Is it right way for handling exceptions using Apache ExceptionUtils.getRootCause?
Is it possible, that below condition in "My code" will be fulfilled(true)? I belive that no, beacuse getRootCause returns object casted to Throwable. So it should check, if Throwable is a subtype of MyOwnException, which is not true. So, in general, it is wrong way to use getRootCause to handle exceptions, is not it?
MyOwnException part
public class MyOwnException extends Exception {
// ....
}
Apache's ExceptionUtils.getRootCause
public static Throwable getRootCause(Throwable throwable) {
List list = getThrowableList(throwable);
return (list.size() < 2 ? null : (Throwable)list.get(list.size() - 1));
}
My code
try {
// do something
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Throwable exc = ExceptionUtils.getRootCause(e);
if (exc instanceof MyOwnException) {
// do something
}
}
}
java exception-handling
add a comment |
Is it possible, that below condition in "My code" will be fulfilled(true)? I belive that no, beacuse getRootCause returns object casted to Throwable. So it should check, if Throwable is a subtype of MyOwnException, which is not true. So, in general, it is wrong way to use getRootCause to handle exceptions, is not it?
MyOwnException part
public class MyOwnException extends Exception {
// ....
}
Apache's ExceptionUtils.getRootCause
public static Throwable getRootCause(Throwable throwable) {
List list = getThrowableList(throwable);
return (list.size() < 2 ? null : (Throwable)list.get(list.size() - 1));
}
My code
try {
// do something
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Throwable exc = ExceptionUtils.getRootCause(e);
if (exc instanceof MyOwnException) {
// do something
}
}
}
java exception-handling
add a comment |
Is it possible, that below condition in "My code" will be fulfilled(true)? I belive that no, beacuse getRootCause returns object casted to Throwable. So it should check, if Throwable is a subtype of MyOwnException, which is not true. So, in general, it is wrong way to use getRootCause to handle exceptions, is not it?
MyOwnException part
public class MyOwnException extends Exception {
// ....
}
Apache's ExceptionUtils.getRootCause
public static Throwable getRootCause(Throwable throwable) {
List list = getThrowableList(throwable);
return (list.size() < 2 ? null : (Throwable)list.get(list.size() - 1));
}
My code
try {
// do something
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Throwable exc = ExceptionUtils.getRootCause(e);
if (exc instanceof MyOwnException) {
// do something
}
}
}
java exception-handling
Is it possible, that below condition in "My code" will be fulfilled(true)? I belive that no, beacuse getRootCause returns object casted to Throwable. So it should check, if Throwable is a subtype of MyOwnException, which is not true. So, in general, it is wrong way to use getRootCause to handle exceptions, is not it?
MyOwnException part
public class MyOwnException extends Exception {
// ....
}
Apache's ExceptionUtils.getRootCause
public static Throwable getRootCause(Throwable throwable) {
List list = getThrowableList(throwable);
return (list.size() < 2 ? null : (Throwable)list.get(list.size() - 1));
}
My code
try {
// do something
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Throwable exc = ExceptionUtils.getRootCause(e);
if (exc instanceof MyOwnException) {
// do something
}
}
}
java exception-handling
java exception-handling
asked Nov 21 '18 at 15:23
Czarek
7318
7318
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
instanceof will check against the actual run-time type of an object instance. It does not matter what the declared compile-time type of the variable that holds the object is.
So your condition works: If the root cause is a MyOwnException then your if block's body will execute.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53415265%2fis-it-right-way-for-handling-exceptions-using-apache-exceptionutils-getrootcause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
instanceof will check against the actual run-time type of an object instance. It does not matter what the declared compile-time type of the variable that holds the object is.
So your condition works: If the root cause is a MyOwnException then your if block's body will execute.
add a comment |
instanceof will check against the actual run-time type of an object instance. It does not matter what the declared compile-time type of the variable that holds the object is.
So your condition works: If the root cause is a MyOwnException then your if block's body will execute.
add a comment |
instanceof will check against the actual run-time type of an object instance. It does not matter what the declared compile-time type of the variable that holds the object is.
So your condition works: If the root cause is a MyOwnException then your if block's body will execute.
instanceof will check against the actual run-time type of an object instance. It does not matter what the declared compile-time type of the variable that holds the object is.
So your condition works: If the root cause is a MyOwnException then your if block's body will execute.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 15:30
Thilo
193k77413572
193k77413572
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53415265%2fis-it-right-way-for-handling-exceptions-using-apache-exceptionutils-getrootcause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown