What equipment did film photographers obsess over?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I found a box of old camera stuff in my in-law's house while helping them move and it got me thinking, "what equipment did film photographers obsess over back in the day?"
For example, with modern day digital photography, the sensor seems to be the most expensive and most sensitive part of the camera body. Keeping it clean and safe is critical to good photos. There are countless articles and how-to's online for cleaning, maintaining and preventing damage to the sensor. However, with a film camera, the imaging surface is not a majorly expensive part of the system. Scratching the film would ruin your photo but it wouldn't ruin your camera body.
So what do you think, what equipment and maintenance questions do you think would fill up the forums back in the day?
film digital digital-vs-film
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I found a box of old camera stuff in my in-law's house while helping them move and it got me thinking, "what equipment did film photographers obsess over back in the day?"
For example, with modern day digital photography, the sensor seems to be the most expensive and most sensitive part of the camera body. Keeping it clean and safe is critical to good photos. There are countless articles and how-to's online for cleaning, maintaining and preventing damage to the sensor. However, with a film camera, the imaging surface is not a majorly expensive part of the system. Scratching the film would ruin your photo but it wouldn't ruin your camera body.
So what do you think, what equipment and maintenance questions do you think would fill up the forums back in the day?
film digital digital-vs-film
What does "back in the day" mean? Film photography has been around for a long time - for example, the V&A Museum in London began acquiring photographs in 1852 - and photographic technology advanced a lot over that time. The last generation of autofocus SLRs were quite fancy electronic gadgets. I still shoot film.
– osullic
1 hour ago
1
Photo.net was launched in 1993. I think all of its old content is still online (although it did have some forum areas intended for more casual chat that would only last a few days before deletion). You can search around there to see what folks were asking about in the 90s. Although, as far as I remember, the most common question was: Which is better - Canon or Nikon?
– osullic
1 hour ago
Actually you invest a lot more in lenses than in camera bodies. And bodies become obsolete a lot faster than lenses.
– xenoid
1 hour ago
The time frame I specified was a bit vague for a reason, I didn't want to specify a time period as I was hoping to discuss general things people worried about before digital cameras became so ubiquitous. I definitely didn't mean to imply that film is dead or that anyone is "old" ;). It's hard to convey intended meaning over the internet :). You're right though, people still frequently shoot film so I guess the question should have been: "what equipment do film photographers worry about keeping in good shape?"
– tmwaddel
56 mins ago
The biggest obsession currently in the digital environment is sensor dynamic range. To some (many), it is the be-all and end-all. How to clean sensors without damaging them is old hat by now.
– Michael Clark
37 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I found a box of old camera stuff in my in-law's house while helping them move and it got me thinking, "what equipment did film photographers obsess over back in the day?"
For example, with modern day digital photography, the sensor seems to be the most expensive and most sensitive part of the camera body. Keeping it clean and safe is critical to good photos. There are countless articles and how-to's online for cleaning, maintaining and preventing damage to the sensor. However, with a film camera, the imaging surface is not a majorly expensive part of the system. Scratching the film would ruin your photo but it wouldn't ruin your camera body.
So what do you think, what equipment and maintenance questions do you think would fill up the forums back in the day?
film digital digital-vs-film
I found a box of old camera stuff in my in-law's house while helping them move and it got me thinking, "what equipment did film photographers obsess over back in the day?"
For example, with modern day digital photography, the sensor seems to be the most expensive and most sensitive part of the camera body. Keeping it clean and safe is critical to good photos. There are countless articles and how-to's online for cleaning, maintaining and preventing damage to the sensor. However, with a film camera, the imaging surface is not a majorly expensive part of the system. Scratching the film would ruin your photo but it wouldn't ruin your camera body.
So what do you think, what equipment and maintenance questions do you think would fill up the forums back in the day?
film digital digital-vs-film
film digital digital-vs-film
asked 1 hour ago
tmwaddel
1614
1614
What does "back in the day" mean? Film photography has been around for a long time - for example, the V&A Museum in London began acquiring photographs in 1852 - and photographic technology advanced a lot over that time. The last generation of autofocus SLRs were quite fancy electronic gadgets. I still shoot film.
– osullic
1 hour ago
1
Photo.net was launched in 1993. I think all of its old content is still online (although it did have some forum areas intended for more casual chat that would only last a few days before deletion). You can search around there to see what folks were asking about in the 90s. Although, as far as I remember, the most common question was: Which is better - Canon or Nikon?
– osullic
1 hour ago
Actually you invest a lot more in lenses than in camera bodies. And bodies become obsolete a lot faster than lenses.
– xenoid
1 hour ago
The time frame I specified was a bit vague for a reason, I didn't want to specify a time period as I was hoping to discuss general things people worried about before digital cameras became so ubiquitous. I definitely didn't mean to imply that film is dead or that anyone is "old" ;). It's hard to convey intended meaning over the internet :). You're right though, people still frequently shoot film so I guess the question should have been: "what equipment do film photographers worry about keeping in good shape?"
– tmwaddel
56 mins ago
The biggest obsession currently in the digital environment is sensor dynamic range. To some (many), it is the be-all and end-all. How to clean sensors without damaging them is old hat by now.
– Michael Clark
37 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
What does "back in the day" mean? Film photography has been around for a long time - for example, the V&A Museum in London began acquiring photographs in 1852 - and photographic technology advanced a lot over that time. The last generation of autofocus SLRs were quite fancy electronic gadgets. I still shoot film.
– osullic
1 hour ago
1
Photo.net was launched in 1993. I think all of its old content is still online (although it did have some forum areas intended for more casual chat that would only last a few days before deletion). You can search around there to see what folks were asking about in the 90s. Although, as far as I remember, the most common question was: Which is better - Canon or Nikon?
