How to sort a nested array using lodash
1
I have a collection of objects in this array and I need to order them by the 'order' key (asc). Is there a way to sort the objects inside the array and then return the whole array? I am relying on the order as I'm using it in a v-for with a :key.
[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
],
[
//Another collection of objects
]
I am currently doing this -
getters: {
sorted: state => {
return _.orderBy(state.experience_sections, function(block) {
if(block.experience_blocks[0]) {
return block.experience_blocks[0].order;
}
});
}
}
The solution above does not seem to order the objects by 'asc' order. Am I on the right track?
Thanks!
P.S. Stack is telling me that is a possible duplicate question but I'm at a loss after hours of searching. My apologies if I missed an already answered question.
javascript lodash
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
add a comment |
1
I have a collection of objects in this array and I need to order them by the 'order' key (asc). Is there a way to sort the objects inside the array and then return the whole array? I am relying on the order as I'm using it in a v-for with a :key.
[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
],
[
//Another collection of objects
]
I am currently doing this -
getters: {
sorted: state => {
return _.orderBy(state.experience_sections, function(block) {
if(block.experience_blocks[0]) {
return block.experience_blocks[0].order;
}
});
}
}
The solution above does not seem to order the objects by 'asc' order. Am I on the right track?
Thanks!
P.S. Stack is telling me that is a possible duplicate question but I'm at a loss after hours of searching. My apologies if I missed an already answered question.
javascript lodash
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
add a comment |
1
1
1
I have a collection of objects in this array and I need to order them by the 'order' key (asc). Is there a way to sort the objects inside the array and then return the whole array? I am relying on the order as I'm using it in a v-for with a :key.
[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
],
[
//Another collection of objects
]
I am currently doing this -
getters: {
sorted: state => {
return _.orderBy(state.experience_sections, function(block) {
if(block.experience_blocks[0]) {
return block.experience_blocks[0].order;
}
});
}
}
The solution above does not seem to order the objects by 'asc' order. Am I on the right track?
Thanks!
P.S. Stack is telling me that is a possible duplicate question but I'm at a loss after hours of searching. My apologies if I missed an already answered question.
javascript lodash
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
I have a collection of objects in this array and I need to order them by the 'order' key (asc). Is there a way to sort the objects inside the array and then return the whole array? I am relying on the order as I'm using it in a v-for with a :key.
[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
],
[
//Another collection of objects
]
I am currently doing this -
getters: {
sorted: state => {
return _.orderBy(state.experience_sections, function(block) {
if(block.experience_blocks[0]) {
return block.experience_blocks[0].order;
}
});
}
}
The solution above does not seem to order the objects by 'asc' order. Am I on the right track?
Thanks!
P.S. Stack is telling me that is a possible duplicate question but I'm at a loss after hours of searching. My apologies if I missed an already answered question.
javascript lodash
javascript lodash
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
George Jempty
7,0251161132
7,0251161132
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
asked Nov 24 '18 at 19:51
Raj SahaRaj Saha
245
245
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
1
You should also consider orderBy method from lodash since you could easily change from asc to desc sort order if you would want to at a later date or have it via a variable being passed through the UI etc:
const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
add a comment |
1
Just in case you want plain javascript solution.. using Array.forEach
I have also extended your array to contain more data
var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
1
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
add a comment |
1
Will sort each subarray in an array
const sortedArr = _.map(arr, subArray => _.sortBy(subArray, "order"));
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
add a comment |
0
Deep sorting using lodash
const sortedArray = _.orderBy(items, [(item) => {
const nestedObj = _.get(item, 'props');
item['props'] = _.orderBy(nestedObj,'order','desc');
return item['order'];
}], 'desc');
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53461822%2fhow-to-sort-a-nested-array-using-lodash%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
You should also consider orderBy method from lodash since you could easily change from asc to desc sort order if you would want to at a later date or have it via a variable being passed through the UI etc:
const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
add a comment |
1
You should also consider orderBy method from lodash since you could easily change from asc to desc sort order if you would want to at a later date or have it via a variable being passed through the UI etc:
const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
add a comment |
1
1
1
You should also consider orderBy method from lodash since you could easily change from asc to desc sort order if you would want to at a later date or have it via a variable being passed through the UI etc:
const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
You should also consider orderBy method from lodash since you could easily change from asc to desc sort order if you would want to at a later date or have it via a variable being passed through the UI etc:
const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>const data = [ [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 0, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ], [{ "id": 0, "type": "Header", "order": 2, "props": { "order": 0, "id": 0, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" }, { "id": 1, "type": "Header", "order": 1, "props": { "order": 1, "id": 1, "section_id": 0 }, "data": { "header": "" }, "component": "header-block" } ] ]
console.log('asc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order'))) // asc order
console.log('desc:', _.map(data, x => _.orderBy(x, 'order', 'desc'))) // desc<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
edited Nov 25 '18 at 1:27
answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
answered Nov 25 '18 at 0:02
AkrionAkrion
9,48511224
9,48511224
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
Just in case you want plain javascript solution.. using Array.forEach
I have also extended your array to contain more data
var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
1
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
add a comment |
1
Just in case you want plain javascript solution.. using Array.forEach
I have also extended your array to contain more data
var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
1
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
add a comment |
1
1
1
Just in case you want plain javascript solution.. using Array.forEach
I have also extended your array to contain more data
var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
Just in case you want plain javascript solution.. using Array.forEach
I have also extended your array to contain more data
var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)var arr = [[
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":0,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
], [
{
"id":0,
"type":"Header",
"order":2,
"props":{
"order":0,
"id":0,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
},
{
"id":1,
"type":"Header",
"order":1,
"props":{
"order":1,
"id":1,
"section_id":0
},
"data":{
"header":""
},
"component":"header-block"
}
]]
arr.forEach(d => d.sort((a,b) => a.order - b.order))
console.log(arr)answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
edited Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9501815
2,9501815
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
1
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
add a comment |
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
1
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
Bang on!! Returning new array will not do any good here.. so yes forEach can be apt here...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:18
1
1
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
Edited @slider :) Thanks for pointing.
– Nitish Narang
Nov 24 '18 at 20:19
add a comment |
1
Will sort each subarray in an array
const sortedArr = _.map(arr, subArray => _.sortBy(subArray, "order"));
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
add a comment |
1
Will sort each subarray in an array
const sortedArr = _.map(arr, subArray => _.sortBy(subArray, "order"));
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
add a comment |
1
1
1
Will sort each subarray in an array
const sortedArr = _.map(arr, subArray => _.sortBy(subArray, "order"));
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
Will sort each subarray in an array
const sortedArr = _.map(arr, subArray => _.sortBy(subArray, "order"));
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
edited Nov 24 '18 at 21:58
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
answered Nov 24 '18 at 20:26
Jacek LipiecJacek Lipiec
1917
1917
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
Deep sorting using lodash
const sortedArray = _.orderBy(items, [(item) => {
const nestedObj = _.get(item, 'props');
item['props'] = _.orderBy(nestedObj,'order','desc');
return item['order'];
}], 'desc');
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
add a comment |
0
Deep sorting using lodash
const sortedArray = _.orderBy(items, [(item) => {
const nestedObj = _.get(item, 'props');
item['props'] = _.orderBy(nestedObj,'order','desc');
return item['order'];
}], 'desc');
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
add a comment |
0
0
0
Deep sorting using lodash
const sortedArray = _.orderBy(items, [(item) => {
const nestedObj = _.get(item, 'props');
item['props'] = _.orderBy(nestedObj,'order','desc');
return item['order'];
}], 'desc');
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
Deep sorting using lodash
const sortedArray = _.orderBy(items, [(item) => {
const nestedObj = _.get(item, 'props');
item['props'] = _.orderBy(nestedObj,'order','desc');
return item['order'];
}], 'desc');
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
answered Jan 21 at 11:10
pradeep gowdapradeep gowda
42157
42157
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53461822%2fhow-to-sort-a-nested-array-using-lodash%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
