Safely Initialising a static variable to a file
$begingroup$
This might appear to be a trivial task, but I think it's not the case. My code originally looked like this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static byte F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Util.GetFile simply reads the file and returns an array of bytes. For completeness, here it is:
class Util
{
public static byte GetFile( String path )
{
IO.MemoryStream ms = new IO.MemoryStream();
using( IO.FileStream f = IO.File.OpenRead( path) )
{
f.CopyTo( ms );
}
return ms.ToArray();
}
}
However, when using DataSetToPdf in a multi-threaded environment (IIS), I was sometimes ( but not always ) getting mysterious null reference exceptions, which I could not easily debug. However, what I believe what was happening is that the static method could be called before the initialisation is complete. Instead what appears to be is necessary is this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static System.Object Locker = new System.Object();
static byte F1;
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
lock( Locker )
{
if ( F1 == null )
{
F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
}
}
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Please review my updated code, was it wrong before, is it right now?
c#
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This might appear to be a trivial task, but I think it's not the case. My code originally looked like this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static byte F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Util.GetFile simply reads the file and returns an array of bytes. For completeness, here it is:
class Util
{
public static byte GetFile( String path )
{
IO.MemoryStream ms = new IO.MemoryStream();
using( IO.FileStream f = IO.File.OpenRead( path) )
{
f.CopyTo( ms );
}
return ms.ToArray();
}
}
However, when using DataSetToPdf in a multi-threaded environment (IIS), I was sometimes ( but not always ) getting mysterious null reference exceptions, which I could not easily debug. However, what I believe what was happening is that the static method could be called before the initialisation is complete. Instead what appears to be is necessary is this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static System.Object Locker = new System.Object();
static byte F1;
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
lock( Locker )
{
if ( F1 == null )
{
F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
}
}
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Please review my updated code, was it wrong before, is it right now?
c#
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
MemoryStream
is also anIDisposable
-implementing class (it descends fromStream
) and should be wrapped in ausing
construct just likeFileStream
is.
$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What was the null reference exception?F1
could never be null, becauseMemoryStream.ToArray()
never returns null. Ideally,F1
should bereadonly
, so I guess it's possible something else is setting it to null. My guess is the exception is unrelated.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Also,File.ReadAllBytes()
should be able to do what you want without the intermediate copy to memory stream.
$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BradM F1 was null because it hadn't YET been initialised. C# doesn't guarantee that initialisation of static members completes before members are called in a multi-threaded environment ( which caught me out ). I believe it can only happen when the initialisation is delayed by blocking, in this case an IO operation.
$endgroup$
– George Barwood
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GeorgeBarwood Thats not true to my knowledge. Static fields are guaranteed to be initalized before first usage.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This might appear to be a trivial task, but I think it's not the case. My code originally looked like this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static byte F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Util.GetFile simply reads the file and returns an array of bytes. For completeness, here it is:
class Util
{
public static byte GetFile( String path )
{
IO.MemoryStream ms = new IO.MemoryStream();
using( IO.FileStream f = IO.File.OpenRead( path) )
{
f.CopyTo( ms );
}
return ms.ToArray();
}
}
However, when using DataSetToPdf in a multi-threaded environment (IIS), I was sometimes ( but not always ) getting mysterious null reference exceptions, which I could not easily debug. However, what I believe what was happening is that the static method could be called before the initialisation is complete. Instead what appears to be is necessary is this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static System.Object Locker = new System.Object();
static byte F1;
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
lock( Locker )
{
if ( F1 == null )
{
F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
}
}
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Please review my updated code, was it wrong before, is it right now?
c#
$endgroup$
This might appear to be a trivial task, but I think it's not the case. My code originally looked like this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static byte F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Util.GetFile simply reads the file and returns an array of bytes. For completeness, here it is:
class Util
{
public static byte GetFile( String path )
{
IO.MemoryStream ms = new IO.MemoryStream();
using( IO.FileStream f = IO.File.OpenRead( path) )
{
f.CopyTo( ms );
}
return ms.ToArray();
}
}
However, when using DataSetToPdf in a multi-threaded environment (IIS), I was sometimes ( but not always ) getting mysterious null reference exceptions, which I could not easily debug. However, what I believe what was happening is that the static method could be called before the initialisation is complete. Instead what appears to be is necessary is this:
class DataSetToPdf
{
static System.Object Locker = new System.Object();
static byte F1;
public static void Go( Data.DataSet ds, int ix, System.IO.Stream output )
{
lock( Locker )
{
if ( F1 == null )
{
F1 = Util.GetFile( "C:PdfFilesFreeSans.ttf" );
}
}
// Code which uses F1
}
}
Please review my updated code, was it wrong before, is it right now?
c#
c#
edited 1 min ago
t3chb0t
34.4k748118
34.4k748118
asked 13 hours ago
George BarwoodGeorge Barwood
4079
4079
2
$begingroup$
MemoryStream
is also anIDisposable
-implementing class (it descends fromStream
) and should be wrapped in ausing
construct just likeFileStream
is.
