Print out all possible letter combinations a given phone number can represent












2














I am working on a problem in which given a 7 digit telephone number, we need to print out all possible combinations of letters that each number could represent.



I came up with below code and I was wondering if there is any way to optimize it or if there is any better way? As of now complexity is O(n3).



public class LetterCombinationsOfPhoneNumber {
private static final HashMap<Character, String> map = new HashMap<>(8);
static {
map.put('2', "abc");
map.put('3', "def");
map.put('4', "ghi");
map.put('5', "jkl");
map.put('6', "mno");
map.put('7', "pqrs");
map.put('8', "tuv");
map.put('9', "wxyz");
};

public static List<String> letterCombinations(String digits) {
LinkedList<String> results = new LinkedList<>();
results.add("");

for (int i = 0; i < digits.length(); i++) {
String letters = map.get(digits.charAt(i));
for (int j = results.size(); j > 0; j--) {
String intermediateResult = results.poll();
for (int k = 0; k < letters.length(); k++) {
results.add(intermediateResult + letters.charAt(k));
}
}
}
return results;
}

public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(letterCombinations("23"));
}
}









share|improve this question
























  • The number of outputs will be 3^n or more (not n^3), so that's obviously a lower bound on the complexity. You won't be able to get lower than that without omitting some of the results.
    – Toby Speight
    Oct 4 '18 at 7:43










  • One small hint regarding the new HashMap<>(8): in your case, it's not worth deciding on an initial capacity. And if you really care, you should start with a bigger capacity, as a new HashMap<>(8) will not accept 8 entries without growth, but only 6. The default load factor is 75%, meaning that the HashMap will grow as soon as it's 75% filled.
    – Ralf Kleberhoff
    Oct 4 '18 at 20:56
















2














I am working on a problem in which given a 7 digit telephone number, we need to print out all possible combinations of letters that each number could represent.



I came up with below code and I was wondering if there is any way to optimize it or if there is any better way? As of now complexity is O(n3).



public class LetterCombinationsOfPhoneNumber {
private static final HashMap<Character, String> map = new HashMap<>(8);
static {
map.put('2', "abc");
map.put('3', "def");
map.put('4', "ghi");
map.put('5', "jkl");
map.put('6', "mno");
map.put('7', "pqrs");
map.put('8', "tuv");
map.put('9', "wxyz");
};

public static List<String> letterCombinations(String digits) {
LinkedList<String> results = new LinkedList<>();
results.add("");

for (int i = 0; i < digits.length(); i++) {
String letters = map.get(digits.charAt(i));
for (int j = results.size(); j > 0; j--) {
String intermediateResult = results.poll();
for (int k = 0; k < letters.length(); k++) {
results.add(intermediateResult + letters.charAt(k));
}
}
}
return results;
}

public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(letterCombinations("23"));
}
}









share|improve this question
























  • The number of outputs will be 3^n or more (not n^3), so that's obviously a lower bound on the complexity. You won't be able to get lower than that without omitting some of the results.
    – Toby Speight
    Oct 4 '18 at 7:43










  • One small hint regarding the new HashMap<>(8): in your case, it's not worth deciding on an initial capacity. And if you really care, you should start with a bigger capacity, as a new HashMap<>(8) will not accept 8 entries without growth, but only 6. The default load factor is 75%, meaning that the HashMap will grow as soon as it's 75% filled.
    – Ralf Kleberhoff
    Oct 4 '18 at 20:56














2












2








2







I am working on a problem in which given a 7 digit telephone number, we need to print out all possible combinations of letters that each number could represent.



I came up with below code and I was wondering if there is any way to optimize it or if there is any better way? As of now complexity is O(n3).



public class LetterCombinationsOfPhoneNumber {
private static final HashMap<Character, String> map = new HashMap<>(8);
static {
map.put('2', "abc");
map.put('3', "def");
map.put('4', "ghi");
map.put('5', "jkl");
map.put('6', "mno");
map.put('7', "pqrs");
map.put('8', "tuv");
map.put('9', "wxyz");
};

public static List<String> letterCombinations(String digits) {
LinkedList<String> results = new LinkedList<>();
results.add("");

for (int i = 0; i < digits.length(); i++) {
String letters = map.get(digits.charAt(i));
for (int j = results.size(); j > 0; j--) {
String intermediateResult = results.poll();
for (int k = 0; k < letters.length(); k++) {
results.add(intermediateResult + letters.charAt(k));
}
}
}
return results;
}

public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(letterCombinations("23"));
}
}









share|improve this question















I am working on a problem in which given a 7 digit telephone number, we need to print out all possible combinations of letters that each number could represent.



I came up with below code and I was wondering if there is any way to optimize it or if there is any better way? As of now complexity is O(n3).



public class LetterCombinationsOfPhoneNumber {
private static final HashMap<Character, String> map = new HashMap<>(8);
static {
map.put('2', "abc");
map.put('3', "def");
map.put('4', "ghi");
map.put('5', "jkl");
map.put('6', "mno");
map.put('7', "pqrs");
map.put('8', "tuv");
map.put('9', "wxyz");
};

public static List<String> letterCombinations(String digits) {
LinkedList<String> results = new LinkedList<>();
results.add("");

for (int i = 0; i < digits.length(); i++) {
String letters = map.get(digits.charAt(i));
for (int j = results.size(); j > 0; j--) {
String intermediateResult = results.poll();
for (int k = 0; k < letters.length(); k++) {
results.add(intermediateResult + letters.charAt(k));
}
}
}
return results;
}

public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(letterCombinations("23"));
}
}






java algorithm combinatorics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 4 '18 at 6:30









200_success

129k15152414




129k15152414










asked Oct 4 '18 at 4:38









dragonsdragons

111




111












  • The number of outputs will be 3^n or more (not n^3), so that's obviously a lower bound on the complexity. You won't be able to get lower than that without omitting some of the results.
    – Toby Speight
    Oct 4 '18 at 7:43










  • One small hint regarding the new HashMap<>(8): in your case, it's not worth deciding on an initial capacity. And if you really care, you should start with a bigger capacity, as a new HashMap<>(8) will not accept 8 entries without growth, but only 6. The default load factor is 75%, meaning that the HashMap will grow as soon as it's 75% filled.
    – Ralf Kleberhoff
    Oct 4 '18 at 20:56


















  • The number of outputs will be 3^n or more (not n^3), so that's obviously a lower bound on the complexity. You won't be able to get lower than that without omitting some of the results.
    – Toby Speight
    Oct 4 '18 at 7:43










  • One small hint regarding the new HashMap<>(8): in your case, it's not worth deciding on an initial capacity. And if you really care, you should start with a bigger capacity, as a new HashMap<>(8) will not accept 8 entries without growth, but only 6. The default load factor is 75%, meaning that the HashMap will grow as soon as it's 75% filled.
    – Ralf Kleberhoff
    Oct 4 '18 at 20:56
















The number of outputs will be 3^n or more (not n^3), so that's obviously a lower bound on the complexity. You won't be able to get lower than that without omitting some of the results.
– Toby Speight
Oct 4 '18 at 7:43




The number of outputs will be 3^n or more (not n^3), so that's obviously a lower bound on the complexity. You won't be able to get lower than that without omitting some of the results.
– Toby Speight
Oct 4 '18 at 7:43












One small hint regarding the new HashMap<>(8): in your case, it's not worth deciding on an initial capacity. And if you really care, you should start with a bigger capacity, as a new HashMap<>(8) will not accept 8 entries without growth, but only 6. The default load factor is 75%, meaning that the HashMap will grow as soon as it's 75% filled.
– Ralf Kleberhoff
Oct 4 '18 at 20:56




One small hint regarding the new HashMap<>(8): in your case, it's not worth deciding on an initial capacity. And if you really care, you should start with a bigger capacity, as a new HashMap<>(8) will not accept 8 entries without growth, but only 6. The default load factor is 75%, meaning that the HashMap will grow as soon as it's 75% filled.
– Ralf Kleberhoff
Oct 4 '18 at 20:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














This can certainly be optimized.
Your algorithm works in loops that iterate over all permutations, placing one letter each time.
Let us take a different approach:



The number of output combinations can be calculated in advanced: multiply the number of letters for all input numbers. in yout example ("23") the calculation is

number 2 has 3 letters

number 3 has 3 letters

output combinations will be 3*3=9



Furthermore, we can calculate which letter will be placed in each combination based on the combination index. if we assume combination index goes from 0 to 8:

for number 2 (first number in input)

- combinations 0-2 will contain 1st letter

- combinations 3-5 will contain 2nd letter

- combinations 6-8 will contain 3rd letter

for number 3 (2nd number in input)

- combinations 0,3,6 will contain 1st letter

- combinations 1,4,7 will contain 2nd letter

- combinations 2,5,8 will contain 3rd letter



so the formula for letter placement is based on the combination index, the position of the number in the input and the position of the letter in the letters-of-number String.



the complexity of this algorithm is o(n*m) where n is number of input letters and m number of output combinations.



one comment regarding the code: You use the results as a Queue. the LinkedList is an implementation of this interface. For clarity sake, the variable should be defined with the type that states its usage. This is also true for the map variable (should be defined as Map)






share|improve this answer





















  • good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
    – dragons
    Oct 4 '18 at 15:18



















0














IMO there is a better way.



Firstly you store every combination in a List. You are doing more than what is asked by giving the possibility to use an arbitrary phone numbers length but you will eventually run out of memory past a certain length.



Secondly you are able to know beforehand the numbers of possibilities you will have so you do not need to go for a double or triple for loop.



So how to do it in one loop in java :



public class LetterCombination {
// Mappings from 0 to 9.
// With 0 and 1 with no mappings because none is given in our instructions
public static String mappings = {
{""}, {""}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {"D", "E", "F"}, {"G", "H", "I"},
{"J", "K", "L"}, {"M", "N", "O"}, {"P", "Q", "R", "S"},
{"T", "U", "V"}, {"W", "X", "Y", "Z"}
};

public static void letterCombinations(String digits) {
// The exercise specify that we will receive a phone number of 7 digits.
// We suppose that the validation of the String received is done before.
// All our digits are converted to int.
int firstDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(0,1));
int secondDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(1,2));
int thirdDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(2,3));
int fourthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(3,4));
int fifthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(4,5));
int sixthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(5,6));
int seventhDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(6,7));

// To each digits is associated its number of possibilities
// (From 3 to 4 in our exercise)
int firstDigitPossibilities = mappings[firstDigit].length;
int secondDigitPossibilities = mappings[secondDigit].length;
int thirdDigitPossibilities = mappings[thirdDigit].length;
int fourthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fourthDigit].length;
int fifthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fifthDigit].length;
int sixthDigitPossibilities = mappings[sixthDigit].length;
int seventhDigitPossibilities = mappings[seventhDigit].length;

// We will have between 3^7 and 4^7 iterations
// We can have our number of iterations by multiplying each possibilities
for(int i = 0; i < firstDigitPossibilities * secondDigitPossibilities * thirdDigitPossibilities * fourthDigitPossibilities * fifthDigitPossibilities * sixthDigitPossibilities * seventhDigitPossibilities ; i++) {

// What is left is to print everything.
// Last number is printed like this :
// * mappings[last Digit][i modulo last Digit possibilities]
// Next Number is printed like this :
// * mapping [next Digit][( i / last Digit possibilities) modulo next Digit possibilities]
// And so on...
System.out.println(
mappings[firstDigit][(i/(secondDigitPossibilities*thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%firstDigitPossibilities]
+ mappings[secondDigit][(i/thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities)%secondDigitPossibilities]
+ mappings[thirdDigit][(i/(fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%thirdDigitPossibilities]
+ mappings[fourthDigit][(i/(fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fourthDigitPossibilities]
+ mappings[fifthDigit][(i/(sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fifthDigitPossibilities]
+ mappings[sixthDigit][(i/(seventhDigitPossibilities))%sixthDigitPossibilities]
+ mappings[seventhDigit][i%seventhDigitPossibilities]);

}
}

public static void main(String args) {
letterCombinations("23456789");
}
}





share|improve this answer








New contributor




Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204910%2fprint-out-all-possible-letter-combinations-a-given-phone-number-can-represent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    This can certainly be optimized.
    Your algorithm works in loops that iterate over all permutations, placing one letter each time.
    Let us take a different approach:



    The number of output combinations can be calculated in advanced: multiply the number of letters for all input numbers. in yout example ("23") the calculation is

    number 2 has 3 letters

    number 3 has 3 letters

    output combinations will be 3*3=9



    Furthermore, we can calculate which letter will be placed in each combination based on the combination index. if we assume combination index goes from 0 to 8:

    for number 2 (first number in input)

    - combinations 0-2 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 3-5 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 6-8 will contain 3rd letter

    for number 3 (2nd number in input)

    - combinations 0,3,6 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 1,4,7 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 2,5,8 will contain 3rd letter



    so the formula for letter placement is based on the combination index, the position of the number in the input and the position of the letter in the letters-of-number String.



    the complexity of this algorithm is o(n*m) where n is number of input letters and m number of output combinations.



    one comment regarding the code: You use the results as a Queue. the LinkedList is an implementation of this interface. For clarity sake, the variable should be defined with the type that states its usage. This is also true for the map variable (should be defined as Map)






    share|improve this answer





















    • good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
      – dragons
      Oct 4 '18 at 15:18
















    2














    This can certainly be optimized.
    Your algorithm works in loops that iterate over all permutations, placing one letter each time.
    Let us take a different approach:



    The number of output combinations can be calculated in advanced: multiply the number of letters for all input numbers. in yout example ("23") the calculation is

    number 2 has 3 letters

    number 3 has 3 letters

    output combinations will be 3*3=9



    Furthermore, we can calculate which letter will be placed in each combination based on the combination index. if we assume combination index goes from 0 to 8:

    for number 2 (first number in input)

    - combinations 0-2 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 3-5 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 6-8 will contain 3rd letter

    for number 3 (2nd number in input)

    - combinations 0,3,6 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 1,4,7 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 2,5,8 will contain 3rd letter



    so the formula for letter placement is based on the combination index, the position of the number in the input and the position of the letter in the letters-of-number String.



    the complexity of this algorithm is o(n*m) where n is number of input letters and m number of output combinations.



    one comment regarding the code: You use the results as a Queue. the LinkedList is an implementation of this interface. For clarity sake, the variable should be defined with the type that states its usage. This is also true for the map variable (should be defined as Map)






    share|improve this answer





















    • good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
      – dragons
      Oct 4 '18 at 15:18














    2












    2








    2






    This can certainly be optimized.
    Your algorithm works in loops that iterate over all permutations, placing one letter each time.
    Let us take a different approach:



    The number of output combinations can be calculated in advanced: multiply the number of letters for all input numbers. in yout example ("23") the calculation is

    number 2 has 3 letters

    number 3 has 3 letters

    output combinations will be 3*3=9



    Furthermore, we can calculate which letter will be placed in each combination based on the combination index. if we assume combination index goes from 0 to 8:

    for number 2 (first number in input)

    - combinations 0-2 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 3-5 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 6-8 will contain 3rd letter

    for number 3 (2nd number in input)

    - combinations 0,3,6 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 1,4,7 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 2,5,8 will contain 3rd letter



    so the formula for letter placement is based on the combination index, the position of the number in the input and the position of the letter in the letters-of-number String.



    the complexity of this algorithm is o(n*m) where n is number of input letters and m number of output combinations.



    one comment regarding the code: You use the results as a Queue. the LinkedList is an implementation of this interface. For clarity sake, the variable should be defined with the type that states its usage. This is also true for the map variable (should be defined as Map)






    share|improve this answer












    This can certainly be optimized.
    Your algorithm works in loops that iterate over all permutations, placing one letter each time.
    Let us take a different approach:



    The number of output combinations can be calculated in advanced: multiply the number of letters for all input numbers. in yout example ("23") the calculation is

    number 2 has 3 letters

    number 3 has 3 letters

    output combinations will be 3*3=9



    Furthermore, we can calculate which letter will be placed in each combination based on the combination index. if we assume combination index goes from 0 to 8:

    for number 2 (first number in input)

    - combinations 0-2 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 3-5 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 6-8 will contain 3rd letter

    for number 3 (2nd number in input)

    - combinations 0,3,6 will contain 1st letter

    - combinations 1,4,7 will contain 2nd letter

    - combinations 2,5,8 will contain 3rd letter



    so the formula for letter placement is based on the combination index, the position of the number in the input and the position of the letter in the letters-of-number String.



    the complexity of this algorithm is o(n*m) where n is number of input letters and m number of output combinations.



    one comment regarding the code: You use the results as a Queue. the LinkedList is an implementation of this interface. For clarity sake, the variable should be defined with the type that states its usage. This is also true for the map variable (should be defined as Map)







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Oct 4 '18 at 7:26









    Sharon Ben AsherSharon Ben Asher

    2,226512




    2,226512












    • good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
      – dragons
      Oct 4 '18 at 15:18


















    • good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
      – dragons
      Oct 4 '18 at 15:18
















    good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
    – dragons
    Oct 4 '18 at 15:18




    good suggestion. can you provide an example in java so that I can understand better on how would this work? Also complexity will be same as my current solution?
    – dragons
    Oct 4 '18 at 15:18













    0














    IMO there is a better way.



    Firstly you store every combination in a List. You are doing more than what is asked by giving the possibility to use an arbitrary phone numbers length but you will eventually run out of memory past a certain length.



    Secondly you are able to know beforehand the numbers of possibilities you will have so you do not need to go for a double or triple for loop.



    So how to do it in one loop in java :



    public class LetterCombination {
    // Mappings from 0 to 9.
    // With 0 and 1 with no mappings because none is given in our instructions
    public static String mappings = {
    {""}, {""}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {"D", "E", "F"}, {"G", "H", "I"},
    {"J", "K", "L"}, {"M", "N", "O"}, {"P", "Q", "R", "S"},
    {"T", "U", "V"}, {"W", "X", "Y", "Z"}
    };

    public static void letterCombinations(String digits) {
    // The exercise specify that we will receive a phone number of 7 digits.
    // We suppose that the validation of the String received is done before.
    // All our digits are converted to int.
    int firstDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(0,1));
    int secondDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(1,2));
    int thirdDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(2,3));
    int fourthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(3,4));
    int fifthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(4,5));
    int sixthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(5,6));
    int seventhDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(6,7));

    // To each digits is associated its number of possibilities
    // (From 3 to 4 in our exercise)
    int firstDigitPossibilities = mappings[firstDigit].length;
    int secondDigitPossibilities = mappings[secondDigit].length;
    int thirdDigitPossibilities = mappings[thirdDigit].length;
    int fourthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fourthDigit].length;
    int fifthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fifthDigit].length;
    int sixthDigitPossibilities = mappings[sixthDigit].length;
    int seventhDigitPossibilities = mappings[seventhDigit].length;

    // We will have between 3^7 and 4^7 iterations
    // We can have our number of iterations by multiplying each possibilities
    for(int i = 0; i < firstDigitPossibilities * secondDigitPossibilities * thirdDigitPossibilities * fourthDigitPossibilities * fifthDigitPossibilities * sixthDigitPossibilities * seventhDigitPossibilities ; i++) {

    // What is left is to print everything.
    // Last number is printed like this :
    // * mappings[last Digit][i modulo last Digit possibilities]
    // Next Number is printed like this :
    // * mapping [next Digit][( i / last Digit possibilities) modulo next Digit possibilities]
    // And so on...
    System.out.println(
    mappings[firstDigit][(i/(secondDigitPossibilities*thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%firstDigitPossibilities]
    + mappings[secondDigit][(i/thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities)%secondDigitPossibilities]
    + mappings[thirdDigit][(i/(fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%thirdDigitPossibilities]
    + mappings[fourthDigit][(i/(fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fourthDigitPossibilities]
    + mappings[fifthDigit][(i/(sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fifthDigitPossibilities]
    + mappings[sixthDigit][(i/(seventhDigitPossibilities))%sixthDigitPossibilities]
    + mappings[seventhDigit][i%seventhDigitPossibilities]);

    }
    }

    public static void main(String args) {
    letterCombinations("23456789");
    }
    }





    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0














      IMO there is a better way.



      Firstly you store every combination in a List. You are doing more than what is asked by giving the possibility to use an arbitrary phone numbers length but you will eventually run out of memory past a certain length.



      Secondly you are able to know beforehand the numbers of possibilities you will have so you do not need to go for a double or triple for loop.



      So how to do it in one loop in java :



      public class LetterCombination {
      // Mappings from 0 to 9.
      // With 0 and 1 with no mappings because none is given in our instructions
      public static String mappings = {
      {""}, {""}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {"D", "E", "F"}, {"G", "H", "I"},
      {"J", "K", "L"}, {"M", "N", "O"}, {"P", "Q", "R", "S"},
      {"T", "U", "V"}, {"W", "X", "Y", "Z"}
      };

      public static void letterCombinations(String digits) {
      // The exercise specify that we will receive a phone number of 7 digits.
      // We suppose that the validation of the String received is done before.
      // All our digits are converted to int.
      int firstDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(0,1));
      int secondDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(1,2));
      int thirdDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(2,3));
      int fourthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(3,4));
      int fifthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(4,5));
      int sixthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(5,6));
      int seventhDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(6,7));

      // To each digits is associated its number of possibilities
      // (From 3 to 4 in our exercise)
      int firstDigitPossibilities = mappings[firstDigit].length;
      int secondDigitPossibilities = mappings[secondDigit].length;
      int thirdDigitPossibilities = mappings[thirdDigit].length;
      int fourthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fourthDigit].length;
      int fifthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fifthDigit].length;
      int sixthDigitPossibilities = mappings[sixthDigit].length;
      int seventhDigitPossibilities = mappings[seventhDigit].length;

      // We will have between 3^7 and 4^7 iterations
      // We can have our number of iterations by multiplying each possibilities
      for(int i = 0; i < firstDigitPossibilities * secondDigitPossibilities * thirdDigitPossibilities * fourthDigitPossibilities * fifthDigitPossibilities * sixthDigitPossibilities * seventhDigitPossibilities ; i++) {

      // What is left is to print everything.
      // Last number is printed like this :
      // * mappings[last Digit][i modulo last Digit possibilities]
      // Next Number is printed like this :
      // * mapping [next Digit][( i / last Digit possibilities) modulo next Digit possibilities]
      // And so on...
      System.out.println(
      mappings[firstDigit][(i/(secondDigitPossibilities*thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%firstDigitPossibilities]
      + mappings[secondDigit][(i/thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities)%secondDigitPossibilities]
      + mappings[thirdDigit][(i/(fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%thirdDigitPossibilities]
      + mappings[fourthDigit][(i/(fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fourthDigitPossibilities]
      + mappings[fifthDigit][(i/(sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fifthDigitPossibilities]
      + mappings[sixthDigit][(i/(seventhDigitPossibilities))%sixthDigitPossibilities]
      + mappings[seventhDigit][i%seventhDigitPossibilities]);

      }
      }

      public static void main(String args) {
      letterCombinations("23456789");
      }
      }





      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        0












        0








        0






        IMO there is a better way.



        Firstly you store every combination in a List. You are doing more than what is asked by giving the possibility to use an arbitrary phone numbers length but you will eventually run out of memory past a certain length.



        Secondly you are able to know beforehand the numbers of possibilities you will have so you do not need to go for a double or triple for loop.



        So how to do it in one loop in java :



        public class LetterCombination {
        // Mappings from 0 to 9.
        // With 0 and 1 with no mappings because none is given in our instructions
        public static String mappings = {
        {""}, {""}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {"D", "E", "F"}, {"G", "H", "I"},
        {"J", "K", "L"}, {"M", "N", "O"}, {"P", "Q", "R", "S"},
        {"T", "U", "V"}, {"W", "X", "Y", "Z"}
        };

        public static void letterCombinations(String digits) {
        // The exercise specify that we will receive a phone number of 7 digits.
        // We suppose that the validation of the String received is done before.
        // All our digits are converted to int.
        int firstDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(0,1));
        int secondDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(1,2));
        int thirdDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(2,3));
        int fourthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(3,4));
        int fifthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(4,5));
        int sixthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(5,6));
        int seventhDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(6,7));

        // To each digits is associated its number of possibilities
        // (From 3 to 4 in our exercise)
        int firstDigitPossibilities = mappings[firstDigit].length;
        int secondDigitPossibilities = mappings[secondDigit].length;
        int thirdDigitPossibilities = mappings[thirdDigit].length;
        int fourthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fourthDigit].length;
        int fifthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fifthDigit].length;
        int sixthDigitPossibilities = mappings[sixthDigit].length;
        int seventhDigitPossibilities = mappings[seventhDigit].length;

        // We will have between 3^7 and 4^7 iterations
        // We can have our number of iterations by multiplying each possibilities
        for(int i = 0; i < firstDigitPossibilities * secondDigitPossibilities * thirdDigitPossibilities * fourthDigitPossibilities * fifthDigitPossibilities * sixthDigitPossibilities * seventhDigitPossibilities ; i++) {

        // What is left is to print everything.
        // Last number is printed like this :
        // * mappings[last Digit][i modulo last Digit possibilities]
        // Next Number is printed like this :
        // * mapping [next Digit][( i / last Digit possibilities) modulo next Digit possibilities]
        // And so on...
        System.out.println(
        mappings[firstDigit][(i/(secondDigitPossibilities*thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%firstDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[secondDigit][(i/thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities)%secondDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[thirdDigit][(i/(fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%thirdDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[fourthDigit][(i/(fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fourthDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[fifthDigit][(i/(sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fifthDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[sixthDigit][(i/(seventhDigitPossibilities))%sixthDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[seventhDigit][i%seventhDigitPossibilities]);

        }
        }

        public static void main(String args) {
        letterCombinations("23456789");
        }
        }





        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        IMO there is a better way.



        Firstly you store every combination in a List. You are doing more than what is asked by giving the possibility to use an arbitrary phone numbers length but you will eventually run out of memory past a certain length.



        Secondly you are able to know beforehand the numbers of possibilities you will have so you do not need to go for a double or triple for loop.



        So how to do it in one loop in java :



        public class LetterCombination {
        // Mappings from 0 to 9.
        // With 0 and 1 with no mappings because none is given in our instructions
        public static String mappings = {
        {""}, {""}, {"A", "B", "C"}, {"D", "E", "F"}, {"G", "H", "I"},
        {"J", "K", "L"}, {"M", "N", "O"}, {"P", "Q", "R", "S"},
        {"T", "U", "V"}, {"W", "X", "Y", "Z"}
        };

        public static void letterCombinations(String digits) {
        // The exercise specify that we will receive a phone number of 7 digits.
        // We suppose that the validation of the String received is done before.
        // All our digits are converted to int.
        int firstDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(0,1));
        int secondDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(1,2));
        int thirdDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(2,3));
        int fourthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(3,4));
        int fifthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(4,5));
        int sixthDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(5,6));
        int seventhDigit = Integer.parseInt(digits.substring(6,7));

        // To each digits is associated its number of possibilities
        // (From 3 to 4 in our exercise)
        int firstDigitPossibilities = mappings[firstDigit].length;
        int secondDigitPossibilities = mappings[secondDigit].length;
        int thirdDigitPossibilities = mappings[thirdDigit].length;
        int fourthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fourthDigit].length;
        int fifthDigitPossibilities = mappings[fifthDigit].length;
        int sixthDigitPossibilities = mappings[sixthDigit].length;
        int seventhDigitPossibilities = mappings[seventhDigit].length;

        // We will have between 3^7 and 4^7 iterations
        // We can have our number of iterations by multiplying each possibilities
        for(int i = 0; i < firstDigitPossibilities * secondDigitPossibilities * thirdDigitPossibilities * fourthDigitPossibilities * fifthDigitPossibilities * sixthDigitPossibilities * seventhDigitPossibilities ; i++) {

        // What is left is to print everything.
        // Last number is printed like this :
        // * mappings[last Digit][i modulo last Digit possibilities]
        // Next Number is printed like this :
        // * mapping [next Digit][( i / last Digit possibilities) modulo next Digit possibilities]
        // And so on...
        System.out.println(
        mappings[firstDigit][(i/(secondDigitPossibilities*thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%firstDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[secondDigit][(i/thirdDigitPossibilities*fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities)%secondDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[thirdDigit][(i/(fourthDigitPossibilities*fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%thirdDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[fourthDigit][(i/(fifthDigitPossibilities*sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fourthDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[fifthDigit][(i/(sixthDigitPossibilities*seventhDigitPossibilities))%fifthDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[sixthDigit][(i/(seventhDigitPossibilities))%sixthDigitPossibilities]
        + mappings[seventhDigit][i%seventhDigitPossibilities]);

        }
        }

        public static void main(String args) {
        letterCombinations("23456789");
        }
        }






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 25 mins ago









        AweuzegagaAweuzegaga

        11




        11




        New contributor




        Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Aweuzegaga is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204910%2fprint-out-all-possible-letter-combinations-a-given-phone-number-can-represent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

            How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

            TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'