Infinite sum of Gaussian functions convergence to a constant
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} textrm{e}^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$$
It appears that
$$lim_{sigma rightarrow infty} f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.
Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.
sequences-and-series exponential-function
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} textrm{e}^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$$
It appears that
$$lim_{sigma rightarrow infty} f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.
Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.
sequences-and-series exponential-function
New contributor
I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
52 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} textrm{e}^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$$
It appears that
$$lim_{sigma rightarrow infty} f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.
Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.
sequences-and-series exponential-function
New contributor
I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} textrm{e}^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$$
It appears that
$$lim_{sigma rightarrow infty} f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.
Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.
sequences-and-series exponential-function
sequences-and-series exponential-function
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Arnfinn
1314
1314
New contributor
New contributor
I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
52 mins ago
add a comment |
I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
52 mins ago
I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
52 mins ago
I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
52 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} hat{f}(j)e^{2pi ijx},quad forall xin mathbb{R}
$$ for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hat{f}$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbb{R}$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}sigma}e^{-frac{x^2}{2sigma^2}}= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac{1}{alpha^{frac{1}{s}}}g(frac{x}{alpha})$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
$$
widehat{f_sigma}(xi) =widehat{D^1_sigma f_1}(xi) = D^infty_{1/sigma}widehat{f_1}(xi)=e^{-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2},quadforall xiinmathbb{R}.
$$ Hence the given sum is
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} widehat{f_sigma}(j)e^{2pi ijx}=sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} = 1+sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}.
$$For $sigma>1$, we have
$$
|e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}|leq e^{-2pi^2j^2} in l^1(mathbb{Z}).
$$ Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
$$
sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} to 0,
$$ and as a result
$$
lim_{sigmatoinfty}sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbb{R}.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Consider $h(w)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{w^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$
Then
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}-frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\leq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$ under the graph of the function $h$.
In a similar way we have that
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}+frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=2h(0)+sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\geq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $h$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:
Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,0)dz=1$$
When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,infty)dz=int_{-0.5}^{0.5}Cdz=C=1$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Arnfinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037664%2finfinite-sum-of-gaussian-functions-convergence-to-a-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} hat{f}(j)e^{2pi ijx},quad forall xin mathbb{R}
$$ for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hat{f}$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbb{R}$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}sigma}e^{-frac{x^2}{2sigma^2}}= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac{1}{alpha^{frac{1}{s}}}g(frac{x}{alpha})$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
$$
widehat{f_sigma}(xi) =widehat{D^1_sigma f_1}(xi) = D^infty_{1/sigma}widehat{f_1}(xi)=e^{-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2},quadforall xiinmathbb{R}.
$$ Hence the given sum is
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} widehat{f_sigma}(j)e^{2pi ijx}=sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} = 1+sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}.
$$For $sigma>1$, we have
$$
|e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}|leq e^{-2pi^2j^2} in l^1(mathbb{Z}).
$$ Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
$$
sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} to 0,
$$ and as a result
$$
lim_{sigmatoinfty}sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbb{R}.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} hat{f}(j)e^{2pi ijx},quad forall xin mathbb{R}
$$ for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hat{f}$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbb{R}$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}sigma}e^{-frac{x^2}{2sigma^2}}= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac{1}{alpha^{frac{1}{s}}}g(frac{x}{alpha})$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
$$
widehat{f_sigma}(xi) =widehat{D^1_sigma f_1}(xi) = D^infty_{1/sigma}widehat{f_1}(xi)=e^{-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2},quadforall xiinmathbb{R}.
$$ Hence the given sum is
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} widehat{f_sigma}(j)e^{2pi ijx}=sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} = 1+sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}.
$$For $sigma>1$, we have
$$
|e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}|leq e^{-2pi^2j^2} in l^1(mathbb{Z}).
$$ Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
$$
sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} to 0,
$$ and as a result
$$
lim_{sigmatoinfty}sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbb{R}.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} hat{f}(j)e^{2pi ijx},quad forall xin mathbb{R}
$$ for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hat{f}$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbb{R}$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}sigma}e^{-frac{x^2}{2sigma^2}}= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac{1}{alpha^{frac{1}{s}}}g(frac{x}{alpha})$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
$$
widehat{f_sigma}(xi) =widehat{D^1_sigma f_1}(xi) = D^infty_{1/sigma}widehat{f_1}(xi)=e^{-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2},quadforall xiinmathbb{R}.
$$ Hence the given sum is
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} widehat{f_sigma}(j)e^{2pi ijx}=sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} = 1+sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}.
$$For $sigma>1$, we have
$$
|e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}|leq e^{-2pi^2j^2} in l^1(mathbb{Z}).
$$ Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
$$
sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} to 0,
$$ and as a result
$$
lim_{sigmatoinfty}sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbb{R}.
$$
As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} hat{f}(j)e^{2pi ijx},quad forall xin mathbb{R}
$$ for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hat{f}$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbb{R}$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}sigma}e^{-frac{x^2}{2sigma^2}}= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac{1}{alpha^{frac{1}{s}}}g(frac{x}{alpha})$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
$$
widehat{f_sigma}(xi) =widehat{D^1_sigma f_1}(xi) = D^infty_{1/sigma}widehat{f_1}(xi)=e^{-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2},quadforall xiinmathbb{R}.
$$ Hence the given sum is
$$
sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} widehat{f_sigma}(j)e^{2pi ijx}=sum_{jinmathbb{Z}} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} = 1+sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}.
$$For $sigma>1$, we have
$$
|e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx}|leq e^{-2pi^2j^2} in l^1(mathbb{Z}).
$$ Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
$$
sum_{jneq 0} e^{-2pi^2sigma^2j^2}e^{2pi ijx} to 0,
$$ and as a result
$$
lim_{sigmatoinfty}sum_{kin mathbb{Z}} f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbb{R}.
$$
answered 31 mins ago
Song
2,215112
2,215112
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Consider $h(w)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{w^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$
Then
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}-frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\leq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$ under the graph of the function $h$.
In a similar way we have that
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}+frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=2h(0)+sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\geq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $h$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Consider $h(w)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{w^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$
Then
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}-frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\leq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$ under the graph of the function $h$.
In a similar way we have that
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}+frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=2h(0)+sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\geq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $h$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Hint. Consider $h(w)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{w^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$
Then
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}-frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\leq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$ under the graph of the function $h$.
In a similar way we have that
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}+frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=2h(0)+sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\geq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $h$.
Hint. Consider $h(w)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{w^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}$
Then
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}-frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\leq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$ under the graph of the function $h$.
In a similar way we have that
$$sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z - k)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}+frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} , sigma} e^{-frac{(z)^2}{2 {sigma}^{2}}}=2h(0)+sum_{k in mathbb{Z}setminus {0}} h(z-k)\geq int_{-infty}^{infty}h(w),dw=1$$
where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $h$.
edited 10 mins ago
answered 30 mins ago
Robert Z
92k1058129
92k1058129
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:
Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,0)dz=1$$
When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,infty)dz=int_{-0.5}^{0.5}Cdz=C=1$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:
Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,0)dz=1$$
When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,infty)dz=int_{-0.5}^{0.5}Cdz=C=1$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:
Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,0)dz=1$$
When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,infty)dz=int_{-0.5}^{0.5}Cdz=C=1$$
While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:
Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,0)dz=1$$
When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_{-0.5}^{0.5}f(z,infty)dz=int_{-0.5}^{0.5}Cdz=C=1$$
answered 14 mins ago
Andrei
10.6k21025
10.6k21025
add a comment |
add a comment |
Arnfinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Arnfinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Arnfinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Arnfinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037664%2finfinite-sum-of-gaussian-functions-convergence-to-a-constant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
52 mins ago