Aggregation by substring in Mongo











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a set of objects like:



{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php",
"clicks" : 15
},
},
{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php/",
"clicks" : 10
}
}


Is it possible to make aggregation by field requests.uri ("test.php" and "test.php/" must be understood by Mongo as the same) to get clicks in sum 25? Mongo version is 3.2.
I watch here, but the main difference is that uri can have various length.
Thanks to everybody for help.










share|improve this question






















  • It's not really clear what you mean here and the complexity would vary by string. The "aggregation framework" allows some types of string manipulation and could theoretically "split" a string on characters like / and just use the "first" part of that split to be the grouping key. For more complex manipulation you might need to employ mapReduce at this time. Anything that relies on "regular expressions" for pattern matching how to determine the part of the string for grouping is currently outside of the aggregation framework operator capabilities. But is actually due for future release.
    – Neil Lunn
    Nov 19 at 13:08










  • I'd suggest that the client that inserts the data will trim redundant /. It will be much easier to run the aggregation this way
    – Hagai
    Nov 19 at 13:34










  • @Neil Lunn. The string can be any valid uri with or without trailing slash. Thank you for the pointing direction. I will check docs about mapReduce and split functions
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:47










  • @Hagai I fully agree with you. If I cannot do this, I will have to delete the last slash. But theoretically, there may be different pages. But that will be other "story".
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:48















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a set of objects like:



{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php",
"clicks" : 15
},
},
{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php/",
"clicks" : 10
}
}


Is it possible to make aggregation by field requests.uri ("test.php" and "test.php/" must be understood by Mongo as the same) to get clicks in sum 25? Mongo version is 3.2.
I watch here, but the main difference is that uri can have various length.
Thanks to everybody for help.










share|improve this question






















  • It's not really clear what you mean here and the complexity would vary by string. The "aggregation framework" allows some types of string manipulation and could theoretically "split" a string on characters like / and just use the "first" part of that split to be the grouping key. For more complex manipulation you might need to employ mapReduce at this time. Anything that relies on "regular expressions" for pattern matching how to determine the part of the string for grouping is currently outside of the aggregation framework operator capabilities. But is actually due for future release.
    – Neil Lunn
    Nov 19 at 13:08










  • I'd suggest that the client that inserts the data will trim redundant /. It will be much easier to run the aggregation this way
    – Hagai
    Nov 19 at 13:34










  • @Neil Lunn. The string can be any valid uri with or without trailing slash. Thank you for the pointing direction. I will check docs about mapReduce and split functions
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:47










  • @Hagai I fully agree with you. If I cannot do this, I will have to delete the last slash. But theoretically, there may be different pages. But that will be other "story".
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:48













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a set of objects like:



{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php",
"clicks" : 15
},
},
{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php/",
"clicks" : 10
}
}


Is it possible to make aggregation by field requests.uri ("test.php" and "test.php/" must be understood by Mongo as the same) to get clicks in sum 25? Mongo version is 3.2.
I watch here, but the main difference is that uri can have various length.
Thanks to everybody for help.










share|improve this question













I have a set of objects like:



{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php",
"clicks" : 15
},
},
{
"_id":"mongoid",
"requests": {
"uri": "test.php/",
"clicks" : 10
}
}


Is it possible to make aggregation by field requests.uri ("test.php" and "test.php/" must be understood by Mongo as the same) to get clicks in sum 25? Mongo version is 3.2.
I watch here, but the main difference is that uri can have various length.
Thanks to everybody for help.







mongodb aggregation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 12:49









sawfly

84




84












  • It's not really clear what you mean here and the complexity would vary by string. The "aggregation framework" allows some types of string manipulation and could theoretically "split" a string on characters like / and just use the "first" part of that split to be the grouping key. For more complex manipulation you might need to employ mapReduce at this time. Anything that relies on "regular expressions" for pattern matching how to determine the part of the string for grouping is currently outside of the aggregation framework operator capabilities. But is actually due for future release.
    – Neil Lunn
    Nov 19 at 13:08










  • I'd suggest that the client that inserts the data will trim redundant /. It will be much easier to run the aggregation this way
    – Hagai
    Nov 19 at 13:34










  • @Neil Lunn. The string can be any valid uri with or without trailing slash. Thank you for the pointing direction. I will check docs about mapReduce and split functions
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:47










  • @Hagai I fully agree with you. If I cannot do this, I will have to delete the last slash. But theoretically, there may be different pages. But that will be other "story".
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:48


















  • It's not really clear what you mean here and the complexity would vary by string. The "aggregation framework" allows some types of string manipulation and could theoretically "split" a string on characters like / and just use the "first" part of that split to be the grouping key. For more complex manipulation you might need to employ mapReduce at this time. Anything that relies on "regular expressions" for pattern matching how to determine the part of the string for grouping is currently outside of the aggregation framework operator capabilities. But is actually due for future release.
    – Neil Lunn
    Nov 19 at 13:08










  • I'd suggest that the client that inserts the data will trim redundant /. It will be much easier to run the aggregation this way
    – Hagai
    Nov 19 at 13:34










  • @Neil Lunn. The string can be any valid uri with or without trailing slash. Thank you for the pointing direction. I will check docs about mapReduce and split functions
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:47










  • @Hagai I fully agree with you. If I cannot do this, I will have to delete the last slash. But theoretically, there may be different pages. But that will be other "story".
    – sawfly
    Nov 19 at 13:48
















It's not really clear what you mean here and the complexity would vary by string. The "aggregation framework" allows some types of string manipulation and could theoretically "split" a string on characters like / and just use the "first" part of that split to be the grouping key. For more complex manipulation you might need to employ mapReduce at this time. Anything that relies on "regular expressions" for pattern matching how to determine the part of the string for grouping is currently outside of the aggregation framework operator capabilities. But is actually due for future release.
– Neil Lunn
Nov 19 at 13:08




It's not really clear what you mean here and the complexity would vary by string. The "aggregation framework" allows some types of string manipulation and could theoretically "split" a string on characters like / and just use the "first" part of that split to be the grouping key. For more complex manipulation you might need to employ mapReduce at this time. Anything that relies on "regular expressions" for pattern matching how to determine the part of the string for grouping is currently outside of the aggregation framework operator capabilities. But is actually due for future release.
– Neil Lunn
Nov 19 at 13:08












I'd suggest that the client that inserts the data will trim redundant /. It will be much easier to run the aggregation this way
– Hagai
Nov 19 at 13:34




I'd suggest that the client that inserts the data will trim redundant /. It will be much easier to run the aggregation this way
– Hagai
Nov 19 at 13:34












@Neil Lunn. The string can be any valid uri with or without trailing slash. Thank you for the pointing direction. I will check docs about mapReduce and split functions
– sawfly
Nov 19 at 13:47




@Neil Lunn. The string can be any valid uri with or without trailing slash. Thank you for the pointing direction. I will check docs about mapReduce and split functions
– sawfly
Nov 19 at 13:47












@Hagai I fully agree with you. If I cannot do this, I will have to delete the last slash. But theoretically, there may be different pages. But that will be other "story".
– sawfly
Nov 19 at 13:48




@Hagai I fully agree with you. If I cannot do this, I will have to delete the last slash. But theoretically, there may be different pages. But that will be other "story".
– sawfly
Nov 19 at 13:48

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53375011%2faggregation-by-substring-in-mongo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53375011%2faggregation-by-substring-in-mongo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

Refactoring coordinates for Minecraft Pi buildings written in Python