How to populate a WPF grid based on a 2-dimensional array
up vote
54
down vote
favorite
I have a 2-dimensional array of objects and I basically want to databind each one to a cell in a WPF grid. Currently I have this working but I am doing most of it procedurally. I create the correct number of row and column definitions, then I loop through the cells and create the controls and set up the correct bindings for each one.
At a minimum I would like to be able to use a template to specify the controls and bindings in xaml. Ideally I would like to get rid of the procedural code and just do it all with databinding, but I'm not sure that's possible.
Here is the code I am currently using:
public void BindGrid()
{
m_Grid.Children.Clear();
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Clear();
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Clear();
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Add(new ColumnDefinition() { Width = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Add(new RowDefinition() { Height = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
Cell cell = (Cell)MefGrid[x, y];
SolidColorBrush brush = new SolidColorBrush();
var binding = new Binding("On");
binding.Converter = new BoolColorConverter();
binding.Mode = BindingMode.OneWay;
BindingOperations.SetBinding(brush, SolidColorBrush.ColorProperty, binding);
var rect = new Rectangle();
rect.DataContext = cell;
rect.Fill = brush;
rect.SetValue(Grid.RowProperty, y);
rect.SetValue(Grid.ColumnProperty, x);
m_Grid.Children.Add(rect);
}
}
}
.net wpf data-binding templates grid
add a comment |
up vote
54
down vote
favorite
I have a 2-dimensional array of objects and I basically want to databind each one to a cell in a WPF grid. Currently I have this working but I am doing most of it procedurally. I create the correct number of row and column definitions, then I loop through the cells and create the controls and set up the correct bindings for each one.
At a minimum I would like to be able to use a template to specify the controls and bindings in xaml. Ideally I would like to get rid of the procedural code and just do it all with databinding, but I'm not sure that's possible.
Here is the code I am currently using:
public void BindGrid()
{
m_Grid.Children.Clear();
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Clear();
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Clear();
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Add(new ColumnDefinition() { Width = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Add(new RowDefinition() { Height = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
Cell cell = (Cell)MefGrid[x, y];
SolidColorBrush brush = new SolidColorBrush();
var binding = new Binding("On");
binding.Converter = new BoolColorConverter();
binding.Mode = BindingMode.OneWay;
BindingOperations.SetBinding(brush, SolidColorBrush.ColorProperty, binding);
var rect = new Rectangle();
rect.DataContext = cell;
rect.Fill = brush;
rect.SetValue(Grid.RowProperty, y);
rect.SetValue(Grid.ColumnProperty, x);
m_Grid.Children.Add(rect);
}
}
}
.net wpf data-binding templates grid
add a comment |
up vote
54
down vote
favorite
up vote
54
down vote
favorite
I have a 2-dimensional array of objects and I basically want to databind each one to a cell in a WPF grid. Currently I have this working but I am doing most of it procedurally. I create the correct number of row and column definitions, then I loop through the cells and create the controls and set up the correct bindings for each one.
At a minimum I would like to be able to use a template to specify the controls and bindings in xaml. Ideally I would like to get rid of the procedural code and just do it all with databinding, but I'm not sure that's possible.
Here is the code I am currently using:
public void BindGrid()
{
m_Grid.Children.Clear();
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Clear();
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Clear();
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Add(new ColumnDefinition() { Width = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Add(new RowDefinition() { Height = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
Cell cell = (Cell)MefGrid[x, y];
SolidColorBrush brush = new SolidColorBrush();
var binding = new Binding("On");
binding.Converter = new BoolColorConverter();
binding.Mode = BindingMode.OneWay;
BindingOperations.SetBinding(brush, SolidColorBrush.ColorProperty, binding);
var rect = new Rectangle();
rect.DataContext = cell;
rect.Fill = brush;
rect.SetValue(Grid.RowProperty, y);
rect.SetValue(Grid.ColumnProperty, x);
m_Grid.Children.Add(rect);
}
}
}
.net wpf data-binding templates grid
I have a 2-dimensional array of objects and I basically want to databind each one to a cell in a WPF grid. Currently I have this working but I am doing most of it procedurally. I create the correct number of row and column definitions, then I loop through the cells and create the controls and set up the correct bindings for each one.
At a minimum I would like to be able to use a template to specify the controls and bindings in xaml. Ideally I would like to get rid of the procedural code and just do it all with databinding, but I'm not sure that's possible.
