How to increase accuracy of Plot
$begingroup$
I have the following code below:
num = 25;
U[x_] := 50*(Sech[1.5*(x - 5.8)])^4 - 0.14*(Sech[0.5*(x - 6.5)])^2
V[x_] := U[x] - U[3.8]
Plot[V[x], {x, 0, 4.75}, PlotRange -> All];
A := 1.05459^2*0.01/2/1.6726/1.60219
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[-(A/x)*D[x*D[[Psi][x], {x}], {x}] +
V[x]*[Psi][x], [Psi][x], {x, 0, 5}, num];
And I get next graphic:
Here, as I expect there should not be such a sharp peak at the beginning of Plot. So I tried to increase a number of points for Plot:
Plot[Evaluate[funs[[25]]/
Sqrt[NIntegrate[x*(funs[[25]])^2, {x, 0, 5},
AccuracyGoal -> 10]]], {x, 0, 5}, PlotLegends -> vals[[25]],
PlotRange -> All]
And get next:
It's the same graph but in different ranges. So my question is How can I do the same but in range from 0 to 5.
plotting graphics recursion precision-and-accuracy
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following code below:
num = 25;
U[x_] := 50*(Sech[1.5*(x - 5.8)])^4 - 0.14*(Sech[0.5*(x - 6.5)])^2
V[x_] := U[x] - U[3.8]
Plot[V[x], {x, 0, 4.75}, PlotRange -> All];
A := 1.05459^2*0.01/2/1.6726/1.60219
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[-(A/x)*D[x*D[[Psi][x], {x}], {x}] +
V[x]*[Psi][x], [Psi][x], {x, 0, 5}, num];
And I get next graphic:
Here, as I expect there should not be such a sharp peak at the beginning of Plot. So I tried to increase a number of points for Plot:
Plot[Evaluate[funs[[25]]/
Sqrt[NIntegrate[x*(funs[[25]])^2, {x, 0, 5},
AccuracyGoal -> 10]]], {x, 0, 5}, PlotLegends -> vals[[25]],
PlotRange -> All]
And get next:
It's the same graph but in different ranges. So my question is How can I do the same but in range from 0 to 5.
plotting graphics recursion precision-and-accuracy
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think PlotPoints is the option you need
$endgroup$
– mikado
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is not an issue ofPlot
. The interpolating function that you are using (funs[[25]]
) already has this shape.
$endgroup$
– Sjoerd C. de Vries
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following code below:
num = 25;
U[x_] := 50*(Sech[1.5*(x - 5.8)])^4 - 0.14*(Sech[0.5*(x - 6.5)])^2
V[x_] := U[x] - U[3.8]
Plot[V[x], {x, 0, 4.75}, PlotRange -> All];
A := 1.05459^2*0.01/2/1.6726/1.60219
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[-(A/x)*D[x*D[[Psi][x], {x}], {x}] +
V[x]*[Psi][x], [Psi][x], {x, 0, 5}, num];
And I get next graphic:
Here, as I expect there should not be such a sharp peak at the beginning of Plot. So I tried to increase a number of points for Plot:
Plot[Evaluate[funs[[25]]/
Sqrt[NIntegrate[x*(funs[[25]])^2, {x, 0, 5},
AccuracyGoal -> 10]]], {x, 0, 5}, PlotLegends -> vals[[25]],
PlotRange -> All]
And get next:
It's the same graph but in different ranges. So my question is How can I do the same but in range from 0 to 5.
plotting graphics recursion precision-and-accuracy
$endgroup$
I have the following code below:
num = 25;
U[x_] := 50*(Sech[1.5*(x - 5.8)])^4 - 0.14*(Sech[0.5*(x - 6.5)])^2
V[x_] := U[x] - U[3.8]
Plot[V[x], {x, 0, 4.75}, PlotRange -> All];
A := 1.05459^2*0.01/2/1.6726/1.60219
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[-(A/x)*D[x*D[[Psi][x], {x}], {x}] +
V[x]*[Psi][x], [Psi][x], {x, 0, 5}, num];
And I get next graphic:
Here, as I expect there should not be such a sharp peak at the beginning of Plot. So I tried to increase a number of points for Plot:
Plot[Evaluate[funs[[25]]/
Sqrt[NIntegrate[x*(funs[[25]])^2, {x, 0, 5},
AccuracyGoal -> 10]]], {x, 0, 5}, PlotLegends -> vals[[25]],
PlotRange -> All]
And get next:
It's the same graph but in different ranges. So my question is How can I do the same but in range from 0 to 5.
plotting graphics recursion precision-and-accuracy
plotting graphics recursion precision-and-accuracy
asked 2 hours ago
JohnJohn
32716
32716
$begingroup$
I think PlotPoints is the option you need
$endgroup$
– mikado
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is not an issue ofPlot
. The interpolating function that you are using (funs[[25]]
) already has this shape.
$endgroup$
– Sjoerd C. de Vries
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think PlotPoints is the option you need
$endgroup$
– mikado
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is not an issue ofPlot
. The interpolating function that you are using (funs[[25]]
) already has this shape.
$endgroup$
– Sjoerd C. de Vries
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think PlotPoints is the option you need
$endgroup$
– mikado
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think PlotPoints is the option you need
$endgroup$
– mikado
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This is not an issue of
Plot
. The interpolating function that you are using (funs[[25]]
) already has this shape.$endgroup$
– Sjoerd C. de Vries
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is not an issue of
Plot
. The interpolating function that you are using (funs[[25]]
) already has this shape.$endgroup$
– Sjoerd C. de Vries
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The problem does not seem to be in Plot
but in NDEigensystem
. Apparently, the default method used for your function is not ideal. If you provide a method explicitly it seems to work better.
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[
-(A/x)*D[x*D[ψ[x], {x}], {x}] + V[x]*ψ[x],
ψ[x],
{x, 0, 5},
num,
Method -> {"PDEDiscretization" ->
{"FiniteElement", {"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.001}}}}];
Multicolumn[Plot[#, {x, 0, 5}, PlotRange -> All] & /@ funs]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192936%2fhow-to-increase-accuracy-of-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The problem does not seem to be in Plot
but in NDEigensystem
. Apparently, the default method used for your function is not ideal. If you provide a method explicitly it seems to work better.
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[
-(A/x)*D[x*D[ψ[x], {x}], {x}] + V[x]*ψ[x],
ψ[x],
{x, 0, 5},
num,
Method -> {"PDEDiscretization" ->
{"FiniteElement", {"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.001}}}}];
Multicolumn[Plot[#, {x, 0, 5}, PlotRange -> All] & /@ funs]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem does not seem to be in Plot
but in NDEigensystem
. Apparently, the default method used for your function is not ideal. If you provide a method explicitly it seems to work better.
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[
-(A/x)*D[x*D[ψ[x], {x}], {x}] + V[x]*ψ[x],
ψ[x],
{x, 0, 5},
num,
Method -> {"PDEDiscretization" ->
{"FiniteElement", {"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.001}}}}];
Multicolumn[Plot[#, {x, 0, 5}, PlotRange -> All] & /@ funs]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem does not seem to be in Plot
but in NDEigensystem
. Apparently, the default method used for your function is not ideal. If you provide a method explicitly it seems to work better.
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[
-(A/x)*D[x*D[ψ[x], {x}], {x}] + V[x]*ψ[x],
ψ[x],
{x, 0, 5},
num,
Method -> {"PDEDiscretization" ->
{"FiniteElement", {"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.001}}}}];
Multicolumn[Plot[#, {x, 0, 5}, PlotRange -> All] & /@ funs]
$endgroup$
The problem does not seem to be in Plot
but in NDEigensystem
. Apparently, the default method used for your function is not ideal. If you provide a method explicitly it seems to work better.
{vals, funs} =
NDEigensystem[
-(A/x)*D[x*D[ψ[x], {x}], {x}] + V[x]*ψ[x],
ψ[x],
{x, 0, 5},
num,
Method -> {"PDEDiscretization" ->
{"FiniteElement", {"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.001}}}}];
Multicolumn[Plot[#, {x, 0, 5}, PlotRange -> All] & /@ funs]
answered 1 hour ago
Sjoerd C. de VriesSjoerd C. de Vries
57.6k10155298
57.6k10155298
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192936%2fhow-to-increase-accuracy-of-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think PlotPoints is the option you need
$endgroup$
– mikado
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is not an issue of
Plot
. The interpolating function that you are using (funs[[25]]
) already has this shape.$endgroup$
– Sjoerd C. de Vries
2 hours ago