How to use std::async on a queue of vectors or a vector of vectors to sort?












0














I am trying to compare std::thread with std::async in this small example that I came up with for a fun exercise. I generate eight vectors with ten random numbers from 0 to 1000. I then push those vectors into a queue so that I can go ahead and multithread the sorting later. Here is the function I am using to generate the random numbers:



std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}


In my thread example, I simply lock the queue, grab a vector out of it, call std::sort on it, and push that back into a list of vectors so I can merge it into one final vector in the end. That was easy enough to implement, but I am trying to figure out how to implement this same thing with std::async This is what I have tried so far:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
std::vector<int> temp;
temp = queue.front();
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async,sortIt,temp);
queue.pop_front();
toMerge.push_back(temp);

}


I then realized, that this would not do what I thought it would. As I do not believe this could call itself over and over again. So I tried this one:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
if(queue.empty()
{
return;
}
else
{
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async[&]{return std::sort(queue.front.begin(),queue.front.end());},work,queue,toMerge);
}
}


But that gave me all sorts of compiler errors that I don't really know how to tackle.



How can I achieve this task?



Full code:



void sortIt(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::sort(begin(v),end(v));
}

void print(std::vector<int> &v)
{
for(auto &&e : v)
{
std::cout << e << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}

std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}

void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
//TODO: Make asnyc work
}

int main()
{
std::deque<std::vector<int>> queue;
std::vector<int> tempA;
std::vector<int> tempB;
std::vector<int> finalVec;
std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge;

for(int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
{
queue.push_back(generate(10));
}

work(queue,toMerge);

}









share|improve this question
























  • It is unclear what you are asking. async returns future with results, you need to call get on future to wait until task ends. What is your goal? Do you want to start 8 tasks by async (each task sorts one vector) and at the end merges all sorted vector into list ?
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 8:09










  • @rafix07 yes that is exactly it. In fact, I do not need async to merge the vectors. I was going to have the program do that in the end by calling std::merge on my list of vectors using tempA, tempB, and finalVec.
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 16:16
















0














I am trying to compare std::thread with std::async in this small example that I came up with for a fun exercise. I generate eight vectors with ten random numbers from 0 to 1000. I then push those vectors into a queue so that I can go ahead and multithread the sorting later. Here is the function I am using to generate the random numbers:



std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}


In my thread example, I simply lock the queue, grab a vector out of it, call std::sort on it, and push that back into a list of vectors so I can merge it into one final vector in the end. That was easy enough to implement, but I am trying to figure out how to implement this same thing with std::async This is what I have tried so far:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
std::vector<int> temp;
temp = queue.front();
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async,sortIt,temp);
queue.pop_front();
toMerge.push_back(temp);

}


I then realized, that this would not do what I thought it would. As I do not believe this could call itself over and over again. So I tried this one:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
if(queue.empty()
{
return;
}
else
{
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async[&]{return std::sort(queue.front.begin(),queue.front.end());},work,queue,toMerge);
}
}


But that gave me all sorts of compiler errors that I don't really know how to tackle.



How can I achieve this task?



Full code:



void sortIt(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::sort(begin(v),end(v));
}

void print(std::vector<int> &v)
{
for(auto &&e : v)
{
std::cout << e << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}

std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}

void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
//TODO: Make asnyc work
}

int main()
{
std::deque<std::vector<int>> queue;
std::vector<int> tempA;
std::vector<int> tempB;
std::vector<int> finalVec;
std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge;

for(int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
{
queue.push_back(generate(10));
}

work(queue,toMerge);

}









share|improve this question
























  • It is unclear what you are asking. async returns future with results, you need to call get on future to wait until task ends. What is your goal? Do you want to start 8 tasks by async (each task sorts one vector) and at the end merges all sorted vector into list ?
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 8:09










  • @rafix07 yes that is exactly it. In fact, I do not need async to merge the vectors. I was going to have the program do that in the end by calling std::merge on my list of vectors using tempA, tempB, and finalVec.
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 16:16














0












0








0







I am trying to compare std::thread with std::async in this small example that I came up with for a fun exercise. I generate eight vectors with ten random numbers from 0 to 1000. I then push those vectors into a queue so that I can go ahead and multithread the sorting later. Here is the function I am using to generate the random numbers:



std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}


In my thread example, I simply lock the queue, grab a vector out of it, call std::sort on it, and push that back into a list of vectors so I can merge it into one final vector in the end. That was easy enough to implement, but I am trying to figure out how to implement this same thing with std::async This is what I have tried so far:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
std::vector<int> temp;
temp = queue.front();
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async,sortIt,temp);
queue.pop_front();
toMerge.push_back(temp);

}


I then realized, that this would not do what I thought it would. As I do not believe this could call itself over and over again. So I tried this one:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
if(queue.empty()
{
return;
}
else
{
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async[&]{return std::sort(queue.front.begin(),queue.front.end());},work,queue,toMerge);
}
}


But that gave me all sorts of compiler errors that I don't really know how to tackle.



How can I achieve this task?



Full code:



void sortIt(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::sort(begin(v),end(v));
}

void print(std::vector<int> &v)
{
for(auto &&e : v)
{
std::cout << e << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}

std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}

void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
//TODO: Make asnyc work
}

int main()
{
std::deque<std::vector<int>> queue;
std::vector<int> tempA;
std::vector<int> tempB;
std::vector<int> finalVec;
std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge;

for(int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
{
queue.push_back(generate(10));
}

work(queue,toMerge);

}









share|improve this question















I am trying to compare std::thread with std::async in this small example that I came up with for a fun exercise. I generate eight vectors with ten random numbers from 0 to 1000. I then push those vectors into a queue so that I can go ahead and multithread the sorting later. Here is the function I am using to generate the random numbers:



std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}


In my thread example, I simply lock the queue, grab a vector out of it, call std::sort on it, and push that back into a list of vectors so I can merge it into one final vector in the end. That was easy enough to implement, but I am trying to figure out how to implement this same thing with std::async This is what I have tried so far:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
std::vector<int> temp;
temp = queue.front();
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async,sortIt,temp);
queue.pop_front();
toMerge.push_back(temp);

}


I then realized, that this would not do what I thought it would. As I do not believe this could call itself over and over again. So I tried this one:



void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
if(queue.empty()
{
return;
}
else
{
auto handle = std::async(std::launch::async[&]{return std::sort(queue.front.begin(),queue.front.end());},work,queue,toMerge);
}
}


But that gave me all sorts of compiler errors that I don't really know how to tackle.



How can I achieve this task?



Full code:



void sortIt(std::vector<int>& v)
{
std::sort(begin(v),end(v));
}

void print(std::vector<int> &v)
{
for(auto &&e : v)
{
std::cout << e << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}

std::vector<int> generate(int count)
{
std::vector<int> newVec(count);
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 mt(rd());
std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0,1000);

std::generate(begin(newVec),end(newVec),std::bind(dis,std::ref(mt)));

return newVec;
}

void work(std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge)
{
//TODO: Make asnyc work
}

int main()
{
std::deque<std::vector<int>> queue;
std::vector<int> tempA;
std::vector<int> tempB;
std::vector<int> finalVec;
std::list<std::vector<int>> toMerge;

for(int i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
{
queue.push_back(generate(10));
}

work(queue,toMerge);

}






c++ multithreading vector






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 5:27

























asked Nov 21 at 4:50









Sailanarmo

348213




348213












  • It is unclear what you are asking. async returns future with results, you need to call get on future to wait until task ends. What is your goal? Do you want to start 8 tasks by async (each task sorts one vector) and at the end merges all sorted vector into list ?
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 8:09










  • @rafix07 yes that is exactly it. In fact, I do not need async to merge the vectors. I was going to have the program do that in the end by calling std::merge on my list of vectors using tempA, tempB, and finalVec.
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 16:16


















  • It is unclear what you are asking. async returns future with results, you need to call get on future to wait until task ends. What is your goal? Do you want to start 8 tasks by async (each task sorts one vector) and at the end merges all sorted vector into list ?
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 8:09










  • @rafix07 yes that is exactly it. In fact, I do not need async to merge the vectors. I was going to have the program do that in the end by calling std::merge on my list of vectors using tempA, tempB, and finalVec.
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 16:16
















It is unclear what you are asking. async returns future with results, you need to call get on future to wait until task ends. What is your goal? Do you want to start 8 tasks by async (each task sorts one vector) and at the end merges all sorted vector into list ?
– rafix07
Nov 21 at 8:09




It is unclear what you are asking. async returns future with results, you need to call get on future to wait until task ends. What is your goal? Do you want to start 8 tasks by async (each task sorts one vector) and at the end merges all sorted vector into list ?
– rafix07
Nov 21 at 8:09












@rafix07 yes that is exactly it. In fact, I do not need async to merge the vectors. I was going to have the program do that in the end by calling std::merge on my list of vectors using tempA, tempB, and finalVec.
– Sailanarmo
Nov 21 at 16:16




@rafix07 yes that is exactly it. In fact, I do not need async to merge the vectors. I was going to have the program do that in the end by calling std::merge on my list of vectors using tempA, tempB, and finalVec.
– Sailanarmo
Nov 21 at 16:16












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














All you need is to create vector for holding future objects,
iterate over queue and at each iterator call async function
to start asynchronous operation - in your case it is sorting of vector.
For each future object you have to call get method to retrieve sorted vector.
Obtained sorted vector by get is added to toMerge list.



void work(
const std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, // const added - don't modify queue
std::list<std::vector<int>>& toMerge) // pass toMerge by reference to store results
{
std::vector<std::future< std::vector<int> >> tasks;
for (const std::vector<int>& v : queue)
tasks.push_back (std::async(
[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}));

// wait until all tasks are complete
for (std::future< std::vector<int> >& f : tasks)
toMerge.push_back(f.get()); // move vector into list
}


Lambda which sorts look like:



[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy  
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}


you don't want to modify v from queue hence the copy of v is made,
the content of v is copied into vecCopy. Because closure
keeps vecCopy by value you need to put mutable keyword to lambda to allow
vecCopy to be modified.






share|improve this answer





















  • Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 19:49






  • 1




    Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 19:58












  • That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 20:20











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53405439%2fhow-to-use-stdasync-on-a-queue-of-vectors-or-a-vector-of-vectors-to-sort%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














All you need is to create vector for holding future objects,
iterate over queue and at each iterator call async function
to start asynchronous operation - in your case it is sorting of vector.
For each future object you have to call get method to retrieve sorted vector.
Obtained sorted vector by get is added to toMerge list.



void work(
const std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, // const added - don't modify queue
std::list<std::vector<int>>& toMerge) // pass toMerge by reference to store results
{
std::vector<std::future< std::vector<int> >> tasks;
for (const std::vector<int>& v : queue)
tasks.push_back (std::async(
[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}));

// wait until all tasks are complete
for (std::future< std::vector<int> >& f : tasks)
toMerge.push_back(f.get()); // move vector into list
}


Lambda which sorts look like:



[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy  
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}


you don't want to modify v from queue hence the copy of v is made,
the content of v is copied into vecCopy. Because closure
keeps vecCopy by value you need to put mutable keyword to lambda to allow
vecCopy to be modified.






share|improve this answer





















  • Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 19:49






  • 1




    Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 19:58












  • That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 20:20
















1














All you need is to create vector for holding future objects,
iterate over queue and at each iterator call async function
to start asynchronous operation - in your case it is sorting of vector.
For each future object you have to call get method to retrieve sorted vector.
Obtained sorted vector by get is added to toMerge list.



void work(
const std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, // const added - don't modify queue
std::list<std::vector<int>>& toMerge) // pass toMerge by reference to store results
{
std::vector<std::future< std::vector<int> >> tasks;
for (const std::vector<int>& v : queue)
tasks.push_back (std::async(
[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}));

// wait until all tasks are complete
for (std::future< std::vector<int> >& f : tasks)
toMerge.push_back(f.get()); // move vector into list
}


Lambda which sorts look like:



[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy  
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}


you don't want to modify v from queue hence the copy of v is made,
the content of v is copied into vecCopy. Because closure
keeps vecCopy by value you need to put mutable keyword to lambda to allow
vecCopy to be modified.






share|improve this answer





















  • Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 19:49






  • 1




    Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 19:58












  • That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 20:20














1












1








1






All you need is to create vector for holding future objects,
iterate over queue and at each iterator call async function
to start asynchronous operation - in your case it is sorting of vector.
For each future object you have to call get method to retrieve sorted vector.
Obtained sorted vector by get is added to toMerge list.



void work(
const std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, // const added - don't modify queue
std::list<std::vector<int>>& toMerge) // pass toMerge by reference to store results
{
std::vector<std::future< std::vector<int> >> tasks;
for (const std::vector<int>& v : queue)
tasks.push_back (std::async(
[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}));

// wait until all tasks are complete
for (std::future< std::vector<int> >& f : tasks)
toMerge.push_back(f.get()); // move vector into list
}


Lambda which sorts look like:



[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy  
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}


you don't want to modify v from queue hence the copy of v is made,
the content of v is copied into vecCopy. Because closure
keeps vecCopy by value you need to put mutable keyword to lambda to allow
vecCopy to be modified.






share|improve this answer












All you need is to create vector for holding future objects,
iterate over queue and at each iterator call async function
to start asynchronous operation - in your case it is sorting of vector.
For each future object you have to call get method to retrieve sorted vector.
Obtained sorted vector by get is added to toMerge list.



void work(
const std::deque<std::vector<int>>& queue, // const added - don't modify queue
std::list<std::vector<int>>& toMerge) // pass toMerge by reference to store results
{
std::vector<std::future< std::vector<int> >> tasks;
for (const std::vector<int>& v : queue)
tasks.push_back (std::async(
[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}));

// wait until all tasks are complete
for (std::future< std::vector<int> >& f : tasks)
toMerge.push_back(f.get()); // move vector into list
}


Lambda which sorts look like:



[vecCopy = v]() mutable { // copy v into vecCopy  
std::sort(vecCopy.begin(), vecCopy.end());
return vecCopy;
}


you don't want to modify v from queue hence the copy of v is made,
the content of v is copied into vecCopy. Because closure
keeps vecCopy by value you need to put mutable keyword to lambda to allow
vecCopy to be modified.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 21 at 19:08









rafix07

6,6031613




6,6031613












  • Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 19:49






  • 1




    Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 19:58












  • That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 20:20


















  • Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 19:49






  • 1




    Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
    – rafix07
    Nov 21 at 19:58












  • That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
    – Sailanarmo
    Nov 21 at 20:20
















Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
– Sailanarmo
Nov 21 at 19:49




Wow! That was really cool! This is the solution I was looking for, the question I have for you is about vecCopy, what is going on when you call vecCopy = v? How does vecCopy know that it is a vector?
– Sailanarmo
Nov 21 at 19:49




1




1




Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
– rafix07
Nov 21 at 19:58






Is works since c++14, in C++11 you can pass variable into closure by reference [&v] - it doesn't work because you cannot call sort on const v, or by value [v] mutable it also doesn't work because v is const. Since C++14 you can name captured value and initialize it, vecCopy = v means that closure has vecCopy as data member and this vector is copy of v. You can google lambda capture expressions c++14 to see more details.
– rafix07
Nov 21 at 19:58














That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
– Sailanarmo
Nov 21 at 20:20




That is super cool! Thank you for your help!
– Sailanarmo
Nov 21 at 20:20


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53405439%2fhow-to-use-stdasync-on-a-queue-of-vectors-or-a-vector-of-vectors-to-sort%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

Refactoring coordinates for Minecraft Pi buildings written in Python