Here is the code I am currently using:
public void BindGrid()
{
m_Grid.Children.Clear();
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Clear();
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Clear();
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
m_Grid.ColumnDefinitions.Add(new ColumnDefinition() { Width = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
m_Grid.RowDefinitions.Add(new RowDefinition() { Height = new GridLength(1, GridUnitType.Star), });
}
for (int x = 0; x < MefGrid.Width; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < MefGrid.Height; y++)
{
Cell cell = (Cell)MefGrid[x, y];
SolidColorBrush brush = new SolidColorBrush();
var binding = new Binding("On");
binding.Converter = new BoolColorConverter();
binding.Mode = BindingMode.OneWay;
BindingOperations.SetBinding(brush, SolidColorBrush.ColorProperty, binding);
var rect = new Rectangle();
rect.DataContext = cell;
rect.Fill = brush;
rect.SetValue(Grid.RowProperty, y);
rect.SetValue(Grid.ColumnProperty, x);
m_Grid.Children.Add(rect);
}
}
}
.net wpf data-binding templates grid
.net wpf data-binding templates grid
edited Nov 10 '08 at 1:15
asked Nov 10 '08 at 1:05
Daniel Plaisted
14.9k43853
14.9k43853
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
64
down vote
accepted
The purpose of the Grid is not for real databinding, it is just a panel. I am listing down the easiest way to accomplish the visualization of a two dimensional list
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level2">
<Button Content="{Binding}" Height="40" Width="50" Margin="4,4,4,4"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level1">
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level2}">
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
</ItemsControl>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ItemsControl x:Name="lst" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level1}"/>
</Grid>
And in the code behind set the ItemsSource of lst with a TwoDimentional data structure.
public Window1()
{
List<List<int>> lsts = new List<List<int>>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
lsts.Add(new List<int>());
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
lsts[i].Add(i * 10 + j);
}
}
InitializeComponent();
lst.ItemsSource = lsts;
}
This gives you the following screen as output. You can edit the DataTemplate_Level2 to add more specific data of your object.
1
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
3
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
1
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
2
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
1
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
42
down vote
Here is a Control called DataGrid2D
that can be populated based on a 2D or
1D array (or anything that implements the IList
interface). It subclasses DataGrid
and adds a property called ItemsSource2D
which is used for binding against 2D or 1D sources. Library can be downloaded here and source code can be downloaded here.
To use it just add a reference to DataGrid2DLibrary.dll, add this namespace
xmlns:dg2d="clr-namespace:DataGrid2DLibrary;assembly=DataGrid2DLibrary"
and then create a DataGrid2D and bind it to your IList, 2D array or 1D array like this
<dg2d:DataGrid2D Name="dataGrid2D"
ItemsSource2D="{Binding Int2DList}"/>
OLD POST
Here is an implementation that can bind a 2D array to the WPF datagrid.
Say we have this 2D array
private int[,] m_intArray = new int[5, 5];
...
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
m_intArray[i,j] = (i * 10 + j);
}
}
And then we want to bind this 2D array to the WPF DataGrid and the changes we make shall be reflected in the array. To do this I used Eric Lippert's Ref class from this thread.
public class Ref<T>
{
private readonly Func<T> getter;
private readonly Action<T> setter;
public Ref(Func<T> getter, Action<T> setter)
{
this.getter = getter;
this.setter = setter;
}
public T Value { get { return getter(); } set { setter(value); } }
}
Then I made a static helper class with a method that could take a 2D array and return a DataView using the Ref class above.
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
DataTable dataTable = new DataTable();
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
dataTable.Columns.Add(i.ToString(), typeof(Ref<T>));
}
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
DataRow dataRow = dataTable.NewRow();
dataTable.Rows.Add(dataRow);
}
DataView dataView = new DataView(dataTable);
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < array.GetLength(1); j++)
{
int a = i;
int b = j;
Ref<T> refT = new Ref<T>(() => array[a, b], z => { array[a, b] = z; });
dataView[i][j] = refT;
}
}
return dataView;
}
This would almost be enough to bind to but the Path in the Binding will point to the Ref object instead of the Ref.Value which we need so we have to change this when the Columns get generated.
<DataGrid Name="c_dataGrid"
RowHeaderWidth="0"
ColumnHeaderHeight="0"
AutoGenerateColumns="True"
AutoGeneratingColumn="c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn"/>
private void c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn(object sender, DataGridAutoGeneratingColumnEventArgs e)
{
DataGridTextColumn column = e.Column as DataGridTextColumn;
Binding binding = column.Binding as Binding;
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(binding.Path.Path + ".Value");
}
And after this we can use
c_dataGrid.ItemsSource = BindingHelper.GetBindable2DArray<int>(m_intArray);
And the output will look like this
Any changes made in the DataGrid
will be reflected in the m_intArray.
