Selecting best row in each group based on two columns [duplicate]












0















This question already has an answer here:




  • SQL select only rows with max value on a column

    29 answers




Suppose we have the following table, where each row represents a submission a user made during a programming contest, id is an auto-increment primary key, probid identifies the problem the submission was made to, score is the number of points the submission earned for the problem, and date is the timestamp when the submission was made. Each user can submit as many times as they want to the same problem:



+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| id | username | probid | score | date |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| 1 | brian | 1 | 5 | 1542766686 |
| 2 | alex | 1 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| 3 | alex | 2 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| 4 | brian | 1 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| 5 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542766983 |
| 6 | jacob | 1 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| 7 | brian | 2 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| 8 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542767456 |
| 9 | brian | 2 | 7 | 1542767522 |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+


In order to rank the contestants, we need to determine the best submission each user made to each problem. The "best" submission is the one with the highest score, with ties broken by submission ID (i.e., if the user got the same score on the same problem twice, we only care about the earlier of the two submissions). This would yield a table like the following:



+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| username | probid | id | score | date |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+


How can I write a query to accomplish this?










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Strawberry mysql
Users with the  mysql badge can single-handedly close mysql questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 21 at 8:29


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • I added the greatest-n-per-group tag. This is a common type of question, and techniques to solve it have been posted many times.
    – Bill Karwin
    Nov 21 at 3:32
















0















This question already has an answer here:




  • SQL select only rows with max value on a column

    29 answers




Suppose we have the following table, where each row represents a submission a user made during a programming contest, id is an auto-increment primary key, probid identifies the problem the submission was made to, score is the number of points the submission earned for the problem, and date is the timestamp when the submission was made. Each user can submit as many times as they want to the same problem:



+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| id | username | probid | score | date |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| 1 | brian | 1 | 5 | 1542766686 |
| 2 | alex | 1 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| 3 | alex | 2 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| 4 | brian | 1 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| 5 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542766983 |
| 6 | jacob | 1 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| 7 | brian | 2 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| 8 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542767456 |
| 9 | brian | 2 | 7 | 1542767522 |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+


In order to rank the contestants, we need to determine the best submission each user made to each problem. The "best" submission is the one with the highest score, with ties broken by submission ID (i.e., if the user got the same score on the same problem twice, we only care about the earlier of the two submissions). This would yield a table like the following:



+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| username | probid | id | score | date |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+


How can I write a query to accomplish this?










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Strawberry mysql
Users with the  mysql badge can single-handedly close mysql questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 21 at 8:29


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • I added the greatest-n-per-group tag. This is a common type of question, and techniques to solve it have been posted many times.
    – Bill Karwin
    Nov 21 at 3:32














0












0








0








This question already has an answer here:




  • SQL select only rows with max value on a column

    29 answers




Suppose we have the following table, where each row represents a submission a user made during a programming contest, id is an auto-increment primary key, probid identifies the problem the submission was made to, score is the number of points the submission earned for the problem, and date is the timestamp when the submission was made. Each user can submit as many times as they want to the same problem:



+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| id | username | probid | score | date |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| 1 | brian | 1 | 5 | 1542766686 |
| 2 | alex | 1 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| 3 | alex | 2 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| 4 | brian | 1 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| 5 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542766983 |
| 6 | jacob | 1 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| 7 | brian | 2 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| 8 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542767456 |
| 9 | brian | 2 | 7 | 1542767522 |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+


In order to rank the contestants, we need to determine the best submission each user made to each problem. The "best" submission is the one with the highest score, with ties broken by submission ID (i.e., if the user got the same score on the same problem twice, we only care about the earlier of the two submissions). This would yield a table like the following:



+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| username | probid | id | score | date |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+


How can I write a query to accomplish this?










share|improve this question
















This question already has an answer here:




  • SQL select only rows with max value on a column

    29 answers




Suppose we have the following table, where each row represents a submission a user made during a programming contest, id is an auto-increment primary key, probid identifies the problem the submission was made to, score is the number of points the submission earned for the problem, and date is the timestamp when the submission was made. Each user can submit as many times as they want to the same problem:



+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| id | username | probid | score | date |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+
| 1 | brian | 1 | 5 | 1542766686 |
| 2 | alex | 1 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| 3 | alex | 2 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| 4 | brian | 1 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| 5 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542766983 |
| 6 | jacob | 1 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| 7 | brian | 2 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| 8 | jacob | 2 | 10 | 1542767456 |
| 9 | brian | 2 | 7 | 1542767522 |
+----+----------+--------+-------+------------+


In order to rank the contestants, we need to determine the best submission each user made to each problem. The "best" submission is the one with the highest score, with ties broken by submission ID (i.e., if the user got the same score on the same problem twice, we only care about the earlier of the two submissions). This would yield a table like the following:



+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| username | probid | id | score | date |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+
| alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
| alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
| brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
| brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
| jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
| jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |
+----------+--------+----+-------+------------+


How can I write a query to accomplish this?





This question already has an answer here:




  • SQL select only rows with max value on a column

    29 answers








mysql greatest-n-per-group






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 3:31









Bill Karwin

372k61510666




372k61510666










asked Nov 21 at 2:24









Brian

63.8k794179




63.8k794179




marked as duplicate by Strawberry mysql
Users with the  mysql badge can single-handedly close mysql questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 21 at 8:29


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Strawberry mysql
Users with the  mysql badge can single-handedly close mysql questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 21 at 8:29


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • I added the greatest-n-per-group tag. This is a common type of question, and techniques to solve it have been posted many times.
    – Bill Karwin
    Nov 21 at 3:32


















  • I added the greatest-n-per-group tag. This is a common type of question, and techniques to solve it have been posted many times.
    – Bill Karwin
    Nov 21 at 3:32
















I added the greatest-n-per-group tag. This is a common type of question, and techniques to solve it have been posted many times.
– Bill Karwin
Nov 21 at 3:32




I added the greatest-n-per-group tag. This is a common type of question, and techniques to solve it have been posted many times.
– Bill Karwin
Nov 21 at 3:32












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















0














SELECT username , probid , id , score , `date`
FROM tableName
ORDER BY username, score DESC, ID





share|improve this answer























  • Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
    – Sagar Zala
    Nov 21 at 5:11



















0














Using MySQL-8.0 or MariaDB-10.2 or later:



SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`
FROM (
SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`,
ROW_NUMBER() over (
PARTITION BY username,probid
ORDER BY score DESC) as `rank`
FROM tablename
) as tmp
WHERE tmp.`rank` = 1





share|improve this answer























  • You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
    – Nick
    Nov 21 at 2:49










  • sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
    – danblack
    Nov 21 at 2:50










  • I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
    – dwir182
    Nov 21 at 2:51



















0














This query will work on versions of MySQL prior to 8.0 as well. The LEFT JOIN removes duplicate scores, ensuring that equal scores only have the lowest date in the result set for a given score. Then the WHERE clause ensures that we have the maximum score for a given user/problem combination:



SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
FROM tablename t1
LEFT JOIN tablename t2
ON t2.username = t1.username AND
t2.probid = t1.probid AND
t2.score = t1.score AND
t2.date < t1.date
WHERE t2.id IS NULL AND
t1.score = (SELECT MAX(score) FROM tablename t3 WHERE t3.username = t1.username AND t3.probid = t1.probid)
ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


Update



It's almost certainly more efficient to JOIN the table to a list of maximum scores per user per problem first rather than computing the MAX value for each row in the result table. This query does that instead:



SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
FROM tablename t1
JOIN (SELECT username, probid, MAX(score) AS score
FROM tablename
GROUP BY username, probid) t2
ON t2.username = t1.username AND
t2.probid = t1.probid AND
t2.score = t1.score
LEFT JOIN tablename t3
ON t3.username = t1.username AND
t3.probid = t1.probid AND
t3.score = t1.score AND
t3.date < t1.date
WHERE t3.id IS NULL
ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


Output (for both queries):



username    probid  id  score   date
alex 1 2 10 1542766686
alex 2 3 5 1542766901
brian 1 4 10 1542766944
brian 2 7 8 1542767271
jacob 1 6 10 1542767053
jacob 2 5 10 1542766983


Updated Demo on SQLFiddle






share|improve this answer































    0














    In pre-MySQL 8.0.2, we can emulate Row_Number() functionality using User-defined Variables. In this technique, we firstly get the data in a particular order (depends on the problem statement at hand).



    In your case, within a partition of probid and username, we need to rank scores in descending order, with the row having lower timestamp value given higher priority (to break the ties). So, we will ORDER BY probid, username, score DESC, date ASC.



    Now, we can use this result-set as a Derived Table, and determine the row number. It will be like a Looping technique (which we use in application code, eg: PHP). We would store the previous row values in the User-defined variables, and use conditional CASE .. WHEN expressions to check the current row's value(s) against the previous row. And, then assign row number accordingly.



    Eventually, we will consider only those rows where row number is 1, and (if required), sort it by username and probid.





    Query



    SELECT dt2.username,
    dt2.probid,
    dt2.id,
    dt2.score,
    dt2.date
    FROM (SELECT @rn := CASE
    WHEN @un = dt1.username
    AND @pid = dt1.probid THEN @rn + 1
    ELSE 1
    end AS row_no,
    @un := dt1.username AS username,
    @pid := dt1.probid AS probid,
    dt1.id,
    dt1.score,
    dt1.date
    FROM (SELECT id,
    username,
    probid,
    score,
    date
    FROM your_table
    ORDER BY username,
    probid,
    score DESC,
    date ASC) AS dt1
    CROSS JOIN (SELECT @un := '',
    @pid := 0,
    @rn := 0) AS user_init_vars) AS dt2
    WHERE dt2.row_no = 1
    ORDER BY dt2.username, dt2.probid;


    Result



    | username | probid | id  | score | date       |
    | -------- | ------ | --- | ----- | ---------- |
    | alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
    | alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
    | brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
    | brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
    | jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
    | jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |




    View on DB Fiddle






    share|improve this answer





















    • This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
      – Nick
      Nov 22 at 23:53










    • @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
      – Madhur Bhaiya
      Nov 23 at 4:11










    • @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
      – Madhur Bhaiya
      Nov 23 at 4:48










    • I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
      – Nick
      Nov 23 at 5:13










    • @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
      – Madhur Bhaiya
      Nov 23 at 5:15




















    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    SELECT username , probid , id , score , `date`
    FROM tableName
    ORDER BY username, score DESC, ID





    share|improve this answer























    • Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
      – Sagar Zala
      Nov 21 at 5:11
















    0














    SELECT username , probid , id , score , `date`
    FROM tableName
    ORDER BY username, score DESC, ID





    share|improve this answer























    • Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
      – Sagar Zala
      Nov 21 at 5:11














    0












    0








    0






    SELECT username , probid , id , score , `date`
    FROM tableName
    ORDER BY username, score DESC, ID





    share|improve this answer














    SELECT username , probid , id , score , `date`
    FROM tableName
    ORDER BY username, score DESC, ID






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 21 at 2:41









    Nick

    22.8k81535




    22.8k81535










    answered Nov 21 at 2:33









    DoubleM

    279129




    279129












    • Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
      – Sagar Zala
      Nov 21 at 5:11


















    • Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
      – Sagar Zala
      Nov 21 at 5:11
















    Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
    – Sagar Zala
    Nov 21 at 5:11




    Adding some explanation would make this answer more useful.
    – Sagar Zala
    Nov 21 at 5:11













    0














    Using MySQL-8.0 or MariaDB-10.2 or later:



    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`
    FROM (
    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`,
    ROW_NUMBER() over (
    PARTITION BY username,probid
    ORDER BY score DESC) as `rank`
    FROM tablename
    ) as tmp
    WHERE tmp.`rank` = 1





    share|improve this answer























    • You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
      – Nick
      Nov 21 at 2:49










    • sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
      – danblack
      Nov 21 at 2:50










    • I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
      – dwir182
      Nov 21 at 2:51
















    0














    Using MySQL-8.0 or MariaDB-10.2 or later:



    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`
    FROM (
    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`,
    ROW_NUMBER() over (
    PARTITION BY username,probid
    ORDER BY score DESC) as `rank`
    FROM tablename
    ) as tmp
    WHERE tmp.`rank` = 1





    share|improve this answer























    • You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
      – Nick
      Nov 21 at 2:49










    • sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
      – danblack
      Nov 21 at 2:50










    • I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
      – dwir182
      Nov 21 at 2:51














    0












    0








    0






    Using MySQL-8.0 or MariaDB-10.2 or later:



    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`
    FROM (
    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`,
    ROW_NUMBER() over (
    PARTITION BY username,probid
    ORDER BY score DESC) as `rank`
    FROM tablename
    ) as tmp
    WHERE tmp.`rank` = 1





    share|improve this answer














    Using MySQL-8.0 or MariaDB-10.2 or later:



    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`
    FROM (
    SELECT username, probid, id, score, `date`,
    ROW_NUMBER() over (
    PARTITION BY username,probid
    ORDER BY score DESC) as `rank`
    FROM tablename
    ) as tmp
    WHERE tmp.`rank` = 1






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 21 at 2:47









    Nick

    22.8k81535




    22.8k81535










    answered Nov 21 at 2:40









    danblack

    1,5071214




    1,5071214












    • You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
      – Nick
      Nov 21 at 2:49










    • sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
      – danblack
      Nov 21 at 2:50










    • I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
      – dwir182
      Nov 21 at 2:51


















    • You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
      – Nick
      Nov 21 at 2:49










    • sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
      – danblack
      Nov 21 at 2:50










    • I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
      – dwir182
      Nov 21 at 2:51
















    You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
    – Nick
    Nov 21 at 2:49




    You really should check your code before posting. Lost count of how many typos I've corrected.
    – Nick
    Nov 21 at 2:49












    sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
    – danblack
    Nov 21 at 2:50




    sorry @Nick. Thanks for fixing.
    – danblack
    Nov 21 at 2:50












    I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
    – dwir182
    Nov 21 at 2:51




    I want answer but see your code really same with me.. Here is fiddle for you.. db-fiddle.com/f/9HXkNFbDMDjPgKbpcbtRXc/0
    – dwir182
    Nov 21 at 2:51











    0














    This query will work on versions of MySQL prior to 8.0 as well. The LEFT JOIN removes duplicate scores, ensuring that equal scores only have the lowest date in the result set for a given score. Then the WHERE clause ensures that we have the maximum score for a given user/problem combination:



    SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
    FROM tablename t1
    LEFT JOIN tablename t2
    ON t2.username = t1.username AND
    t2.probid = t1.probid AND
    t2.score = t1.score AND
    t2.date < t1.date
    WHERE t2.id IS NULL AND
    t1.score = (SELECT MAX(score) FROM tablename t3 WHERE t3.username = t1.username AND t3.probid = t1.probid)
    ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


    Update



    It's almost certainly more efficient to JOIN the table to a list of maximum scores per user per problem first rather than computing the MAX value for each row in the result table. This query does that instead:



    SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
    FROM tablename t1
    JOIN (SELECT username, probid, MAX(score) AS score
    FROM tablename
    GROUP BY username, probid) t2
    ON t2.username = t1.username AND
    t2.probid = t1.probid AND
    t2.score = t1.score
    LEFT JOIN tablename t3
    ON t3.username = t1.username AND
    t3.probid = t1.probid AND
    t3.score = t1.score AND
    t3.date < t1.date
    WHERE t3.id IS NULL
    ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


    Output (for both queries):



    username    probid  id  score   date
    alex 1 2 10 1542766686
    alex 2 3 5 1542766901
    brian 1 4 10 1542766944
    brian 2 7 8 1542767271
    jacob 1 6 10 1542767053
    jacob 2 5 10 1542766983


    Updated Demo on SQLFiddle






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      This query will work on versions of MySQL prior to 8.0 as well. The LEFT JOIN removes duplicate scores, ensuring that equal scores only have the lowest date in the result set for a given score. Then the WHERE clause ensures that we have the maximum score for a given user/problem combination:



      SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
      FROM tablename t1
      LEFT JOIN tablename t2
      ON t2.username = t1.username AND
      t2.probid = t1.probid AND
      t2.score = t1.score AND
      t2.date < t1.date
      WHERE t2.id IS NULL AND
      t1.score = (SELECT MAX(score) FROM tablename t3 WHERE t3.username = t1.username AND t3.probid = t1.probid)
      ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


      Update



      It's almost certainly more efficient to JOIN the table to a list of maximum scores per user per problem first rather than computing the MAX value for each row in the result table. This query does that instead:



      SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
      FROM tablename t1
      JOIN (SELECT username, probid, MAX(score) AS score
      FROM tablename
      GROUP BY username, probid) t2
      ON t2.username = t1.username AND
      t2.probid = t1.probid AND
      t2.score = t1.score
      LEFT JOIN tablename t3
      ON t3.username = t1.username AND
      t3.probid = t1.probid AND
      t3.score = t1.score AND
      t3.date < t1.date
      WHERE t3.id IS NULL
      ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


      Output (for both queries):



      username    probid  id  score   date
      alex 1 2 10 1542766686
      alex 2 3 5 1542766901
      brian 1 4 10 1542766944
      brian 2 7 8 1542767271
      jacob 1 6 10 1542767053
      jacob 2 5 10 1542766983


      Updated Demo on SQLFiddle






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        This query will work on versions of MySQL prior to 8.0 as well. The LEFT JOIN removes duplicate scores, ensuring that equal scores only have the lowest date in the result set for a given score. Then the WHERE clause ensures that we have the maximum score for a given user/problem combination:



        SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
        FROM tablename t1
        LEFT JOIN tablename t2
        ON t2.username = t1.username AND
        t2.probid = t1.probid AND
        t2.score = t1.score AND
        t2.date < t1.date
        WHERE t2.id IS NULL AND
        t1.score = (SELECT MAX(score) FROM tablename t3 WHERE t3.username = t1.username AND t3.probid = t1.probid)
        ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


        Update



        It's almost certainly more efficient to JOIN the table to a list of maximum scores per user per problem first rather than computing the MAX value for each row in the result table. This query does that instead:



        SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
        FROM tablename t1
        JOIN (SELECT username, probid, MAX(score) AS score
        FROM tablename
        GROUP BY username, probid) t2
        ON t2.username = t1.username AND
        t2.probid = t1.probid AND
        t2.score = t1.score
        LEFT JOIN tablename t3
        ON t3.username = t1.username AND
        t3.probid = t1.probid AND
        t3.score = t1.score AND
        t3.date < t1.date
        WHERE t3.id IS NULL
        ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


        Output (for both queries):



        username    probid  id  score   date
        alex 1 2 10 1542766686
        alex 2 3 5 1542766901
        brian 1 4 10 1542766944
        brian 2 7 8 1542767271
        jacob 1 6 10 1542767053
        jacob 2 5 10 1542766983


        Updated Demo on SQLFiddle






        share|improve this answer














        This query will work on versions of MySQL prior to 8.0 as well. The LEFT JOIN removes duplicate scores, ensuring that equal scores only have the lowest date in the result set for a given score. Then the WHERE clause ensures that we have the maximum score for a given user/problem combination:



        SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
        FROM tablename t1
        LEFT JOIN tablename t2
        ON t2.username = t1.username AND
        t2.probid = t1.probid AND
        t2.score = t1.score AND
        t2.date < t1.date
        WHERE t2.id IS NULL AND
        t1.score = (SELECT MAX(score) FROM tablename t3 WHERE t3.username = t1.username AND t3.probid = t1.probid)
        ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


        Update



        It's almost certainly more efficient to JOIN the table to a list of maximum scores per user per problem first rather than computing the MAX value for each row in the result table. This query does that instead:



        SELECT t1.username, t1.probid, t1.id, t1.score, t1.date
        FROM tablename t1
        JOIN (SELECT username, probid, MAX(score) AS score
        FROM tablename
        GROUP BY username, probid) t2
        ON t2.username = t1.username AND
        t2.probid = t1.probid AND
        t2.score = t1.score
        LEFT JOIN tablename t3
        ON t3.username = t1.username AND
        t3.probid = t1.probid AND
        t3.score = t1.score AND
        t3.date < t1.date
        WHERE t3.id IS NULL
        ORDER BY t1.username, t1.probid


        Output (for both queries):



        username    probid  id  score   date
        alex 1 2 10 1542766686
        alex 2 3 5 1542766901
        brian 1 4 10 1542766944
        brian 2 7 8 1542767271
        jacob 1 6 10 1542767053
        jacob 2 5 10 1542766983


        Updated Demo on SQLFiddle







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 21 at 4:51

























        answered Nov 21 at 3:05









        Nick

        22.8k81535




        22.8k81535























            0














            In pre-MySQL 8.0.2, we can emulate Row_Number() functionality using User-defined Variables. In this technique, we firstly get the data in a particular order (depends on the problem statement at hand).



            In your case, within a partition of probid and username, we need to rank scores in descending order, with the row having lower timestamp value given higher priority (to break the ties). So, we will ORDER BY probid, username, score DESC, date ASC.



            Now, we can use this result-set as a Derived Table, and determine the row number. It will be like a Looping technique (which we use in application code, eg: PHP). We would store the previous row values in the User-defined variables, and use conditional CASE .. WHEN expressions to check the current row's value(s) against the previous row. And, then assign row number accordingly.



            Eventually, we will consider only those rows where row number is 1, and (if required), sort it by username and probid.





            Query



            SELECT dt2.username,
            dt2.probid,
            dt2.id,
            dt2.score,
            dt2.date
            FROM (SELECT @rn := CASE
            WHEN @un = dt1.username
            AND @pid = dt1.probid THEN @rn + 1
            ELSE 1
            end AS row_no,
            @un := dt1.username AS username,
            @pid := dt1.probid AS probid,
            dt1.id,
            dt1.score,
            dt1.date
            FROM (SELECT id,
            username,
            probid,
            score,
            date
            FROM your_table
            ORDER BY username,
            probid,
            score DESC,
            date ASC) AS dt1
            CROSS JOIN (SELECT @un := '',
            @pid := 0,
            @rn := 0) AS user_init_vars) AS dt2
            WHERE dt2.row_no = 1
            ORDER BY dt2.username, dt2.probid;


            Result



            | username | probid | id  | score | date       |
            | -------- | ------ | --- | ----- | ---------- |
            | alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
            | alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
            | brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
            | brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
            | jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
            | jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |




            View on DB Fiddle






            share|improve this answer





















            • This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
              – Nick
              Nov 22 at 23:53










            • @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:11










            • @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:48










            • I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
              – Nick
              Nov 23 at 5:13










            • @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 5:15


















            0














            In pre-MySQL 8.0.2, we can emulate Row_Number() functionality using User-defined Variables. In this technique, we firstly get the data in a particular order (depends on the problem statement at hand).



            In your case, within a partition of probid and username, we need to rank scores in descending order, with the row having lower timestamp value given higher priority (to break the ties). So, we will ORDER BY probid, username, score DESC, date ASC.



            Now, we can use this result-set as a Derived Table, and determine the row number. It will be like a Looping technique (which we use in application code, eg: PHP). We would store the previous row values in the User-defined variables, and use conditional CASE .. WHEN expressions to check the current row's value(s) against the previous row. And, then assign row number accordingly.



            Eventually, we will consider only those rows where row number is 1, and (if required), sort it by username and probid.





            Query



            SELECT dt2.username,
            dt2.probid,
            dt2.id,
            dt2.score,
            dt2.date
            FROM (SELECT @rn := CASE
            WHEN @un = dt1.username
            AND @pid = dt1.probid THEN @rn + 1
            ELSE 1
            end AS row_no,
            @un := dt1.username AS username,
            @pid := dt1.probid AS probid,
            dt1.id,
            dt1.score,
            dt1.date
            FROM (SELECT id,
            username,
            probid,
            score,
            date
            FROM your_table
            ORDER BY username,
            probid,
            score DESC,
            date ASC) AS dt1
            CROSS JOIN (SELECT @un := '',
            @pid := 0,
            @rn := 0) AS user_init_vars) AS dt2
            WHERE dt2.row_no = 1
            ORDER BY dt2.username, dt2.probid;


            Result



            | username | probid | id  | score | date       |
            | -------- | ------ | --- | ----- | ---------- |
            | alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
            | alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
            | brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
            | brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
            | jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
            | jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |




            View on DB Fiddle






            share|improve this answer





















            • This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
              – Nick
              Nov 22 at 23:53










            • @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:11










            • @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:48










            • I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
              – Nick
              Nov 23 at 5:13










            • @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 5:15
















            0












            0








            0






            In pre-MySQL 8.0.2, we can emulate Row_Number() functionality using User-defined Variables. In this technique, we firstly get the data in a particular order (depends on the problem statement at hand).



            In your case, within a partition of probid and username, we need to rank scores in descending order, with the row having lower timestamp value given higher priority (to break the ties). So, we will ORDER BY probid, username, score DESC, date ASC.



            Now, we can use this result-set as a Derived Table, and determine the row number. It will be like a Looping technique (which we use in application code, eg: PHP). We would store the previous row values in the User-defined variables, and use conditional CASE .. WHEN expressions to check the current row's value(s) against the previous row. And, then assign row number accordingly.



            Eventually, we will consider only those rows where row number is 1, and (if required), sort it by username and probid.





            Query



            SELECT dt2.username,
            dt2.probid,
            dt2.id,
            dt2.score,
            dt2.date
            FROM (SELECT @rn := CASE
            WHEN @un = dt1.username
            AND @pid = dt1.probid THEN @rn + 1
            ELSE 1
            end AS row_no,
            @un := dt1.username AS username,
            @pid := dt1.probid AS probid,
            dt1.id,
            dt1.score,
            dt1.date
            FROM (SELECT id,
            username,
            probid,
            score,
            date
            FROM your_table
            ORDER BY username,
            probid,
            score DESC,
            date ASC) AS dt1
            CROSS JOIN (SELECT @un := '',
            @pid := 0,
            @rn := 0) AS user_init_vars) AS dt2
            WHERE dt2.row_no = 1
            ORDER BY dt2.username, dt2.probid;


            Result



            | username | probid | id  | score | date       |
            | -------- | ------ | --- | ----- | ---------- |
            | alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
            | alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
            | brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
            | brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
            | jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
            | jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |




            View on DB Fiddle






            share|improve this answer












            In pre-MySQL 8.0.2, we can emulate Row_Number() functionality using User-defined Variables. In this technique, we firstly get the data in a particular order (depends on the problem statement at hand).



            In your case, within a partition of probid and username, we need to rank scores in descending order, with the row having lower timestamp value given higher priority (to break the ties). So, we will ORDER BY probid, username, score DESC, date ASC.



            Now, we can use this result-set as a Derived Table, and determine the row number. It will be like a Looping technique (which we use in application code, eg: PHP). We would store the previous row values in the User-defined variables, and use conditional CASE .. WHEN expressions to check the current row's value(s) against the previous row. And, then assign row number accordingly.



            Eventually, we will consider only those rows where row number is 1, and (if required), sort it by username and probid.





            Query



            SELECT dt2.username,
            dt2.probid,
            dt2.id,
            dt2.score,
            dt2.date
            FROM (SELECT @rn := CASE
            WHEN @un = dt1.username
            AND @pid = dt1.probid THEN @rn + 1
            ELSE 1
            end AS row_no,
            @un := dt1.username AS username,
            @pid := dt1.probid AS probid,
            dt1.id,
            dt1.score,
            dt1.date
            FROM (SELECT id,
            username,
            probid,
            score,
            date
            FROM your_table
            ORDER BY username,
            probid,
            score DESC,
            date ASC) AS dt1
            CROSS JOIN (SELECT @un := '',
            @pid := 0,
            @rn := 0) AS user_init_vars) AS dt2
            WHERE dt2.row_no = 1
            ORDER BY dt2.username, dt2.probid;


            Result



            | username | probid | id  | score | date       |
            | -------- | ------ | --- | ----- | ---------- |
            | alex | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1542766686 |
            | alex | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1542766901 |
            | brian | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1542766944 |
            | brian | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1542767271 |
            | jacob | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1542767053 |
            | jacob | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1542766983 |




            View on DB Fiddle







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 21 at 4:55









            Madhur Bhaiya

            19.5k62236




            19.5k62236












            • This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
              – Nick
              Nov 22 at 23:53










            • @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:11










            • @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:48










            • I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
              – Nick
              Nov 23 at 5:13










            • @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 5:15




















            • This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
              – Nick
              Nov 22 at 23:53










            • @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:11










            • @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 4:48










            • I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
              – Nick
              Nov 23 at 5:13










            • @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
              – Madhur Bhaiya
              Nov 23 at 5:15


















            This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
            – Nick
            Nov 22 at 23:53




            This is an interesting article on variables from the MySQL dev team which is worth reading: mysqlserverteam.com/…. Basically they suggest you can't rely on them for this type of functionality.
            – Nick
            Nov 22 at 23:53












            @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
            – Madhur Bhaiya
            Nov 23 at 4:11




            @Nick well I have experimented with them quite a bit. There is a reason that I always do explicit ordering in a subquery (derived table) first, and then use variables in outer subquery. This ensures reliability. The article is about using order by in the same query block which also evaluates user variables in the select clause, and I have seen its unreliability. Thanks for the article though, as I was looking for some sort of documentation which explain this behaviour.
            – Madhur Bhaiya
            Nov 23 at 4:11












            @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
            – Madhur Bhaiya
            Nov 23 at 4:48




            @Nick I was trying to implement LEAD() function using variables. Initially tried this: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/1 Even with explicit sorting done in inner subquery, it did not work when I tried to sort again in outer subquery. I had to move sorting to outermost (3rd level) subquery. This worked: db-fiddle.com/f/rdPgxKC7UphoHxwU5VAVeB/0 So basically, we should avoid using order by and evaluation of variables in select together in the same subquery block.
            – Madhur Bhaiya
            Nov 23 at 4:48












            I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
            – Nick
            Nov 23 at 5:13




            I think that is the way to avoid problems (as much as possible); the only problem though is that if you sort in an inner subquery there's no guarantee that the MySQL optimiser won't decide that it doesn't actually need to sort. I've seen that happen in one query that I tried to use and eventually had to resort to all sorts of horrible JOINs to make the query work.
            – Nick
            Nov 23 at 5:13












            @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
            – Madhur Bhaiya
            Nov 23 at 5:15






            @Nick Do you have a ready example of that behaviour ? I also fear that this might happen in some edge case. Will be interesting to look at. Nevertheless, with 8.0 version, over the time, we should not have a need to use variables in such problems
            – Madhur Bhaiya
            Nov 23 at 5:15





            Popular posts from this blog

            404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

            How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

            TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'