DDD, how to persist deletes on child entities with NHibernate?
Having an AggregateRoot and a list of child Entities, how do you persist the updated list of children after removing or updating one of them ?
This is an application layer service
async Task HandleAsync(RemoveChildRequest request)
{
Aggregate aggregate = await _aggregateRepository.GetByIdAsync(request.AggregateId);
aggregate.RemoveChild(request.ChildId);
await _aggregateRepository.Update(aggregate);
await _unitOfWork.CommitAsync();
}
This is the Aggregate method of removing a child.
public virtual void RemoveChild(Guid ChildId)
{
Child kid = _children.Single(item => item.Id == ChildId);
_children.Remove(kid);
}
And this is the repository
The aggregate is as it should be, has same data but without the child it was removed from the collection.
Update(Aggregate aggregate)
{
await Session.UpdateAsync(aggregate, aggregate.Id);
}
This is my NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Children>(Reveal.Member<Aggregate>("Children"))
.Not.Inverse()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate()
.Cascade.Delete();
After the commit is done, there is no update done against the DB. Somehow i feel is normal because, I only remove an entry from the children collection and that's all.
The structure
Aggregate
{
private virtual IList<Child> _children;
protected virtual List<Child> Children { get => _children; }
}
Child
{
}
So only the parent holds a reference to the Child
I could do something like this in the Aggregate Repository
RemoveChild(Child kid)
{
Session.DeleteAsync(kid);
}
But as far as I know, Repositories should be Aggregates specific only.
I'm interested in how the code that will actually persist the changes to the data store looks like? How do you remove the child. The Repository.
nhibernate architecture software-design
add a comment |
Having an AggregateRoot and a list of child Entities, how do you persist the updated list of children after removing or updating one of them ?
This is an application layer service
async Task HandleAsync(RemoveChildRequest request)
{
Aggregate aggregate = await _aggregateRepository.GetByIdAsync(request.AggregateId);
aggregate.RemoveChild(request.ChildId);
await _aggregateRepository.Update(aggregate);
await _unitOfWork.CommitAsync();
}
This is the Aggregate method of removing a child.
public virtual void RemoveChild(Guid ChildId)
{
Child kid = _children.Single(item => item.Id == ChildId);
_children.Remove(kid);
}
And this is the repository
The aggregate is as it should be, has same data but without the child it was removed from the collection.
Update(Aggregate aggregate)
{
await Session.UpdateAsync(aggregate, aggregate.Id);
}
This is my NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Children>(Reveal.Member<Aggregate>("Children"))
.Not.Inverse()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate()
.Cascade.Delete();
After the commit is done, there is no update done against the DB. Somehow i feel is normal because, I only remove an entry from the children collection and that's all.
The structure
Aggregate
{
private virtual IList<Child> _children;
protected virtual List<Child> Children { get => _children; }
}
Child
{
}
So only the parent holds a reference to the Child
I could do something like this in the Aggregate Repository
RemoveChild(Child kid)
{
Session.DeleteAsync(kid);
}
But as far as I know, Repositories should be Aggregates specific only.
I'm interested in how the code that will actually persist the changes to the data store looks like? How do you remove the child. The Repository.
nhibernate architecture software-design
Possible duplicate of How to delete child object in NHibernate?
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:12
add a comment |
Having an AggregateRoot and a list of child Entities, how do you persist the updated list of children after removing or updating one of them ?
This is an application layer service
async Task HandleAsync(RemoveChildRequest request)
{
Aggregate aggregate = await _aggregateRepository.GetByIdAsync(request.AggregateId);
aggregate.RemoveChild(request.ChildId);
await _aggregateRepository.Update(aggregate);
await _unitOfWork.CommitAsync();
}
This is the Aggregate method of removing a child.
public virtual void RemoveChild(Guid ChildId)
{
Child kid = _children.Single(item => item.Id == ChildId);
_children.Remove(kid);
}
And this is the repository
The aggregate is as it should be, has same data but without the child it was removed from the collection.
Update(Aggregate aggregate)
{
await Session.UpdateAsync(aggregate, aggregate.Id);
}
This is my NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Children>(Reveal.Member<Aggregate>("Children"))
.Not.Inverse()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate()
.Cascade.Delete();
After the commit is done, there is no update done against the DB. Somehow i feel is normal because, I only remove an entry from the children collection and that's all.
The structure
Aggregate
{
private virtual IList<Child> _children;
protected virtual List<Child> Children { get => _children; }
}
Child
{
}
So only the parent holds a reference to the Child
I could do something like this in the Aggregate Repository
RemoveChild(Child kid)
{
Session.DeleteAsync(kid);
}
But as far as I know, Repositories should be Aggregates specific only.
I'm interested in how the code that will actually persist the changes to the data store looks like? How do you remove the child. The Repository.
nhibernate architecture software-design
Having an AggregateRoot and a list of child Entities, how do you persist the updated list of children after removing or updating one of them ?
This is an application layer service
async Task HandleAsync(RemoveChildRequest request)
{
Aggregate aggregate = await _aggregateRepository.GetByIdAsync(request.AggregateId);
aggregate.RemoveChild(request.ChildId);
await _aggregateRepository.Update(aggregate);
await _unitOfWork.CommitAsync();
}
This is the Aggregate method of removing a child.
public virtual void RemoveChild(Guid ChildId)
{
Child kid = _children.Single(item => item.Id == ChildId);
_children.Remove(kid);
}
And this is the repository
The aggregate is as it should be, has same data but without the child it was removed from the collection.
Update(Aggregate aggregate)
{
await Session.UpdateAsync(aggregate, aggregate.Id);
}
This is my NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Children>(Reveal.Member<Aggregate>("Children"))
.Not.Inverse()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate()
.Cascade.Delete();
After the commit is done, there is no update done against the DB. Somehow i feel is normal because, I only remove an entry from the children collection and that's all.
The structure
Aggregate
{
private virtual IList<Child> _children;
protected virtual List<Child> Children { get => _children; }
}
Child
{
}
So only the parent holds a reference to the Child
I could do something like this in the Aggregate Repository
RemoveChild(Child kid)
{
Session.DeleteAsync(kid);
}
But as far as I know, Repositories should be Aggregates specific only.
I'm interested in how the code that will actually persist the changes to the data store looks like? How do you remove the child. The Repository.
nhibernate architecture software-design
nhibernate architecture software-design
edited Nov 24 '18 at 21:36
MCR
asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:01
MCRMCR
547217
547217
Possible duplicate of How to delete child object in NHibernate?
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:12
add a comment |
Possible duplicate of How to delete child object in NHibernate?
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:12
Possible duplicate of How to delete child object in NHibernate?
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:12
Possible duplicate of How to delete child object in NHibernate?
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:12
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Found my answer Here
nhibernate mapping: A collection with cascade="all-delete-orphan" was no longer referenced
and here
property Access strategies in nhibernate
NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Child>(Reveal.Member<Order>("Children"))
.Access.LowerCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate();
add a comment |
Here is the way it is done with ByCode mapping, important is colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All). I hope this helps.
public class Client
{
public virtual int ClientId { get; protected set; }
public virtual string ClientName { get; protected set; }
public virtual IList<ClientLocation> ClientLocations { get; protected set; }
protected Client()
{
this.ClientLocations = new List<ClientLocation>();
}
}
public class ClientLocation
{
public virtual int ClientLocationId { get; protected set; }
public virtual Client Client { get; protected set; }
public virtual string LocationName { get; protected set; }
protected ClientBranch()
{
}
}
Mappings
public class ClientMap : ClassMapping<Client>
{
public ClientMap() {
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.ClientName);
Bag(x => x.ClientLocations, colmap => { colmap.Key(x => x.Column("CLIENTID")); colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All); }, map => { map.OneToMany(); });
}
}
public class ClientLocationMap : ClassMapping<ClientLocation>
{
public ClientLocationMap()
{
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientLocationId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.LocationName);
ManyToOne(x => x.Client, map => { map.Column("CLIENTID"); map.NotNullable(true); map.Cascade(Cascade.All); });
}
}
add a comment |
If the children belong to the aggregate root (i.e. composition instead of association), the removal or addition of the child entity must happen through the AggregateRoot and not independently. Moreover, children should be Value Objects and not aggregates in their own right.
Therefore, you are right - the Repository
would only fetch the parent. You would then have RemoveChild
command that would act on that instance and post a ChildRemoved
event which would take the child away from the list.
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
1
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433657%2fddd-how-to-persist-deletes-on-child-entities-with-nhibernate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Found my answer Here
nhibernate mapping: A collection with cascade="all-delete-orphan" was no longer referenced
and here
property Access strategies in nhibernate
NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Child>(Reveal.Member<Order>("Children"))
.Access.LowerCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate();
add a comment |
Found my answer Here
nhibernate mapping: A collection with cascade="all-delete-orphan" was no longer referenced
and here
property Access strategies in nhibernate
NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Child>(Reveal.Member<Order>("Children"))
.Access.LowerCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate();
add a comment |
Found my answer Here
nhibernate mapping: A collection with cascade="all-delete-orphan" was no longer referenced
and here
property Access strategies in nhibernate
NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Child>(Reveal.Member<Order>("Children"))
.Access.LowerCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate();
Found my answer Here
nhibernate mapping: A collection with cascade="all-delete-orphan" was no longer referenced
and here
property Access strategies in nhibernate
NHibernate configuration
mapping
.HasMany<Child>(Reveal.Member<Order>("Children"))
.Access.LowerCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Not.KeyNullable()
.Not.KeyUpdate();
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:57
MCRMCR
547217
547217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here is the way it is done with ByCode mapping, important is colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All). I hope this helps.
public class Client
{
public virtual int ClientId { get; protected set; }
public virtual string ClientName { get; protected set; }
public virtual IList<ClientLocation> ClientLocations { get; protected set; }
protected Client()
{
this.ClientLocations = new List<ClientLocation>();
}
}
public class ClientLocation
{
public virtual int ClientLocationId { get; protected set; }
public virtual Client Client { get; protected set; }
public virtual string LocationName { get; protected set; }
protected ClientBranch()
{
}
}
Mappings
public class ClientMap : ClassMapping<Client>
{
public ClientMap() {
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.ClientName);
Bag(x => x.ClientLocations, colmap => { colmap.Key(x => x.Column("CLIENTID")); colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All); }, map => { map.OneToMany(); });
}
}
public class ClientLocationMap : ClassMapping<ClientLocation>
{
public ClientLocationMap()
{
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientLocationId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.LocationName);
ManyToOne(x => x.Client, map => { map.Column("CLIENTID"); map.NotNullable(true); map.Cascade(Cascade.All); });
}
}
add a comment |
Here is the way it is done with ByCode mapping, important is colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All). I hope this helps.
public class Client
{
public virtual int ClientId { get; protected set; }
public virtual string ClientName { get; protected set; }
public virtual IList<ClientLocation> ClientLocations { get; protected set; }
protected Client()
{
this.ClientLocations = new List<ClientLocation>();
}
}
public class ClientLocation
{
public virtual int ClientLocationId { get; protected set; }
public virtual Client Client { get; protected set; }
public virtual string LocationName { get; protected set; }
protected ClientBranch()
{
}
}
Mappings
public class ClientMap : ClassMapping<Client>
{
public ClientMap() {
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.ClientName);
Bag(x => x.ClientLocations, colmap => { colmap.Key(x => x.Column("CLIENTID")); colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All); }, map => { map.OneToMany(); });
}
}
public class ClientLocationMap : ClassMapping<ClientLocation>
{
public ClientLocationMap()
{
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientLocationId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.LocationName);
ManyToOne(x => x.Client, map => { map.Column("CLIENTID"); map.NotNullable(true); map.Cascade(Cascade.All); });
}
}
add a comment |
Here is the way it is done with ByCode mapping, important is colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All). I hope this helps.
public class Client
{
public virtual int ClientId { get; protected set; }
public virtual string ClientName { get; protected set; }
public virtual IList<ClientLocation> ClientLocations { get; protected set; }
protected Client()
{
this.ClientLocations = new List<ClientLocation>();
}
}
public class ClientLocation
{
public virtual int ClientLocationId { get; protected set; }
public virtual Client Client { get; protected set; }
public virtual string LocationName { get; protected set; }
protected ClientBranch()
{
}
}
Mappings
public class ClientMap : ClassMapping<Client>
{
public ClientMap() {
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.ClientName);
Bag(x => x.ClientLocations, colmap => { colmap.Key(x => x.Column("CLIENTID")); colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All); }, map => { map.OneToMany(); });
}
}
public class ClientLocationMap : ClassMapping<ClientLocation>
{
public ClientLocationMap()
{
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientLocationId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.LocationName);
ManyToOne(x => x.Client, map => { map.Column("CLIENTID"); map.NotNullable(true); map.Cascade(Cascade.All); });
}
}
Here is the way it is done with ByCode mapping, important is colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All). I hope this helps.
public class Client
{
public virtual int ClientId { get; protected set; }
public virtual string ClientName { get; protected set; }
public virtual IList<ClientLocation> ClientLocations { get; protected set; }
protected Client()
{
this.ClientLocations = new List<ClientLocation>();
}
}
public class ClientLocation
{
public virtual int ClientLocationId { get; protected set; }
public virtual Client Client { get; protected set; }
public virtual string LocationName { get; protected set; }
protected ClientBranch()
{
}
}
Mappings
public class ClientMap : ClassMapping<Client>
{
public ClientMap() {
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.ClientName);
Bag(x => x.ClientLocations, colmap => { colmap.Key(x => x.Column("CLIENTID")); colmap.Cascade(Cascade.All); }, map => { map.OneToMany(); });
}
}
public class ClientLocationMap : ClassMapping<ClientLocation>
{
public ClientLocationMap()
{
Lazy(true);
Id(x => x.ClientLocationId, map => map.Generator(Generators.Identity));
Property(x => x.LocationName);
ManyToOne(x => x.Client, map => { map.Column("CLIENTID"); map.NotNullable(true); map.Cascade(Cascade.All); });
}
}
answered Nov 29 '18 at 10:26
RajRaj
3917
3917
add a comment |
add a comment |
If the children belong to the aggregate root (i.e. composition instead of association), the removal or addition of the child entity must happen through the AggregateRoot and not independently. Moreover, children should be Value Objects and not aggregates in their own right.
Therefore, you are right - the Repository
would only fetch the parent. You would then have RemoveChild
command that would act on that instance and post a ChildRemoved
event which would take the child away from the list.
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
1
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
If the children belong to the aggregate root (i.e. composition instead of association), the removal or addition of the child entity must happen through the AggregateRoot and not independently. Moreover, children should be Value Objects and not aggregates in their own right.
Therefore, you are right - the Repository
would only fetch the parent. You would then have RemoveChild
command that would act on that instance and post a ChildRemoved
event which would take the child away from the list.
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
1
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
If the children belong to the aggregate root (i.e. composition instead of association), the removal or addition of the child entity must happen through the AggregateRoot and not independently. Moreover, children should be Value Objects and not aggregates in their own right.
Therefore, you are right - the Repository
would only fetch the parent. You would then have RemoveChild
command that would act on that instance and post a ChildRemoved
event which would take the child away from the list.
If the children belong to the aggregate root (i.e. composition instead of association), the removal or addition of the child entity must happen through the AggregateRoot and not independently. Moreover, children should be Value Objects and not aggregates in their own right.
Therefore, you are right - the Repository
would only fetch the parent. You would then have RemoveChild
command that would act on that instance and post a ChildRemoved
event which would take the child away from the list.
edited Nov 22 '18 at 22:08
answered Nov 22 '18 at 21:50
Alessandro SantiniAlessandro Santini
1,734913
1,734913
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
1
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
1
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
Yes, but how do you persist changes made upon the aggregate to a data store ? Can you maybe write a piece of code that does so, i'm interested only in how the piece of code that persists changes look like ? Let's say you want to delete, how would you do it ?
– MCR
Nov 23 '18 at 10:15
1
1
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
@AlessandroSantini Internal aggregate objects can be entities, they don't have to be value objects. Also, the original question doesn't mention the use of commands or events. I think an answer shouldn't imply these.
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433657%2fddd-how-to-persist-deletes-on-child-entities-with-nhibernate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Possible duplicate of How to delete child object in NHibernate?
– guillaume31
Nov 23 '18 at 14:12