– osullic
1 hour ago
Actually you invest a lot more in lenses than in camera bodies. And bodies become obsolete a lot faster than lenses.
– xenoid
1 hour ago
The time frame I specified was a bit vague for a reason, I didn't want to specify a time period as I was hoping to discuss general things people worried about before digital cameras became so ubiquitous. I definitely didn't mean to imply that film is dead or that anyone is "old" ;). It's hard to convey intended meaning over the internet :). You're right though, people still frequently shoot film so I guess the question should have been: "what equipment do film photographers worry about keeping in good shape?"
– tmwaddel
56 mins ago
The biggest obsession currently in the digital environment is sensor dynamic range. To some (many), it is the be-all and end-all. How to clean sensors without damaging them is old hat by now.
– Michael Clark
37 mins ago
What does "back in the day" mean? Film photography has been around for a long time - for example, the V&A Museum in London began acquiring photographs in 1852 - and photographic technology advanced a lot over that time. The last generation of autofocus SLRs were quite fancy electronic gadgets. I still shoot film.
– osullic
1 hour ago
What does "back in the day" mean? Film photography has been around for a long time - for example, the V&A Museum in London began acquiring photographs in 1852 - and photographic technology advanced a lot over that time. The last generation of autofocus SLRs were quite fancy electronic gadgets. I still shoot film.
– osullic
1 hour ago
1
1
Photo.net was launched in 1993. I think all of its old content is still online (although it did have some forum areas intended for more casual chat that would only last a few days before deletion). You can search around there to see what folks were asking about in the 90s. Although, as far as I remember, the most common question was: Which is better - Canon or Nikon?
– osullic
1 hour ago
Photo.net was launched in 1993. I think all of its old content is still online (although it did have some forum areas intended for more casual chat that would only last a few days before deletion). You can search around there to see what folks were asking about in the 90s. Although, as far as I remember, the most common question was: Which is better - Canon or Nikon?
– osullic
1 hour ago
Actually you invest a lot more in lenses than in camera bodies. And bodies become obsolete a lot faster than lenses.
– xenoid
1 hour ago
Actually you invest a lot more in lenses than in camera bodies. And bodies become obsolete a lot faster than lenses.
– xenoid
1 hour ago
The time frame I specified was a bit vague for a reason, I didn't want to specify a time period as I was hoping to discuss general things people worried about before digital cameras became so ubiquitous. I definitely didn't mean to imply that film is dead or that anyone is "old" ;). It's hard to convey intended meaning over the internet :). You're right though, people still frequently shoot film so I guess the question should have been: "what equipment do film photographers worry about keeping in good shape?"
– tmwaddel
56 mins ago
The time frame I specified was a bit vague for a reason, I didn't want to specify a time period as I was hoping to discuss general things people worried about before digital cameras became so ubiquitous. I definitely didn't mean to imply that film is dead or that anyone is "old" ;). It's hard to convey intended meaning over the internet :). You're right though, people still frequently shoot film so I guess the question should have been: "what equipment do film photographers worry about keeping in good shape?"
– tmwaddel
56 mins ago
The biggest obsession currently in the digital environment is sensor dynamic range. To some (many), it is the be-all and end-all. How to clean sensors without damaging them is old hat by now.
– Michael Clark
37 mins ago
The biggest obsession currently in the digital environment is sensor dynamic range. To some (many), it is the be-all and end-all. How to clean sensors without damaging them is old hat by now.
– Michael Clark
37 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Oh, goodness — everything. Film, camera, lenses, lighting, style, fashions and trends, whether or not photography is art, everything we see today. But the "forums" were... more literal forums — people getting together in person to discuss in photography and camera clubs. And, instead of the blogosphere of today, so many periodicals. To get a taste, do a Google Books search for "photography" in the 19th century. This will return some scanned and digitized annual collections of these journals. Of course, you can also choose later dates, but I think it's interesting to go back... basically to the beginning. Browse through though those, and you will see that the more things change, the more they stay the same!
For a quick sample, here's the index o The American Annual of Photography, 1887:
Abnormal Chloride of Silver. Dr. Julius Schnauss 203
A Cry for Simplicity. W. H. Potter 134
Alum in the Hypo Bath. G. Cramer 247
"Amateurs," "Professionals," or "Photographers." Roberts. Redfield 188
Argentometer for Controlling Silver Baths. Dr. E. A. Just 115
A Talk to Beginners. Chas. Ehrmann 198
Blisters in Albumen Prints, The Origin of. W. H. Sherman 56
Bromide Paper, About. Robert Barr (Luke Sharp) 79
Camera and a New Tripod-head, A Home-made Tourist. Rev. W. H. Burbank 137
Carbonate of Soda Development for Platinotypes. Joseph B. Brown, U. S. A 110
Collodion Emulsion. C. E. von Sothen 213
Colored Screens in Out-door Photography. E. Bierstadt 72
Composition in Landscape Photography. W. H. Walmsley 150
Carrying-box, A Convenient. Charles E. Willard 133
Copying and Enlarging Closet, A. W. H. Gardner 204
Dark-rooms. Ellerslie Wallace 71
Dark-rooms for Photographic Clubs. F. C. Beach 97
Detective Camera for Newspaper Photography, The. Henry L. Tolman 192
Detective Cameras. W. J. Stillman 87
"Detective" for Artists, The. J. Wells Champney 226
Developer, A Convenient, for Travelers. A. S. Murray 157
Developer, A New. A Russian Amateur 280
Developer, A New. John E. Dumont 192
Does it Pay? G. L. Hurd 231
Durable Sensitized Albumen Paper. Karl Schwier 215
Drying Negatives Quickly. F.A.Jackson 210
Enlarging and Reducing with Ordinary Camera. Frank La Manna... 162
"Equivalent Focus," The, Not a Constant. Ernst Gundlach 145
Figure, Landscape, and Combination Printing. H. P. Robinson 81
Focal Adjustment in Detective Cameras. Clarence E. Woodman, Ph.D , 52
Focusing. W. H. Bartholomew 152
Frills and Blisters. G. Watmough S. Webster, F. C. S 224
Genre Photography. John Bartlett 100
Heliogravure and Galvanography. Ottomar Volkmer, Lt.-Col 179
High or Low Art. W. I. Lincoln Adams 217
Hypo in the Developer. G. M. Searle 73
Ink Transfer, A Method of. P. C. Duchochois 74
Iodide of Silver in Gelatino-bromide of Silver Emulsion. Victor Schumann 160
"It's no Jist Ready Yet." T.N.Armstrong 70
Japanese Paper for Photographers. W. K. Burton 112
Lantern Slides and Transparencies. Geo. L. Sinclair, M. D 185
Large Telescopes for Celestial Photography. Rudolph Spitaler 76
Magnesium Light Experiments. George Mason 142
Marine Shots. A. A. Adee 82
Memoranda from My Reading and Practice. H. Edwards-Ficken 228
Mixing an Emulsion with Ammonia. Samuel Wadsworth 125
Mounting Silver Prints in Optical Contact with Glass, and Ornamental Borders. W. M. Ashman 68
Musings by the Way. H. McMichael 144
My Dark-room Window. George E. Francis, M. D 155 "My" Developer. C.C. Vevers 108
Objectives for Photo-micrography. Andrew Pringle 90
Observations. E M. Estabrooke 306
Odds and Ends. W. Jerome Harrison 167
Old Friend, Keep Young. J.F.Ryder 234
On the Character of Optical Glass. Dr. Adolph Steinheil 164
Optical Sensitizers, On the So-called. C. Schiendl 345
Orthochromatic Photography of Paintings. W. J. Baker 132
Orthochromatic Plates, Experiments with. Ed. L. Boissonnas 66
Over-Exposure and the Means to Correct It. John Carbutt 258
Photo-copper-plate Printing and Steel-facing of Etched Copper-plates. E. Obernetter 122
Photographic Chips. J. R. Swain 195
Photographing in Japan. W. H. Metcalf 195
Photographing in the Arctic. Herbert L. Aldrich 118
Photographing Machinery. F. R. C. Perrin 158
Photography by Lamplight. Robt. E. M. Bain 197
Photography in the Navy. Saml. W. Very, Lieut.-Comdr., U. S. Navy 221
Photography of Solar Eclipses, On the. Wm. Harkness 250
Photo-micrographs, A Simple Arrangement for the Production of. Maurice N. Miller, M. D 240
Portraits in Imitation of Old Paintings. Karl Klauser 93
Practical Hints on Obernetter's Method of Copying Negatives. F.Mueller 153
Preparation of Photographic Gun-cotton, On the. Dr. Jos. M. Eder. 55
Printing, Suggestions on. Walter S. Goodnough 235
Reproducing Architectural Drawings. J. Albert Cole 168
Results. Abraham Bogardus. 107
Retouching Gelatine Negatives with Red Chalk and Black Crayon. Anton Baumgartner 238
Review of the Year. The Editor 49
Reversing the Print. Henry M. Parkhurst 136
Silver Printing.—An Amateur's Experience. W. J. Hickmott 130
Silver Printing, An Amateur's Routine of. Ottomar Jarecki 171
Shutter, A Simple Time and Instantaneous. Hermann Lemp 211
Some Thoughts of an Amateur. N. W. Starbird, Jr 104
Stereopticon Outfit, A Home-made. A. H. Oakes 61
Stereoscooic Pictures. Chas. Wager Hull 141
Tannin Plates for Lantern Slides. J. H. Harvey 126
Temporary Binding for Photographic Journals. Jos. S. Rich 202
Theatre Photography by Electric Light. Ernest Edwards 218
The Elimination of Heat from Condensed Light. O. G. Mason 189
The Lightning Photographer: A Sketch of the Future. J. Gaedike.. 94
The Undeveloped Side of Photography. Wendell Stanton Howard.. 249
Why Study Art? Edward L. Wilson 117
I do kind of have to question your premise, though. I don't think sensors are an overriding obsession — on this site, we get at least as much worry about lenses and other gear too. Just like the above.
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Simple. Film shooter obsessed over...wait for it...film.
How different emulsions captured the same scene, which could be push or pulled, which reacted well to stand development and how each reacted to a different developer. Darkroom techniques. These types of questions are still a hot topic on film discussion sites.
With film, the camera is quite literally just a tool to get the light to the medium. A lot of work takes place after that capture. The same can't really be said about digital because you do marry a sensor and it's behind the scenes technology.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Oh, goodness — everything. Film, camera, lenses, lighting, style, fashions and trends, whether or not photography is art, everything we see today. But the "forums" were... more literal forums — people getting together in person to discuss in photography and camera clubs. And, instead of the blogosphere of today, so many periodicals. To get a taste, do a Google Books search for "photography" in the 19th century. This will return some scanned and digitized annual collections of these journals. Of course, you can also choose later dates, but I think it's interesting to go back... basically to the beginning. Browse through though those, and you will see that the more things change, the more they stay the same!
