An example of a sequence which does not have any subsequence with a finite limit.











up vote
2
down vote

favorite













Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.




I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$



But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 8




    Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago












  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
    – roman
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago










  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
    – roman
    5 hours ago










  • Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite













Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.




I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$



But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 8




    Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago












  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
    – roman
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago










  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
    – roman
    5 hours ago










  • Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago















up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.




I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$



But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?










share|cite|improve this question














Find and example of a sequence ${x_n}$ which does not contain any subsequences having a finite limit.




I've been thinking of the following seqeunce:
$$
x_n = sin(n)cdotsin(sqrt{3}n)
$$



But is that true? Also what are other examples of such sequences?







calculus limits examples-counterexamples






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









roman

1,23711017




1,23711017








  • 8




    Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago












  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
    – roman
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago










  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
    – roman
    5 hours ago










  • Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago
















  • 8




    Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago












  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
    – roman
    5 hours ago






  • 3




    Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago










  • @астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
    – roman
    5 hours ago










  • Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    5 hours ago










8




8




Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago






Natural numbers $1,2,3,...$? No subsequence is Cauchy, hence convergent?
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago














@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago




@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг oh my, shame on me
– roman
5 hours ago




3




3




Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago




Remember, every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. Therefore, your sequence being bounded does not have a convergent subsequence. The best bet is to take an unbounded sequence where the distance between any two terms is greater than some fixed number.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago












@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago




@астонвіллаолофмэллбэрг thank you! it's crystal clear now
– roman
5 hours ago












Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago






Great. You can now answer this question yourself and close it.
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
5 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.



By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    6
    down vote













    The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.



    Now if we consider:
    $$
    x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
    $$

    its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Upvoted. Good job.
      – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
      5 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034077%2fan-example-of-a-sequence-which-does-not-have-any-subsequence-with-a-finite-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.



    By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.



      By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted






        Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.



        By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Any sequence ${x_n}$ with $|x_n| to infty$ will do.



        By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem others wont: if $|x_n| not to infty$, there is $M$, such that you can find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ that is bounded by $M$. Then you can find a converging subsequence of that subsequence (and hence of the original sequence).







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 49 mins ago

























        answered 5 hours ago









        ploosu2

        4,5001023




        4,5001023






















            up vote
            6
            down vote













            The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.



            Now if we consider:
            $$
            x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
            $$

            its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Upvoted. Good job.
              – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
              5 hours ago















            up vote
            6
            down vote













            The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.



            Now if we consider:
            $$
            x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
            $$

            its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Upvoted. Good job.
              – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
              5 hours ago













            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.



            Now if we consider:
            $$
            x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
            $$

            its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            The example in the OP is wrong. This can be shown by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem which states that every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.



            Now if we consider:
            $$
            x_n = sin(n)sin(sqrt{3}n)
            $$

            its clear that the sequence is bounded by $[-1, 1]$. Hence it contains a convergent subsequence.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            roman

            1,23711017




            1,23711017












            • Upvoted. Good job.
              – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
              5 hours ago


















            • Upvoted. Good job.
              – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
              5 hours ago
















            Upvoted. Good job.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            5 hours ago




            Upvoted. Good job.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            5 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034077%2fan-example-of-a-sequence-which-does-not-have-any-subsequence-with-a-finite-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Feedback on college project

            Futebolista

            Albești (Vaslui)