Minimization problem solving and its step limits












0














I am trying to solve the following minimization problem:



$$
minlvertlvert{x}rvertrvert_1 + betalvertlvert{x}rvertrvert^2_2 s.t. sum_{m = 1}^m (y - lvert{c}^{H} . xrvert^2)^2) lg in
$$





  • x: my unknown value (input) with complex elements and known size, here (4x1)


  • y: the output vector (known)


  • c: a 'skaling' vector


I am very new to this so my approach may seem basic. I simply loop over all combination of c (non-redundant) and according to the computed minimization value and condition I update my results.



My questions are the following:




  • Is this correct and is there a better approach to this?

  • This code fails with a small step due to the huge size of combinations, so how can I solve that?




from itertools import combinations
from random import randint
import numpy as np

def deg2rad(phase):
return round(((phase*3.14)/180),3)

def excitation(amplitude, phase):
return complex(round(amplitude * (np.cos(deg2rad(phase))),3), round(amplitude*(np.sin(deg2rad(phase))),3))

def compute_subject_equation_result(x):
M = 12
difference =
y = [randint(10, 20) for i in range(M)]

for m in range(0, M):
c = np.array([randint(0, 9), randint(10,20), randint(0, 9), randint(0,20)]).reshape(4,1)
ch = c.conjugate().T
eq = (y[m] - (abs(np.dot(ch, x))[0])**2)**2
difference.append(eq**2)
return round(sum(difference)[0], 3)

def compute_main_equation_result(x, beta):
norm1 = np.linalg.norm(x,1)
norm2 = np.linalg.norm(x,2)
return round(norm1 + beta*(norm2**2), 3)

def optimize(x, min_x, min_phi_x):
min_result = 10**25

# compute the optimization formals and check for the min value
main_equation_result = compute_main_equation_result(c, beta)
subject_equation_result = compute_subject_equation_result(c)

# update min value if min detected'
if subject_equation_result < epsilon and main_equation_result < min_result:
min_result = main_equation_result
min_x = x
min_phi_x = phx
return min_x, min_phi_x

# initialization
phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 90)]
beta = 1
epsilon = 10**25
min_x = np.array()
min_phi_x = np.array()

phases_combinations = [list(comb) for comb in combinations(phases, 4)]

# start checking all combinations
for phx in phases_combinations:
phi1, phi2, phi3, phi4 = phx[0], phx[1], phx[2], phx[3]
# build the hypothesis for the excitations vector c
c = np.array([ excitation(1, phi1), excitation(1, phi2), excitation(1, phi3), excitation(1, phi4) ]).T.reshape(4,1)
min_x, min_phi_x = optimize(c, min_x, min_phi_x)
print(' --------------------------------------------------')
print('-----> new_min_c = ', list(min_x))
print('-----> new_min_phi_c = ', min_phi_x)


Remark: When trying phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 1)] I get a "memory error". I can avoid using a higher step. However I am not sure about my approach in general nor of the step change effect on the accuracy.










share|improve this question









New contributor




kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0














    I am trying to solve the following minimization problem:



    $$
    minlvertlvert{x}rvertrvert_1 + betalvertlvert{x}rvertrvert^2_2 s.t. sum_{m = 1}^m (y - lvert{c}^{H} . xrvert^2)^2) lg in
    $$





    • x: my unknown value (input) with complex elements and known size, here (4x1)


    • y: the output vector (known)


    • c: a 'skaling' vector


    I am very new to this so my approach may seem basic. I simply loop over all combination of c (non-redundant) and according to the computed minimization value and condition I update my results.



    My questions are the following:




    • Is this correct and is there a better approach to this?