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above:if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in theItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case thate.NewValue
isnull
. When someone sets theItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed aif (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps alsodataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set tonull
??
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when settingItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix thenull
bug. Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
I wrote a small library of attached properties for the DataGrid
.
Here is the source
Sample, where Data2D is int[,]
:
<DataGrid HeadersVisibility="None"
dataGrid2D:Source2D.ItemsSource2D="{Binding Data2D}" />
Renders:
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You may want to check out this link: http://www.thinkbottomup.com.au/site/blog/Game_of_Life_in_XAML_WPF_using_embedded_Python
If you use a List within a List you can use myList[x][y] to access a cell.
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Here is another solution based on Meleak's answer but without requiring for an AutoGeneratingColumn
event handler in the code behind of each binded DataGrid
:
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
var table = new DataTable();
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
table.Columns.Add(i+1, typeof(bool))
.ExtendedProperties.Add("idx", i); // Save original column index
}
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
table.Rows.Add(table.NewRow());
}
var view = new DataView(table);
for (var ri = 0; ri < array.GetLength(0); ri++)
{
for (var ci = 0; ci < array.GetLength(1); ci++)
{
view[ri][ci] = array[ri, ci];
}
}
// Avoids writing an 'AutogeneratingColumn' handler
table.ColumnChanged += (s, e) =>
{
var ci = (int)e.Column.ExtendedProperties["idx"]; // Retrieve original column index
var ri = e.Row.Table.Rows.IndexOf(e.Row); // Retrieve row index
array[ri, ci] = (T)view[ri][ci];
};
return view;
}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f276808%2fhow-to-populate-a-wpf-grid-based-on-a-2-dimensional-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
64
down vote
accepted
The purpose of the Grid is not for real databinding, it is just a panel. I am listing down the easiest way to accomplish the visualization of a two dimensional list
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level2">
<Button Content="{Binding}" Height="40" Width="50" Margin="4,4,4,4"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level1">
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level2}">
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
</ItemsControl>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ItemsControl x:Name="lst" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level1}"/>
</Grid>
And in the code behind set the ItemsSource of lst with a TwoDimentional data structure.
public Window1()
{
List<List<int>> lsts = new List<List<int>>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
lsts.Add(new List<int>());
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
lsts[i].Add(i * 10 + j);
}
}
InitializeComponent();
lst.ItemsSource = lsts;
}
This gives you the following screen as output. You can edit the DataTemplate_Level2 to add more specific data of your object.
1
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
3
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
1
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
2
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
1
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
64
down vote
accepted
The purpose of the Grid is not for real databinding, it is just a panel. I am listing down the easiest way to accomplish the visualization of a two dimensional list
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level2">
<Button Content="{Binding}" Height="40" Width="50" Margin="4,4,4,4"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level1">
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level2}">
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
</ItemsControl>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ItemsControl x:Name="lst" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level1}"/>
</Grid>
And in the code behind set the ItemsSource of lst with a TwoDimentional data structure.
public Window1()
{
List<List<int>> lsts = new List<List<int>>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
lsts.Add(new List<int>());
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
lsts[i].Add(i * 10 + j);
}
}
InitializeComponent();
lst.ItemsSource = lsts;
}
This gives you the following screen as output. You can edit the DataTemplate_Level2 to add more specific data of your object.
1
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
3
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
1
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
2
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
1
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
64
down vote
accepted
up vote
64
down vote
accepted
The purpose of the Grid is not for real databinding, it is just a panel. I am listing down the easiest way to accomplish the visualization of a two dimensional list
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level2">
<Button Content="{Binding}" Height="40" Width="50" Margin="4,4,4,4"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level1">
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level2}">
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
</ItemsControl>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ItemsControl x:Name="lst" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level1}"/>
</Grid>
And in the code behind set the ItemsSource of lst with a TwoDimentional data structure.
public Window1()
{
List<List<int>> lsts = new List<List<int>>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
lsts.Add(new List<int>());
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
lsts[i].Add(i * 10 + j);
}
}
InitializeComponent();
lst.ItemsSource = lsts;
}
This gives you the following screen as output. You can edit the DataTemplate_Level2 to add more specific data of your object.
The purpose of the Grid is not for real databinding, it is just a panel. I am listing down the easiest way to accomplish the visualization of a two dimensional list
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level2">
<Button Content="{Binding}" Height="40" Width="50" Margin="4,4,4,4"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="DataTemplate_Level1">
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding}" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level2}">
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
</ItemsControl>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ItemsControl x:Name="lst" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource DataTemplate_Level1}"/>
</Grid>
And in the code behind set the ItemsSource of lst with a TwoDimentional data structure.
public Window1()
{
List<List<int>> lsts = new List<List<int>>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
lsts.Add(new List<int>());
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
lsts[i].Add(i * 10 + j);
}
}
InitializeComponent();
lst.ItemsSource = lsts;
}
This gives you the following screen as output. You can edit the DataTemplate_Level2 to add more specific data of your object.
edited Jul 27 '15 at 10:41
Ilmari Karonen
36.9k566124
36.9k566124
answered Nov 10 '08 at 1:50
Jobi Joy
31.7k1998116
31.7k1998116
1
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
3
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
1
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
2
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
1
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
|
show 3 more comments
1
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
3
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
1
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
2
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
1
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
1
1
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
I don't necessarily need to use a grid for the databinding, but I don't want to have to create a list of lists for the source. I want to use an object that has an indexer that takes two parameters, x and y.
– Daniel Plaisted
Nov 10 '08 at 2:52
3
3
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
WPF binding cant recongnize an array, it has to be an Enumerable collection. So better create a List of List and databind it.
– Jobi Joy
Nov 13 '08 at 4:57
1
1
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
Is it possible to use the new WPF DataGrid to achieve this?
– Brian Low
Jul 10 '10 at 22:03
2
2
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
Bonus points for using a reference image to display correct results. A picture is worth 2^10 words.
– ford
Oct 22 '11 at 0:08
1
1
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
Quick question, do you really need to use DynamicResource in this example, or could Static do as well?
– Kranach
May 13 '14 at 17:02
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
42
down vote
Here is a Control called DataGrid2D
that can be populated based on a 2D or
1D array (or anything that implements the IList
interface). It subclasses DataGrid
and adds a property called ItemsSource2D
which is used for binding against 2D or 1D sources. Library can be downloaded here and source code can be downloaded here.
To use it just add a reference to DataGrid2DLibrary.dll, add this namespace
xmlns:dg2d="clr-namespace:DataGrid2DLibrary;assembly=DataGrid2DLibrary"
and then create a DataGrid2D and bind it to your IList, 2D array or 1D array like this
<dg2d:DataGrid2D Name="dataGrid2D"
ItemsSource2D="{Binding Int2DList}"/>
OLD POST
Here is an implementation that can bind a 2D array to the WPF datagrid.
Say we have this 2D array
private int[,] m_intArray = new int[5, 5];
...
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
m_intArray[i,j] = (i * 10 + j);
}
}
And then we want to bind this 2D array to the WPF DataGrid and the changes we make shall be reflected in the array. To do this I used Eric Lippert's Ref class from this thread.
public class Ref<T>
{
private readonly Func<T> getter;
private readonly Action<T> setter;
public Ref(Func<T> getter, Action<T> setter)
{
this.getter = getter;
this.setter = setter;
}
public T Value { get { return getter(); } set { setter(value); } }
}
Then I made a static helper class with a method that could take a 2D array and return a DataView using the Ref class above.
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
DataTable dataTable = new DataTable();
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
dataTable.Columns.Add(i.ToString(), typeof(Ref<T>));
}
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
DataRow dataRow = dataTable.NewRow();
dataTable.Rows.Add(dataRow);
}
DataView dataView = new DataView(dataTable);
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < array.GetLength(1); j++)
{
int a = i;
int b = j;
Ref<T> refT = new Ref<T>(() => array[a, b], z => { array[a, b] = z; });
dataView[i][j] = refT;
}
}
return dataView;
}
This would almost be enough to bind to but the Path in the Binding will point to the Ref object instead of the Ref.Value which we need so we have to change this when the Columns get generated.
<DataGrid Name="c_dataGrid"
RowHeaderWidth="0"
ColumnHeaderHeight="0"
AutoGenerateColumns="True"
AutoGeneratingColumn="c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn"/>
private void c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn(object sender, DataGridAutoGeneratingColumnEventArgs e)
{
DataGridTextColumn column = e.Column as DataGridTextColumn;
Binding binding = column.Binding as Binding;
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(binding.Path.Path + ".Value");
}
And after this we can use
c_dataGrid.ItemsSource = BindingHelper.GetBindable2DArray<int>(m_intArray);
And the output will look like this
Any changes made in the DataGrid
will be reflected in the m_intArray.
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above:if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in theItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case thate.NewValue
isnull
. When someone sets theItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed aif (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps alsodataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set tonull
??
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when settingItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix thenull
bug. Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
42
down vote
Here is a Control called DataGrid2D
that can be populated based on a 2D or
1D array (or anything that implements the IList
interface). It subclasses DataGrid
and adds a property called ItemsSource2D
which is used for binding against 2D or 1D sources. Library can be downloaded here and source code can be downloaded here.
To use it just add a reference to DataGrid2DLibrary.dll, add this namespace
xmlns:dg2d="clr-namespace:DataGrid2DLibrary;assembly=DataGrid2DLibrary"
and then create a DataGrid2D and bind it to your IList, 2D array or 1D array like this
<dg2d:DataGrid2D Name="dataGrid2D"
ItemsSource2D="{Binding Int2DList}"/>
OLD POST
Here is an implementation that can bind a 2D array to the WPF datagrid.
Say we have this 2D array
private int[,] m_intArray = new int[5, 5];
...
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
m_intArray[i,j] = (i * 10 + j);
}
}
And then we want to bind this 2D array to the WPF DataGrid and the changes we make shall be reflected in the array. To do this I used Eric Lippert's Ref class from this thread.
public class Ref<T>
{
private readonly Func<T> getter;
private readonly Action<T> setter;
public Ref(Func<T> getter, Action<T> setter)
{
this.getter = getter;
this.setter = setter;
}
public T Value { get { return getter(); } set { setter(value); } }
}
Then I made a static helper class with a method that could take a 2D array and return a DataView using the Ref class above.
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
DataTable dataTable = new DataTable();
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
dataTable.Columns.Add(i.ToString(), typeof(Ref<T>));
}
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
DataRow dataRow = dataTable.NewRow();
dataTable.Rows.Add(dataRow);
}
DataView dataView = new DataView(dataTable);
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < array.GetLength(1); j++)
{
int a = i;
int b = j;
Ref<T> refT = new Ref<T>(() => array[a, b], z => { array[a, b] = z; });
dataView[i][j] = refT;
}
}
return dataView;
}
This would almost be enough to bind to but the Path in the Binding will point to the Ref object instead of the Ref.Value which we need so we have to change this when the Columns get generated.
<DataGrid Name="c_dataGrid"
RowHeaderWidth="0"
ColumnHeaderHeight="0"
AutoGenerateColumns="True"
AutoGeneratingColumn="c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn"/>
private void c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn(object sender, DataGridAutoGeneratingColumnEventArgs e)
{
DataGridTextColumn column = e.Column as DataGridTextColumn;
Binding binding = column.Binding as Binding;
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(binding.Path.Path + ".Value");
}
And after this we can use
c_dataGrid.ItemsSource = BindingHelper.GetBindable2DArray<int>(m_intArray);
And the output will look like this
Any changes made in the DataGrid
will be reflected in the m_intArray.
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above:if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in theItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case thate.NewValue
isnull
. When someone sets theItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed aif (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps alsodataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set tonull
??
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when settingItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix thenull
bug. Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
42
down vote
up vote
42
down vote
Here is a Control called DataGrid2D
that can be populated based on a 2D or
1D array (or anything that implements the IList
interface). It subclasses DataGrid
and adds a property called ItemsSource2D
which is used for binding against 2D or 1D sources. Library can be downloaded here and source code can be downloaded here.
To use it just add a reference to DataGrid2DLibrary.dll, add this namespace
xmlns:dg2d="clr-namespace:DataGrid2DLibrary;assembly=DataGrid2DLibrary"
and then create a DataGrid2D and bind it to your IList, 2D array or 1D array like this
<dg2d:DataGrid2D Name="dataGrid2D"
ItemsSource2D="{Binding Int2DList}"/>
OLD POST
Here is an implementation that can bind a 2D array to the WPF datagrid.
Say we have this 2D array
private int[,] m_intArray = new int[5, 5];
...
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
m_intArray[i,j] = (i * 10 + j);
}
}
And then we want to bind this 2D array to the WPF DataGrid and the changes we make shall be reflected in the array. To do this I used Eric Lippert's Ref class from this thread.
public class Ref<T>
{
private readonly Func<T> getter;
private readonly Action<T> setter;
public Ref(Func<T> getter, Action<T> setter)
{
this.getter = getter;
this.setter = setter;
}
public T Value { get { return getter(); } set { setter(value); } }
}
Then I made a static helper class with a method that could take a 2D array and return a DataView using the Ref class above.
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
DataTable dataTable = new DataTable();
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
dataTable.Columns.Add(i.ToString(), typeof(Ref<T>));
}
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
DataRow dataRow = dataTable.NewRow();
dataTable.Rows.Add(dataRow);
}
DataView dataView = new DataView(dataTable);
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < array.GetLength(1); j++)
{
int a = i;
int b = j;
Ref<T> refT = new Ref<T>(() => array[a, b], z => { array[a, b] = z; });
dataView[i][j] = refT;
}
}
return dataView;
}
This would almost be enough to bind to but the Path in the Binding will point to the Ref object instead of the Ref.Value which we need so we have to change this when the Columns get generated.
<DataGrid Name="c_dataGrid"
RowHeaderWidth="0"
ColumnHeaderHeight="0"
AutoGenerateColumns="True"
AutoGeneratingColumn="c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn"/>
private void c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn(object sender, DataGridAutoGeneratingColumnEventArgs e)
{
DataGridTextColumn column = e.Column as DataGridTextColumn;
Binding binding = column.Binding as Binding;
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(binding.Path.Path + ".Value");
}
And after this we can use
c_dataGrid.ItemsSource = BindingHelper.GetBindable2DArray<int>(m_intArray);
And the output will look like this
Any changes made in the DataGrid
will be reflected in the m_intArray.
Here is a Control called DataGrid2D
that can be populated based on a 2D or
1D array (or anything that implements the IList
interface). It subclasses DataGrid
and adds a property called ItemsSource2D
which is used for binding against 2D or 1D sources. Library can be downloaded here and source code can be downloaded here.
To use it just add a reference to DataGrid2DLibrary.dll, add this namespace
xmlns:dg2d="clr-namespace:DataGrid2DLibrary;assembly=DataGrid2DLibrary"
and then create a DataGrid2D and bind it to your IList, 2D array or 1D array like this
<dg2d:DataGrid2D Name="dataGrid2D"
ItemsSource2D="{Binding Int2DList}"/>
OLD POST
Here is an implementation that can bind a 2D array to the WPF datagrid.
Say we have this 2D array
private int[,] m_intArray = new int[5, 5];
...
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
{
m_intArray[i,j] = (i * 10 + j);
}
}
And then we want to bind this 2D array to the WPF DataGrid and the changes we make shall be reflected in the array. To do this I used Eric Lippert's Ref class from this thread.
public class Ref<T>
{
private readonly Func<T> getter;
private readonly Action<T> setter;
public Ref(Func<T> getter, Action<T> setter)
{
this.getter = getter;
this.setter = setter;
}
public T Value { get { return getter(); } set { setter(value); } }
}
Then I made a static helper class with a method that could take a 2D array and return a DataView using the Ref class above.
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
DataTable dataTable = new DataTable();
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
dataTable.Columns.Add(i.ToString(), typeof(Ref<T>));
}
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
DataRow dataRow = dataTable.NewRow();
dataTable.Rows.Add(dataRow);
}
DataView dataView = new DataView(dataTable);
for (int i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < array.GetLength(1); j++)
{
int a = i;
int b = j;
Ref<T> refT = new Ref<T>(() => array[a, b], z => { array[a, b] = z; });
dataView[i][j] = refT;
}
}
return dataView;
}
This would almost be enough to bind to but the Path in the Binding will point to the Ref object instead of the Ref.Value which we need so we have to change this when the Columns get generated.
<DataGrid Name="c_dataGrid"
RowHeaderWidth="0"
ColumnHeaderHeight="0"
AutoGenerateColumns="True"
AutoGeneratingColumn="c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn"/>
private void c_dataGrid_AutoGeneratingColumn(object sender, DataGridAutoGeneratingColumnEventArgs e)
{
DataGridTextColumn column = e.Column as DataGridTextColumn;
Binding binding = column.Binding as Binding;
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(binding.Path.Path + ".Value");
}
And after this we can use
c_dataGrid.ItemsSource = BindingHelper.GetBindable2DArray<int>(m_intArray);
And the output will look like this
Any changes made in the DataGrid
will be reflected in the m_intArray.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:33
Community♦
11
11
answered Oct 23 '10 at 4:02
Fredrik Hedblad
69.9k18215252
69.9k18215252
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above:if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in theItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case thate.NewValue
isnull
. When someone sets theItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed aif (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps alsodataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set tonull
??
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when settingItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix thenull
bug. Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
|
show 8 more comments
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above:if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in theItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case thate.NewValue
isnull
. When someone sets theItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed aif (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps alsodataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set tonull
??
– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when settingItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix thenull
bug. Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:
bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above: if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
Great example, thanks for sharing it! You had a question in DataGrid2D.cs: "Better way to find this out?". I think, you can write:
bool multiDimensionalArray = type.IsArray && type.GetArrayRank() == 2;
and the if statement two lines above: if (e.NewValue is IList && (!type.IsArray || type.GetArrayRank() <= 2))
That seems to work, couldn't find an issue during quick test of the examples.– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 17:57
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
@Slauma: Glad you liked it and thanks for the feedback! I was hoping somebody would eventually give me an update on that :) I'll try it out and update the lib! Thanks again!
– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 14 '11 at 18:45
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in the
ItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case that e.NewValue
is null
. When someone sets the ItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed a if (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps also dataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set to null
??– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
I'm just testing and playing around a bit ;) There seems to be another minor glitch: I think, in the
ItemsSource2DPropertyChanged
EventHandler you need to consider the case that e.NewValue
is null
. When someone sets the ItemsSource2D
to null it crashes. I just had this situation accidentally. I've simply placed a if (e.NewValue != null)
around the whole EventHandler. It doesn't crash anymore, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient. Perhaps also dataGrid2D.ItemsSource
must be set to null
??– Slauma
Feb 14 '11 at 20:23
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when setting
ItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix the null
bug. Thanks again!– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
@Slauma: It definitely shouldn't crash when setting
ItemsSource2D
to null :) That was previously handled by the if statement but due to an optimization attempt I accidently broke it.. I uploaded a new version that implements the suggestion from your first comment and fix the null
bug. Thanks again!– Fredrik Hedblad
Feb 16 '11 at 8:09
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
Hi Meleak, would it be possible to get the source of your lib DataGrid2D? Thx Fred
– Fred
Feb 17 '11 at 21:52
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
I wrote a small library of attached properties for the DataGrid
.
Here is the source
Sample, where Data2D is int[,]
:
<DataGrid HeadersVisibility="None"
dataGrid2D:Source2D.ItemsSource2D="{Binding Data2D}" />
Renders:
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
I wrote a small library of attached properties for the DataGrid
.
Here is the source
Sample, where Data2D is int[,]
:
<DataGrid HeadersVisibility="None"
dataGrid2D:Source2D.ItemsSource2D="{Binding Data2D}" />
Renders:
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
I wrote a small library of attached properties for the DataGrid
.
Here is the source
Sample, where Data2D is int[,]
:
<DataGrid HeadersVisibility="None"
dataGrid2D:Source2D.ItemsSource2D="{Binding Data2D}" />
Renders:
I wrote a small library of attached properties for the DataGrid
.
Here is the source
Sample, where Data2D is int[,]
:
<DataGrid HeadersVisibility="None"
dataGrid2D:Source2D.ItemsSource2D="{Binding Data2D}" />
Renders:
answered Jun 28 '15 at 18:08
Johan Larsson
10.8k84768
10.8k84768
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
add a comment |
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
Surprised there is no comments to this. Nothing else I can find for doing something simple like this. Spend days trying to bind a 2D array to a gridview! So difficult when it takes less than 10 minutes in winforms
– rolls
Nov 7 '16 at 5:00
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You may want to check out this link: http://www.thinkbottomup.com.au/site/blog/Game_of_Life_in_XAML_WPF_using_embedded_Python
If you use a List within a List you can use myList[x][y] to access a cell.
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You may want to check out this link: http://www.thinkbottomup.com.au/site/blog/Game_of_Life_in_XAML_WPF_using_embedded_Python
If you use a List within a List you can use myList[x][y] to access a cell.
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You may want to check out this link: http://www.thinkbottomup.com.au/site/blog/Game_of_Life_in_XAML_WPF_using_embedded_Python
If you use a List within a List you can use myList[x][y] to access a cell.
You may want to check out this link: http://www.thinkbottomup.com.au/site/blog/Game_of_Life_in_XAML_WPF_using_embedded_Python
If you use a List within a List you can use myList[x][y] to access a cell.
answered Oct 28 '09 at 9:19
Torsten
7141134
7141134
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
add a comment |
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
with a list inside a list it is usually mylist[y][x]
– MikeT
Jan 16 '13 at 9:31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Here is another solution based on Meleak's answer but without requiring for an AutoGeneratingColumn
event handler in the code behind of each binded DataGrid
:
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
var table = new DataTable();
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
table.Columns.Add(i+1, typeof(bool))
.ExtendedProperties.Add("idx", i); // Save original column index
}
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
table.Rows.Add(table.NewRow());
}
var view = new DataView(table);
for (var ri = 0; ri < array.GetLength(0); ri++)
{
for (var ci = 0; ci < array.GetLength(1); ci++)
{
view[ri][ci] = array[ri, ci];
}
}
// Avoids writing an 'AutogeneratingColumn' handler
table.ColumnChanged += (s, e) =>
{
var ci = (int)e.Column.ExtendedProperties["idx"]; // Retrieve original column index
var ri = e.Row.Table.Rows.IndexOf(e.Row); // Retrieve row index
array[ri, ci] = (T)view[ri][ci];
};
return view;
}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Here is another solution based on Meleak's answer but without requiring for an AutoGeneratingColumn
event handler in the code behind of each binded DataGrid
:
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
var table = new DataTable();
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
table.Columns.Add(i+1, typeof(bool))
.ExtendedProperties.Add("idx", i); // Save original column index
}
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
table.Rows.Add(table.NewRow());
}
var view = new DataView(table);
for (var ri = 0; ri < array.GetLength(0); ri++)
{
for (var ci = 0; ci < array.GetLength(1); ci++)
{
view[ri][ci] = array[ri, ci];
}
}
// Avoids writing an 'AutogeneratingColumn' handler
table.ColumnChanged += (s, e) =>
{
var ci = (int)e.Column.ExtendedProperties["idx"]; // Retrieve original column index
var ri = e.Row.Table.Rows.IndexOf(e.Row); // Retrieve row index
array[ri, ci] = (T)view[ri][ci];
};
return view;
}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Here is another solution based on Meleak's answer but without requiring for an AutoGeneratingColumn
event handler in the code behind of each binded DataGrid
:
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
var table = new DataTable();
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
table.Columns.Add(i+1, typeof(bool))
.ExtendedProperties.Add("idx", i); // Save original column index
}
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
table.Rows.Add(table.NewRow());
}
var view = new DataView(table);
for (var ri = 0; ri < array.GetLength(0); ri++)
{
for (var ci = 0; ci < array.GetLength(1); ci++)
{
view[ri][ci] = array[ri, ci];
}
}
// Avoids writing an 'AutogeneratingColumn' handler
table.ColumnChanged += (s, e) =>
{
var ci = (int)e.Column.ExtendedProperties["idx"]; // Retrieve original column index
var ri = e.Row.Table.Rows.IndexOf(e.Row); // Retrieve row index
array[ri, ci] = (T)view[ri][ci];
};
return view;
}
Here is another solution based on Meleak's answer but without requiring for an AutoGeneratingColumn
event handler in the code behind of each binded DataGrid
:
public static DataView GetBindable2DArray<T>(T[,] array)
{
var table = new DataTable();
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(1); i++)
{
table.Columns.Add(i+1, typeof(bool))
.ExtendedProperties.Add("idx", i); // Save original column index
}
for (var i = 0; i < array.GetLength(0); i++)
{
table.Rows.Add(table.NewRow());
}
var view = new DataView(table);
for (var ri = 0; ri < array.GetLength(0); ri++)
{
for (var ci = 0; ci < array.GetLength(1); ci++)
{
view[ri][ci] = array[ri, ci];
}
}
// Avoids writing an 'AutogeneratingColumn' handler
table.ColumnChanged += (s, e) =>
{
var ci = (int)e.Column.ExtendedProperties["idx"]; // Retrieve original column index
var ri = e.Row.Table.Rows.IndexOf(e.Row); // Retrieve row index
array[ri, ci] = (T)view[ri][ci];
};
return view;
}
edited May 23 '17 at 12:10
Community♦
11
11
answered Nov 30 '11 at 13:43
CitizenInsane
3,3461534
3,3461534
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f276808%2fhow-to-populate-a-wpf-grid-based-on-a-2-dimensional-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown