An example of a sequence which does not have any subsequence with a finite limit.
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.
I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?
calculus limits examples-counterexamples
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.
I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?
calculus limits examples-counterexamples
8
Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago
3
Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago
Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.
I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?
calculus limits examples-counterexamples
Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.
I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?
calculus limits examples-counterexamples
calculus limits examples-counterexamples
asked 5 hours ago
roman
1,23711017
1,23711017
8
Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago
3
Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago
Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
8
Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago
3
Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago
Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
8
8
Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago
3
3
Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago
Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.
By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.
Now if we consider:
$$
x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.
By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.
By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.
By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).
Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.
By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).
edited 49 mins ago
answered 5 hours ago
ploosu2
4,5001023
4,5001023
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.
Now if we consider:
$$
x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.
Now if we consider:
$$
x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.
Now if we consider:
$$
x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.
The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.
Now if we consider:
$$
x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
$$
its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
roman
1,23711017
1,23711017
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
Upvoted. Good job.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034077%2fan-example-of-a-sequence-which-does-not-have-any-subsequence-with-a-finite-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
8
Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago
3
Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago
@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago
Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago