efficiently find kth smallest element in binary search tree?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I was faced with below interview question today and I came up with below solution but somehow interviewer was not happy. I am not sure why..




Given a binary search tree, find the kth smallest element in it.




Is there any better or efficient way to do this problem?



  /*****************************************************
*
* Kth Smallest Iterative
*
******************************************************/

public int kthSmallestIterative(TreeNode root, int k) {
Stack<TreeNode> st = new Stack<>();

while (root != null) {
st.push(root);
root = root.left;
}

while (k != 0) {
TreeNode n = st.pop();
k--;
if (k == 0)
return n.data;
TreeNode right = n.right;
while (right != null) {
st.push(right);
right = right.left;
}
}

return -1;
}


I mentioned time and space complexity as O(n). My iterative version takes extra space. Is there any way to do it without any extra space?









share


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I was faced with below interview question today and I came up with below solution but somehow interviewer was not happy. I am not sure why..




    Given a binary search tree, find the kth smallest element in it.




    Is there any better or efficient way to do this problem?



      /*****************************************************
    *
    * Kth Smallest Iterative
    *
    ******************************************************/

    public int kthSmallestIterative(TreeNode root, int k) {
    Stack<TreeNode> st = new Stack<>();

    while (root != null) {
    st.push(root);
    root = root.left;
    }

    while (k != 0) {
    TreeNode n = st.pop();
    k--;
    if (k == 0)
    return n.data;
    TreeNode right = n.right;
    while (right != null) {
    st.push(right);
    right = right.left;
    }
    }

    return -1;
    }


    I mentioned time and space complexity as O(n). My iterative version takes extra space. Is there any way to do it without any extra space?









    share
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I was faced with below interview question today and I came up with below solution but somehow interviewer was not happy. I am not sure why..




      Given a binary search tree, find the kth smallest element in it.




      Is there any better or efficient way to do this problem?



        /*****************************************************
      *
      * Kth Smallest Iterative
      *
      ******************************************************/

      public int kthSmallestIterative(TreeNode root, int k) {
      Stack<TreeNode> st = new Stack<>();

      while (root != null) {
      st.push(root);
      root = root.left;
      }

      while (k != 0) {
      TreeNode n = st.pop();
      k--;
      if (k == 0)
      return n.data;
      TreeNode right = n.right;
      while (right != null) {
      st.push(right);
      right = right.left;
      }
      }

      return -1;
      }


      I mentioned time and space complexity as O(n). My iterative version takes extra space. Is there any way to do it without any extra space?









      share













      I was faced with below interview question today and I came up with below solution but somehow interviewer was not happy. I am not sure why..




      Given a binary search tree, find the kth smallest element in it.




      Is there any better or efficient way to do this problem?



        /*****************************************************
      *
      * Kth Smallest Iterative
      *
      ******************************************************/

      public int kthSmallestIterative(TreeNode root, int k) {
      Stack<TreeNode> st = new Stack<>();

      while (root != null) {
      st.push(root);
      root = root.left;
      }

      while (k != 0) {
      TreeNode n = st.pop();
      k--;
      if (k == 0)
      return n.data;
      TreeNode right = n.right;
      while (right != null) {
      st.push(right);
      right = right.left;
      }
      }

      return -1;
      }


      I mentioned time and space complexity as O(n). My iterative version takes extra space. Is there any way to do it without any extra space?







      java algorithm interview-questions





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 3 mins ago









      user5447339

      14318




      14318



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208668%2fefficiently-find-kth-smallest-element-in-binary-search-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208668%2fefficiently-find-kth-smallest-element-in-binary-search-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

          How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

          TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'