How to remove unnecessary fills in the eagle polygon?












1














There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
enter image description here






pcb eagle polygon







share|improve this question



























    1














    There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
    enter image description here






    pcb eagle polygon







    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
      enter image description here






      pcb eagle polygon







      share|improve this question













      There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
      enter image description here






      pcb eagle polygon




      pcb eagle polygon






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Алекс Гарисон

      415




      415






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



          Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

          The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



          Example:
          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • That helped! Thank you!
            – Алекс Гарисон
            2 hours ago



















          0














          They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
            StackExchange.schematics.init();
            });
            }, "cicuitlab");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "135"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-to-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-the-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              2 hours ago
















            3














            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              2 hours ago














            3












            3








            3






            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            Jeroen3

            11.2k1648




            11.2k1648












            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              2 hours ago


















            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              2 hours ago
















            That helped! Thank you!
            – Алекс Гарисон
            2 hours ago




            That helped! Thank you!
            – Алекс Гарисон
            2 hours ago













            0














            They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






            share|improve this answer


























              0














              They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






              share|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






                share|improve this answer












                They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                awjlogan

                3,35811227




                3,35811227






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-to-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-the-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                    Image
                    0 The contact form does not work, and affects loading after one try. The chrome console shows the error message: POST http://example.com/wp-json/contact-form-7/v1/contact-forms/50/feedback 404 (Not Found) send @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:4 ajax @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:4 wpcf7.submit @ scripts.js?ver=5.0.3:346 (anonymous) @ scripts.js?ver=5.0.3:53 dispatch @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:3 r.handle @ jquery.js?ver=1.12.4:3 How to solve this issue? thanks in advance javascript wordpress contact-form-7 share | improve this question edited Jul 17 '18 at 5:39 Kiran Shahi 4,745 3 16 43 ...
                    Read more

                    How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                    Image
                    1 I would like to know if and how is it possible to know if a AD user can login interactively (on a server) in a domain. I need to know if I can find it out using a LDAP search. Thanks. windows active-directory login user-permissions user-profile share | improve this question edited 1 hour ago yagmoth555 ♦ 11.6k 3 17 42 asked 1 hour ago Luigi Luigi 6 1 New contributor ...
                    Read more

                    Refactoring coordinates for Minecraft Pi buildings written in Python

                    Image
                    0 $begingroup$ I'm fairly new to coding and I wrote this script in Python for a house with a roof in Minecraft Pi. I've found different ways to write the coordinates to make the code base shorter, but I'm wondering if it is possible for me to refactor it any further so I don't have to list each coordinate line by line. import mcpi.minecraft as minecraft import mcpi.block as block mc = minecraft.Minecraft.create() p = mc.player.getTilePos() mc.setBlocks(p.x+1, p.y, p.z+1, #Main structure starting coordinates (DO NOT ALTER) p.x+19, p.y+4, p.z+6, #Structure size/coordinates (Alters cube size) block.STONE_BRICK) mc.setBlocks(p.x+2, p.y+1, p.z+2, #Hollowing out main structure interior p.x+18, p.y+3, p.z+5, block.AIR) mc.setBlocks(p.x, p.y...
                    Read more