Passing generated empty strings as command line arguments
I do the following:
$ ./input ""
Output:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 0
But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:
$ python -c 'print """"'
""
./input $(python -c 'print """"')
gives:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")
So how can I generate something like
$ ./input "" "" "" ""
and get result same as in example 1 ?
bash c arguments
add a comment |
I do the following:
$ ./input ""
Output:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 0
But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:
$ python -c 'print """"'
""
./input $(python -c 'print """"')
gives:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")
So how can I generate something like
$ ./input "" "" "" ""
and get result same as in example 1 ?
bash c arguments
You should post your C code too.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)
– ilkkachu
9 mins ago
add a comment |
I do the following:
$ ./input ""
Output:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 0
But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:
$ python -c 'print """"'
""
./input $(python -c 'print """"')
gives:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")
So how can I generate something like
$ ./input "" "" "" ""
and get result same as in example 1 ?
bash c arguments
I do the following:
$ ./input ""
Output:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 0
But if I want to pass (several) empty quotes in program based manner:
$ python -c 'print """"'
""
./input $(python -c 'print """"')
gives:
argc 2
argv[1][0] 22 - (22 hex value for ")
So how can I generate something like
$ ./input "" "" "" ""
and get result same as in example 1 ?
bash c arguments
bash c arguments
edited 12 mins ago
ilkkachu
57.1k785158
57.1k785158
asked 2 hours ago
Alex HoppusAlex Hoppus
1529
1529
You should post your C code too.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)
– ilkkachu
9 mins ago
add a comment |
You should post your C code too.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)
– ilkkachu
9 mins ago
You should post your C code too.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
You should post your C code too.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)
– ilkkachu
9 mins ago
As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)
– ilkkachu
9 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
in
./input $(cmd)
Because, $(cmd)
is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd
, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS
special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt
into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh
) and in the case of ksh
also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c}
into ab
and ac
for instance).
The default value of $IFS
contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh
, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.
If the output of cmd
is " a bnc n"
, that split+glob operator will generate a "a"
, "b"
and "c"
arguments to ./input
. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob
to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).
So for instance if you do:
IFS=: # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
./input $(cmd)
And if cmd
outputs a::bn
, then that split+glob operator will result in "a"
, ""
and "b"
arguments (note that the "
s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).
With a:b:n
, depending on the shell, that will result in "a"
and "b"
or "a"
, "b"
and ""
. You can make it consistent across all shells with
./input $(cmd)""
(which also means that for an empty output of cmd
(or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input
will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).
Example:
cmd() {
printf 'a b:: cn'
}
input() {
printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
[ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
}
IFS=:
set -o noglob
input $(cmd)
gives:
I got 3 arguments:
- <a b>
- <>
- < c>
Also note that when you do:
./input ""
Those "
are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those "
characters are not passed to input
.
add a comment |
But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:
#!/bin/bash
printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"
It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s
for brevity.
$ ./s a
Argument count: 1.
$ ./s a b
Argument count: 2.
$ ./s a b ""
Argument count: 3.
$ ./s a b "" ""
Argument count: 4.
$ ./s a b "" "" ""
Argument count: 5.
As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But ""
can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.
Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs andxargs
:$ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:
$ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10'
./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
$#: 100
$1: ><
(q/"" /
is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100
makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)
eval
processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.
If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x
could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):
$ n=33
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
$#: 33
$1: ><
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496843%2fpassing-generated-empty-strings-as-command-line-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
in
./input $(cmd)
Because, $(cmd)
is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd
, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS
special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt
into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh
) and in the case of ksh
also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c}
into ab
and ac
for instance).
The default value of $IFS
contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh
, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.
If the output of cmd
is " a bnc n"
, that split+glob operator will generate a "a"
, "b"
and "c"
arguments to ./input
. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob
to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).
So for instance if you do:
IFS=: # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
./input $(cmd)
And if cmd
outputs a::bn
, then that split+glob operator will result in "a"
, ""
and "b"
arguments (note that the "
s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).
With a:b:n
, depending on the shell, that will result in "a"
and "b"
or "a"
, "b"
and ""
. You can make it consistent across all shells with
./input $(cmd)""
(which also means that for an empty output of cmd
(or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input
will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).
Example:
cmd() {
printf 'a b:: cn'
}
input() {
printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
[ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
}
IFS=:
set -o noglob
input $(cmd)
gives:
I got 3 arguments:
- <a b>
- <>
- < c>
Also note that when you do:
./input ""
Those "
are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those "
characters are not passed to input
.
add a comment |
in
./input $(cmd)
Because, $(cmd)
is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd
, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS
special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt
into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh
) and in the case of ksh
also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c}
into ab
and ac
for instance).
The default value of $IFS
contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh
, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.
If the output of cmd
is " a bnc n"
, that split+glob operator will generate a "a"
, "b"
and "c"
arguments to ./input
. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob
to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).
So for instance if you do:
IFS=: # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
./input $(cmd)
And if cmd
outputs a::bn
, then that split+glob operator will result in "a"
, ""
and "b"
arguments (note that the "
s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).
With a:b:n
, depending on the shell, that will result in "a"
and "b"
or "a"
, "b"
and ""
. You can make it consistent across all shells with
./input $(cmd)""
(which also means that for an empty output of cmd
(or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input
will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).
Example:
cmd() {
printf 'a b:: cn'
}
input() {
printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
[ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
}
IFS=:
set -o noglob
input $(cmd)
gives:
I got 3 arguments:
- <a b>
- <>
- < c>
Also note that when you do:
./input ""
Those "
are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those "
characters are not passed to input
.
add a comment |
in
./input $(cmd)
Because, $(cmd)
is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd
, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS
special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt
into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh
) and in the case of ksh
also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c}
into ab
and ac
for instance).
The default value of $IFS
contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh
, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.
If the output of cmd
is " a bnc n"
, that split+glob operator will generate a "a"
, "b"
and "c"
arguments to ./input
. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob
to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).
So for instance if you do:
IFS=: # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
./input $(cmd)
And if cmd
outputs a::bn
, then that split+glob operator will result in "a"
, ""
and "b"
arguments (note that the "
s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).
With a:b:n
, depending on the shell, that will result in "a"
and "b"
or "a"
, "b"
and ""
. You can make it consistent across all shells with
./input $(cmd)""
(which also means that for an empty output of cmd
(or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input
will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).
Example:
cmd() {
printf 'a b:: cn'
}
input() {
printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
[ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
}
IFS=:
set -o noglob
input $(cmd)
gives:
I got 3 arguments:
- <a b>
- <>
- < c>
Also note that when you do:
./input ""
Those "
are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those "
characters are not passed to input
.
in
./input $(cmd)
Because, $(cmd)
is unquoted, that's a split+glob operator. The shell retrieves the output of cmd
, removes all the trailing newline characters, then splits that based on the value of the $IFS
special parameter, and then performs filename generation (for instance turns *.txt
into the list of non-hidden txt files in the current directory) on the resulting words (that latter part not with zsh
) and in the case of ksh
also performs brace expansion (turns a{b,c}
into ab
and ac
for instance).
The default value of $IFS
contains the SPC, TAB and NL characters (also NUL in zsh
, other shells either remove the NULs or choke on them). Those (not NUL) also happen to be IFS-whitespace character, which are treated specially when it comes to IFS-splitting.
If the output of cmd
is " a bnc n"
, that split+glob operator will generate a "a"
, "b"
and "c"
arguments to ./input
. With IFS-white-space characters, it's impossible for split+glob
to generate an empty argument because sequences of one or more IFS-whitespace characters are treated as one delimiter. To generate an empty argument, you'd need to choose a separator that is not an IFS-whitespace character. Actually, any character but SPC, TAB or NL will do (best to also avoid multi-byte characters which are not supported by all shells here).
So for instance if you do:
IFS=: # split on ":" which is not an IFS-whitespace character
set -o noglob # disable globbing (also brace expansion in ksh)
./input $(cmd)
And if cmd
outputs a::bn
, then that split+glob operator will result in "a"
, ""
and "b"
arguments (note that the "
s are not part of the value, I'm just using them here to help show the values).
With a:b:n
, depending on the shell, that will result in "a"
and "b"
or "a"
, "b"
and ""
. You can make it consistent across all shells with
./input $(cmd)""
(which also means that for an empty output of cmd
(or an output consisting only of newline characters), ./input
will receive one empty argument as opposed to no argument at all).
Example:
cmd() {
printf 'a b:: cn'
}
input() {
printf 'I got %d arguments:n' "$#"
[ "$#" -eq 0 ] || printf ' - <%s>n' "$@"
}
IFS=:
set -o noglob
input $(cmd)
gives:
I got 3 arguments:
- <a b>
- <>
- < c>
Also note that when you do:
./input ""
Those "
are part of the shell syntax, they are shell quoting operators. Those "
characters are not passed to input
.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas
302k56568921
302k56568921
add a comment |
add a comment |
But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:
#!/bin/bash
printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"
It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s
for brevity.
$ ./s a
Argument count: 1.
$ ./s a b
Argument count: 2.
$ ./s a b ""
Argument count: 3.
$ ./s a b "" ""
Argument count: 4.
$ ./s a b "" "" ""
Argument count: 5.
As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But ""
can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.
Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs andxargs
:$ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:
#!/bin/bash
printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"
It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s
for brevity.
$ ./s a
Argument count: 1.
$ ./s a b
Argument count: 2.
$ ./s a b ""
Argument count: 3.
$ ./s a b "" ""
Argument count: 4.
$ ./s a b "" "" ""
Argument count: 5.
As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But ""
can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.
Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs andxargs
:$ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:
#!/bin/bash
printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"
It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s
for brevity.
$ ./s a
Argument count: 1.
$ ./s a b
Argument count: 2.
$ ./s a b ""
Argument count: 3.
$ ./s a b "" ""
Argument count: 4.
$ ./s a b "" "" ""
Argument count: 5.
As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But ""
can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.
Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.
But what do you want to pass in fact? Empty quotes or empty strings? Both are valid arguments and this simple bash script can help illustrate this:
#!/bin/bash
printf "Argument count: %s.n" "${#@}"
It just prints the number of arguments passed to it. I'll call it s
for brevity.
$ ./s a
Argument count: 1.
$ ./s a b
Argument count: 2.
$ ./s a b ""
Argument count: 3.
$ ./s a b "" ""
Argument count: 4.
$ ./s a b "" "" ""
Argument count: 5.
As you can see the empty strings are just empty strings - the quotes are removed at parsing time - and they're still valid arguments. The shell feeds them into the command. But ""
can be passed on as well. It's not an empty string though. It contains two characters.
Under the hood, for C, strings are NUL () terminated and no quotes are needed to represent them.
answered 1 hour ago
TomaszTomasz
9,43852965
9,43852965
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs andxargs
:$ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs andxargs
:$ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
Mmm... Let's put it in a different way: I want pass 100 empty quotes. In C program empty quote passed as a parameter is a string which contains only 0x00. I can do it easy for one parameter like i said: ./input "" , but if i need 100 NULL parameters, it is hard to type in console ./input "" "" "" "" "" .... so i want to generate this command.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and
xargs
: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.– Tomasz
1 hour ago
@AlexHoppus Then you need 100 NULs and
xargs
: $ perl -e'print""x100' | xargs -0 ./s
.– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
Okay I have already done this via xargs, but the problem is that this ./input program also have an stdin input (the program reads some values using scanf()). And if i do python -c 'print "x00 "*65+" \nr"+"x00 "*34' | xargs ./input i don't know how to pass this input to my app (./input) when it is launched via xargs
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:
$ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10'
./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
$#: 100
$1: ><
(q/"" /
is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100
makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)
eval
processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.
If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x
could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):
$ n=33
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
$#: 33
$1: ><
add a comment |
You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:
$ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10'
./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
$#: 100
$1: ><
(q/"" /
is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100
makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)
eval
processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.
If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x
could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):
$ n=33
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
$#: 33
$1: ><
add a comment |
You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:
$ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10'
./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
$#: 100
$1: ><
(q/"" /
is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100
makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)
eval
processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.
If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x
could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):
$ n=33
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
$#: 33
$1: ><
You could generate the whole command line programmatically, and either copy-paste it, or run it through eval, e.g.:
$ perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 10'
./args.sh "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x 100')"
$#: 100
$1: ><
(q/"" /
is one of Perl's ways of quoting a string, x 100
makes hundred copies of it and concatenates them.)
eval
processes its argument(s) as shell commands, running all quote processing and expansions. This means that if any of the input comes from untrusted sources, you'll need to be careful in generating the evaluated code to prevent vulnerabilities.
If you want the number of empty arguments variable, that should be doable without issues (at least I can't come up with how the second operand to Perl's x
could be misused as it folds the operand to an integer):
$ n=33
$ eval "$(perl -e 'printf "./args.sh %sn", q/"" / x $ARGV[0]' "$n")"
$#: 33
$1: ><
answered 18 mins ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
57.1k785158
57.1k785158
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496843%2fpassing-generated-empty-strings-as-command-line-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You should post your C code too.
– Tomasz
1 hour ago
Why do you need it? It is clear from a context that is prints argc and argv[1][0] as a hex value.
– Alex Hoppus
1 hour ago
As far as the problem here seems to be how the shell translates the programmatically generated output to the actual arguments this seems on-topic to me. (Asking how to generate some output with Python would be SO stuff, but I suppose that wasn't the issue.)
– ilkkachu
9 mins ago