Derivative of integral, which way?
$begingroup$
I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$
can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$
but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?
is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?
calculus integration
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$
can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$
but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?
is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?
calculus integration
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$
can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$
but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?
is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?
calculus integration
New contributor
$endgroup$
I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$
can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$
but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?
is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?
calculus integration
calculus integration
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
user10998700user10998700
284
284
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:
$$
frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
$$
If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:
$$
frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
0.
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:
($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$
(This is because of the derivative chain rule).
It's pretty easy to go on from here.
Good luck.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105789%2fderivative-of-integral-which-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$
$endgroup$
Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$
answered 2 hours ago
HAMIDINE SOUMAREHAMIDINE SOUMARE
35618
35618
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:
$$
frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
$$
If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:
$$
frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
0.
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:
$$
frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
$$
If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:
$$
frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
0.
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:
$$
frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
$$
If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:
$$
frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
0.
$$
$endgroup$
It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:
$$
frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
$$
If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:
$$
frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
0.
$$
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Mike R.Mike R.
1,965314
1,965314
2
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
$endgroup$
– Mike R.
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:
($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$
(This is because of the derivative chain rule).
It's pretty easy to go on from here.
Good luck.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:
($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$
(This is because of the derivative chain rule).
It's pretty easy to go on from here.
Good luck.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:
($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$
(This is because of the derivative chain rule).
It's pretty easy to go on from here.
Good luck.
New contributor
$endgroup$
The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:
($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$
(This is because of the derivative chain rule).
It's pretty easy to go on from here.
Good luck.
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Jonathan PeralesJonathan Perales
385
385
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Perales
1 hour ago
add a comment |
user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105789%2fderivative-of-integral-which-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown