AspectJ weaving for private methods
I've got an AspectJ weaving annotation that works for public methods, but private method are being ignored.
The purpose of this method is to simply log the time it took to run the function.
@Aspect
@Slf4j
public class TimedLogAspect {
@Pointcut("@annotation(timedLogVar)")
public void annotationPointCutDefinition(TimedLog timedLogVar) {}
@Pointcut("execution(* *(..))")
public void atExecution() {}
@Around(value = "annotationPointCutDefinition(timedLogVar) && atExecution()", argNames = "joinPoint,timedLogVar")
public Object around(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint, TimedLog timedLogVar) throws Throwable {
Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();
Object returnValue = joinPoint.proceed();
stopwatch.stop();
MessageBuilder messageBuilder = new MessageBuilder(joinPoint.toShortString(), stopwatch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.attachMessage(timedLogVar.message())
.attachMethodArgs(timedLogVar.shouldAttachMethodArgs(), Stream.of(joinPoint.getArgs()).collect(Collectors.toList()))
.attachReturnValue(timedLogVar.shouldAttachReturnValue(), returnValue);
log.info(messageBuilder.build(), messageBuilder.getArgs().toArray());
return returnValue;
}
}
with this being the actual interface:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface TimedLog {
boolean shouldAttachMethodArgs() default false;
boolean shouldAttachReturnValue() default false;
String message() default "";
}
I've seen a lot of answer, being adding private
before the first *
in the execution
portion, I've seen privileged
which isn't supported for annotations, and I'm using AspectJ with no SpringAOP.
any ideas?
java spring aspectj
add a comment |
I've got an AspectJ weaving annotation that works for public methods, but private method are being ignored.
The purpose of this method is to simply log the time it took to run the function.
@Aspect
@Slf4j
public class TimedLogAspect {
@Pointcut("@annotation(timedLogVar)")
public void annotationPointCutDefinition(TimedLog timedLogVar) {}
@Pointcut("execution(* *(..))")
public void atExecution() {}
@Around(value = "annotationPointCutDefinition(timedLogVar) && atExecution()", argNames = "joinPoint,timedLogVar")
public Object around(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint, TimedLog timedLogVar) throws Throwable {
Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();
Object returnValue = joinPoint.proceed();
stopwatch.stop();
MessageBuilder messageBuilder = new MessageBuilder(joinPoint.toShortString(), stopwatch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.attachMessage(timedLogVar.message())
.attachMethodArgs(timedLogVar.shouldAttachMethodArgs(), Stream.of(joinPoint.getArgs()).collect(Collectors.toList()))
.attachReturnValue(timedLogVar.shouldAttachReturnValue(), returnValue);
log.info(messageBuilder.build(), messageBuilder.getArgs().toArray());
return returnValue;
}
}
with this being the actual interface:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface TimedLog {
boolean shouldAttachMethodArgs() default false;
boolean shouldAttachReturnValue() default false;
String message() default "";
}
I've seen a lot of answer, being adding private
before the first *
in the execution
portion, I've seen privileged
which isn't supported for annotations, and I'm using AspectJ with no SpringAOP.
any ideas?
java spring aspectj
add a comment |
I've got an AspectJ weaving annotation that works for public methods, but private method are being ignored.
The purpose of this method is to simply log the time it took to run the function.
@Aspect
@Slf4j
public class TimedLogAspect {
@Pointcut("@annotation(timedLogVar)")
public void annotationPointCutDefinition(TimedLog timedLogVar) {}
@Pointcut("execution(* *(..))")
public void atExecution() {}
@Around(value = "annotationPointCutDefinition(timedLogVar) && atExecution()", argNames = "joinPoint,timedLogVar")
public Object around(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint, TimedLog timedLogVar) throws Throwable {
Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();
Object returnValue = joinPoint.proceed();
stopwatch.stop();
MessageBuilder messageBuilder = new MessageBuilder(joinPoint.toShortString(), stopwatch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.attachMessage(timedLogVar.message())
.attachMethodArgs(timedLogVar.shouldAttachMethodArgs(), Stream.of(joinPoint.getArgs()).collect(Collectors.toList()))
.attachReturnValue(timedLogVar.shouldAttachReturnValue(), returnValue);
log.info(messageBuilder.build(), messageBuilder.getArgs().toArray());
return returnValue;
}
}
with this being the actual interface:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface TimedLog {
boolean shouldAttachMethodArgs() default false;
boolean shouldAttachReturnValue() default false;
String message() default "";
}
I've seen a lot of answer, being adding private
before the first *
in the execution
portion, I've seen privileged
which isn't supported for annotations, and I'm using AspectJ with no SpringAOP.
any ideas?
java spring aspectj
I've got an AspectJ weaving annotation that works for public methods, but private method are being ignored.
The purpose of this method is to simply log the time it took to run the function.
@Aspect
@Slf4j
public class TimedLogAspect {
@Pointcut("@annotation(timedLogVar)")
public void annotationPointCutDefinition(TimedLog timedLogVar) {}
@Pointcut("execution(* *(..))")
public void atExecution() {}
@Around(value = "annotationPointCutDefinition(timedLogVar) && atExecution()", argNames = "joinPoint,timedLogVar")
public Object around(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint, TimedLog timedLogVar) throws Throwable {
Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();
Object returnValue = joinPoint.proceed();
stopwatch.stop();
MessageBuilder messageBuilder = new MessageBuilder(joinPoint.toShortString(), stopwatch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.attachMessage(timedLogVar.message())
.attachMethodArgs(timedLogVar.shouldAttachMethodArgs(), Stream.of(joinPoint.getArgs()).collect(Collectors.toList()))
.attachReturnValue(timedLogVar.shouldAttachReturnValue(), returnValue);
log.info(messageBuilder.build(), messageBuilder.getArgs().toArray());
return returnValue;
}
}
with this being the actual interface:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface TimedLog {
boolean shouldAttachMethodArgs() default false;
boolean shouldAttachReturnValue() default false;
String message() default "";
}
I've seen a lot of answer, being adding private
before the first *
in the execution
portion, I've seen privileged
which isn't supported for annotations, and I'm using AspectJ with no SpringAOP.
any ideas?
java spring aspectj
java spring aspectj
asked Nov 25 '18 at 9:21
Dor MunisDor Munis
133
133
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The answer is simple: use native AspectJ syntax. You mentioned it by yourself. You even said that you use full AspectJ, not Spring AOP. So switching should not be a problem.
You have lots of advantages:
- more power (some features are unavailable in annotation syntax, as you noticed),
- syntax highlighting and code completion in IDEs,
- more expressive syntax (less verbose and more elegant, i.e. no need to bind
thisJoinPoint
in advices and easier use ofif()
, no need for fully-qualified class names because you can just import them).
The annotation-based syntax IMO is just terribly difficult to read, everything is in a single string inside an annotation parameter. I only use it if I have no other choice or when answering questions about it here.
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53466151%2faspectj-weaving-for-private-methods%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The answer is simple: use native AspectJ syntax. You mentioned it by yourself. You even said that you use full AspectJ, not Spring AOP. So switching should not be a problem.
You have lots of advantages:
- more power (some features are unavailable in annotation syntax, as you noticed),
- syntax highlighting and code completion in IDEs,
- more expressive syntax (less verbose and more elegant, i.e. no need to bind
thisJoinPoint
in advices and easier use ofif()
, no need for fully-qualified class names because you can just import them).
The annotation-based syntax IMO is just terribly difficult to read, everything is in a single string inside an annotation parameter. I only use it if I have no other choice or when answering questions about it here.
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
add a comment |
The answer is simple: use native AspectJ syntax. You mentioned it by yourself. You even said that you use full AspectJ, not Spring AOP. So switching should not be a problem.
You have lots of advantages:
- more power (some features are unavailable in annotation syntax, as you noticed),
- syntax highlighting and code completion in IDEs,
- more expressive syntax (less verbose and more elegant, i.e. no need to bind
thisJoinPoint
in advices and easier use ofif()
, no need for fully-qualified class names because you can just import them).
The annotation-based syntax IMO is just terribly difficult to read, everything is in a single string inside an annotation parameter. I only use it if I have no other choice or when answering questions about it here.
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
add a comment |
The answer is simple: use native AspectJ syntax. You mentioned it by yourself. You even said that you use full AspectJ, not Spring AOP. So switching should not be a problem.
You have lots of advantages:
- more power (some features are unavailable in annotation syntax, as you noticed),
- syntax highlighting and code completion in IDEs,
- more expressive syntax (less verbose and more elegant, i.e. no need to bind
thisJoinPoint
in advices and easier use ofif()
, no need for fully-qualified class names because you can just import them).
The annotation-based syntax IMO is just terribly difficult to read, everything is in a single string inside an annotation parameter. I only use it if I have no other choice or when answering questions about it here.
The answer is simple: use native AspectJ syntax. You mentioned it by yourself. You even said that you use full AspectJ, not Spring AOP. So switching should not be a problem.
You have lots of advantages:
- more power (some features are unavailable in annotation syntax, as you noticed),
- syntax highlighting and code completion in IDEs,
- more expressive syntax (less verbose and more elegant, i.e. no need to bind
thisJoinPoint
in advices and easier use ofif()
, no need for fully-qualified class names because you can just import them).
The annotation-based syntax IMO is just terribly difficult to read, everything is in a single string inside an annotation parameter. I only use it if I have no other choice or when answering questions about it here.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 12:00
kriegaexkriegaex
31.7k366101
31.7k366101
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
add a comment |
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
But I couldn't find a way to use the syntax and pointcut to every method (instead of just 1). Do you have any examples of working code?
– Dor Munis
Nov 25 '18 at 14:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53466151%2faspectj-weaving-for-private-methods%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown