Which are all the musical intervals that are valid?
I have been reading around many sources, but it seems there is not a full standardized way in naming intervals, some sources say that such a thing as a diminished first exist.
So I started making an interval chart and realized something, intervals have two variables, the type (1st, 2nd, 3rd, ...) and the quality (diminished, minor, perfect, major, or augmented). But not all the qualities are to be used by any type.
Types 1,4,5 can use diminished, perfect, or augmented.
Types 2,3,6,7 can use diminished, minor, major, or augmented.
Intervals that are more than an octave apart are called compound intervals, but I don't know if the same rules apply??
So I ended up with something like this:
Now substituting for the Note C I got:
With this chart I think is easy too see all intervals, but I am not convinced of the validity of all of them, for example, I have never heard someone talk about a diminished tenth interval.
So, do you think this is a valid way to get to any single interval for a note?, expanding this more would be valid?, or is there a limit on interval naming?
theory intervals
add a comment |
I have been reading around many sources, but it seems there is not a full standardized way in naming intervals, some sources say that such a thing as a diminished first exist.
So I started making an interval chart and realized something, intervals have two variables, the type (1st, 2nd, 3rd, ...) and the quality (diminished, minor, perfect, major, or augmented). But not all the qualities are to be used by any type.
Types 1,4,5 can use diminished, perfect, or augmented.
Types 2,3,6,7 can use diminished, minor, major, or augmented.
Intervals that are more than an octave apart are called compound intervals, but I don't know if the same rules apply??
So I ended up with something like this:
Now substituting for the Note C I got:
With this chart I think is easy too see all intervals, but I am not convinced of the validity of all of them, for example, I have never heard someone talk about a diminished tenth interval.
So, do you think this is a valid way to get to any single interval for a note?, expanding this more would be valid?, or is there a limit on interval naming?
theory intervals
add a comment |
I have been reading around many sources, but it seems there is not a full standardized way in naming intervals, some sources say that such a thing as a diminished first exist.
So I started making an interval chart and realized something, intervals have two variables, the type (1st, 2nd, 3rd, ...) and the quality (diminished, minor, perfect, major, or augmented). But not all the qualities are to be used by any type.
Types 1,4,5 can use diminished, perfect, or augmented.
Types 2,3,6,7 can use diminished, minor, major, or augmented.
Intervals that are more than an octave apart are called compound intervals, but I don't know if the same rules apply??
So I ended up with something like this:
Now substituting for the Note C I got:
With this chart I think is easy too see all intervals, but I am not convinced of the validity of all of them, for example, I have never heard someone talk about a diminished tenth interval.
So, do you think this is a valid way to get to any single interval for a note?, expanding this more would be valid?, or is there a limit on interval naming?
theory intervals
I have been reading around many sources, but it seems there is not a full standardized way in naming intervals, some sources say that such a thing as a diminished first exist.
So I started making an interval chart and realized something, intervals have two variables, the type (1st, 2nd, 3rd, ...) and the quality (diminished, minor, perfect, major, or augmented). But not all the qualities are to be used by any type.
Types 1,4,5 can use diminished, perfect, or augmented.
Types 2,3,6,7 can use diminished, minor, major, or augmented.
Intervals that are more than an octave apart are called compound intervals, but I don't know if the same rules apply??
So I ended up with something like this:
Now substituting for the Note C I got:
With this chart I think is easy too see all intervals, but I am not convinced of the validity of all of them, for example, I have never heard someone talk about a diminished tenth interval.
So, do you think this is a valid way to get to any single interval for a note?, expanding this more would be valid?, or is there a limit on interval naming?
theory intervals
theory intervals
edited 2 hours ago
Cheche Romo
asked 2 hours ago
Cheche RomoCheche Romo
223
223
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your chart looks correct, with one exception: in your bottom chart, the diminished 11th should be 15 semitones from C, not 12.
In theory, every interval is possible and valid, with the exception of flagrantly wrong intervals like a "major fourth." With that said, there is a point of diminishing returns: it's almost always pointless to go through the trouble of identifying something as an augmented 27th, when we may as well just call it an augmented 6th. If we really want to get specific, we can just call it a compound augmented sixth.
Which brings me to something that may save you some time: The Rule of 7. This is just a convenient way to translate between simple (intervals within and octave) and compound intervals. If a third is expanded by an octave, it becomes a (3 + 7 =) 10th. When I mentioned a 27th earlier, that's just a compound version of a (27 - 7 - 7 - 7 =) 6th. Knowing this rule prevents your table from continuing on indefinitely.
Lastly, you will occasionally encounter a doubly augmented or double diminished interval. C up to Gbb, for instance, is a doubly diminished fifth. It's rare, but you will occasionally encounter it.
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The categorysation of intervals as you did is one point. Your list is almost perfect.
Another is the notation respectively the signing. The manual of Band in a Box contains a vaste list of chords. (Pdf will follow)
The validation is another question. All may be valid but not all are used. Someone will be the first one but this would not be a new creation.
Many composer use enharmonic change or interchange and ignore the correct writing ( as use in popmusic or the sheets of a single instrument part. Bartok was a purist in correct writing.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78673%2fwhich-are-all-the-musical-intervals-that-are-valid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your chart looks correct, with one exception: in your bottom chart, the diminished 11th should be 15 semitones from C, not 12.
In theory, every interval is possible and valid, with the exception of flagrantly wrong intervals like a "major fourth." With that said, there is a point of diminishing returns: it's almost always pointless to go through the trouble of identifying something as an augmented 27th, when we may as well just call it an augmented 6th. If we really want to get specific, we can just call it a compound augmented sixth.
Which brings me to something that may save you some time: The Rule of 7. This is just a convenient way to translate between simple (intervals within and octave) and compound intervals. If a third is expanded by an octave, it becomes a (3 + 7 =) 10th. When I mentioned a 27th earlier, that's just a compound version of a (27 - 7 - 7 - 7 =) 6th. Knowing this rule prevents your table from continuing on indefinitely.
Lastly, you will occasionally encounter a doubly augmented or double diminished interval. C up to Gbb, for instance, is a doubly diminished fifth. It's rare, but you will occasionally encounter it.
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your chart looks correct, with one exception: in your bottom chart, the diminished 11th should be 15 semitones from C, not 12.
In theory, every interval is possible and valid, with the exception of flagrantly wrong intervals like a "major fourth." With that said, there is a point of diminishing returns: it's almost always pointless to go through the trouble of identifying something as an augmented 27th, when we may as well just call it an augmented 6th. If we really want to get specific, we can just call it a compound augmented sixth.
Which brings me to something that may save you some time: The Rule of 7. This is just a convenient way to translate between simple (intervals within and octave) and compound intervals. If a third is expanded by an octave, it becomes a (3 + 7 =) 10th. When I mentioned a 27th earlier, that's just a compound version of a (27 - 7 - 7 - 7 =) 6th. Knowing this rule prevents your table from continuing on indefinitely.
Lastly, you will occasionally encounter a doubly augmented or double diminished interval. C up to Gbb, for instance, is a doubly diminished fifth. It's rare, but you will occasionally encounter it.
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your chart looks correct, with one exception: in your bottom chart, the diminished 11th should be 15 semitones from C, not 12.
In theory, every interval is possible and valid, with the exception of flagrantly wrong intervals like a "major fourth." With that said, there is a point of diminishing returns: it's almost always pointless to go through the trouble of identifying something as an augmented 27th, when we may as well just call it an augmented 6th. If we really want to get specific, we can just call it a compound augmented sixth.
Which brings me to something that may save you some time: The Rule of 7. This is just a convenient way to translate between simple (intervals within and octave) and compound intervals. If a third is expanded by an octave, it becomes a (3 + 7 =) 10th. When I mentioned a 27th earlier, that's just a compound version of a (27 - 7 - 7 - 7 =) 6th. Knowing this rule prevents your table from continuing on indefinitely.
Lastly, you will occasionally encounter a doubly augmented or double diminished interval. C up to Gbb, for instance, is a doubly diminished fifth. It's rare, but you will occasionally encounter it.
Your chart looks correct, with one exception: in your bottom chart, the diminished 11th should be 15 semitones from C, not 12.
In theory, every interval is possible and valid, with the exception of flagrantly wrong intervals like a "major fourth." With that said, there is a point of diminishing returns: it's almost always pointless to go through the trouble of identifying something as an augmented 27th, when we may as well just call it an augmented 6th. If we really want to get specific, we can just call it a compound augmented sixth.
Which brings me to something that may save you some time: The Rule of 7. This is just a convenient way to translate between simple (intervals within and octave) and compound intervals. If a third is expanded by an octave, it becomes a (3 + 7 =) 10th. When I mentioned a 27th earlier, that's just a compound version of a (27 - 7 - 7 - 7 =) 6th. Knowing this rule prevents your table from continuing on indefinitely.
Lastly, you will occasionally encounter a doubly augmented or double diminished interval. C up to Gbb, for instance, is a doubly diminished fifth. It's rare, but you will occasionally encounter it.
answered 2 hours ago
RichardRichard
38.9k687166
38.9k687166
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
Not to forget the Rule of 9. m3 inverted=M6; dim 4 inverted=aug5; M2 inverted=m7 etc.
– Tim
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The categorysation of intervals as you did is one point. Your list is almost perfect.
Another is the notation respectively the signing. The manual of Band in a Box contains a vaste list of chords. (Pdf will follow)
The validation is another question. All may be valid but not all are used. Someone will be the first one but this would not be a new creation.
Many composer use enharmonic change or interchange and ignore the correct writing ( as use in popmusic or the sheets of a single instrument part. Bartok was a purist in correct writing.
add a comment |
The categorysation of intervals as you did is one point. Your list is almost perfect.
Another is the notation respectively the signing. The manual of Band in a Box contains a vaste list of chords. (Pdf will follow)
The validation is another question. All may be valid but not all are used. Someone will be the first one but this would not be a new creation.
Many composer use enharmonic change or interchange and ignore the correct writing ( as use in popmusic or the sheets of a single instrument part. Bartok was a purist in correct writing.
add a comment |
The categorysation of intervals as you did is one point. Your list is almost perfect.
Another is the notation respectively the signing. The manual of Band in a Box contains a vaste list of chords. (Pdf will follow)
The validation is another question. All may be valid but not all are used. Someone will be the first one but this would not be a new creation.
Many composer use enharmonic change or interchange and ignore the correct writing ( as use in popmusic or the sheets of a single instrument part. Bartok was a purist in correct writing.
The categorysation of intervals as you did is one point. Your list is almost perfect.
Another is the notation respectively the signing. The manual of Band in a Box contains a vaste list of chords. (Pdf will follow)
The validation is another question. All may be valid but not all are used. Someone will be the first one but this would not be a new creation.
Many composer use enharmonic change or interchange and ignore the correct writing ( as use in popmusic or the sheets of a single instrument part. Bartok was a purist in correct writing.
answered 55 mins ago
Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli
31711
31711
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78673%2fwhich-are-all-the-musical-intervals-that-are-valid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown