Validate conformance object to protocol with associated type
This is my code:
protocol Protocol {
associatedtype A
}
class Class: Protocol {
typealias A = Int
}
assert(type(of: Class()) == Protocol.self)
The error is ofcourse:
Protocol 'Protocol' can only be used as a generic constraint because
it has Self or associated type requirements
I understand the error, but I hope there is some way to check if a given object conform to a protocol with an associated type, without the need of binding/casting.
swift protocols swift-protocols
add a comment |
This is my code:
protocol Protocol {
associatedtype A
}
class Class: Protocol {
typealias A = Int
}
assert(type(of: Class()) == Protocol.self)
The error is ofcourse:
Protocol 'Protocol' can only be used as a generic constraint because
it has Self or associated type requirements
I understand the error, but I hope there is some way to check if a given object conform to a protocol with an associated type, without the need of binding/casting.
swift protocols swift-protocols
I don't think it's possible. The issue is thatProtocolisn't one type. It's a template for a type, where one type exists for every possible value ofA.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 12:14
@Alexander Maybe with reflection? I can't work it out though with Mirror...
– J. Doe
Nov 25 '18 at 13:43
Swift doesn't really have many reflection capabilities yet. The meta data necessary to do that at run time exists, and it's used by the debug tools, but an API hasn't been built to expose it yet. They're prioritizing ABI stability first.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 19:33
add a comment |
This is my code:
protocol Protocol {
associatedtype A
}
class Class: Protocol {
typealias A = Int
}
assert(type(of: Class()) == Protocol.self)
The error is ofcourse:
Protocol 'Protocol' can only be used as a generic constraint because
it has Self or associated type requirements
I understand the error, but I hope there is some way to check if a given object conform to a protocol with an associated type, without the need of binding/casting.
swift protocols swift-protocols
This is my code:
protocol Protocol {
associatedtype A
}
class Class: Protocol {
typealias A = Int
}
assert(type(of: Class()) == Protocol.self)
The error is ofcourse:
Protocol 'Protocol' can only be used as a generic constraint because
it has Self or associated type requirements
I understand the error, but I hope there is some way to check if a given object conform to a protocol with an associated type, without the need of binding/casting.
swift protocols swift-protocols
swift protocols swift-protocols
asked Nov 25 '18 at 11:12
J. DoeJ. Doe
3,01711133
3,01711133
I don't think it's possible. The issue is thatProtocolisn't one type. It's a template for a type, where one type exists for every possible value ofA.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 12:14
@Alexander Maybe with reflection? I can't work it out though with Mirror...
– J. Doe
Nov 25 '18 at 13:43
Swift doesn't really have many reflection capabilities yet. The meta data necessary to do that at run time exists, and it's used by the debug tools, but an API hasn't been built to expose it yet. They're prioritizing ABI stability first.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 19:33
add a comment |
I don't think it's possible. The issue is thatProtocolisn't one type. It's a template for a type, where one type exists for every possible value ofA.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 12:14
@Alexander Maybe with reflection? I can't work it out though with Mirror...
– J. Doe
Nov 25 '18 at 13:43
Swift doesn't really have many reflection capabilities yet. The meta data necessary to do that at run time exists, and it's used by the debug tools, but an API hasn't been built to expose it yet. They're prioritizing ABI stability first.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 19:33
I don't think it's possible. The issue is that
Protocol isn't one type. It's a template for a type, where one type exists for every possible value of A.– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 12:14
I don't think it's possible. The issue is that
Protocol isn't one type. It's a template for a type, where one type exists for every possible value of A.– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 12:14
@Alexander Maybe with reflection? I can't work it out though with Mirror...
– J. Doe
Nov 25 '18 at 13:43
@Alexander Maybe with reflection? I can't work it out though with Mirror...
– J. Doe
Nov 25 '18 at 13:43
Swift doesn't really have many reflection capabilities yet. The meta data necessary to do that at run time exists, and it's used by the debug tools, but an API hasn't been built to expose it yet. They're prioritizing ABI stability first.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 19:33
Swift doesn't really have many reflection capabilities yet. The meta data necessary to do that at run time exists, and it's used by the debug tools, but an API hasn't been built to expose it yet. They're prioritizing ABI stability first.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 19:33
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53466884%2fvalidate-conformance-object-to-protocol-with-associated-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53466884%2fvalidate-conformance-object-to-protocol-with-associated-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I don't think it's possible. The issue is that
Protocolisn't one type. It's a template for a type, where one type exists for every possible value ofA.– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 12:14
@Alexander Maybe with reflection? I can't work it out though with Mirror...
– J. Doe
Nov 25 '18 at 13:43
Swift doesn't really have many reflection capabilities yet. The meta data necessary to do that at run time exists, and it's used by the debug tools, but an API hasn't been built to expose it yet. They're prioritizing ABI stability first.
– Alexander
Nov 25 '18 at 19:33