$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What was the null reference exception?F1
could never be null, becauseMemoryStream.ToArray()
never returns null. Ideally,F1
should bereadonly
, so I guess it's possible something else is setting it to null. My guess is the exception is unrelated.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Also,File.ReadAllBytes()
should be able to do what you want without the intermediate copy to memory stream.
$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BradM F1 was null because it hadn't YET been initialised. C# doesn't guarantee that initialisation of static members completes before members are called in a multi-threaded environment ( which caught me out ). I believe it can only happen when the initialisation is delayed by blocking, in this case an IO operation.
$endgroup$
– George Barwood
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GeorgeBarwood Thats not true to my knowledge. Static fields are guaranteed to be initalized before first usage.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
MemoryStream
is also anIDisposable
-implementing class (it descends fromStream
) and should be wrapped in ausing
construct just likeFileStream
is.
$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What was the null reference exception?F1
could never be null, becauseMemoryStream.ToArray()
never returns null. Ideally,F1
should bereadonly
, so I guess it's possible something else is setting it to null. My guess is the exception is unrelated.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Also,File.ReadAllBytes()
should be able to do what you want without the intermediate copy to memory stream.
$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BradM F1 was null because it hadn't YET been initialised. C# doesn't guarantee that initialisation of static members completes before members are called in a multi-threaded environment ( which caught me out ). I believe it can only happen when the initialisation is delayed by blocking, in this case an IO operation.
$endgroup$
– George Barwood
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GeorgeBarwood Thats not true to my knowledge. Static fields are guaranteed to be initalized before first usage.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
MemoryStream
is also an IDisposable
-implementing class (it descends from Stream
) and should be wrapped in a using
construct just like FileStream
is.$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
MemoryStream
is also an IDisposable
-implementing class (it descends from Stream
) and should be wrapped in a using
construct just like FileStream
is.$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
What was the null reference exception?
F1
could never be null, because MemoryStream.ToArray()
never returns null. Ideally, F1
should be readonly
, so I guess it's possible something else is setting it to null. My guess is the exception is unrelated.$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
What was the null reference exception?
F1
could never be null, because MemoryStream.ToArray()
never returns null. Ideally, F1
should be readonly
, so I guess it's possible something else is setting it to null. My guess is the exception is unrelated.$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Also,
File.ReadAllBytes()
should be able to do what you want without the intermediate copy to memory stream.$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also,
File.ReadAllBytes()
should be able to do what you want without the intermediate copy to memory stream.$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BradM F1 was null because it hadn't YET been initialised. C# doesn't guarantee that initialisation of static members completes before members are called in a multi-threaded environment ( which caught me out ). I believe it can only happen when the initialisation is delayed by blocking, in this case an IO operation.
$endgroup$
– George Barwood
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BradM F1 was null because it hadn't YET been initialised. C# doesn't guarantee that initialisation of static members completes before members are called in a multi-threaded environment ( which caught me out ). I believe it can only happen when the initialisation is delayed by blocking, in this case an IO operation.
$endgroup$
– George Barwood
12 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@GeorgeBarwood Thats not true to my knowledge. Static fields are guaranteed to be initalized before first usage.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GeorgeBarwood Thats not true to my knowledge. Static fields are guaranteed to be initalized before first usage.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213058%2fsafely-initialising-a-static-variable-to-a-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213058%2fsafely-initialising-a-static-variable-to-a-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
MemoryStream
is also anIDisposable
-implementing class (it descends fromStream
) and should be wrapped in ausing
construct just likeFileStream
is.$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What was the null reference exception?
F1
could never be null, becauseMemoryStream.ToArray()
never returns null. Ideally,F1
should bereadonly
, so I guess it's possible something else is setting it to null. My guess is the exception is unrelated.$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Also,
File.ReadAllBytes()
should be able to do what you want without the intermediate copy to memory stream.$endgroup$
– Jesse C. Slicer
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BradM F1 was null because it hadn't YET been initialised. C# doesn't guarantee that initialisation of static members completes before members are called in a multi-threaded environment ( which caught me out ). I believe it can only happen when the initialisation is delayed by blocking, in this case an IO operation.
$endgroup$
– George Barwood
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GeorgeBarwood Thats not true to my knowledge. Static fields are guaranteed to be initalized before first usage.
$endgroup$
– Brad M
12 hours ago