    • This code fails with a small step due to the huge size of combinations, so how can I solve that?




    from itertools import combinations
    from random import randint
    import numpy as np

    def deg2rad(phase):
    return round(((phase*3.14)/180),3)

    def excitation(amplitude, phase):
    return complex(round(amplitude * (np.cos(deg2rad(phase))),3), round(amplitude*(np.sin(deg2rad(phase))),3))

    def compute_subject_equation_result(x):
    M = 12
    difference =
    y = [randint(10, 20) for i in range(M)]

    for m in range(0, M):
    c = np.array([randint(0, 9), randint(10,20), randint(0, 9), randint(0,20)]).reshape(4,1)
    ch = c.conjugate().T
    eq = (y[m] - (abs(np.dot(ch, x))[0])**2)**2
    difference.append(eq**2)
    return round(sum(difference)[0], 3)

    def compute_main_equation_result(x, beta):
    norm1 = np.linalg.norm(x,1)
    norm2 = np.linalg.norm(x,2)
    return round(norm1 + beta*(norm2**2), 3)

    def optimize(x, min_x, min_phi_x):
    min_result = 10**25

    # compute the optimization formals and check for the min value
    main_equation_result = compute_main_equation_result(c, beta)
    subject_equation_result = compute_subject_equation_result(c)

    # update min value if min detected'
    if subject_equation_result < epsilon and main_equation_result < min_result:
    min_result = main_equation_result
    min_x = x
    min_phi_x = phx
    return min_x, min_phi_x

    # initialization
    phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 90)]
    beta = 1
    epsilon = 10**25
    min_x = np.array()
    min_phi_x = np.array()

    phases_combinations = [list(comb) for comb in combinations(phases, 4)]

    # start checking all combinations
    for phx in phases_combinations:
    phi1, phi2, phi3, phi4 = phx[0], phx[1], phx[2], phx[3]
    # build the hypothesis for the excitations vector c
    c = np.array([ excitation(1, phi1), excitation(1, phi2), excitation(1, phi3), excitation(1, phi4) ]).T.reshape(4,1)
    min_x, min_phi_x = optimize(c, min_x, min_phi_x)
    print(' --------------------------------------------------')
    print('-----> new_min_c = ', list(min_x))
    print('-----> new_min_phi_c = ', min_phi_x)


    Remark: When trying phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 1)] I get a "memory error". I can avoid using a higher step. However I am not sure about my approach in general nor of the step change effect on the accuracy.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0







      I am trying to solve the following minimization problem:



      $$
      minlvertlvert{x}rvertrvert_1 + betalvertlvert{x}rvertrvert^2_2 s.t. sum_{m = 1}^m (y - lvert{c}^{H} . xrvert^2)^2) lg in
      $$





      • x: my unknown value (input) with complex elements and known size, here (4x1)


      • y: the output vector (known)


      • c: a 'skaling' vector


      I am very new to this so my approach may seem basic. I simply loop over all combination of c (non-redundant) and according to the computed minimization value and condition I update my results.



      My questions are the following:




      • Is this correct and is there a better approach to this?

      • This code fails with a small step due to the huge size of combinations, so how can I solve that?




      from itertools import combinations
      from random import randint
      import numpy as np

      def deg2rad(phase):
      return round(((phase*3.14)/180),3)

      def excitation(amplitude, phase):
      return complex(round(amplitude * (np.cos(deg2rad(phase))),3), round(amplitude*(np.sin(deg2rad(phase))),3))

      def compute_subject_equation_result(x):
      M = 12
      difference =
      y = [randint(10, 20) for i in range(M)]

      for m in range(0, M):
      c = np.array([randint(0, 9), randint(10,20), randint(0, 9), randint(0,20)]).reshape(4,1)
      ch = c.conjugate().T
      eq = (y[m] - (abs(np.dot(ch, x))[0])**2)**2
      difference.append(eq**2)
      return round(sum(difference)[0], 3)

      def compute_main_equation_result(x, beta):
      norm1 = np.linalg.norm(x,1)
      norm2 = np.linalg.norm(x,2)
      return round(norm1 + beta*(norm2**2), 3)

      def optimize(x, min_x, min_phi_x):
      min_result = 10**25

      # compute the optimization formals and check for the min value
      main_equation_result = compute_main_equation_result(c, beta)
      subject_equation_result = compute_subject_equation_result(c)

      # update min value if min detected'
      if subject_equation_result < epsilon and main_equation_result < min_result:
      min_result = main_equation_result
      min_x = x
      min_phi_x = phx
      return min_x, min_phi_x

      # initialization
      phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 90)]
      beta = 1
      epsilon = 10**25
      min_x = np.array()
      min_phi_x = np.array()

      phases_combinations = [list(comb) for comb in combinations(phases, 4)]

      # start checking all combinations
      for phx in phases_combinations:
      phi1, phi2, phi3, phi4 = phx[0], phx[1], phx[2], phx[3]
      # build the hypothesis for the excitations vector c
      c = np.array([ excitation(1, phi1), excitation(1, phi2), excitation(1, phi3), excitation(1, phi4) ]).T.reshape(4,1)
      min_x, min_phi_x = optimize(c, min_x, min_phi_x)
      print(' --------------------------------------------------')
      print('-----> new_min_c = ', list(min_x))
      print('-----> new_min_phi_c = ', min_phi_x)


      Remark: When trying phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 1)] I get a "memory error". I can avoid using a higher step. However I am not sure about my approach in general nor of the step change effect on the accuracy.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I am trying to solve the following minimization problem:



      $$
      minlvertlvert{x}rvertrvert_1 + betalvertlvert{x}rvertrvert^2_2 s.t. sum_{m = 1}^m (y - lvert{c}^{H} . xrvert^2)^2) lg in
      $$





      • x: my unknown value (input) with complex elements and known size, here (4x1)


      • y: the output vector (known)


      • c: a 'skaling' vector


      I am very new to this so my approach may seem basic. I simply loop over all combination of c (non-redundant) and according to the computed minimization value and condition I update my results.



      My questions are the following:




      • Is this correct and is there a better approach to this?

      • This code fails with a small step due to the huge size of combinations, so how can I solve that?




      from itertools import combinations
      from random import randint
      import numpy as np

      def deg2rad(phase):
      return round(((phase*3.14)/180),3)

      def excitation(amplitude, phase):
      return complex(round(amplitude * (np.cos(deg2rad(phase))),3), round(amplitude*(np.sin(deg2rad(phase))),3))

      def compute_subject_equation_result(x):
      M = 12
      difference =
      y = [randint(10, 20) for i in range(M)]

      for m in range(0, M):
      c = np.array([randint(0, 9), randint(10,20), randint(0, 9), randint(0,20)]).reshape(4,1)
      ch = c.conjugate().T
      eq = (y[m] - (abs(np.dot(ch, x))[0])**2)**2
      difference.append(eq**2)
      return round(sum(difference)[0], 3)

      def compute_main_equation_result(x, beta):
      norm1 = np.linalg.norm(x,1)
      norm2 = np.linalg.norm(x,2)
      return round(norm1 + beta*(norm2**2), 3)

      def optimize(x, min_x, min_phi_x):
      min_result = 10**25

      # compute the optimization formals and check for the min value
      main_equation_result = compute_main_equation_result(c, beta)
      subject_equation_result = compute_subject_equation_result(c)

      # update min value if min detected'
      if subject_equation_result < epsilon and main_equation_result < min_result:
      min_result = main_equation_result
      min_x = x
      min_phi_x = phx
      return min_x, min_phi_x

      # initialization
      phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 90)]
      beta = 1
      epsilon = 10**25
      min_x = np.array()
      min_phi_x = np.array()

      phases_combinations = [list(comb) for comb in combinations(phases, 4)]

      # start checking all combinations
      for phx in phases_combinations:
      phi1, phi2, phi3, phi4 = phx[0], phx[1], phx[2], phx[3]
      # build the hypothesis for the excitations vector c
      c = np.array([ excitation(1, phi1), excitation(1, phi2), excitation(1, phi3), excitation(1, phi4) ]).T.reshape(4,1)
      min_x, min_phi_x = optimize(c, min_x, min_phi_x)
      print(' --------------------------------------------------')
      print('-----> new_min_c = ', list(min_x))
      print('-----> new_min_phi_c = ', min_phi_x)


      Remark: When trying phases = [alpha for alpha in range(0, 361, 1)] I get a "memory error". I can avoid using a higher step. However I am not sure about my approach in general nor of the step change effect on the accuracy.







      python memory-optimization






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 23 mins ago









      Jamal

      30.3k11116226




      30.3k11116226






      New contributor




      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 1 hour ago









      kogitokogito

      1011




      1011




      New contributor




      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      kogito is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          kogito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211153%2fminimization-problem-solving-and-its-step-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          kogito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          kogito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          kogito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          kogito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211153%2fminimization-problem-solving-and-its-step-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

          How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

          Refactoring coordinates for Minecraft Pi buildings written in Python