Standard for “not found” when using size_t












0















Is there a standard what value to use when you do an array search and the value is not found.
With signed I would return -1. But what about size_t aka long unsigned.



   int find(int a,int b, int n){
for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
if(a[i]==b)
return i;
}
return -1;
}


When using size_t just would come up with this. But it's not really perfect.



   long long int find(int a,int b, size_t n){
for(size_t i=0; i<n; i++){
if(a[i]==b)
return (long long int)i;
}
return -1;
}









share|improve this question



























    0















    Is there a standard what value to use when you do an array search and the value is not found.
    With signed I would return -1. But what about size_t aka long unsigned.



       int find(int a,int b, int n){
    for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
    if(a[i]==b)
    return i;
    }
    return -1;
    }


    When using size_t just would come up with this. But it's not really perfect.



       long long int find(int a,int b, size_t n){
    for(size_t i=0; i<n; i++){
    if(a[i]==b)
    return (long long int)i;
    }
    return -1;
    }









    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      Is there a standard what value to use when you do an array search and the value is not found.
      With signed I would return -1. But what about size_t aka long unsigned.



         int find(int a,int b, int n){
      for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
      if(a[i]==b)
      return i;
      }
      return -1;
      }


      When using size_t just would come up with this. But it's not really perfect.



         long long int find(int a,int b, size_t n){
      for(size_t i=0; i<n; i++){
      if(a[i]==b)
      return (long long int)i;
      }
      return -1;
      }









      share|improve this question














      Is there a standard what value to use when you do an array search and the value is not found.
      With signed I would return -1. But what about size_t aka long unsigned.



         int find(int a,int b, int n){
      for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
      if(a[i]==b)
      return i;
      }
      return -1;
      }


      When using size_t just would come up with this. But it's not really perfect.



         long long int find(int a,int b, size_t n){
      for(size_t i=0; i<n; i++){
      if(a[i]==b)
      return (long long int)i;
      }
      return -1;
      }






      clang size-t






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:45









      Felix Yah Batta ManFelix Yah Batta Man

      12729




      12729
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          To allow a size_t type to have a negative value, there is a ssize_t type which is signed.



          You can't rely on the equivalence of the size_t to unsigned long as its architecture specific.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53423166%2fstandard-for-not-found-when-using-size-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            To allow a size_t type to have a negative value, there is a ssize_t type which is signed.



            You can't rely on the equivalence of the size_t to unsigned long as its architecture specific.






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              To allow a size_t type to have a negative value, there is a ssize_t type which is signed.



              You can't rely on the equivalence of the size_t to unsigned long as its architecture specific.






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                To allow a size_t type to have a negative value, there is a ssize_t type which is signed.



                You can't rely on the equivalence of the size_t to unsigned long as its architecture specific.






                share|improve this answer













                To allow a size_t type to have a negative value, there is a ssize_t type which is signed.



                You can't rely on the equivalence of the size_t to unsigned long as its architecture specific.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 '18 at 2:50









                danblackdanblack

                1,5671214




                1,5671214






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53423166%2fstandard-for-not-found-when-using-size-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                    How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                    TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'