Should I dispose injected variable after assigment












0















I'm working on an active directory service class for my ASP.NET MVC web app. I use Ninject to IOC. I inject Forest to my class with the following manner.



private readonly Forest forest;
public ActiveDirectoryServices(Forest forest)
{
this.forest = forest;
}


In my NinjectWebCommon I use the following binding.



kernel.Bind<Forest>().ToSelf().InRequestScope();


After that, in my function I assign a new Forest to my injected forest variable.



this.forest = Forest.GetCurrentForest();


I know that, ninject handle object disposing if I use InRequestScope() binding, but is it true after a new reference assigment as well?
My question is, should I dispose the forest field in my class, or Ninject will handle it?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    the container will manage what it creates. If you create further instances after that, the container is unaware of those.

    – Nkosi
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:22











  • Thank you for your response. One more question. Can this cause memory leak? kernel.Bind<GlobalCatalog>().ToMethod(t => Forest.GetCurrentForest().FindGlobalCatalog());

    – Ezayex
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:42








  • 1





    You should share the code of Forest.GetCurrentForest() Is this a static method ? With a service locator call ?

    – jbl
    Nov 26 '18 at 10:51
















0















I'm working on an active directory service class for my ASP.NET MVC web app. I use Ninject to IOC. I inject Forest to my class with the following manner.



private readonly Forest forest;
public ActiveDirectoryServices(Forest forest)
{
this.forest = forest;
}


In my NinjectWebCommon I use the following binding.



kernel.Bind<Forest>().ToSelf().InRequestScope();


After that, in my function I assign a new Forest to my injected forest variable.



this.forest = Forest.GetCurrentForest();


I know that, ninject handle object disposing if I use InRequestScope() binding, but is it true after a new reference assigment as well?
My question is, should I dispose the forest field in my class, or Ninject will handle it?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    the container will manage what it creates. If you create further instances after that, the container is unaware of those.

    – Nkosi
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:22











  • Thank you for your response. One more question. Can this cause memory leak? kernel.Bind<GlobalCatalog>().ToMethod(t => Forest.GetCurrentForest().FindGlobalCatalog());

    – Ezayex
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:42








  • 1





    You should share the code of Forest.GetCurrentForest() Is this a static method ? With a service locator call ?

    – jbl
    Nov 26 '18 at 10:51














0












0








0


1






I'm working on an active directory service class for my ASP.NET MVC web app. I use Ninject to IOC. I inject Forest to my class with the following manner.



private readonly Forest forest;
public ActiveDirectoryServices(Forest forest)
{
this.forest = forest;
}


In my NinjectWebCommon I use the following binding.



kernel.Bind<Forest>().ToSelf().InRequestScope();


After that, in my function I assign a new Forest to my injected forest variable.



this.forest = Forest.GetCurrentForest();


I know that, ninject handle object disposing if I use InRequestScope() binding, but is it true after a new reference assigment as well?
My question is, should I dispose the forest field in my class, or Ninject will handle it?










share|improve this question














I'm working on an active directory service class for my ASP.NET MVC web app. I use Ninject to IOC. I inject Forest to my class with the following manner.



private readonly Forest forest;
public ActiveDirectoryServices(Forest forest)
{
this.forest = forest;
}


In my NinjectWebCommon I use the following binding.



kernel.Bind<Forest>().ToSelf().InRequestScope();


After that, in my function I assign a new Forest to my injected forest variable.



this.forest = Forest.GetCurrentForest();


I know that, ninject handle object disposing if I use InRequestScope() binding, but is it true after a new reference assigment as well?
My question is, should I dispose the forest field in my class, or Ninject will handle it?







c# asp.net-mvc ninject ioc-container dispose






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 '18 at 15:19









EzayexEzayex

334




334








  • 1





    the container will manage what it creates. If you create further instances after that, the container is unaware of those.

    – Nkosi
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:22











  • Thank you for your response. One more question. Can this cause memory leak? kernel.Bind<GlobalCatalog>().ToMethod(t => Forest.GetCurrentForest().FindGlobalCatalog());

    – Ezayex
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:42








  • 1





    You should share the code of Forest.GetCurrentForest() Is this a static method ? With a service locator call ?

    – jbl
    Nov 26 '18 at 10:51














  • 1





    the container will manage what it creates. If you create further instances after that, the container is unaware of those.

    – Nkosi
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:22











  • Thank you for your response. One more question. Can this cause memory leak? kernel.Bind<GlobalCatalog>().ToMethod(t => Forest.GetCurrentForest().FindGlobalCatalog());

    – Ezayex
    Nov 22 '18 at 15:42








  • 1





    You should share the code of Forest.GetCurrentForest() Is this a static method ? With a service locator call ?

    – jbl
    Nov 26 '18 at 10:51








1




1





the container will manage what it creates. If you create further instances after that, the container is unaware of those.

– Nkosi
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22





the container will manage what it creates. If you create further instances after that, the container is unaware of those.

– Nkosi
Nov 22 '18 at 15:22













Thank you for your response. One more question. Can this cause memory leak? kernel.Bind<GlobalCatalog>().ToMethod(t => Forest.GetCurrentForest().FindGlobalCatalog());

– Ezayex
Nov 22 '18 at 15:42







Thank you for your response. One more question. Can this cause memory leak? kernel.Bind<GlobalCatalog>().ToMethod(t => Forest.GetCurrentForest().FindGlobalCatalog());

– Ezayex
Nov 22 '18 at 15:42






1




1





You should share the code of Forest.GetCurrentForest() Is this a static method ? With a service locator call ?

– jbl
Nov 26 '18 at 10:51





You should share the code of Forest.GetCurrentForest() Is this a static method ? With a service locator call ?

– jbl
Nov 26 '18 at 10:51












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433978%2fshould-i-dispose-injected-variable-after-assigment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433978%2fshould-i-dispose-injected-variable-after-assigment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'