Constructor injection on spring configuration classes
In several code examples I see autowiring used instead of constructor injection. Can any one explain why Constructor injection is difficult but autowiring is possible on spring configuration classes? Thanks in advance.
this question does touch the topic but doesn't have the detailed answer.
spring constructor-injection spring-config
add a comment |
In several code examples I see autowiring used instead of constructor injection. Can any one explain why Constructor injection is difficult but autowiring is possible on spring configuration classes? Thanks in advance.
this question does touch the topic but doesn't have the detailed answer.
spring constructor-injection spring-config
Can you extend your question about Constructor injection is difficult?
– user7294900
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Please refer the link provided in the question. it mentions 'earlier versions don't support', 'possible for simple cases only', 'problem when using this feature'
– BhendiGawaar
Nov 22 '18 at 12:26
1
The answer is yes.Btw,I use @Autowired cause it's simple and convenient.After I adding or taking away some fields,I dont need to change the constructor.Further more,with lombok I dont need to write constructor,getter or setter by myself,so I choose field injection.
– AokoQin
Nov 23 '18 at 3:28
add a comment |
In several code examples I see autowiring used instead of constructor injection. Can any one explain why Constructor injection is difficult but autowiring is possible on spring configuration classes? Thanks in advance.
this question does touch the topic but doesn't have the detailed answer.
spring constructor-injection spring-config
In several code examples I see autowiring used instead of constructor injection. Can any one explain why Constructor injection is difficult but autowiring is possible on spring configuration classes? Thanks in advance.
this question does touch the topic but doesn't have the detailed answer.
spring constructor-injection spring-config
spring constructor-injection spring-config
asked Nov 22 '18 at 9:24
BhendiGawaarBhendiGawaar
6271515
6271515
Can you extend your question about Constructor injection is difficult?
– user7294900
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Please refer the link provided in the question. it mentions 'earlier versions don't support', 'possible for simple cases only', 'problem when using this feature'
– BhendiGawaar
Nov 22 '18 at 12:26
1
The answer is yes.Btw,I use @Autowired cause it's simple and convenient.After I adding or taking away some fields,I dont need to change the constructor.Further more,with lombok I dont need to write constructor,getter or setter by myself,so I choose field injection.
– AokoQin
Nov 23 '18 at 3:28
add a comment |
Can you extend your question about Constructor injection is difficult?
– user7294900
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Please refer the link provided in the question. it mentions 'earlier versions don't support', 'possible for simple cases only', 'problem when using this feature'
– BhendiGawaar
Nov 22 '18 at 12:26
1
The answer is yes.Btw,I use @Autowired cause it's simple and convenient.After I adding or taking away some fields,I dont need to change the constructor.Further more,with lombok I dont need to write constructor,getter or setter by myself,so I choose field injection.
– AokoQin
Nov 23 '18 at 3:28
Can you extend your question about Constructor injection is difficult?
– user7294900
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Can you extend your question about Constructor injection is difficult?
– user7294900
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Please refer the link provided in the question. it mentions 'earlier versions don't support', 'possible for simple cases only', 'problem when using this feature'
– BhendiGawaar
Nov 22 '18 at 12:26
Please refer the link provided in the question. it mentions 'earlier versions don't support', 'possible for simple cases only', 'problem when using this feature'
– BhendiGawaar
Nov 22 '18 at 12:26
1
1
The answer is yes.Btw,I use @Autowired cause it's simple and convenient.After I adding or taking away some fields,I dont need to change the constructor.Further more,with lombok I dont need to write constructor,getter or setter by myself,so I choose field injection.
– AokoQin
Nov 23 '18 at 3:28
The answer is yes.Btw,I use @Autowired cause it's simple and convenient.After I adding or taking away some fields,I dont need to change the constructor.Further more,with lombok I dont need to write constructor,getter or setter by myself,so I choose field injection.
– AokoQin
Nov 23 '18 at 3:28
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53427595%2fconstructor-injection-on-spring-configuration-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53427595%2fconstructor-injection-on-spring-configuration-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you extend your question about Constructor injection is difficult?
– user7294900
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Please refer the link provided in the question. it mentions 'earlier versions don't support', 'possible for simple cases only', 'problem when using this feature'
– BhendiGawaar
Nov 22 '18 at 12:26
1
The answer is yes.Btw,I use @Autowired cause it's simple and convenient.After I adding or taking away some fields,I dont need to change the constructor.Further more,with lombok I dont need to write constructor,getter or setter by myself,so I choose field injection.
– AokoQin
Nov 23 '18 at 3:28