Is there a term for “the user can't use anything wrong” design?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












I'm of the opinion that the user is always using software or hardware correctly and to imply otherwise is rude, condescending, and philosophically wrong. For example, I and everyone I know pulls USB drives out of a computer without bothering to click eject. OS developers should see this and build their software to accommodate this instead of bothering users with "you did that wrong" messages.



Is this a widely-held view among UX designers/developers? Is there an official term for this philosophy?










share|improve this question







New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    What you write about USB drives is, unfortunately, impossible physically. The OS needs to clean stuff up in the filesystem before the drive is disconnected. And the OS can not know your intentions if you don't warn it. So: what do you do if making sure something can't be done wrongly is impossible?
    – Jan Dorniak
    5 hours ago








  • 3




    This isn't true. A file system can pre-emptively do all of this. And almost all modern operating systems, even Android, do exactly this. The warning messages are there out of habit and in the vain hope it will discourage users from pulling out a memory stick whilst files are being transferred.
    – Confused
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    term = "the user is always right" ;) a play on "the customer is always right".
    – Confused
    2 hours ago










  • Pretty sure you're using those USBs wrong.
    – Robert Frost
    28 mins ago










  • @JanDorniak then the USB is designed poorly. E.g. it should be locked in until ejected, or have a catch, the release of which triggers the ejection routine.
    – Robert Frost
    26 mins ago

















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












I'm of the opinion that the user is always using software or hardware correctly and to imply otherwise is rude, condescending, and philosophically wrong. For example, I and everyone I know pulls USB drives out of a computer without bothering to click eject. OS developers should see this and build their software to accommodate this instead of bothering users with "you did that wrong" messages.



Is this a widely-held view among UX designers/developers? Is there an official term for this philosophy?










share|improve this question







New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    What you write about USB drives is, unfortunately, impossible physically. The OS needs to clean stuff up in the filesystem before the drive is disconnected. And the OS can not know your intentions if you don't warn it. So: what do you do if making sure something can't be done wrongly is impossible?
    – Jan Dorniak
    5 hours ago








  • 3




    This isn't true. A file system can pre-emptively do all of this. And almost all modern operating systems, even Android, do exactly this. The warning messages are there out of habit and in the vain hope it will discourage users from pulling out a memory stick whilst files are being transferred.
    – Confused
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    term = "the user is always right" ;) a play on "the customer is always right".
    – Confused
    2 hours ago










  • Pretty sure you're using those USBs wrong.
    – Robert Frost
    28 mins ago










  • @JanDorniak then the USB is designed poorly. E.g. it should be locked in until ejected, or have a catch, the release of which triggers the ejection routine.
    – Robert Frost
    26 mins ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2






2





I'm of the opinion that the user is always using software or hardware correctly and to imply otherwise is rude, condescending, and philosophically wrong. For example, I and everyone I know pulls USB drives out of a computer without bothering to click eject. OS developers should see this and build their software to accommodate this instead of bothering users with "you did that wrong" messages.



Is this a widely-held view among UX designers/developers? Is there an official term for this philosophy?










share|improve this question







New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm of the opinion that the user is always using software or hardware correctly and to imply otherwise is rude, condescending, and philosophically wrong. For example, I and everyone I know pulls USB drives out of a computer without bothering to click eject. OS developers should see this and build their software to accommodate this instead of bothering users with "you did that wrong" messages.



Is this a widely-held view among UX designers/developers? Is there an official term for this philosophy?







user-behavior user-centered-design






share|improve this question







New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









PascLeRasc

1212




1212




New contributor




PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






PascLeRasc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    What you write about USB drives is, unfortunately, impossible physically. The OS needs to clean stuff up in the filesystem before the drive is disconnected. And the OS can not know your intentions if you don't warn it. So: what do you do if making sure something can't be done wrongly is impossible?
    – Jan Dorniak
    5 hours ago








  • 3




    This isn't true. A file system can pre-emptively do all of this. And almost all modern operating systems, even Android, do exactly this. The warning messages are there out of habit and in the vain hope it will discourage users from pulling out a memory stick whilst files are being transferred.
    – Confused
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    term = "the user is always right" ;) a play on "the customer is always right".
    – Confused
    2 hours ago










  • Pretty sure you're using those USBs wrong.
    – Robert Frost
    28 mins ago










  • @JanDorniak then the USB is designed poorly. E.g. it should be locked in until ejected, or have a catch, the release of which triggers the ejection routine.
    – Robert Frost
    26 mins ago














  • 1




    What you write about USB drives is, unfortunately, impossible physically. The OS needs to clean stuff up in the filesystem before the drive is disconnected. And the OS can not know your intentions if you don't warn it. So: what do you do if making sure something can't be done wrongly is impossible?
    – Jan Dorniak
    5 hours ago








  • 3




    This isn't true. A file system can pre-emptively do all of this. And almost all modern operating systems, even Android, do exactly this. The warning messages are there out of habit and in the vain hope it will discourage users from pulling out a memory stick whilst files are being transferred.
    – Confused
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    term = "the user is always right" ;) a play on "the customer is always right".
    – Confused
    2 hours ago










  • Pretty sure you're using those USBs wrong.
    – Robert Frost
    28 mins ago










  • @JanDorniak then the USB is designed poorly. E.g. it should be locked in until ejected, or have a catch, the release of which triggers the ejection routine.
    – Robert Frost
    26 mins ago








1




1




What you write about USB drives is, unfortunately, impossible physically. The OS needs to clean stuff up in the filesystem before the drive is disconnected. And the OS can not know your intentions if you don't warn it. So: what do you do if making sure something can't be done wrongly is impossible?
– Jan Dorniak
5 hours ago






What you write about USB drives is, unfortunately, impossible physically. The OS needs to clean stuff up in the filesystem before the drive is disconnected. And the OS can not know your intentions if you don't warn it. So: what do you do if making sure something can't be done wrongly is impossible?
– Jan Dorniak
5 hours ago






3




3




This isn't true. A file system can pre-emptively do all of this. And almost all modern operating systems, even Android, do exactly this. The warning messages are there out of habit and in the vain hope it will discourage users from pulling out a memory stick whilst files are being transferred.
– Confused
2 hours ago




This isn't true. A file system can pre-emptively do all of this. And almost all modern operating systems, even Android, do exactly this. The warning messages are there out of habit and in the vain hope it will discourage users from pulling out a memory stick whilst files are being transferred.
– Confused
2 hours ago




2




2




term = "the user is always right" ;) a play on "the customer is always right".
– Confused
2 hours ago




term = "the user is always right" ;) a play on "the customer is always right".
– Confused
2 hours ago












Pretty sure you're using those USBs wrong.
– Robert Frost
28 mins ago




Pretty sure you're using those USBs wrong.
– Robert Frost
28 mins ago












@JanDorniak then the USB is designed poorly. E.g. it should be locked in until ejected, or have a catch, the release of which triggers the ejection routine.
– Robert Frost
26 mins ago




@JanDorniak then the USB is designed poorly. E.g. it should be locked in until ejected, or have a catch, the release of which triggers the ejection routine.
– Robert Frost
26 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













No. It is not a widely held view among UX designers. Unfortunately.



Even less so amongst those using SO and considering themselves to be UX Designers.



I suspect this is mainly because UX design is not a rigorous field, nor do its proponents practice patience and understanding of their potential users. Perhaps even worse, they're seemingly of the belief ideal UX 'design' exists and can be discerned from data, without realising this is done through the subjectivity of themselves and their peers. This compounds because they're often the least qualified to set criteria for analysis, lacking both insight and intuition. Often not valuing these things, at all.



UX Design is one of the few fields suffering from more issues pertaining to self-selection bias than programming. Quite an achievement.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "102"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    PascLeRasc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122360%2fis-there-a-term-for-the-user-cant-use-anything-wrong-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    No. It is not a widely held view among UX designers. Unfortunately.



    Even less so amongst those using SO and considering themselves to be UX Designers.



    I suspect this is mainly because UX design is not a rigorous field, nor do its proponents practice patience and understanding of their potential users. Perhaps even worse, they're seemingly of the belief ideal UX 'design' exists and can be discerned from data, without realising this is done through the subjectivity of themselves and their peers. This compounds because they're often the least qualified to set criteria for analysis, lacking both insight and intuition. Often not valuing these things, at all.



    UX Design is one of the few fields suffering from more issues pertaining to self-selection bias than programming. Quite an achievement.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      No. It is not a widely held view among UX designers. Unfortunately.



      Even less so amongst those using SO and considering themselves to be UX Designers.



      I suspect this is mainly because UX design is not a rigorous field, nor do its proponents practice patience and understanding of their potential users. Perhaps even worse, they're seemingly of the belief ideal UX 'design' exists and can be discerned from data, without realising this is done through the subjectivity of themselves and their peers. This compounds because they're often the least qualified to set criteria for analysis, lacking both insight and intuition. Often not valuing these things, at all.



      UX Design is one of the few fields suffering from more issues pertaining to self-selection bias than programming. Quite an achievement.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        No. It is not a widely held view among UX designers. Unfortunately.



        Even less so amongst those using SO and considering themselves to be UX Designers.



        I suspect this is mainly because UX design is not a rigorous field, nor do its proponents practice patience and understanding of their potential users. Perhaps even worse, they're seemingly of the belief ideal UX 'design' exists and can be discerned from data, without realising this is done through the subjectivity of themselves and their peers. This compounds because they're often the least qualified to set criteria for analysis, lacking both insight and intuition. Often not valuing these things, at all.



        UX Design is one of the few fields suffering from more issues pertaining to self-selection bias than programming. Quite an achievement.






        share|improve this answer












        No. It is not a widely held view among UX designers. Unfortunately.



        Even less so amongst those using SO and considering themselves to be UX Designers.



        I suspect this is mainly because UX design is not a rigorous field, nor do its proponents practice patience and understanding of their potential users. Perhaps even worse, they're seemingly of the belief ideal UX 'design' exists and can be discerned from data, without realising this is done through the subjectivity of themselves and their peers. This compounds because they're often the least qualified to set criteria for analysis, lacking both insight and intuition. Often not valuing these things, at all.



        UX Design is one of the few fields suffering from more issues pertaining to self-selection bias than programming. Quite an achievement.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Confused

        1,765516




        1,765516






















            PascLeRasc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            PascLeRasc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            PascLeRasc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            PascLeRasc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122360%2fis-there-a-term-for-the-user-cant-use-anything-wrong-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

            How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

            TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'