I want to know sentence is grammatically correct? sentence is “She would make for a convincing Amy.”
This sentence is part of dialogue between producer and actor, when she was convincing them to cast her in film.
film is ready now. during the premiere, they were recalling some moment.
event happen in past.
tenses past-tense would mood
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 2 more comments
This sentence is part of dialogue between producer and actor, when she was convincing them to cast her in film.
film is ready now. during the premiere, they were recalling some moment.
event happen in past.
tenses past-tense would mood
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Yes, the sentence is grammatical.
– Lawrence
2 hours ago
However, it's film, not flim.
– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago
@JasonBassford Thanks i will edit it now.
– raghav
2 hours ago
@Lawrence please explain why it is correct. i am new in english
– raghav
2 hours ago
1
This question should have been posted on ell.stackexchange.com, if you are new to English.
– vectory
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
This sentence is part of dialogue between producer and actor, when she was convincing them to cast her in film.
film is ready now. during the premiere, they were recalling some moment.
event happen in past.
tenses past-tense would mood
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This sentence is part of dialogue between producer and actor, when she was convincing them to cast her in film.
film is ready now. during the premiere, they were recalling some moment.
event happen in past.
tenses past-tense would mood
tenses past-tense would mood
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
asked 2 hours ago
raghav
162
162
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
raghav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Yes, the sentence is grammatical.
– Lawrence
2 hours ago
However, it's film, not flim.
– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago
@JasonBassford Thanks i will edit it now.
– raghav
2 hours ago
@Lawrence please explain why it is correct. i am new in english
– raghav
2 hours ago
1
This question should have been posted on ell.stackexchange.com, if you are new to English.
– vectory
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
Yes, the sentence is grammatical.
– Lawrence
2 hours ago
However, it's film, not flim.
– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago
@JasonBassford Thanks i will edit it now.
– raghav
2 hours ago
@Lawrence please explain why it is correct. i am new in english
– raghav
2 hours ago
1
This question should have been posted on ell.stackexchange.com, if you are new to English.
– vectory
1 hour ago
Yes, the sentence is grammatical.
– Lawrence
2 hours ago
Yes, the sentence is grammatical.
– Lawrence
2 hours ago
However, it's film, not flim.
– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago
However, it's film, not flim.
– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago
@JasonBassford Thanks i will edit it now.
– raghav
2 hours ago
@JasonBassford Thanks i will edit it now.
– raghav
2 hours ago
@Lawrence please explain why it is correct. i am new in english
– raghav
2 hours ago
@Lawrence please explain why it is correct. i am new in english
– raghav
2 hours ago
1
1
This question should have been posted on ell.stackexchange.com, if you are new to English.
– vectory
1 hour ago
This question should have been posted on ell.stackexchange.com, if you are new to English.
– vectory
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is correct, though unusual, which makes it powerful. You are using "Amy" as a kind of non-personal object, "objectification" being the opposite of personification, which expands and expounds on her character.
"Objectifying" a person, if not done too often, paints a wider view of the person being described. English celebrates figurative usage, just like this.
Alternate forms of the same structure you are using:
That would make for a convincing argument.
or
It would have made for an impactful movie.
Or in politics...
This will make for an effective presidential term.
The advantage is that you are being both descriptive and brief at the same time. It is unusual, but correct; and that is its value. Sentences like this spice up English usage, making it more memorable and quotable.
As per the story you ask about using it in, I say go for it!
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
add a comment |
This use of to make for is confusing. It is a usual idiom, but stems from an expression that is rare now. I suppose it stems either from to make for "to go to" (also in German "(nach [place]) machen") or from a sense to prepare for, to bring (in my humble opinion).
Either way or another, it now also means to tend to produce or result, which is what it means here (see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/make_for. So yes, it is correct. In effect would make for means to resemble. But will make for rather means to contribute to, as far as an Amy is a symbol rather than a status.
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
raghav is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480159%2fi-want-to-know-sentence-is-grammatically-correct-sentence-is-she-would-make-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is correct, though unusual, which makes it powerful. You are using "Amy" as a kind of non-personal object, "objectification" being the opposite of personification, which expands and expounds on her character.
"Objectifying" a person, if not done too often, paints a wider view of the person being described. English celebrates figurative usage, just like this.
Alternate forms of the same structure you are using:
That would make for a convincing argument.
or
It would have made for an impactful movie.
Or in politics...
This will make for an effective presidential term.
The advantage is that you are being both descriptive and brief at the same time. It is unusual, but correct; and that is its value. Sentences like this spice up English usage, making it more memorable and quotable.
As per the story you ask about using it in, I say go for it!
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
add a comment |
This is correct, though unusual, which makes it powerful. You are using "Amy" as a kind of non-personal object, "objectification" being the opposite of personification, which expands and expounds on her character.
"Objectifying" a person, if not done too often, paints a wider view of the person being described. English celebrates figurative usage, just like this.
Alternate forms of the same structure you are using:
That would make for a convincing argument.
or
It would have made for an impactful movie.
Or in politics...
This will make for an effective presidential term.
The advantage is that you are being both descriptive and brief at the same time. It is unusual, but correct; and that is its value. Sentences like this spice up English usage, making it more memorable and quotable.
As per the story you ask about using it in, I say go for it!
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
add a comment |
This is correct, though unusual, which makes it powerful. You are using "Amy" as a kind of non-personal object, "objectification" being the opposite of personification, which expands and expounds on her character.
"Objectifying" a person, if not done too often, paints a wider view of the person being described. English celebrates figurative usage, just like this.
Alternate forms of the same structure you are using:
That would make for a convincing argument.
or
It would have made for an impactful movie.
Or in politics...
This will make for an effective presidential term.
The advantage is that you are being both descriptive and brief at the same time. It is unusual, but correct; and that is its value. Sentences like this spice up English usage, making it more memorable and quotable.
As per the story you ask about using it in, I say go for it!
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
This is correct, though unusual, which makes it powerful. You are using "Amy" as a kind of non-personal object, "objectification" being the opposite of personification, which expands and expounds on her character.
"Objectifying" a person, if not done too often, paints a wider view of the person being described. English celebrates figurative usage, just like this.
Alternate forms of the same structure you are using:
That would make for a convincing argument.
or
It would have made for an impactful movie.
Or in politics...
This will make for an effective presidential term.
The advantage is that you are being both descriptive and brief at the same time. It is unusual, but correct; and that is its value. Sentences like this spice up English usage, making it more memorable and quotable.
As per the story you ask about using it in, I say go for it!
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
answered 1 hour ago
Jesse Steele
534214
534214
add a comment |
add a comment |
This use of to make for is confusing. It is a usual idiom, but stems from an expression that is rare now. I suppose it stems either from to make for "to go to" (also in German "(nach [place]) machen") or from a sense to prepare for, to bring (in my humble opinion).
Either way or another, it now also means to tend to produce or result, which is what it means here (see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/make_for. So yes, it is correct. In effect would make for means to resemble. But will make for rather means to contribute to, as far as an Amy is a symbol rather than a status.
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
add a comment |
This use of to make for is confusing. It is a usual idiom, but stems from an expression that is rare now. I suppose it stems either from to make for "to go to" (also in German "(nach [place]) machen") or from a sense to prepare for, to bring (in my humble opinion).
Either way or another, it now also means to tend to produce or result, which is what it means here (see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/make_for. So yes, it is correct. In effect would make for means to resemble. But will make for rather means to contribute to, as far as an Amy is a symbol rather than a status.
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
add a comment |
This use of to make for is confusing. It is a usual idiom, but stems from an expression that is rare now. I suppose it stems either from to make for "to go to" (also in German "(nach [place]) machen") or from a sense to prepare for, to bring (in my humble opinion).
Either way or another, it now also means to tend to produce or result, which is what it means here (see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/make_for. So yes, it is correct. In effect would make for means to resemble. But will make for rather means to contribute to, as far as an Amy is a symbol rather than a status.
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
This use of to make for is confusing. It is a usual idiom, but stems from an expression that is rare now. I suppose it stems either from to make for "to go to" (also in German "(nach [place]) machen") or from a sense to prepare for, to bring (in my humble opinion).
Either way or another, it now also means to tend to produce or result, which is what it means here (see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/make_for. So yes, it is correct. In effect would make for means to resemble. But will make for rather means to contribute to, as far as an Amy is a symbol rather than a status.
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
edited 42 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
answered 1 hour ago
vectory
646
646
add a comment |
add a comment |
raghav is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
raghav is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
raghav is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
raghav is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480159%2fi-want-to-know-sentence-is-grammatically-correct-sentence-is-she-would-make-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Yes, the sentence is grammatical.
– Lawrence
2 hours ago
However, it's film, not flim.
– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago
@JasonBassford Thanks i will edit it now.
– raghav
2 hours ago
@Lawrence please explain why it is correct. i am new in english
– raghav
2 hours ago
1
This question should have been posted on ell.stackexchange.com, if you are new to English.
– vectory
1 hour ago