Meshlab volume and area measurements of a mesh
I need help because I do not know where to start. I'm not a programmer
I work with wounds and I wanted to see for my PhD if I can, with a 3D scan, measure the area, volume and depth of a wound.
This scanner obtains both STL and OBJ. I get a mesh with the topography of the wound.
Can you guide me if in the meshlab it can be done? I know that in Artec Studio it can be done but due to access difficulty I can not use it.
Thank you very much to all.
meshlab
add a comment |
I need help because I do not know where to start. I'm not a programmer
I work with wounds and I wanted to see for my PhD if I can, with a 3D scan, measure the area, volume and depth of a wound.
This scanner obtains both STL and OBJ. I get a mesh with the topography of the wound.
Can you guide me if in the meshlab it can be done? I know that in Artec Studio it can be done but due to access difficulty I can not use it.
Thank you very much to all.
meshlab
add a comment |
I need help because I do not know where to start. I'm not a programmer
I work with wounds and I wanted to see for my PhD if I can, with a 3D scan, measure the area, volume and depth of a wound.
This scanner obtains both STL and OBJ. I get a mesh with the topography of the wound.
Can you guide me if in the meshlab it can be done? I know that in Artec Studio it can be done but due to access difficulty I can not use it.
Thank you very much to all.
meshlab
I need help because I do not know where to start. I'm not a programmer
I work with wounds and I wanted to see for my PhD if I can, with a 3D scan, measure the area, volume and depth of a wound.
This scanner obtains both STL and OBJ. I get a mesh with the topography of the wound.
Can you guide me if in the meshlab it can be done? I know that in Artec Studio it can be done but due to access difficulty I can not use it.
Thank you very much to all.
meshlab
meshlab
asked Apr 20 '18 at 9:03
JuanJuan
62
62
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It sounds like you'd like to enclose a hole/valley (the wound) and measure the resulting volume. I expect the shapes are not simple, so what I'd suggest is to first delete the surface that is not part of the wound.
To get an immediate approximation you can use Filters->Remeshing, Simplification and Reconstruction->Convex hull which will create a volume that encloses your surface. It usually gets the face normal inconsistent (some will appear black while other will be white), so use Normals->Re-orient All Faces Coherently to fix this. Then use Quality Measure->Compute Geometric Measures.
If the containment is not satisfactory you'll have to go further and delete the faces you don't want from the hull, flatten all layers, and then fill holes to create a closer fit. To measure depth you can use the measure tape tool in the tool bar.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f49937934%2fmeshlab-volume-and-area-measurements-of-a-mesh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It sounds like you'd like to enclose a hole/valley (the wound) and measure the resulting volume. I expect the shapes are not simple, so what I'd suggest is to first delete the surface that is not part of the wound.
To get an immediate approximation you can use Filters->Remeshing, Simplification and Reconstruction->Convex hull which will create a volume that encloses your surface. It usually gets the face normal inconsistent (some will appear black while other will be white), so use Normals->Re-orient All Faces Coherently to fix this. Then use Quality Measure->Compute Geometric Measures.
If the containment is not satisfactory you'll have to go further and delete the faces you don't want from the hull, flatten all layers, and then fill holes to create a closer fit. To measure depth you can use the measure tape tool in the tool bar.
add a comment |
It sounds like you'd like to enclose a hole/valley (the wound) and measure the resulting volume. I expect the shapes are not simple, so what I'd suggest is to first delete the surface that is not part of the wound.
To get an immediate approximation you can use Filters->Remeshing, Simplification and Reconstruction->Convex hull which will create a volume that encloses your surface. It usually gets the face normal inconsistent (some will appear black while other will be white), so use Normals->Re-orient All Faces Coherently to fix this. Then use Quality Measure->Compute Geometric Measures.
If the containment is not satisfactory you'll have to go further and delete the faces you don't want from the hull, flatten all layers, and then fill holes to create a closer fit. To measure depth you can use the measure tape tool in the tool bar.
add a comment |
It sounds like you'd like to enclose a hole/valley (the wound) and measure the resulting volume. I expect the shapes are not simple, so what I'd suggest is to first delete the surface that is not part of the wound.
To get an immediate approximation you can use Filters->Remeshing, Simplification and Reconstruction->Convex hull which will create a volume that encloses your surface. It usually gets the face normal inconsistent (some will appear black while other will be white), so use Normals->Re-orient All Faces Coherently to fix this. Then use Quality Measure->Compute Geometric Measures.
If the containment is not satisfactory you'll have to go further and delete the faces you don't want from the hull, flatten all layers, and then fill holes to create a closer fit. To measure depth you can use the measure tape tool in the tool bar.
It sounds like you'd like to enclose a hole/valley (the wound) and measure the resulting volume. I expect the shapes are not simple, so what I'd suggest is to first delete the surface that is not part of the wound.
To get an immediate approximation you can use Filters->Remeshing, Simplification and Reconstruction->Convex hull which will create a volume that encloses your surface. It usually gets the face normal inconsistent (some will appear black while other will be white), so use Normals->Re-orient All Faces Coherently to fix this. Then use Quality Measure->Compute Geometric Measures.
If the containment is not satisfactory you'll have to go further and delete the faces you don't want from the hull, flatten all layers, and then fill holes to create a closer fit. To measure depth you can use the measure tape tool in the tool bar.
edited Nov 26 '18 at 2:33
answered Oct 29 '18 at 22:48
JamesJames
32110
32110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f49937934%2fmeshlab-volume-and-area-measurements-of-a-mesh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown