IC product lifetime as function of junction temperature
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?
integrated-circuit thermal
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?
integrated-circuit thermal
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?
integrated-circuit thermal
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?
integrated-circuit thermal
integrated-circuit thermal
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
asked 3 hours ago
VanGo
419415
419415
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:
Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life
Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.
The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation
$ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $
The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).
MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage
https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:
Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life
Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.
The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation
$ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $
The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).
MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage
https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:
Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life
Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.
The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation
$ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $
The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).
MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage
https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:
Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life
Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.
The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation
$ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $
The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).
MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage
https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:
Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life
Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.
The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation
$ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $
The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).
MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage
https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
answered 3 hours ago
JonRB
12.9k21940
12.9k21940
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408537%2fic-product-lifetime-as-function-of-junction-temperature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
