Clang Analyzer on custom shared pointer, false positive or not
Clang static analyzer reports a memory use after it's freed with a following implementation of the shared ptr (rather naive but still it should work fine):
template <class T>
class Shared
{
public:
Shared()
: ptr(0) , count(0)
{
}
explicit Shared(T* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
explicit Shared(DerivedT* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
explicit Shared(OutRef<T> ref)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(ref.ptr);
}
Shared(const Shared& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared(const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
Shared& operator = (const Shared& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared& operator = (const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
~Shared()
{
destroy();
}
operator bool() const
{
return ptr != 0;
}
void operator = (T* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
void operator = (DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
void operator = (OutRef<T> ref)
{
set(ref.ptr);
}
T* operator->()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* operator->() const
{
return ptr;
}
T& operator*()
{
return *ptr;
}
const T& operator*() const
{
return *ptr;
}
template <class DerivedT>
void set(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
if (ptr != otherPtr)
{
destroy();
init(otherPtr);
}
}
T* get()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* get() const
{
return ptr;
}
operator T*()
{
return ptr;
}
operator const T*() const
{
return ptr;
}
template <class TT>
Shared<TT> cast()
{
Shared<TT> result;
result.ptr = (TT*)ptr;
result.count = count;
result.addShared();
return result;
}
bool isLastOwner() const
{
return count && *count == 1;
}
private:
void addShared()
{
if (count)
{
*count += 1;
}
}
template <class DerivedT>
void init(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
presume(ptr == 0);
presume(count == 0);
if (otherPtr == 0)
{
return;
}
ptr = otherPtr;
count = new Index(1);
}
void destroy()
{
if (count)
{
*count -= 1;
if (*count == 0)
{
presume(sizeof(T) > 0); //will break compilation in case of undefined T
delete ptr;
delete count;
}
}
ptr = 0;
count = 0;
}
void swap(Shared& other)
{
Swap(ptr, other.ptr);
Swap(count, other.count);
}
private:
T* ptr;
Index* count;
template <class OtherT> friend class Shared;
};
For example, if I have function Shared f() and use it as
Shared<X> a = f();
a->callSomeMethod();
I get static analyzer warning that "a" is used after memory is freed. Basically it detects that destroy() method was called but cannot detect that counter is positive (it writes "Assuming condition is true" for counter zero check) in the stack trace. Is this possible to add some assert() so it understands that counter is positive here? Or may be it is really an incorrect shared pointer implementation?
c++ clang shared-ptr clang-static-analyzer
add a comment |
Clang static analyzer reports a memory use after it's freed with a following implementation of the shared ptr (rather naive but still it should work fine):
template <class T>
class Shared
{
public:
Shared()
: ptr(0) , count(0)
{
}
explicit Shared(T* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
explicit Shared(DerivedT* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
explicit Shared(OutRef<T> ref)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(ref.ptr);
}
Shared(const Shared& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared(const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
Shared& operator = (const Shared& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared& operator = (const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
~Shared()
{
destroy();
}
operator bool() const
{
return ptr != 0;
}
void operator = (T* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
void operator = (DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
void operator = (OutRef<T> ref)
{
set(ref.ptr);
}
T* operator->()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* operator->() const
{
return ptr;
}
T& operator*()
{
return *ptr;
}
const T& operator*() const
{
return *ptr;
}
template <class DerivedT>
void set(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
if (ptr != otherPtr)
{
destroy();
init(otherPtr);
}
}
T* get()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* get() const
{
return ptr;
}
operator T*()
{
return ptr;
}
operator const T*() const
{
return ptr;
}
template <class TT>
Shared<TT> cast()
{
Shared<TT> result;
result.ptr = (TT*)ptr;
result.count = count;
result.addShared();
return result;
}
bool isLastOwner() const
{
return count && *count == 1;
}
private:
void addShared()
{
if (count)
{
*count += 1;
}
}
template <class DerivedT>
void init(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
presume(ptr == 0);
presume(count == 0);
if (otherPtr == 0)
{
return;
}
ptr = otherPtr;
count = new Index(1);
}
void destroy()
{
if (count)
{
*count -= 1;
if (*count == 0)
{
presume(sizeof(T) > 0); //will break compilation in case of undefined T
delete ptr;
delete count;
}
}
ptr = 0;
count = 0;
}
void swap(Shared& other)
{
Swap(ptr, other.ptr);
Swap(count, other.count);
}
private:
T* ptr;
Index* count;
template <class OtherT> friend class Shared;
};
For example, if I have function Shared f() and use it as
Shared<X> a = f();
a->callSomeMethod();
I get static analyzer warning that "a" is used after memory is freed. Basically it detects that destroy() method was called but cannot detect that counter is positive (it writes "Assuming condition is true" for counter zero check) in the stack trace. Is this possible to add some assert() so it understands that counter is positive here? Or may be it is really an incorrect shared pointer implementation?
c++ clang shared-ptr clang-static-analyzer
add a comment |
Clang static analyzer reports a memory use after it's freed with a following implementation of the shared ptr (rather naive but still it should work fine):
template <class T>
class Shared
{
public:
Shared()
: ptr(0) , count(0)
{
}
explicit Shared(T* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
explicit Shared(DerivedT* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
explicit Shared(OutRef<T> ref)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(ref.ptr);
}
Shared(const Shared& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared(const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
Shared& operator = (const Shared& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared& operator = (const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
~Shared()
{
destroy();
}
operator bool() const
{
return ptr != 0;
}
void operator = (T* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
void operator = (DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
void operator = (OutRef<T> ref)
{
set(ref.ptr);
}
T* operator->()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* operator->() const
{
return ptr;
}
T& operator*()
{
return *ptr;
}
const T& operator*() const
{
return *ptr;
}
template <class DerivedT>
void set(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
if (ptr != otherPtr)
{
destroy();
init(otherPtr);
}
}
T* get()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* get() const
{
return ptr;
}
operator T*()
{
return ptr;
}
operator const T*() const
{
return ptr;
}
template <class TT>
Shared<TT> cast()
{
Shared<TT> result;
result.ptr = (TT*)ptr;
result.count = count;
result.addShared();
return result;
}
bool isLastOwner() const
{
return count && *count == 1;
}
private:
void addShared()
{
if (count)
{
*count += 1;
}
}
template <class DerivedT>
void init(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
presume(ptr == 0);
presume(count == 0);
if (otherPtr == 0)
{
return;
}
ptr = otherPtr;
count = new Index(1);
}
void destroy()
{
if (count)
{
*count -= 1;
if (*count == 0)
{
presume(sizeof(T) > 0); //will break compilation in case of undefined T
delete ptr;
delete count;
}
}
ptr = 0;
count = 0;
}
void swap(Shared& other)
{
Swap(ptr, other.ptr);
Swap(count, other.count);
}
private:
T* ptr;
Index* count;
template <class OtherT> friend class Shared;
};
For example, if I have function Shared f() and use it as
Shared<X> a = f();
a->callSomeMethod();
I get static analyzer warning that "a" is used after memory is freed. Basically it detects that destroy() method was called but cannot detect that counter is positive (it writes "Assuming condition is true" for counter zero check) in the stack trace. Is this possible to add some assert() so it understands that counter is positive here? Or may be it is really an incorrect shared pointer implementation?
c++ clang shared-ptr clang-static-analyzer
Clang static analyzer reports a memory use after it's freed with a following implementation of the shared ptr (rather naive but still it should work fine):
template <class T>
class Shared
{
public:
Shared()
: ptr(0) , count(0)
{
}
explicit Shared(T* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
explicit Shared(DerivedT* otherPtr)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(otherPtr);
}
explicit Shared(OutRef<T> ref)
: ptr(0), count(0)
{
init(ref.ptr);
}
Shared(const Shared& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared(const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
: ptr(other.ptr), count(other.count)
{
addShared();
}
Shared& operator = (const Shared& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
template <class DerivedT>
Shared& operator = (const Shared<DerivedT>& other)
{
Shared tmp(other);
swap(tmp);
return *this;
}
~Shared()
{
destroy();
}
operator bool() const
{
return ptr != 0;
}
void operator = (T* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
template <class DerivedT>
void operator = (DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
set(otherPtr);
}
void operator = (OutRef<T> ref)
{
set(ref.ptr);
}
T* operator->()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* operator->() const
{
return ptr;
}
T& operator*()
{
return *ptr;
}
const T& operator*() const
{
return *ptr;
}
template <class DerivedT>
void set(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
if (ptr != otherPtr)
{
destroy();
init(otherPtr);
}
}
T* get()
{
return ptr;
}
const T* get() const
{
return ptr;
}
operator T*()
{
return ptr;
}
operator const T*() const
{
return ptr;
}
template <class TT>
Shared<TT> cast()
{
Shared<TT> result;
result.ptr = (TT*)ptr;
result.count = count;
result.addShared();
return result;
}
bool isLastOwner() const
{
return count && *count == 1;
}
private:
void addShared()
{
if (count)
{
*count += 1;
}
}
template <class DerivedT>
void init(DerivedT* otherPtr)
{
presume(ptr == 0);
presume(count == 0);
if (otherPtr == 0)
{
return;
}
ptr = otherPtr;
count = new Index(1);
}
void destroy()
{
if (count)
{
*count -= 1;
if (*count == 0)
{
presume(sizeof(T) > 0); //will break compilation in case of undefined T
delete ptr;
delete count;
}
}
ptr = 0;
count = 0;
}
void swap(Shared& other)
{
Swap(ptr, other.ptr);
Swap(count, other.count);
}
private:
T* ptr;
Index* count;
template <class OtherT> friend class Shared;
};
For example, if I have function Shared f() and use it as
Shared<X> a = f();
a->callSomeMethod();
I get static analyzer warning that "a" is used after memory is freed. Basically it detects that destroy() method was called but cannot detect that counter is positive (it writes "Assuming condition is true" for counter zero check) in the stack trace. Is this possible to add some assert() so it understands that counter is positive here? Or may be it is really an incorrect shared pointer implementation?
c++ clang shared-ptr clang-static-analyzer
c++ clang shared-ptr clang-static-analyzer
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:23
Alexander B
asked Nov 24 '18 at 8:40
Alexander BAlexander B
19213
19213
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53456554%2fclang-analyzer-on-custom-shared-pointer-false-positive-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53456554%2fclang-analyzer-on-custom-shared-pointer-false-positive-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown