firing $onChanges hook when collection is updated from the service in angularjs
I am trying to make $onChanges hook work by using immutable way.
Chat Service
class ChatService {
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
getCollection() {
return this.collection;
}
getChatById(id) {
return this.collection[id];
}
addChat(id, chat) {
// this.collection[id].push(chat);
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
}
Chat Component
const Chat = {
bindings: {},
template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
// template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
controller: class Chat {
constructor(ChatService) {
this.ChatService = ChatService;
this.id = 1;
// if i get the all the chat collection by
// this.chats = ChatService.getCollection()
// and then use like above in the commented out template,
// and it works and triggers $onChanges
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
}
addMsg(msg) {
this.ChatService.addChat(this.id, { chat: msg });
}
},
};
Chat List Component
const ChatList = {
bindings: {
chats: '<',
addMsg: '&',
},
template: `
<div>
<li ng-repeat="chat in $ctrl.chats">{{chat.chat}}</li>
<form ng-submit="$ctrl.addMsg({chat: chatmodel})">
<input ng-model="chatmodel">
</form>
</div>
`,
controller: class ChatList {
$onChanges(changes) {
console.log(changes);
if (changes.chats && !changes.chats.isFirstChange()) {
// this.chats = changes.chats.currentValue;
}
}
},
};
However, $onChanges
hook doesn't fire. I know that in order to make the $onChanges
fire, need to break the reference of binding chats
in chat-list
component from the chat
component.
Also I could re-fetch the chats after adding on the addMsg
method, it would work and trigger $onChanges
but if the msg was from the another user and lets say if I was using Pusher
service, it would only update the chats collection on the Chat Service not the chat-list
component.
One way $onChanges
seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection and then use ctrl.id
to get particular chats when passing via the bindings like <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
. However, this will update chat list without doing anything on the $onChanges
.
Ideally, I would like to update the chat list on the view by <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
and then using the currentValue
from the $onChanges
hook and not use like $watch
and $doCheck
. I am not sure how to do it. Any help is appreciated. Thanks and in advance.
Here's very basic example of it on the plunkr.
angularjs angularjs-components
add a comment |
I am trying to make $onChanges hook work by using immutable way.
Chat Service
class ChatService {
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
getCollection() {
return this.collection;
}
getChatById(id) {
return this.collection[id];
}
addChat(id, chat) {
// this.collection[id].push(chat);
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
}
Chat Component
const Chat = {
bindings: {},
template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
// template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
controller: class Chat {
constructor(ChatService) {
this.ChatService = ChatService;
this.id = 1;
// if i get the all the chat collection by
// this.chats = ChatService.getCollection()
// and then use like above in the commented out template,
// and it works and triggers $onChanges
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
}
addMsg(msg) {
this.ChatService.addChat(this.id, { chat: msg });
}
},
};
Chat List Component
const ChatList = {
bindings: {
chats: '<',
addMsg: '&',
},
template: `
<div>
<li ng-repeat="chat in $ctrl.chats">{{chat.chat}}</li>
<form ng-submit="$ctrl.addMsg({chat: chatmodel})">
<input ng-model="chatmodel">
</form>
</div>
`,
controller: class ChatList {
$onChanges(changes) {
console.log(changes);
if (changes.chats && !changes.chats.isFirstChange()) {
// this.chats = changes.chats.currentValue;
}
}
},
};
However, $onChanges
hook doesn't fire. I know that in order to make the $onChanges
fire, need to break the reference of binding chats
in chat-list
component from the chat
component.
Also I could re-fetch the chats after adding on the addMsg
method, it would work and trigger $onChanges
but if the msg was from the another user and lets say if I was using Pusher
service, it would only update the chats collection on the Chat Service not the chat-list
component.
One way $onChanges
seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection and then use ctrl.id
to get particular chats when passing via the bindings like <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
. However, this will update chat list without doing anything on the $onChanges
.
Ideally, I would like to update the chat list on the view by <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
and then using the currentValue
from the $onChanges
hook and not use like $watch
and $doCheck
. I am not sure how to do it. Any help is appreciated. Thanks and in advance.
Here's very basic example of it on the plunkr.
angularjs angularjs-components
add a comment |
I am trying to make $onChanges hook work by using immutable way.
Chat Service
class ChatService {
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
getCollection() {
return this.collection;
}
getChatById(id) {
return this.collection[id];
}
addChat(id, chat) {
// this.collection[id].push(chat);
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
}
Chat Component
const Chat = {
bindings: {},
template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
// template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
controller: class Chat {
constructor(ChatService) {
this.ChatService = ChatService;
this.id = 1;
// if i get the all the chat collection by
// this.chats = ChatService.getCollection()
// and then use like above in the commented out template,
// and it works and triggers $onChanges
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
}
addMsg(msg) {
this.ChatService.addChat(this.id, { chat: msg });
}
},
};
Chat List Component
const ChatList = {
bindings: {
chats: '<',
addMsg: '&',
},
template: `
<div>
<li ng-repeat="chat in $ctrl.chats">{{chat.chat}}</li>
<form ng-submit="$ctrl.addMsg({chat: chatmodel})">
<input ng-model="chatmodel">
</form>
</div>
`,
controller: class ChatList {
$onChanges(changes) {
console.log(changes);
if (changes.chats && !changes.chats.isFirstChange()) {
// this.chats = changes.chats.currentValue;
}
}
},
};
However, $onChanges
hook doesn't fire. I know that in order to make the $onChanges
fire, need to break the reference of binding chats
in chat-list
component from the chat
component.
Also I could re-fetch the chats after adding on the addMsg
method, it would work and trigger $onChanges
but if the msg was from the another user and lets say if I was using Pusher
service, it would only update the chats collection on the Chat Service not the chat-list
component.
One way $onChanges
seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection and then use ctrl.id
to get particular chats when passing via the bindings like <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
. However, this will update chat list without doing anything on the $onChanges
.
Ideally, I would like to update the chat list on the view by <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
and then using the currentValue
from the $onChanges
hook and not use like $watch
and $doCheck
. I am not sure how to do it. Any help is appreciated. Thanks and in advance.
Here's very basic example of it on the plunkr.
angularjs angularjs-components
I am trying to make $onChanges hook work by using immutable way.
Chat Service
class ChatService {
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
getCollection() {
return this.collection;
}
getChatById(id) {
return this.collection[id];
}
addChat(id, chat) {
// this.collection[id].push(chat);
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
}
Chat Component
const Chat = {
bindings: {},
template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
// template: `<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]" add-msg="$ctrl.addMsg(chat)"></chat-list>`,
controller: class Chat {
constructor(ChatService) {
this.ChatService = ChatService;
this.id = 1;
// if i get the all the chat collection by
// this.chats = ChatService.getCollection()
// and then use like above in the commented out template,
// and it works and triggers $onChanges
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
}
addMsg(msg) {
this.ChatService.addChat(this.id, { chat: msg });
}
},
};
Chat List Component
const ChatList = {
bindings: {
chats: '<',
addMsg: '&',
},
template: `
<div>
<li ng-repeat="chat in $ctrl.chats">{{chat.chat}}</li>
<form ng-submit="$ctrl.addMsg({chat: chatmodel})">
<input ng-model="chatmodel">
</form>
</div>
`,
controller: class ChatList {
$onChanges(changes) {
console.log(changes);
if (changes.chats && !changes.chats.isFirstChange()) {
// this.chats = changes.chats.currentValue;
}
}
},
};
However, $onChanges
hook doesn't fire. I know that in order to make the $onChanges
fire, need to break the reference of binding chats
in chat-list
component from the chat
component.
Also I could re-fetch the chats after adding on the addMsg
method, it would work and trigger $onChanges
but if the msg was from the another user and lets say if I was using Pusher
service, it would only update the chats collection on the Chat Service not the chat-list
component.
One way $onChanges
seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection and then use ctrl.id
to get particular chats when passing via the bindings like <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
. However, this will update chat list without doing anything on the $onChanges
.
Ideally, I would like to update the chat list on the view by <chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
and then using the currentValue
from the $onChanges
hook and not use like $watch
and $doCheck
. I am not sure how to do it. Any help is appreciated. Thanks and in advance.
Here's very basic example of it on the plunkr.
angularjs angularjs-components
angularjs angularjs-components
edited Nov 23 '18 at 21:18
khyamay
asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:58
khyamaykhyamay
35
35
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Let's walk trough what your code is doing for a minute to ensure we understand what's going wrong:
The constructor in ChatServices
creates a new object in memory (Object A
), this object has a property 1
which holds an array in memory (Array 1
)
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
In your component's constructor, you use the ChatService
to retrieve Array 1
from memory and store it in the this.chats
property from your component
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
So currently, we have two variables pointing to the same array (Array 1
) in memory: The chats
property on your component and the collection
's 1
property in the ChatService
.
However, when you add a message to the ChatService, you are using the following:
addChat(id, chat) {
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
What this is doing is: It updates collection
's 1
property to not point towards Array 1
, but instead creates a new array by concatenating both the current Array 1
and a new message
, store it in memory (Array 2
) and assign it to collection[id]
.
Note: This means the
Object A
object's1
property also points toArray 2
Even tho the collection
's 1
property has been updated properly when it comes to immutability, the chats
property on your component is still pointing towards Array 1
in memory.
There's nothing indicating it should be pointing to Array 2
.
Here's a simple example demonstrating what's happening:
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
As you can see in the above snippet, pointing obj['1']
towards a new array doesn't change the array result
points to.
This is also why the following is working correctly:
One way $onChanges seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection
and then use ctrl.id to get particular chats when passing via the
bindings like<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of
<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
.
In this case you are storing a reference to Object A
. As mentioned above, the 1
property on the ChatService
's collection
is updated correctly, so this will reflect in your component as it's also using that same Object A
.
To resolve this without using the above way (which is, passing Object A
to your component), you should ensure the component is aware of the changes made to Object A
(as it can not know this when not having access to it).
A typical way these kind of things are done in Angular (I know this is AngularJS, but just pointing out how you can resolve this in a way Angular would do and works fine with Angular JS) is by using RXjs and subscribe to the chats changes in your component.
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or useRxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example usingRxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview
– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447168%2ffiring-onchanges-hook-when-collection-is-updated-from-the-service-in-angularjs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let's walk trough what your code is doing for a minute to ensure we understand what's going wrong:
The constructor in ChatServices
creates a new object in memory (Object A
), this object has a property 1
which holds an array in memory (Array 1
)
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
In your component's constructor, you use the ChatService
to retrieve Array 1
from memory and store it in the this.chats
property from your component
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
So currently, we have two variables pointing to the same array (Array 1
) in memory: The chats
property on your component and the collection
's 1
property in the ChatService
.
However, when you add a message to the ChatService, you are using the following:
addChat(id, chat) {
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
What this is doing is: It updates collection
's 1
property to not point towards Array 1
, but instead creates a new array by concatenating both the current Array 1
and a new message
, store it in memory (Array 2
) and assign it to collection[id]
.
Note: This means the
Object A
object's1
property also points toArray 2
Even tho the collection
's 1
property has been updated properly when it comes to immutability, the chats
property on your component is still pointing towards Array 1
in memory.
There's nothing indicating it should be pointing to Array 2
.
Here's a simple example demonstrating what's happening:
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
As you can see in the above snippet, pointing obj['1']
towards a new array doesn't change the array result
points to.
This is also why the following is working correctly:
One way $onChanges seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection
and then use ctrl.id to get particular chats when passing via the
bindings like<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of
<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
.
In this case you are storing a reference to Object A
. As mentioned above, the 1
property on the ChatService
's collection
is updated correctly, so this will reflect in your component as it's also using that same Object A
.
To resolve this without using the above way (which is, passing Object A
to your component), you should ensure the component is aware of the changes made to Object A
(as it can not know this when not having access to it).
A typical way these kind of things are done in Angular (I know this is AngularJS, but just pointing out how you can resolve this in a way Angular would do and works fine with Angular JS) is by using RXjs and subscribe to the chats changes in your component.
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or useRxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example usingRxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview
– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
add a comment |
Let's walk trough what your code is doing for a minute to ensure we understand what's going wrong:
The constructor in ChatServices
creates a new object in memory (Object A
), this object has a property 1
which holds an array in memory (Array 1
)
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
In your component's constructor, you use the ChatService
to retrieve Array 1
from memory and store it in the this.chats
property from your component
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
So currently, we have two variables pointing to the same array (Array 1
) in memory: The chats
property on your component and the collection
's 1
property in the ChatService
.
However, when you add a message to the ChatService, you are using the following:
addChat(id, chat) {
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
What this is doing is: It updates collection
's 1
property to not point towards Array 1
, but instead creates a new array by concatenating both the current Array 1
and a new message
, store it in memory (Array 2
) and assign it to collection[id]
.
Note: This means the
Object A
object's1
property also points toArray 2
Even tho the collection
's 1
property has been updated properly when it comes to immutability, the chats
property on your component is still pointing towards Array 1
in memory.
There's nothing indicating it should be pointing to Array 2
.
Here's a simple example demonstrating what's happening:
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
As you can see in the above snippet, pointing obj['1']
towards a new array doesn't change the array result
points to.
This is also why the following is working correctly:
One way $onChanges seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection
and then use ctrl.id to get particular chats when passing via the
bindings like<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of
<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
.
In this case you are storing a reference to Object A
. As mentioned above, the 1
property on the ChatService
's collection
is updated correctly, so this will reflect in your component as it's also using that same Object A
.
To resolve this without using the above way (which is, passing Object A
to your component), you should ensure the component is aware of the changes made to Object A
(as it can not know this when not having access to it).
A typical way these kind of things are done in Angular (I know this is AngularJS, but just pointing out how you can resolve this in a way Angular would do and works fine with Angular JS) is by using RXjs and subscribe to the chats changes in your component.
