How much did we know about lunar soil conditions prior to Apollo 11?












15












$begingroup$


Hell everyone who have answered / commented on my question. Thanks for showing interest. What I was looking for is whether NASA or any other agency attempting to land something (any object) on moon, had anticipated that the object can "sink" into moon soil and knowingly took the risk and invested Time and money, Or they had crash landed objects on moon, and studied lunar soil in detail before deciding to go in for soft landing.



By the way, can anyone recommend any site (or many sites) which would give "absolutely in depth" knowledge about all lunar missions? (Knowledge pertaining to design aspects of equipments on board).










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Is there any evidence that NASA was worried about deep lunar dust?
    $endgroup$
    – Nathan Tuggy
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:46










  • $begingroup$
    Hard Scifi considered the possibility that lunar seas were filled with dust and were able to flow like a liquid because of the vaccuum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fall_of_Moondust was first published in 1961.
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:02
















15












$begingroup$


Hell everyone who have answered / commented on my question. Thanks for showing interest. What I was looking for is whether NASA or any other agency attempting to land something (any object) on moon, had anticipated that the object can "sink" into moon soil and knowingly took the risk and invested Time and money, Or they had crash landed objects on moon, and studied lunar soil in detail before deciding to go in for soft landing.



By the way, can anyone recommend any site (or many sites) which would give "absolutely in depth" knowledge about all lunar missions? (Knowledge pertaining to design aspects of equipments on board).










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Is there any evidence that NASA was worried about deep lunar dust?
    $endgroup$
    – Nathan Tuggy
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:46










  • $begingroup$
    Hard Scifi considered the possibility that lunar seas were filled with dust and were able to flow like a liquid because of the vaccuum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fall_of_Moondust was first published in 1961.
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:02














15












15








15





$begingroup$


Hell everyone who have answered / commented on my question. Thanks for showing interest. What I was looking for is whether NASA or any other agency attempting to land something (any object) on moon, had anticipated that the object can "sink" into moon soil and knowingly took the risk and invested Time and money, Or they had crash landed objects on moon, and studied lunar soil in detail before deciding to go in for soft landing.



By the way, can anyone recommend any site (or many sites) which would give "absolutely in depth" knowledge about all lunar missions? (Knowledge pertaining to design aspects of equipments on board).










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Hell everyone who have answered / commented on my question. Thanks for showing interest. What I was looking for is whether NASA or any other agency attempting to land something (any object) on moon, had anticipated that the object can "sink" into moon soil and knowingly took the risk and invested Time and money, Or they had crash landed objects on moon, and studied lunar soil in detail before deciding to go in for soft landing.



By the way, can anyone recommend any site (or many sites) which would give "absolutely in depth" knowledge about all lunar missions? (Knowledge pertaining to design aspects of equipments on board).







mission-design lunar






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 26 '18 at 6:07







Niranjan

















asked Nov 22 '18 at 4:13









NiranjanNiranjan

319111




319111








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Is there any evidence that NASA was worried about deep lunar dust?
    $endgroup$
    – Nathan Tuggy
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:46










  • $begingroup$
    Hard Scifi considered the possibility that lunar seas were filled with dust and were able to flow like a liquid because of the vaccuum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fall_of_Moondust was first published in 1961.
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:02














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Is there any evidence that NASA was worried about deep lunar dust?
    $endgroup$
    – Nathan Tuggy
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:46










  • $begingroup$
    Hard Scifi considered the possibility that lunar seas were filled with dust and were able to flow like a liquid because of the vaccuum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fall_of_Moondust was first published in 1961.
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:02








3




3




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Is there any evidence that NASA was worried about deep lunar dust?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Nov 22 '18 at 4:46




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Is there any evidence that NASA was worried about deep lunar dust?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Nov 22 '18 at 4:46












$begingroup$
Hard Scifi considered the possibility that lunar seas were filled with dust and were able to flow like a liquid because of the vaccuum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fall_of_Moondust was first published in 1961.
$endgroup$
– Criggie
Nov 22 '18 at 9:02




$begingroup$
Hard Scifi considered the possibility that lunar seas were filled with dust and were able to flow like a liquid because of the vaccuum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fall_of_Moondust was first published in 1961.
$endgroup$
– Criggie
Nov 22 '18 at 9:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















25












$begingroup$

The uncrewed Surveyor probes landed on the moon before Apollo did. They provided visual images of the landscape and pictures of soil samples that were dug up robotically. All the visual indications were that the terrain was fairly firm:



enter image description here



Surveyor also took pictures of its own footpads to see how deep they went into the soil:



enter image description here



The ground pressure of the Apollo LM, with its meter-wide foot pads, was only about 25% more than that of the Surveyor probes, so it would not sink much more deeply.



In particular, a marshy consistency would be very unlikely given the extreme temperatures (the ground alternates baking in bare sunlight for two weeks, then radiating heat away to bare space for two weeks) and lack of atmosphere.



The worst-case plausible scenario was that there would be a deep layer of dust fine enough to act like a fluid, but the Surveyor imagery showed large particles.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruadhan2300
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Nov 23 '18 at 0:21



















7












$begingroup$

In addition to Russell Borogrove's answer, it is worth mentioning that the Soviet Luna 9 soft-landed on the moon four months before Surveyor, and transmitted panoramic photographs of the surface back to Earth. According to the Wikipedia article, the mission confirmed that the lunar dust could support a spacecraft.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32198%2fhow-much-did-we-know-about-lunar-soil-conditions-prior-to-apollo-11%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    25












    $begingroup$

    The uncrewed Surveyor probes landed on the moon before Apollo did. They provided visual images of the landscape and pictures of soil samples that were dug up robotically. All the visual indications were that the terrain was fairly firm:



    enter image description here



    Surveyor also took pictures of its own footpads to see how deep they went into the soil:



    enter image description here



    The ground pressure of the Apollo LM, with its meter-wide foot pads, was only about 25% more than that of the Surveyor probes, so it would not sink much more deeply.



    In particular, a marshy consistency would be very unlikely given the extreme temperatures (the ground alternates baking in bare sunlight for two weeks, then radiating heat away to bare space for two weeks) and lack of atmosphere.



    The worst-case plausible scenario was that there would be a deep layer of dust fine enough to act like a fluid, but the Surveyor imagery showed large particles.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruadhan2300
      Nov 22 '18 at 9:25






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Nov 22 '18 at 10:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
      $endgroup$
      – Organic Marble
      Nov 23 '18 at 0:21
















    25












    $begingroup$

    The uncrewed Surveyor probes landed on the moon before Apollo did. They provided visual images of the landscape and pictures of soil samples that were dug up robotically. All the visual indications were that the terrain was fairly firm:



    enter image description here



    Surveyor also took pictures of its own footpads to see how deep they went into the soil:



    enter image description here



    The ground pressure of the Apollo LM, with its meter-wide foot pads, was only about 25% more than that of the Surveyor probes, so it would not sink much more deeply.



    In particular, a marshy consistency would be very unlikely given the extreme temperatures (the ground alternates baking in bare sunlight for two weeks, then radiating heat away to bare space for two weeks) and lack of atmosphere.



    The worst-case plausible scenario was that there would be a deep layer of dust fine enough to act like a fluid, but the Surveyor imagery showed large particles.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruadhan2300
      Nov 22 '18 at 9:25






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Nov 22 '18 at 10:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
      $endgroup$
      – Organic Marble
      Nov 23 '18 at 0:21














    25












    25








    25





    $begingroup$

    The uncrewed Surveyor probes landed on the moon before Apollo did. They provided visual images of the landscape and pictures of soil samples that were dug up robotically. All the visual indications were that the terrain was fairly firm:



    enter image description here



    Surveyor also took pictures of its own footpads to see how deep they went into the soil:



    enter image description here



    The ground pressure of the Apollo LM, with its meter-wide foot pads, was only about 25% more than that of the Surveyor probes, so it would not sink much more deeply.



    In particular, a marshy consistency would be very unlikely given the extreme temperatures (the ground alternates baking in bare sunlight for two weeks, then radiating heat away to bare space for two weeks) and lack of atmosphere.



    The worst-case plausible scenario was that there would be a deep layer of dust fine enough to act like a fluid, but the Surveyor imagery showed large particles.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The uncrewed Surveyor probes landed on the moon before Apollo did. They provided visual images of the landscape and pictures of soil samples that were dug up robotically. All the visual indications were that the terrain was fairly firm:



    enter image description here



    Surveyor also took pictures of its own footpads to see how deep they went into the soil:



    enter image description here



    The ground pressure of the Apollo LM, with its meter-wide foot pads, was only about 25% more than that of the Surveyor probes, so it would not sink much more deeply.



    In particular, a marshy consistency would be very unlikely given the extreme temperatures (the ground alternates baking in bare sunlight for two weeks, then radiating heat away to bare space for two weeks) and lack of atmosphere.



    The worst-case plausible scenario was that there would be a deep layer of dust fine enough to act like a fluid, but the Surveyor imagery showed large particles.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 22 '18 at 5:08

























    answered Nov 22 '18 at 4:47









    Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove

    83.9k2281362




    83.9k2281362












    • $begingroup$
      I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruadhan2300
      Nov 22 '18 at 9:25






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Nov 22 '18 at 10:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
      $endgroup$
      – Organic Marble
      Nov 23 '18 at 0:21


















    • $begingroup$
      I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruadhan2300
      Nov 22 '18 at 9:25






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Nov 22 '18 at 10:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
      $endgroup$
      – Organic Marble
      Nov 23 '18 at 0:21
















    $begingroup$
    I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruadhan2300
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:25




    $begingroup$
    I somehow always forget the existence of the Surveyor missions, but it makes sense, They were racing ahead to get to the moon ahead of the soviets but they didn't cut corners on it. On the other hand, Even assuming fluid-dust was possible, as long as the spacecraft sank reasonably evenly and didn't tip over, they could probably have still returned to orbit in the upper stage as intended.
    $endgroup$
    – Ruadhan2300
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:25




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:29




    $begingroup$
    There is a ?Larry Niven? science fiction story about this. The expectation was that moon dust would vacuum weld together, but Mars has enough atmosphere to prevent vacuum welding.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:29




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Nov 23 '18 at 0:21




    $begingroup$
    Martin Bonner are you thinking of the Clarke novel "A Fall of Moondust?"
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Nov 23 '18 at 0:21











    7












    $begingroup$

    In addition to Russell Borogrove's answer, it is worth mentioning that the Soviet Luna 9 soft-landed on the moon four months before Surveyor, and transmitted panoramic photographs of the surface back to Earth. According to the Wikipedia article, the mission confirmed that the lunar dust could support a spacecraft.



    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      7












      $begingroup$

      In addition to Russell Borogrove's answer, it is worth mentioning that the Soviet Luna 9 soft-landed on the moon four months before Surveyor, and transmitted panoramic photographs of the surface back to Earth. According to the Wikipedia article, the mission confirmed that the lunar dust could support a spacecraft.



      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        In addition to Russell Borogrove's answer, it is worth mentioning that the Soviet Luna 9 soft-landed on the moon four months before Surveyor, and transmitted panoramic photographs of the surface back to Earth. According to the Wikipedia article, the mission confirmed that the lunar dust could support a spacecraft.



        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In addition to Russell Borogrove's answer, it is worth mentioning that the Soviet Luna 9 soft-landed on the moon four months before Surveyor, and transmitted panoramic photographs of the surface back to Earth. According to the Wikipedia article, the mission confirmed that the lunar dust could support a spacecraft.



        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 22 '18 at 19:14









        jbayjbay

        1711




        1711






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32198%2fhow-much-did-we-know-about-lunar-soil-conditions-prior-to-apollo-11%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

            How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

            TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'