For a quick sample, here's the index o The American Annual of Photography, 1887:
Abnormal Chloride of Silver. Dr. Julius Schnauss 203
A Cry for Simplicity. W. H. Potter 134
Alum in the Hypo Bath. G. Cramer 247
"Amateurs," "Professionals," or "Photographers." Roberts. Redfield 188
Argentometer for Controlling Silver Baths. Dr. E. A. Just 115
A Talk to Beginners. Chas. Ehrmann 198
Blisters in Albumen Prints, The Origin of. W. H. Sherman 56
Bromide Paper, About. Robert Barr (Luke Sharp) 79
Camera and a New Tripod-head, A Home-made Tourist. Rev. W. H. Burbank 137
Carbonate of Soda Development for Platinotypes. Joseph B. Brown, U. S. A 110
Collodion Emulsion. C. E. von Sothen 213
Colored Screens in Out-door Photography. E. Bierstadt 72
Composition in Landscape Photography. W. H. Walmsley 150
Carrying-box, A Convenient. Charles E. Willard 133
Copying and Enlarging Closet, A. W. H. Gardner 204
Dark-rooms. Ellerslie Wallace 71
Dark-rooms for Photographic Clubs. F. C. Beach 97
Detective Camera for Newspaper Photography, The. Henry L. Tolman 192
Detective Cameras. W. J. Stillman 87
"Detective" for Artists, The. J. Wells Champney 226
Developer, A Convenient, for Travelers. A. S. Murray 157
Developer, A New. A Russian Amateur 280
Developer, A New. John E. Dumont 192
Does it Pay? G. L. Hurd 231
Durable Sensitized Albumen Paper. Karl Schwier 215
Drying Negatives Quickly. F.A.Jackson 210
Enlarging and Reducing with Ordinary Camera. Frank La Manna... 162
"Equivalent Focus," The, Not a Constant. Ernst Gundlach 145
Figure, Landscape, and Combination Printing. H. P. Robinson 81
Focal Adjustment in Detective Cameras. Clarence E. Woodman, Ph.D , 52
Focusing. W. H. Bartholomew 152
Frills and Blisters. G. Watmough S. Webster, F. C. S 224
Genre Photography. John Bartlett 100
Heliogravure and Galvanography. Ottomar Volkmer, Lt.-Col 179
High or Low Art. W. I. Lincoln Adams 217
Hypo in the Developer. G. M. Searle 73
Ink Transfer, A Method of. P. C. Duchochois 74
Iodide of Silver in Gelatino-bromide of Silver Emulsion. Victor Schumann 160
"It's no Jist Ready Yet." T.N.Armstrong 70
Japanese Paper for Photographers. W. K. Burton 112
Lantern Slides and Transparencies. Geo. L. Sinclair, M. D 185
Large Telescopes for Celestial Photography. Rudolph Spitaler 76
Magnesium Light Experiments. George Mason 142
Marine Shots. A. A. Adee 82
Memoranda from My Reading and Practice. H. Edwards-Ficken 228
Mixing an Emulsion with Ammonia. Samuel Wadsworth 125
Mounting Silver Prints in Optical Contact with Glass, and Ornamental Borders. W. M. Ashman 68
Musings by the Way. H. McMichael 144
My Dark-room Window. George E. Francis, M. D 155 "My" Developer. C.C. Vevers 108
Objectives for Photo-micrography. Andrew Pringle 90
Observations. E M. Estabrooke 306
Odds and Ends. W. Jerome Harrison 167
Old Friend, Keep Young. J.F.Ryder 234
On the Character of Optical Glass. Dr. Adolph Steinheil 164
Optical Sensitizers, On the So-called. C. Schiendl 345
Orthochromatic Photography of Paintings. W. J. Baker 132
Orthochromatic Plates, Experiments with. Ed. L. Boissonnas 66
Over-Exposure and the Means to Correct It. John Carbutt 258
Photo-copper-plate Printing and Steel-facing of Etched Copper-plates. E. Obernetter 122
Photographic Chips. J. R. Swain 195
Photographing in Japan. W. H. Metcalf 195
Photographing in the Arctic. Herbert L. Aldrich 118
Photographing Machinery. F. R. C. Perrin 158
Photography by Lamplight. Robt. E. M. Bain 197
Photography in the Navy. Saml. W. Very, Lieut.-Comdr., U. S. Navy 221
Photography of Solar Eclipses, On the. Wm. Harkness 250
Photo-micrographs, A Simple Arrangement for the Production of. Maurice N. Miller, M. D 240
Portraits in Imitation of Old Paintings. Karl Klauser 93
Practical Hints on Obernetter's Method of Copying Negatives. F.Mueller 153
Preparation of Photographic Gun-cotton, On the. Dr. Jos. M. Eder. 55
Printing, Suggestions on. Walter S. Goodnough 235
Reproducing Architectural Drawings. J. Albert Cole 168
Results. Abraham Bogardus. 107
Retouching Gelatine Negatives with Red Chalk and Black Crayon. Anton Baumgartner 238
Review of the Year. The Editor 49
Reversing the Print. Henry M. Parkhurst 136
Silver Printing.—An Amateur's Experience. W. J. Hickmott 130
Silver Printing, An Amateur's Routine of. Ottomar Jarecki 171
Shutter, A Simple Time and Instantaneous. Hermann Lemp 211
Some Thoughts of an Amateur. N. W. Starbird, Jr 104
Stereopticon Outfit, A Home-made. A. H. Oakes 61
Stereoscooic Pictures. Chas. Wager Hull 141
Tannin Plates for Lantern Slides. J. H. Harvey 126
Temporary Binding for Photographic Journals. Jos. S. Rich 202
Theatre Photography by Electric Light. Ernest Edwards 218
The Elimination of Heat from Condensed Light. O. G. Mason 189
The Lightning Photographer: A Sketch of the Future. J. Gaedike.. 94
The Undeveloped Side of Photography. Wendell Stanton Howard.. 249
Why Study Art? Edward L. Wilson 117
I do kind of have to question your premise, though. I don't think sensors are an overriding obsession — on this site, we get at least as much worry about lenses and other gear too. Just like the above.
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Oh, goodness — everything. Film, camera, lenses, lighting, style, fashions and trends, whether or not photography is art, everything we see today. But the "forums" were... more literal forums — people getting together in person to discuss in photography and camera clubs. And, instead of the blogosphere of today, so many periodicals. To get a taste, do a Google Books search for "photography" in the 19th century. This will return some scanned and digitized annual collections of these journals. Of course, you can also choose later dates, but I think it's interesting to go back... basically to the beginning. Browse through though those, and you will see that the more things change, the more they stay the same!
For a quick sample, here's the index o The American Annual of Photography, 1887:
Abnormal Chloride of Silver. Dr. Julius Schnauss 203
A Cry for Simplicity. W. H. Potter 134
Alum in the Hypo Bath. G. Cramer 247
"Amateurs," "Professionals," or "Photographers." Roberts. Redfield 188
Argentometer for Controlling Silver Baths. Dr. E. A. Just 115
A Talk to Beginners. Chas. Ehrmann 198
Blisters in Albumen Prints, The Origin of. W. H. Sherman 56
Bromide Paper, About. Robert Barr (Luke Sharp) 79
Camera and a New Tripod-head, A Home-made Tourist. Rev. W. H. Burbank 137
Carbonate of Soda Development for Platinotypes. Joseph B. Brown, U. S. A 110
Collodion Emulsion. C. E. von Sothen 213
Colored Screens in Out-door Photography. E. Bierstadt 72
Composition in Landscape Photography. W. H. Walmsley 150
Carrying-box, A Convenient. Charles E. Willard 133
Copying and Enlarging Closet, A. W. H. Gardner 204
Dark-rooms. Ellerslie Wallace 71
Dark-rooms for Photographic Clubs. F. C. Beach 97
Detective Camera for Newspaper Photography, The. Henry L. Tolman 192
Detective Cameras. W. J. Stillman 87
"Detective" for Artists, The. J. Wells Champney 226
Developer, A Convenient, for Travelers. A. S. Murray 157
Developer, A New. A Russian Amateur 280
Developer, A New. John E. Dumont 192
Does it Pay? G. L. Hurd 231
Durable Sensitized Albumen Paper. Karl Schwier 215
Drying Negatives Quickly. F.A.Jackson 210
Enlarging and Reducing with Ordinary Camera. Frank La Manna... 162
"Equivalent Focus," The, Not a Constant. Ernst Gundlach 145
Figure, Landscape, and Combination Printing. H. P. Robinson 81
Focal Adjustment in Detective Cameras. Clarence E. Woodman, Ph.D , 52
Focusing. W. H. Bartholomew 152
Frills and Blisters. G. Watmough S. Webster, F. C. S 224
Genre Photography. John Bartlett 100
Heliogravure and Galvanography. Ottomar Volkmer, Lt.-Col 179
High or Low Art. W. I. Lincoln Adams 217
Hypo in the Developer. G. M. Searle 73
Ink Transfer, A Method of. P. C. Duchochois 74
Iodide of Silver in Gelatino-bromide of Silver Emulsion. Victor Schumann 160
"It's no Jist Ready Yet." T.N.Armstrong 70
Japanese Paper for Photographers. W. K. Burton 112
Lantern Slides and Transparencies. Geo. L. Sinclair, M. D 185
Large Telescopes for Celestial Photography. Rudolph Spitaler 76
Magnesium Light Experiments. George Mason 142
Marine Shots. A. A. Adee 82
Memoranda from My Reading and Practice. H. Edwards-Ficken 228
Mixing an Emulsion with Ammonia. Samuel Wadsworth 125
Mounting Silver Prints in Optical Contact with Glass, and Ornamental Borders. W. M. Ashman 68
Musings by the Way. H. McMichael 144
My Dark-room Window. George E. Francis, M. D 155 "My" Developer. C.C. Vevers 108
Objectives for Photo-micrography. Andrew Pringle 90
Observations. E M. Estabrooke 306
Odds and Ends. W. Jerome Harrison 167
Old Friend, Keep Young. J.F.Ryder 234
On the Character of Optical Glass. Dr. Adolph Steinheil 164
Optical Sensitizers, On the So-called. C. Schiendl 345
Orthochromatic Photography of Paintings. W. J. Baker 132
Orthochromatic Plates, Experiments with. Ed. L. Boissonnas 66
Over-Exposure and the Means to Correct It. John Carbutt 258
Photo-copper-plate Printing and Steel-facing of Etched Copper-plates. E. Obernetter 122
Photographic Chips. J. R. Swain 195
Photographing in Japan. W. H. Metcalf 195
Photographing in the Arctic. Herbert L. Aldrich 118
Photographing Machinery. F. R. C. Perrin 158
Photography by Lamplight. Robt. E. M. Bain 197
Photography in the Navy. Saml. W. Very, Lieut.-Comdr., U. S. Navy 221
Photography of Solar Eclipses, On the. Wm. Harkness 250
Photo-micrographs, A Simple Arrangement for the Production of. Maurice N. Miller, M. D 240
Portraits in Imitation of Old Paintings. Karl Klauser 93
Practical Hints on Obernetter's Method of Copying Negatives. F.Mueller 153
Preparation of Photographic Gun-cotton, On the. Dr. Jos. M. Eder. 55
Printing, Suggestions on. Walter S. Goodnough 235
Reproducing Architectural Drawings. J. Albert Cole 168
Results. Abraham Bogardus. 107
Retouching Gelatine Negatives with Red Chalk and Black Crayon. Anton Baumgartner 238
Review of the Year. The Editor 49
Reversing the Print. Henry M. Parkhurst 136
Silver Printing.—An Amateur's Experience. W. J. Hickmott 130
Silver Printing, An Amateur's Routine of. Ottomar Jarecki 171
Shutter, A Simple Time and Instantaneous. Hermann Lemp 211
Some Thoughts of an Amateur. N. W. Starbird, Jr 104
Stereopticon Outfit, A Home-made. A. H. Oakes 61
Stereoscooic Pictures. Chas. Wager Hull 141
Tannin Plates for Lantern Slides. J. H. Harvey 126
Temporary Binding for Photographic Journals. Jos. S. Rich 202
Theatre Photography by Electric Light. Ernest Edwards 218
The Elimination of Heat from Condensed Light. O. G. Mason 189
The Lightning Photographer: A Sketch of the Future. J. Gaedike.. 94
The Undeveloped Side of Photography. Wendell Stanton Howard.. 249
Why Study Art? Edward L. Wilson 117
I do kind of have to question your premise, though. I don't think sensors are an overriding obsession — on this site, we get at least as much worry about lenses and other gear too. Just like the above.
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Oh, goodness — everything. Film, camera, lenses, lighting, style, fashions and trends, whether or not photography is art, everything we see today. But the "forums" were... more literal forums — people getting together in person to discuss in photography and camera clubs. And, instead of the blogosphere of today, so many periodicals. To get a taste, do a Google Books search for "photography" in the 19th century. This will return some scanned and digitized annual collections of these journals. Of course, you can also choose later dates, but I think it's interesting to go back... basically to the beginning. Browse through though those, and you will see that the more things change, the more they stay the same!
For a quick sample, here's the index o The American Annual of Photography, 1887:
Abnormal Chloride of Silver. Dr. Julius Schnauss 203
A Cry for Simplicity. W. H. Potter 134
Alum in the Hypo Bath. G. Cramer 247
"Amateurs," "Professionals," or "Photographers." Roberts. Redfield 188
Argentometer for Controlling Silver Baths. Dr. E. A. Just 115
A Talk to Beginners. Chas. Ehrmann 198
Blisters in Albumen Prints, The Origin of. W. H. Sherman 56
Bromide Paper, About. Robert Barr (Luke Sharp) 79
Camera and a New Tripod-head, A Home-made Tourist. Rev. W. H. Burbank 137
Carbonate of Soda Development for Platinotypes. Joseph B. Brown, U. S. A 110
Collodion Emulsion. C. E. von Sothen 213
Colored Screens in Out-door Photography. E. Bierstadt 72
Composition in Landscape Photography. W. H. Walmsley 150
Carrying-box, A Convenient. Charles E. Willard 133
Copying and Enlarging Closet, A. W. H. Gardner 204
Dark-rooms. Ellerslie Wallace 71
Dark-rooms for Photographic Clubs. F. C. Beach 97
Detective Camera for Newspaper Photography, The. Henry L. Tolman 192
Detective Cameras. W. J. Stillman 87
"Detective" for Artists, The. J. Wells Champney 226
Developer, A Convenient, for Travelers. A. S. Murray 157
Developer, A New. A Russian Amateur 280
Developer, A New. John E. Dumont 192
Does it Pay? G. L. Hurd 231
Durable Sensitized Albumen Paper. Karl Schwier 215
Drying Negatives Quickly. F.A.Jackson 210
Enlarging and Reducing with Ordinary Camera. Frank La Manna... 162
"Equivalent Focus," The, Not a Constant. Ernst Gundlach 145
Figure, Landscape, and Combination Printing. H. P. Robinson 81
Focal Adjustment in Detective Cameras. Clarence E. Woodman, Ph.D , 52
Focusing. W. H. Bartholomew 152
Frills and Blisters. G. Watmough S. Webster, F. C. S 224
Genre Photography. John Bartlett 100
Heliogravure and Galvanography. Ottomar Volkmer, Lt.-Col 179
High or Low Art. W. I. Lincoln Adams 217
Hypo in the Developer. G. M. Searle 73
Ink Transfer, A Method of. P. C. Duchochois 74
Iodide of Silver in Gelatino-bromide of Silver Emulsion. Victor Schumann 160
"It's no Jist Ready Yet." T.N.Armstrong 70
Japanese Paper for Photographers. W. K. Burton 112
Lantern Slides and Transparencies. Geo. L. Sinclair, M. D 185
Large Telescopes for Celestial Photography. Rudolph Spitaler 76
Magnesium Light Experiments. George Mason 142
Marine Shots. A. A. Adee 82
Memoranda from My Reading and Practice. H. Edwards-Ficken 228
Mixing an Emulsion with Ammonia. Samuel Wadsworth 125
Mounting Silver Prints in Optical Contact with Glass, and Ornamental Borders. W. M. Ashman 68
Musings by the Way. H. McMichael 144
My Dark-room Window. George E. Francis, M. D 155 "My" Developer. C.C. Vevers 108
Objectives for Photo-micrography. Andrew Pringle 90
Observations. E M. Estabrooke 306
Odds and Ends. W. Jerome Harrison 167
Old Friend, Keep Young. J.F.Ryder 234
On the Character of Optical Glass. Dr. Adolph Steinheil 164
Optical Sensitizers, On the So-called. C. Schiendl 345
Orthochromatic Photography of Paintings. W. J. Baker 132
Orthochromatic Plates, Experiments with. Ed. L. Boissonnas 66
Over-Exposure and the Means to Correct It. John Carbutt 258
Photo-copper-plate Printing and Steel-facing of Etched Copper-plates. E. Obernetter 122
Photographic Chips. J. R. Swain 195
Photographing in Japan. W. H. Metcalf 195
Photographing in the Arctic. Herbert L. Aldrich 118
Photographing Machinery. F. R. C. Perrin 158
Photography by Lamplight. Robt. E. M. Bain 197
Photography in the Navy. Saml. W. Very, Lieut.-Comdr., U. S. Navy 221
Photography of Solar Eclipses, On the. Wm. Harkness 250
Photo-micrographs, A Simple Arrangement for the Production of. Maurice N. Miller, M. D 240
Portraits in Imitation of Old Paintings. Karl Klauser 93
Practical Hints on Obernetter's Method of Copying Negatives. F.Mueller 153
Preparation of Photographic Gun-cotton, On the. Dr. Jos. M. Eder. 55
Printing, Suggestions on. Walter S. Goodnough 235
Reproducing Architectural Drawings. J. Albert Cole 168
Results. Abraham Bogardus. 107
Retouching Gelatine Negatives with Red Chalk and Black Crayon. Anton Baumgartner 238
Review of the Year. The Editor 49
Reversing the Print. Henry M. Parkhurst 136
Silver Printing.—An Amateur's Experience. W. J. Hickmott 130
Silver Printing, An Amateur's Routine of. Ottomar Jarecki 171
Shutter, A Simple Time and Instantaneous. Hermann Lemp 211
Some Thoughts of an Amateur. N. W. Starbird, Jr 104
Stereopticon Outfit, A Home-made. A. H. Oakes 61
Stereoscooic Pictures. Chas. Wager Hull 141
Tannin Plates for Lantern Slides. J. H. Harvey 126
Temporary Binding for Photographic Journals. Jos. S. Rich 202
Theatre Photography by Electric Light. Ernest Edwards 218
The Elimination of Heat from Condensed Light. O. G. Mason 189
The Lightning Photographer: A Sketch of the Future. J. Gaedike.. 94
The Undeveloped Side of Photography. Wendell Stanton Howard.. 249
Why Study Art? Edward L. Wilson 117
I do kind of have to question your premise, though. I don't think sensors are an overriding obsession — on this site, we get at least as much worry about lenses and other gear too. Just like the above.
Oh, goodness — everything. Film, camera, lenses, lighting, style, fashions and trends, whether or not photography is art, everything we see today. But the "forums" were... more literal forums — people getting together in person to discuss in photography and camera clubs. And, instead of the blogosphere of today, so many periodicals. To get a taste, do a Google Books search for "photography" in the 19th century. This will return some scanned and digitized annual collections of these journals. Of course, you can also choose later dates, but I think it's interesting to go back... basically to the beginning. Browse through though those, and you will see that the more things change, the more they stay the same!
For a quick sample, here's the index o The American Annual of Photography, 1887:
Abnormal Chloride of Silver. Dr. Julius Schnauss 203
A Cry for Simplicity. W. H. Potter 134
Alum in the Hypo Bath. G. Cramer 247
"Amateurs," "Professionals," or "Photographers." Roberts. Redfield 188
Argentometer for Controlling Silver Baths. Dr. E. A. Just 115
A Talk to Beginners. Chas. Ehrmann 198
Blisters in Albumen Prints, The Origin of. W. H. Sherman 56
Bromide Paper, About. Robert Barr (Luke Sharp) 79
Camera and a New Tripod-head, A Home-made Tourist. Rev. W. H. Burbank 137
Carbonate of Soda Development for Platinotypes. Joseph B. Brown, U. S. A 110
Collodion Emulsion. C. E. von Sothen 213
Colored Screens in Out-door Photography. E. Bierstadt 72
Composition in Landscape Photography. W. H. Walmsley 150
Carrying-box, A Convenient. Charles E. Willard 133
Copying and Enlarging Closet, A. W. H. Gardner 204
Dark-rooms. Ellerslie Wallace 71
Dark-rooms for Photographic Clubs. F. C. Beach 97
Detective Camera for Newspaper Photography, The. Henry L. Tolman 192
Detective Cameras. W. J. Stillman 87
"Detective" for Artists, The. J. Wells Champney 226
Developer, A Convenient, for Travelers. A. S. Murray 157
Developer, A New. A Russian Amateur 280
Developer, A New. John E. Dumont 192
Does it Pay? G. L. Hurd 231
Durable Sensitized Albumen Paper. Karl Schwier 215
Drying Negatives Quickly. F.A.Jackson 210
Enlarging and Reducing with Ordinary Camera. Frank La Manna... 162
"Equivalent Focus," The, Not a Constant. Ernst Gundlach 145
Figure, Landscape, and Combination Printing. H. P. Robinson 81
Focal Adjustment in Detective Cameras. Clarence E. Woodman, Ph.D , 52
Focusing. W. H. Bartholomew 152
Frills and Blisters. G. Watmough S. Webster, F. C. S 224
Genre Photography. John Bartlett 100
Heliogravure and Galvanography. Ottomar Volkmer, Lt.-Col 179
High or Low Art. W. I. Lincoln Adams 217
Hypo in the Developer. G. M. Searle 73
Ink Transfer, A Method of. P. C. Duchochois 74
Iodide of Silver in Gelatino-bromide of Silver Emulsion. Victor Schumann 160
"It's no Jist Ready Yet." T.N.Armstrong 70
Japanese Paper for Photographers. W. K. Burton 112
Lantern Slides and Transparencies. Geo. L. Sinclair, M. D 185
Large Telescopes for Celestial Photography. Rudolph Spitaler 76
Magnesium Light Experiments. George Mason 142
Marine Shots. A. A. Adee 82
Memoranda from My Reading and Practice. H. Edwards-Ficken 228
Mixing an Emulsion with Ammonia. Samuel Wadsworth 125
Mounting Silver Prints in Optical Contact with Glass, and Ornamental Borders. W. M. Ashman 68
Musings by the Way. H. McMichael 144
My Dark-room Window. George E. Francis, M. D 155 "My" Developer. C.C. Vevers 108
Objectives for Photo-micrography. Andrew Pringle 90
Observations. E M. Estabrooke 306
Odds and Ends. W. Jerome Harrison 167
Old Friend, Keep Young. J.F.Ryder 234
On the Character of Optical Glass. Dr. Adolph Steinheil 164
Optical Sensitizers, On the So-called. C. Schiendl 345
Orthochromatic Photography of Paintings. W. J. Baker 132
Orthochromatic Plates, Experiments with. Ed. L. Boissonnas 66
Over-Exposure and the Means to Correct It. John Carbutt 258
Photo-copper-plate Printing and Steel-facing of Etched Copper-plates. E. Obernetter 122
Photographic Chips. J. R. Swain 195
Photographing in Japan. W. H. Metcalf 195
Photographing in the Arctic. Herbert L. Aldrich 118
Photographing Machinery. F. R. C. Perrin 158
Photography by Lamplight. Robt. E. M. Bain 197
Photography in the Navy. Saml. W. Very, Lieut.-Comdr., U. S. Navy 221
Photography of Solar Eclipses, On the. Wm. Harkness 250
Photo-micrographs, A Simple Arrangement for the Production of. Maurice N. Miller, M. D 240
Portraits in Imitation of Old Paintings. Karl Klauser 93
Practical Hints on Obernetter's Method of Copying Negatives. F.Mueller 153
Preparation of Photographic Gun-cotton, On the. Dr. Jos. M. Eder. 55
Printing, Suggestions on. Walter S. Goodnough 235
Reproducing Architectural Drawings. J. Albert Cole 168
Results. Abraham Bogardus. 107
Retouching Gelatine Negatives with Red Chalk and Black Crayon. Anton Baumgartner 238
Review of the Year. The Editor 49
Reversing the Print. Henry M. Parkhurst 136
Silver Printing.—An Amateur's Experience. W. J. Hickmott 130
Silver Printing, An Amateur's Routine of. Ottomar Jarecki 171
Shutter, A Simple Time and Instantaneous. Hermann Lemp 211
Some Thoughts of an Amateur. N. W. Starbird, Jr 104
Stereopticon Outfit, A Home-made. A. H. Oakes 61
Stereoscooic Pictures. Chas. Wager Hull 141
Tannin Plates for Lantern Slides. J. H. Harvey 126
Temporary Binding for Photographic Journals. Jos. S. Rich 202
Theatre Photography by Electric Light. Ernest Edwards 218
The Elimination of Heat from Condensed Light. O. G. Mason 189
The Lightning Photographer: A Sketch of the Future. J. Gaedike.. 94
The Undeveloped Side of Photography. Wendell Stanton Howard.. 249
Why Study Art? Edward L. Wilson 117
I do kind of have to question your premise, though. I don't think sensors are an overriding obsession — on this site, we get at least as much worry about lenses and other gear too. Just like the above.
edited 31 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
mattdm
118k38345636
118k38345636
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
Awesome resources! That's so interesting. It seems like there was a lot more interest in process. As far as sensors go, I've not seen it here, just on other sites it seems like that is a big concern for a lot of people. It was just an example of something I thought would be a good comparison.
– tmwaddel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Simple. Film shooter obsessed over...wait for it...film.
How different emulsions captured the same scene, which could be push or pulled, which reacted well to stand development and how each reacted to a different developer. Darkroom techniques. These types of questions are still a hot topic on film discussion sites.
With film, the camera is quite literally just a tool to get the light to the medium. A lot of work takes place after that capture. The same can't really be said about digital because you do marry a sensor and it's behind the scenes technology.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Simple. Film shooter obsessed over...wait for it...film.
How different emulsions captured the same scene, which could be push or pulled, which reacted well to stand development and how each reacted to a different developer. Darkroom techniques. These types of questions are still a hot topic on film discussion sites.
With film, the camera is quite literally just a tool to get the light to the medium. A lot of work takes place after that capture. The same can't really be said about digital because you do marry a sensor and it's behind the scenes technology.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Simple. Film shooter obsessed over...wait for it...film.
How different emulsions captured the same scene, which could be push or pulled, which reacted well to stand development and how each reacted to a different developer. Darkroom techniques. These types of questions are still a hot topic on film discussion sites.
With film, the camera is quite literally just a tool to get the light to the medium. A lot of work takes place after that capture. The same can't really be said about digital because you do marry a sensor and it's behind the scenes technology.
Simple. Film shooter obsessed over...wait for it...film.
How different emulsions captured the same scene, which could be push or pulled, which reacted well to stand development and how each reacted to a different developer. Darkroom techniques. These types of questions are still a hot topic on film discussion sites.
With film, the camera is quite literally just a tool to get the light to the medium. A lot of work takes place after that capture. The same can't really be said about digital because you do marry a sensor and it's behind the scenes technology.
answered 6 mins ago
Hueco
9,67732346
9,67732346
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102997%2fwhat-equipment-did-film-photographers-obsess-over%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What does "back in the day" mean? Film photography has been around for a long time - for example, the V&A Museum in London began acquiring photographs in 1852 - and photographic technology advanced a lot over that time. The last generation of autofocus SLRs were quite fancy electronic gadgets. I still shoot film.
– osullic
1 hour ago
1
Photo.net was launched in 1993. I think all of its old content is still online (although it did have some forum areas intended for more casual chat that would only last a few days before deletion). You can search around there to see what folks were asking about in the 90s. Although, as far as I remember, the most common question was: Which is better - Canon or Nikon?
– osullic
1 hour ago
Actually you invest a lot more in lenses than in camera bodies. And bodies become obsolete a lot faster than lenses.
– xenoid
1 hour ago
The time frame I specified was a bit vague for a reason, I didn't want to specify a time period as I was hoping to discuss general things people worried about before digital cameras became so ubiquitous. I definitely didn't mean to imply that film is dead or that anyone is "old" ;). It's hard to convey intended meaning over the internet :). You're right though, people still frequently shoot film so I guess the question should have been: "what equipment do film photographers worry about keeping in good shape?"
– tmwaddel
56 mins ago
The biggest obsession currently in the digital environment is sensor dynamic range. To some (many), it is the be-all and end-all. How to clean sensors without damaging them is old hat by now.
– Michael Clark
37 mins ago