Passing generated empty strings as command line arguments












3















I do the following:



$ ./input ""


Output:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 0


But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:



$ python -c 'print """"'
""

./input $(python -c 'print """"')


gives:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")


So how can I generate something like



$ ./input "" "" "" ""


and get result same as in example 1 ?










share|improve this question

























  • You should post your C code too.

    – Tomasz
    1 hour ago











  • Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.

    – Alex Hoppus
    1 hour ago











  • As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)

    – ilkkachu
    9 mins ago
















3















I do the following:



$ ./input ""


Output:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 0


But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:



$ python -c 'print """"'
""

./input $(python -c 'print """"')


gives:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")


So how can I generate something like



$ ./input "" "" "" ""


and get result same as in example 1 ?










share|improve this question

























  • You should post your C code too.

    – Tomasz
    1 hour ago











  • Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.

    – Alex Hoppus
    1 hour ago











  • As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)

    – ilkkachu
    9 mins ago














3












3








3








I do the following:



$ ./input ""


Output:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 0


But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:



$ python -c 'print """"'
""

./input $(python -c 'print """"')


gives:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")


So how can I generate something like



$ ./input "" "" "" ""


and get result same as in example 1 ?










share|improve this question
















I do the following:



$ ./input ""


Output:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 0


But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:



$ python -c 'print """"'
""

./input $(python -c 'print """"')


gives:



argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")


So how can I generate something like



$ ./input "" "" "" ""


and get result same as in example 1 ?







bash c arguments






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 12 mins ago









ilkkachu

57.1k785158




57.1k785158










asked 2 hours ago









Alex HoppusAlex Hoppus

1529




1529













  • You should post your C code too.

    – Tomasz
    1 hour ago











  • Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.

    – Alex Hoppus
    1 hour ago











  • As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)

    – ilkkachu
    9 mins ago



















  • You should post your C code too.

    – Tomasz
    1 hour ago











  • Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.

    – Alex Hoppus
    1 hour ago











  • As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)

    – ilkkachu
    9 mins ago

















You should post your C code too.

– Tomasz
1 hour ago





You should post your C code too.

– Tomasz
1 hour ago













Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.

– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago





Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.

– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago













As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)

– ilkkachu
9 mins ago





As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)

– ilkkachu
9 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














in



./input $(cmd)


Because, $(cmd) is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh) and in the case of ksh also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c} into ab and ac for instance).



The default value of $IFS contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.



If the output of cmd is " a bnc n", that split+glob operator will generate a "a", "b" and "c" arguments to ./input. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).



So for instance if you do:



IFS=:          # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
./input $(cmd)


And if cmd outputs a::bn, then that split+glob operator will result in "a", "" and "b" arguments (note that the "s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).



With a:b:n, depending on the shell, that will result in "a" and "b" or "a", "b" and "". You can make it consistent across all shells with



./input $(cmd)""


(which also means that for an empty output of cmd (or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).



Example:



cmd() {
printf 'a b:: cn'
}
input() {
printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
[ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
}
IFS=:
set -o noglob
input $(cmd)


gives:



I got 3 arguments:
- <a b>
- <>
- < c>


Also note that when you do:



./input ""


Those " are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those " characters are not passed to input.






share|improve this answer

































    3














    But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:



    #!/bin/bash

    printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"


    It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s for brevity.



    $ ./s a
    Argument count: 1.
    $ ./s a b
    Argument count: 2.
    $ ./s a b ""
    Argument count: 3.
    $ ./s a b "" ""
    Argument count: 4.
    $ ./s a b "" "" ""
    Argument count: 5.


    As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But "" can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.



    Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

      – Alex Hoppus
      1 hour ago













    • @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

      – Tomasz
      1 hour ago











    • Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

      – Alex Hoppus
      1 hour ago





















    1














    You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:



    $ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10' 
    ./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""

    $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
    $#: 100
    $1: ><


    (q/"" / is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100 makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)



    eval processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.



    If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):



    $ n=33
    $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
    $#: 33
    $1: ><





    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496843%2fpassing-generated-empty-strings-as-command-line-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      in



      ./input $(cmd)


      Because, $(cmd) is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh) and in the case of ksh also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c} into ab and ac for instance).



      The default value of $IFS contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.



      If the output of cmd is " a bnc n", that split+glob operator will generate a "a", "b" and "c" arguments to ./input. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).



      So for instance if you do:



      IFS=:          # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
      set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
      ./input $(cmd)


      And if cmd outputs a::bn, then that split+glob operator will result in "a", "" and "b" arguments (note that the "s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).



      With a:b:n, depending on the shell, that will result in "a" and "b" or "a", "b" and "". You can make it consistent across all shells with



      ./input $(cmd)""


      (which also means that for an empty output of cmd (or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).



      Example:



      cmd() {
      printf 'a b:: cn'
      }
      input() {
      printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
      [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
      }
      IFS=:
      set -o noglob
      input $(cmd)


      gives:



      I got 3 arguments:
      - <a b>
      - <>
      - < c>


      Also note that when you do:



      ./input ""


      Those " are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those " characters are not passed to input.






      share|improve this answer






























        3














        in



        ./input $(cmd)


        Because, $(cmd) is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh) and in the case of ksh also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c} into ab and ac for instance).



        The default value of $IFS contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.



        If the output of cmd is " a bnc n", that split+glob operator will generate a "a", "b" and "c" arguments to ./input. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).



        So for instance if you do:



        IFS=:          # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
        set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
        ./input $(cmd)


        And if cmd outputs a::bn, then that split+glob operator will result in "a", "" and "b" arguments (note that the "s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).



        With a:b:n, depending on the shell, that will result in "a" and "b" or "a", "b" and "". You can make it consistent across all shells with



        ./input $(cmd)""


        (which also means that for an empty output of cmd (or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).



        Example:



        cmd() {
        printf 'a b:: cn'
        }
        input() {
        printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
        [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
        }
        IFS=:
        set -o noglob
        input $(cmd)


        gives:



        I got 3 arguments:
        - <a b>
        - <>
        - < c>


        Also note that when you do:



        ./input ""


        Those " are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those " characters are not passed to input.






        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          in



          ./input $(cmd)


          Because, $(cmd) is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh) and in the case of ksh also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c} into ab and ac for instance).



          The default value of $IFS contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.



          If the output of cmd is " a bnc n", that split+glob operator will generate a "a", "b" and "c" arguments to ./input. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).



          So for instance if you do:



          IFS=:          # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
          set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
          ./input $(cmd)


          And if cmd outputs a::bn, then that split+glob operator will result in "a", "" and "b" arguments (note that the "s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).



          With a:b:n, depending on the shell, that will result in "a" and "b" or "a", "b" and "". You can make it consistent across all shells with



          ./input $(cmd)""


          (which also means that for an empty output of cmd (or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).



          Example:



          cmd() {
          printf 'a b:: cn'
          }
          input() {
          printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
          [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
          }
          IFS=:
          set -o noglob
          input $(cmd)


          gives:



          I got 3 arguments:
          - <a b>
          - <>
          - < c>


          Also note that when you do:



          ./input ""


          Those " are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those " characters are not passed to input.






          share|improve this answer















          in



          ./input $(cmd)


          Because, $(cmd) is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh) and in the case of ksh also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c} into ab and ac for instance).



          The default value of $IFS contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.



          If the output of cmd is " a bnc n", that split+glob operator will generate a "a", "b" and "c" arguments to ./input. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).



          So for instance if you do:



          IFS=:          # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
          set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
          ./input $(cmd)


          And if cmd outputs a::bn, then that split+glob operator will result in "a", "" and "b" arguments (note that the "s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).



          With a:b:n, depending on the shell, that will result in "a" and "b" or "a", "b" and "". You can make it consistent across all shells with



          ./input $(cmd)""


          (which also means that for an empty output of cmd (or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).



          Example:



          cmd() {
          printf 'a b:: cn'
          }
          input() {
          printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
          [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
          }
          IFS=:
          set -o noglob
          input $(cmd)


          gives:



          I got 3 arguments:
          - <a b>
          - <>
          - < c>


          Also note that when you do:



          ./input ""


          Those " are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those " characters are not passed to input.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

          302k56568921




          302k56568921

























              3














              But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:



              #!/bin/bash

              printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"


              It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s for brevity.



              $ ./s a
              Argument count: 1.
              $ ./s a b
              Argument count: 2.
              $ ./s a b ""
              Argument count: 3.
              $ ./s a b "" ""
              Argument count: 4.
              $ ./s a b "" "" ""
              Argument count: 5.


              As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But "" can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.



              Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago













              • @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

                – Tomasz
                1 hour ago











              • Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago


















              3














              But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:



              #!/bin/bash

              printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"


              It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s for brevity.



              $ ./s a
              Argument count: 1.
              $ ./s a b
              Argument count: 2.
              $ ./s a b ""
              Argument count: 3.
              $ ./s a b "" ""
              Argument count: 4.
              $ ./s a b "" "" ""
              Argument count: 5.


              As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But "" can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.



              Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago













              • @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

                – Tomasz
                1 hour ago











              • Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago
















              3












              3








              3







              But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:



              #!/bin/bash

              printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"


              It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s for brevity.



              $ ./s a
              Argument count: 1.
              $ ./s a b
              Argument count: 2.
              $ ./s a b ""
              Argument count: 3.
              $ ./s a b "" ""
              Argument count: 4.
              $ ./s a b "" "" ""
              Argument count: 5.


              As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But "" can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.



              Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.






              share|improve this answer













              But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:



              #!/bin/bash

              printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"


              It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s for brevity.



              $ ./s a
              Argument count: 1.
              $ ./s a b
              Argument count: 2.
              $ ./s a b ""
              Argument count: 3.
              $ ./s a b "" ""
              Argument count: 4.
              $ ./s a b "" "" ""
              Argument count: 5.


              As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But "" can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.



              Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 1 hour ago









              TomaszTomasz

              9,43852965




              9,43852965













              • Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago













              • @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

                – Tomasz
                1 hour ago











              • Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago





















              • Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago













              • @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

                – Tomasz
                1 hour ago











              • Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

                – Alex Hoppus
                1 hour ago



















              Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

              – Alex Hoppus
              1 hour ago







              Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.

              – Alex Hoppus
              1 hour ago















              @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

              – Tomasz
              1 hour ago





              @AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and xargs: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s.

              – Tomasz
              1 hour ago













              Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

              – Alex Hoppus
              1 hour ago







              Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs

              – Alex Hoppus
              1 hour ago













              1














              You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:



              $ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10' 
              ./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""

              $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
              $#: 100
              $1: ><


              (q/"" / is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100 makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)



              eval processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.



              If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):



              $ n=33
              $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
              $#: 33
              $1: ><





              share|improve this answer




























                1














                You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:



                $ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10' 
                ./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""

                $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
                $#: 100
                $1: ><


                (q/"" / is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100 makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)



                eval processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.



                If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):



                $ n=33
                $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
                $#: 33
                $1: ><





                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:



                  $ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10' 
                  ./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""

                  $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
                  $#: 100
                  $1: ><


                  (q/"" / is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100 makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)



                  eval processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.



                  If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):



                  $ n=33
                  $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
                  $#: 33
                  $1: ><





                  share|improve this answer













                  You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:



                  $ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10' 
                  ./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""

                  $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
                  $#: 100
                  $1: ><


                  (q/"" / is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100 makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)



                  eval processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.



                  If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):



                  $ n=33
                  $ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
                  $#: 33
                  $1: ><






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 18 mins ago









                  ilkkachuilkkachu

                  57.1k785158




                  57.1k785158






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496843%2fpassing-generated-empty-strings-as-command-line-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                      How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                      Refactoring coordinates for Minecraft Pi buildings written in Python