could not display ${out.body} at Log for external soap provider












0














I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
Any hints are more than welcome!



<from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
<to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
<log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`









share|improve this question





























    0














    I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
    Any hints are more than welcome!



    <from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
    <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
    <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`









    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
      Any hints are more than welcome!



      <from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
      <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
      <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`









      share|improve this question















      I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
      Any hints are more than welcome!



      <from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
      <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
      <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`






      apache-camel






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 24 '18 at 8:42









      Francesco Montesano

      5,5232651




      5,5232651










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 19:46









      stewchickenstewchicken

      7611




      7611
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



          I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



          Quote from the book Camel in Action:




          In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
          the in message is reused.







          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419500%2fcould-not-display-out-body-at-log-for-external-soap-provider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



            I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



            Quote from the book Camel in Action:




            In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
            the in message is reused.







            share|improve this answer


























              1














              The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



              I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



              Quote from the book Camel in Action:




              In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
              the in message is reused.







              share|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



                I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



                Quote from the book Camel in Action:




                In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
                the in message is reused.







                share|improve this answer












                The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



                I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



                Quote from the book Camel in Action:




                In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
                the in message is reused.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 23 '18 at 6:53









                burkiburki

                1,7431415




                1,7431415






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419500%2fcould-not-display-out-body-at-log-for-external-soap-provider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                    How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                    TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'