C++ constructor specialization using SFINAE
I have a templated struct whose member type depends on the specialization:
template<typename T>
struct Base
{
typedef T VT[4];
}
template<>
struct Base<float>
{
typedef ___m128 VT;
} // And other similar specializations for int, uint etc...
template<typename T>
struct A
{
typename A<T>::VT data;
}
I would like to specialize the copy constructor for pointer and non-pointer types:
// Non-pointer
A::A(const A & a) : data(a.data) { }
// Pointer
A::A(const A & a) { memcpy(data, a.data, sizeof(data)); }
I tried using a combination of std::enable_if
and std::is_pointer
but I cannot seem to make it work. Can someone show me how it's done?
c++ templates constructor sfinae template-specialization
add a comment |
I have a templated struct whose member type depends on the specialization:
template<typename T>
struct Base
{
typedef T VT[4];
}
template<>
struct Base<float>
{
typedef ___m128 VT;
} // And other similar specializations for int, uint etc...
template<typename T>
struct A
{
typename A<T>::VT data;
}
I would like to specialize the copy constructor for pointer and non-pointer types:
// Non-pointer
A::A(const A & a) : data(a.data) { }
// Pointer
A::A(const A & a) { memcpy(data, a.data, sizeof(data)); }
I tried using a combination of std::enable_if
and std::is_pointer
but I cannot seem to make it work. Can someone show me how it's done?
c++ templates constructor sfinae template-specialization
Have a look at stackoverflow.com/questions/29430090/…, may be a duplicate.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:09
@Matthieu I think I did (in the sense that I'm not sure whether I did that correctly or not) but the compiler gave me a redefined error on the constructor
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:11
Then perhaps share your trials so that we can figure out the issue with your constructor.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:12
Ok sorry, I'll edit my question as soon as I get my hands on the computer. That link you posted talks about conditionally disabling the copy constructor, which is not what I want, but I'll give it a look to see if it applies to my case too
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:17
add a comment |
I have a templated struct whose member type depends on the specialization:
template<typename T>
struct Base
{
typedef T VT[4];
}
template<>
struct Base<float>
{
typedef ___m128 VT;
} // And other similar specializations for int, uint etc...
template<typename T>
struct A
{
typename A<T>::VT data;
}
I would like to specialize the copy constructor for pointer and non-pointer types:
// Non-pointer
A::A(const A & a) : data(a.data) { }
// Pointer
A::A(const A & a) { memcpy(data, a.data, sizeof(data)); }
I tried using a combination of std::enable_if
and std::is_pointer
but I cannot seem to make it work. Can someone show me how it's done?
c++ templates constructor sfinae template-specialization
I have a templated struct whose member type depends on the specialization:
template<typename T>
struct Base
{
typedef T VT[4];
}
template<>
struct Base<float>
{
typedef ___m128 VT;
} // And other similar specializations for int, uint etc...
template<typename T>
struct A
{
typename A<T>::VT data;
}
I would like to specialize the copy constructor for pointer and non-pointer types:
// Non-pointer
A::A(const A & a) : data(a.data) { }
// Pointer
A::A(const A & a) { memcpy(data, a.data, sizeof(data)); }
I tried using a combination of std::enable_if
and std::is_pointer
but I cannot seem to make it work. Can someone show me how it's done?
c++ templates constructor sfinae template-specialization
c++ templates constructor sfinae template-specialization
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:07
SneppySneppy
92211
92211
Have a look at stackoverflow.com/questions/29430090/…, may be a duplicate.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:09
@Matthieu I think I did (in the sense that I'm not sure whether I did that correctly or not) but the compiler gave me a redefined error on the constructor
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:11
Then perhaps share your trials so that we can figure out the issue with your constructor.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:12
Ok sorry, I'll edit my question as soon as I get my hands on the computer. That link you posted talks about conditionally disabling the copy constructor, which is not what I want, but I'll give it a look to see if it applies to my case too
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:17
add a comment |
Have a look at stackoverflow.com/questions/29430090/…, may be a duplicate.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:09
@Matthieu I think I did (in the sense that I'm not sure whether I did that correctly or not) but the compiler gave me a redefined error on the constructor
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:11
Then perhaps share your trials so that we can figure out the issue with your constructor.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:12
Ok sorry, I'll edit my question as soon as I get my hands on the computer. That link you posted talks about conditionally disabling the copy constructor, which is not what I want, but I'll give it a look to see if it applies to my case too
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:17
Have a look at stackoverflow.com/questions/29430090/…, may be a duplicate.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:09
Have a look at stackoverflow.com/questions/29430090/…, may be a duplicate.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:09
@Matthieu I think I did (in the sense that I'm not sure whether I did that correctly or not) but the compiler gave me a redefined error on the constructor
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:11
@Matthieu I think I did (in the sense that I'm not sure whether I did that correctly or not) but the compiler gave me a redefined error on the constructor
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:11
Then perhaps share your trials so that we can figure out the issue with your constructor.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:12
Then perhaps share your trials so that we can figure out the issue with your constructor.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:12
Ok sorry, I'll edit my question as soon as I get my hands on the computer. That link you posted talks about conditionally disabling the copy constructor, which is not what I want, but I'll give it a look to see if it applies to my case too
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:17
Ok sorry, I'll edit my question as soon as I get my hands on the computer. That link you posted talks about conditionally disabling the copy constructor, which is not what I want, but I'll give it a look to see if it applies to my case too
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:17
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53443547%2fc-constructor-specialization-using-sfinae%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53443547%2fc-constructor-specialization-using-sfinae%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have a look at stackoverflow.com/questions/29430090/…, may be a duplicate.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:09
@Matthieu I think I did (in the sense that I'm not sure whether I did that correctly or not) but the compiler gave me a redefined error on the constructor
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:11
Then perhaps share your trials so that we can figure out the issue with your constructor.
– Matthieu Brucher
Nov 23 '18 at 9:12
Ok sorry, I'll edit my question as soon as I get my hands on the computer. That link you posted talks about conditionally disabling the copy constructor, which is not what I want, but I'll give it a look to see if it applies to my case too
– Sneppy
Nov 23 '18 at 9:17