x):=sum_{k=0}^n,a_kx^ktext{ for each }xinmathbb{C}text{ and }ninmathbb{Z}_{>0},.$$
This provides a justification for swapping the infinite sum and the integral, that is,
$$int_0^1,f(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,int_0^1,a_kx^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{a_{k}}{k+1},.$$
In particular, the power series
$$g(x):=sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k$$
has radius of convergence $dfrac{1}{limsuplimits_{ktoinfty},sqrt[k]{big|chi(k+1)big|}}=1$. Therefore, you can swap the integral and the infinite sum to obtain
$$int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x=int_0^1,sum_{k=0}^infty,chi(k+1),x^k,text{d}x=sum_{k=0}^infty,frac{chi(k+1)}{k+1}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
Note that $x^4,g(x)=g(x)-1+x^2$, so $$g(x)=frac{1-x^2}{1-x^4}=frac{1}{1+x^2}text{ for all }xinmathbb{C}text{ such that }|x|<1,.$$
That is,
$$sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k}=int_0^1,frac{1}{1+x^2},text{d}x=arctan(x)big|_{x=0}^{x=1}=frac{pi}{4},.$$
Alternatively, note that
$$chi(k)=frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i}}text{ for each }k=0,1,2,ldots,,$$
where $text{i}$ is the imaginary unit $sqrt{-1}$. From the Taylor series of the principal branch of the natural logarithm function $$ln(1+z)=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k},z^k,,$$ we note that the series above converges for $z=pm text{i}$, yielding
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)+text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1+text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{(-text{i})^k}{k}$$
and
$$frac{1}{2},ln(2)-text{i}frac{pi}{4}=ln(1-text{i})=-sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k}{k},.$$
Subtracting the two equations above and dividing the result by $2text{i}$ yields
$$frac{pi}{4}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{text{i}^k-(-text{i})^k}{2text{i},k}=sum_{k=1}^infty,frac{chi(k)}{k},.$$
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Batominovski
31.3k23187
31.3k23187
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
For all this to work, you need to show that $g(1)$ converges and that seems to be the crux of the matter.
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
@Matematleta No, I don't need to know that. The integral can be viewed as the integral on the interval $[0,1)$. The important thing is that $g(x)$ converges absolutely for $xin[0,1)$, and that the partial sums of $g(x)$ converge to $g(x)$ uniformly on compact sets. And in fact, $g(1)$ diverges.
– Batominovski
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
Right. So, as it stands, $int_0^1,g(x),text{d}x$ does not make sense. If you want to use the DCT, what is your dominating function?
– Matematleta
6 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
@Matematleta I wasn't using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. It is a well known result that if $f_nto f$ uniformly on compact sets (i.e., $f_n$ compactly converges to $f$) and $Esubset mathbb{R}$ is a measurable set of finite measure, then $int_E,f_nto int_E,f$. But sure, if you want to use that theorem, then you can take the dominating function to be $1$. For all $xin[0,1)$, $big|g(x)big|leq 1$.
– Batominovski
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
Got it! Thanks. I did not use the correct def of $chi.$ As for the well-known result, yes I know it, and my question is how does it apply since the partial sums of $g$ do not even converge pointwise on the compact set $[0,1]$,never mind uniformly. (Convergence fails at $x=1.$)
– Matematleta
5 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
connor lane is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
connor lane is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
connor lane is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
connor lane is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006984%2ftransfer-between-integrals-and-infinite-sums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown