How to remove unnecessary fills in the eagle polygon?
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
add a comment |
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
add a comment |
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
pcb eagle polygon
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
asked 2 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
415
415
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-to-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-the-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
add a comment |
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
add a comment |
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
answered 2 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
11.2k1648
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
add a comment |
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
2 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
answered 2 hours ago
awjlogan
3,35811227
3,35811227
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-to-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-the-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
