Is is posible to use a custom authentication logic in Keycloak?
I have configured Keycloak with LDAP User Federation. When a user wants to login into an application, he is redirected to the Keycloak login page, enters the uid/pwd and is authenticated using an LDAP bind.
This isn't enough for my requirements since I would like to implement some custom authentication logic, e.g:
public boolean authenticate(String uid, String pwd) {
//1.- validate against LDAP
//2.- do some other validations
return validationResult;
}
How could I include my own authentication logic into Keycloak?
keycloak redhat-sso
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
add a comment |
I have configured Keycloak with LDAP User Federation. When a user wants to login into an application, he is redirected to the Keycloak login page, enters the uid/pwd and is authenticated using an LDAP bind.
This isn't enough for my requirements since I would like to implement some custom authentication logic, e.g:
public boolean authenticate(String uid, String pwd) {
//1.- validate against LDAP
//2.- do some other validations
return validationResult;
}
How could I include my own authentication logic into Keycloak?
keycloak redhat-sso
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
add a comment |
I have configured Keycloak with LDAP User Federation. When a user wants to login into an application, he is redirected to the Keycloak login page, enters the uid/pwd and is authenticated using an LDAP bind.
This isn't enough for my requirements since I would like to implement some custom authentication logic, e.g:
public boolean authenticate(String uid, String pwd) {
//1.- validate against LDAP
//2.- do some other validations
return validationResult;
}
How could I include my own authentication logic into Keycloak?
keycloak redhat-sso
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
I have configured Keycloak with LDAP User Federation. When a user wants to login into an application, he is redirected to the Keycloak login page, enters the uid/pwd and is authenticated using an LDAP bind.
This isn't enough for my requirements since I would like to implement some custom authentication logic, e.g:
public boolean authenticate(String uid, String pwd) {
//1.- validate against LDAP
//2.- do some other validations
return validationResult;
}
How could I include my own authentication logic into Keycloak?
keycloak redhat-sso
keycloak redhat-sso
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
edited Nov 25 '18 at 22:48
codependent
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:37
codependentcodependent
7,4181061130
7,4181061130
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
To add a new authentication mechanism, you implement the Authentication SPI. This is described in the Server Development guide > Authentication SPI section.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
add a comment |
You could implement an Authentication SPI and deploy it to Keycloak server, or you could implement the authentication logic inside the custom user provider package if you are implementing user federation without using the default options (this authentication flow would be available only for this particular federated user store in this case).
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53472715%2fis-is-posible-to-use-a-custom-authentication-logic-in-keycloak%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To add a new authentication mechanism, you implement the Authentication SPI. This is described in the Server Development guide > Authentication SPI section.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
add a comment |
To add a new authentication mechanism, you implement the Authentication SPI. This is described in the Server Development guide > Authentication SPI section.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
add a comment |
To add a new authentication mechanism, you implement the Authentication SPI. This is described in the Server Development guide > Authentication SPI section.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
To add a new authentication mechanism, you implement the Authentication SPI. This is described in the Server Development guide > Authentication SPI section.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
answered Nov 26 '18 at 21:28
Cyril DangervilleCyril Dangerville
1,332516
1,332516
add a comment |
add a comment |
You could implement an Authentication SPI and deploy it to Keycloak server, or you could implement the authentication logic inside the custom user provider package if you are implementing user federation without using the default options (this authentication flow would be available only for this particular federated user store in this case).
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
add a comment |
You could implement an Authentication SPI and deploy it to Keycloak server, or you could implement the authentication logic inside the custom user provider package if you are implementing user federation without using the default options (this authentication flow would be available only for this particular federated user store in this case).
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
add a comment |
You could implement an Authentication SPI and deploy it to Keycloak server, or you could implement the authentication logic inside the custom user provider package if you are implementing user federation without using the default options (this authentication flow would be available only for this particular federated user store in this case).
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
You could implement an Authentication SPI and deploy it to Keycloak server, or you could implement the authentication logic inside the custom user provider package if you are implementing user federation without using the default options (this authentication flow would be available only for this particular federated user store in this case).
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:40
RakihthaRRRakihthaRR
194112
194112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53472715%2fis-is-posible-to-use-a-custom-authentication-logic-in-keycloak%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