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or useRxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example usingRxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview
– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
add a comment |
Let's walk trough what your code is doing for a minute to ensure we understand what's going wrong:
The constructor in ChatServices
creates a new object in memory (Object A
), this object has a property 1
which holds an array in memory (Array 1
)
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
In your component's constructor, you use the ChatService
to retrieve Array 1
from memory and store it in the this.chats
property from your component
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
So currently, we have two variables pointing to the same array (Array 1
) in memory: The chats
property on your component and the collection
's 1
property in the ChatService
.
However, when you add a message to the ChatService, you are using the following:
addChat(id, chat) {
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
What this is doing is: It updates collection
's 1
property to not point towards Array 1
, but instead creates a new array by concatenating both the current Array 1
and a new message
, store it in memory (Array 2
) and assign it to collection[id]
.
Note: This means the
Object A
object's1
property also points toArray 2
Even tho the collection
's 1
property has been updated properly when it comes to immutability, the chats
property on your component is still pointing towards Array 1
in memory.
There's nothing indicating it should be pointing to Array 2
.
Here's a simple example demonstrating what's happening:
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
As you can see in the above snippet, pointing obj['1']
towards a new array doesn't change the array result
points to.
This is also why the following is working correctly:
One way $onChanges seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection
and then use ctrl.id to get particular chats when passing via the
bindings like<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of
<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
.
In this case you are storing a reference to Object A
. As mentioned above, the 1
property on the ChatService
's collection
is updated correctly, so this will reflect in your component as it's also using that same Object A
.
To resolve this without using the above way (which is, passing Object A
to your component), you should ensure the component is aware of the changes made to Object A
(as it can not know this when not having access to it).
A typical way these kind of things are done in Angular (I know this is AngularJS, but just pointing out how you can resolve this in a way Angular would do and works fine with Angular JS) is by using RXjs and subscribe to the chats changes in your component.
Let's walk trough what your code is doing for a minute to ensure we understand what's going wrong:
The constructor in ChatServices
creates a new object in memory (Object A
), this object has a property 1
which holds an array in memory (Array 1
)
constructor() {
this.collection = {
1: [
{
chat: 'Hi',
},
{
chat: 'Hello',
},
{
chat: 'How are you?',
},
],
};
}
In your component's constructor, you use the ChatService
to retrieve Array 1
from memory and store it in the this.chats
property from your component
this.chats = ChatService.getChatById(this.id);
So currently, we have two variables pointing to the same array (Array 1
) in memory: The chats
property on your component and the collection
's 1
property in the ChatService
.
However, when you add a message to the ChatService, you are using the following:
addChat(id, chat) {
this.collection[id] = this.collection[id].concat(chat);
}
What this is doing is: It updates collection
's 1
property to not point towards Array 1
, but instead creates a new array by concatenating both the current Array 1
and a new message
, store it in memory (Array 2
) and assign it to collection[id]
.
Note: This means the
Object A
object's1
property also points toArray 2
Even tho the collection
's 1
property has been updated properly when it comes to immutability, the chats
property on your component is still pointing towards Array 1
in memory.
There's nothing indicating it should be pointing to Array 2
.
Here's a simple example demonstrating what's happening:
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
As you can see in the above snippet, pointing obj['1']
towards a new array doesn't change the array result
points to.
This is also why the following is working correctly:
One way $onChanges seems to fire is when I get all the chat collection
and then use ctrl.id to get particular chats when passing via the
bindings like<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats[$ctrl.id]"
instead of
<chat-list chats="$ctrl.chats
.
In this case you are storing a reference to Object A
. As mentioned above, the 1
property on the ChatService
's collection
is updated correctly, so this will reflect in your component as it's also using that same Object A
.
To resolve this without using the above way (which is, passing Object A
to your component), you should ensure the component is aware of the changes made to Object A
(as it can not know this when not having access to it).
A typical way these kind of things are done in Angular (I know this is AngularJS, but just pointing out how you can resolve this in a way Angular would do and works fine with Angular JS) is by using RXjs and subscribe to the chats changes in your component.
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
const obj = { 1: ['a'] };
function get() {
return obj['1'];
}
function update() {
obj['1'] = obj['1'].concat('b');
}
const result = get();
console.log('result before update', result );
console.log('obj before update', obj['1']);
update();
console.log('result after update', result );
console.log('obj after update', obj['1']);
edited Nov 23 '18 at 20:36
answered Nov 23 '18 at 19:43
Frederik PrijckFrederik Prijck
983514
983514
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or useRxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example usingRxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview
– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
add a comment |
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or useRxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example usingRxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview
– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or use
RxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example using RxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
Thanks @Frederik for your explaination. Looks like I would have to use either passing reference directly on the component or use
RxJS
as you have mentioned. Here a example using RxJs
next.plnkr.co/edit/JZOFEP62IALB97om?preview– khyamay
Nov 26 '18 at 9:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447168%2ffiring-onchanges-hook-when-collection-is-updated-from-the-service-in-angularjs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown