Displaying a sentence letter by letter including spaces
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Can I make this simpler anyhow?
My code displays it correctly:
v = lambda x: [x[0:i+1] for i in range(len(x))]+[x[0:-i-1] for i in range(len(x))]
print(*v(input("Enter a sentence: ")), sep="n")
This also works:
text = input("Enter a sentence: ")
v = [text[:i] for i in range(1, len(text)+1)]
print(*(v + v[::-1]), sep='n')
This is what it prints:
Enter something: test
t
te
tes
test
tes
te
t
python python-3.x
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Can I make this simpler anyhow?
My code displays it correctly:
v = lambda x: [x[0:i+1] for i in range(len(x))]+[x[0:-i-1] for i in range(len(x))]
print(*v(input("Enter a sentence: ")), sep="n")
This also works:
text = input("Enter a sentence: ")
v = [text[:i] for i in range(1, len(text)+1)]
print(*(v + v[::-1]), sep='n')
This is what it prints:
Enter something: test
t
te
tes
test
tes
te
t
python python-3.x
New contributor
Csn you just suggest an easier version of the first one
– Samardeep Khurana
9 hours ago
2
Have you written this yourself and do you fully understand how it works?
– janos
8 hours ago
1
not exactly to be honest
– Samardeep Khurana
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Can I make this simpler anyhow?
My code displays it correctly:
v = lambda x: [x[0:i+1] for i in range(len(x))]+[x[0:-i-1] for i in range(len(x))]
print(*v(input("Enter a sentence: ")), sep="n")
This also works:
text = input("Enter a sentence: ")
v = [text[:i] for i in range(1, len(text)+1)]
print(*(v + v[::-1]), sep='n')
This is what it prints:
Enter something: test
t
te
tes
test
tes
te
t
python python-3.x
New contributor
Can I make this simpler anyhow?
My code displays it correctly:
v = lambda x: [x[0:i+1] for i in range(len(x))]+[x[0:-i-1] for i in range(len(x))]
print(*v(input("Enter a sentence: ")), sep="n")
This also works:
text = input("Enter a sentence: ")
v = [text[:i] for i in range(1, len(text)+1)]
print(*(v + v[::-1]), sep='n')
This is what it prints:
Enter something: test
t
te
tes
test
tes
te
t
python python-3.x
python python-3.x
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 mins ago
Jamal♦
30.2k11115226
30.2k11115226
New contributor
asked 10 hours ago
Samardeep Khurana
92
92
New contributor
New contributor
Csn you just suggest an easier version of the first one
– Samardeep Khurana
9 hours ago
2
Have you written this yourself and do you fully understand how it works?
– janos
8 hours ago
1
not exactly to be honest
– Samardeep Khurana
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Csn you just suggest an easier version of the first one
– Samardeep Khurana
9 hours ago
2
Have you written this yourself and do you fully understand how it works?
– janos
8 hours ago
1
not exactly to be honest
– Samardeep Khurana
8 hours ago
Csn you just suggest an easier version of the first one
– Samardeep Khurana
9 hours ago
Csn you just suggest an easier version of the first one
– Samardeep Khurana
9 hours ago
2
2
Have you written this yourself and do you fully understand how it works?
– janos
8 hours ago
Have you written this yourself and do you fully understand how it works?
– janos
8 hours ago
1
1
not exactly to be honest
– Samardeep Khurana
8 hours ago
not exactly to be honest
– Samardeep Khurana
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Since the program is only a snippet, there's not much to talk about in terms of larger design choices, but there are a few things of note:
Inconsistency / non-identical programs: Your two programs are not identical: the first one produces the original word once, while the second version produces the ascending list and then the same list reversed; hence, the original word appears twice. This could be fixed by tweaking the first list to remove the last element, likev[:-1]
. You can read more about list slices here; they're generally a useful tool.
Efficiency: Unless having the list for a later part of the program is important, it can be made more efficient by using iterators. Iterators can output a pattern's elements one-by-one without storing the entire pattern in memory. For a small program like this, it doesn't make any difference, but being aware of the technique is useful as the situations scale up. This SO answer explains the rationale of using iterators in a bit more detail. Using iterators, one could write:
import itertools as it
intext = input("Enter a sentence: ")
for s in it.chain((intext[:i] for i in range(1, len(intext))),
(intext[:i] for i in range(len(intext), 0, -1))):
print(s)
Here, itertools (an extremely useful standard library, probably one of the most commonly used standard libraries), is used to chain two two iterators together so they are iterated one after another using the nicely named
chain
function. The mid-line indent is used to limit the line length, and complies with PEP 8's guidelines about indenting split lines.
Other critiques: Concatenating two lists together is generally something to avoid if you can, because it's somewhat inefficient. Lambda functions should probably be used sparingly unless they offer a utility over functions in your particular situation. Unpacking argument lists is clever, but in this situation, it's probably more clear and efficient to just iterate through a for-loop as shown above.
If you want to learn more Python, I highly recommend starting to read through portions of the Python docs as they become relevant. They're generally very well-written and easy to understand. Reading Stack Overflow questions to find solutions to specific programming problems also helps, but the docs help fill in the gaps.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Samardeep Khurana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209851%2fdisplaying-a-sentence-letter-by-letter-including-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Since the program is only a snippet, there's not much to talk about in terms of larger design choices, but there are a few things of note:
Inconsistency / non-identical programs: Your two programs are not identical: the first one produces the original word once, while the second version produces the ascending list and then the same list reversed; hence, the original word appears twice. This could be fixed by tweaking the first list to remove the last element, likev[:-1]
. You can read more about list slices here; they're generally a useful tool.
Efficiency: Unless having the list for a later part of the program is important, it can be made more efficient by using iterators. Iterators can output a pattern's elements one-by-one without storing the entire pattern in memory. For a small program like this, it doesn't make any difference, but being aware of the technique is useful as the situations scale up. This SO answer explains the rationale of using iterators in a bit more detail. Using iterators, one could write:
import itertools as it
intext = input("Enter a sentence: ")
for s in it.chain((intext[:i] for i in range(1, len(intext))),
(intext[:i] for i in range(len(intext), 0, -1))):
print(s)
Here, itertools (an extremely useful standard library, probably one of the most commonly used standard libraries), is used to chain two two iterators together so they are iterated one after another using the nicely named
chain
function. The mid-line indent is used to limit the line length, and complies with PEP 8's guidelines about indenting split lines.
Other critiques: Concatenating two lists together is generally something to avoid if you can, because it's somewhat inefficient. Lambda functions should probably be used sparingly unless they offer a utility over functions in your particular situation. Unpacking argument lists is clever, but in this situation, it's probably more clear and efficient to just iterate through a for-loop as shown above.
If you want to learn more Python, I highly recommend starting to read through portions of the Python docs as they become relevant. They're generally very well-written and easy to understand. Reading Stack Overflow questions to find solutions to specific programming problems also helps, but the docs help fill in the gaps.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Since the program is only a snippet, there's not much to talk about in terms of larger design choices, but there are a few things of note:
Inconsistency / non-identical programs: Your two programs are not identical: the first one produces the original word once, while the second version produces the ascending list and then the same list reversed; hence, the original word appears twice. This could be fixed by tweaking the first list to remove the last element, likev[:-1]
. You can read more about list slices here; they're generally a useful tool.
Efficiency: Unless having the list for a later part of the program is important, it can be made more efficient by using iterators. Iterators can output a pattern's elements one-by-one without storing the entire pattern in memory. For a small program like this, it doesn't make any difference, but being aware of the technique is useful as the situations scale up. This SO answer explains the rationale of using iterators in a bit more detail. Using iterators, one could write:
import itertools as it
intext = input("Enter a sentence: ")
for s in it.chain((intext[:i] for i in range(1, len(intext))),
(intext[:i] for i in range(len(intext), 0, -1))):
print(s)
Here, itertools (an extremely useful standard library, probably one of the most commonly used standard libraries), is used to chain two two iterators together so they are iterated one after another using the nicely named
chain
function. The mid-line indent is used to limit the line length, and complies with PEP 8's guidelines about indenting split lines.
Other critiques: Concatenating two lists together is generally something to avoid if you can, because it's somewhat inefficient. Lambda functions should probably be used sparingly unless they offer a utility over functions in your particular situation. Unpacking argument lists is clever, but in this situation, it's probably more clear and efficient to just iterate through a for-loop as shown above.
If you want to learn more Python, I highly recommend starting to read through portions of the Python docs as they become relevant. They're generally very well-written and easy to understand. Reading Stack Overflow questions to find solutions to specific programming problems also helps, but the docs help fill in the gaps.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Since the program is only a snippet, there's not much to talk about in terms of larger design choices, but there are a few things of note:
Inconsistency / non-identical programs: Your two programs are not identical: the first one produces the original word once, while the second version produces the ascending list and then the same list reversed; hence, the original word appears twice. This could be fixed by tweaking the first list to remove the last element, likev[:-1]
. You can read more about list slices here; they're generally a useful tool.
Efficiency: Unless having the list for a later part of the program is important, it can be made more efficient by using iterators. Iterators can output a pattern's elements one-by-one without storing the entire pattern in memory. For a small program like this, it doesn't make any difference, but being aware of the technique is useful as the situations scale up. This SO answer explains the rationale of using iterators in a bit more detail. Using iterators, one could write:
import itertools as it
intext = input("Enter a sentence: ")
for s in it.chain((intext[:i] for i in range(1, len(intext))),
(intext[:i] for i in range(len(intext), 0, -1))):
print(s)
Here, itertools (an extremely useful standard library, probably one of the most commonly used standard libraries), is used to chain two two iterators together so they are iterated one after another using the nicely named
chain
function. The mid-line indent is used to limit the line length, and complies with PEP 8's guidelines about indenting split lines.
Other critiques: Concatenating two lists together is generally something to avoid if you can, because it's somewhat inefficient. Lambda functions should probably be used sparingly unless they offer a utility over functions in your particular situation. Unpacking argument lists is clever, but in this situation, it's probably more clear and efficient to just iterate through a for-loop as shown above.
If you want to learn more Python, I highly recommend starting to read through portions of the Python docs as they become relevant. They're generally very well-written and easy to understand. Reading Stack Overflow questions to find solutions to specific programming problems also helps, but the docs help fill in the gaps.
Since the program is only a snippet, there's not much to talk about in terms of larger design choices, but there are a few things of note:
Inconsistency / non-identical programs: Your two programs are not identical: the first one produces the original word once, while the second version produces the ascending list and then the same list reversed; hence, the original word appears twice. This could be fixed by tweaking the first list to remove the last element, likev[:-1]
. You can read more about list slices here; they're generally a useful tool.
Efficiency: Unless having the list for a later part of the program is important, it can be made more efficient by using iterators. Iterators can output a pattern's elements one-by-one without storing the entire pattern in memory. For a small program like this, it doesn't make any difference, but being aware of the technique is useful as the situations scale up. This SO answer explains the rationale of using iterators in a bit more detail. Using iterators, one could write:
import itertools as it
intext = input("Enter a sentence: ")
for s in it.chain((intext[:i] for i in range(1, len(intext))),
(intext[:i] for i in range(len(intext), 0, -1))):
print(s)
Here, itertools (an extremely useful standard library, probably one of the most commonly used standard libraries), is used to chain two two iterators together so they are iterated one after another using the nicely named
chain
function. The mid-line indent is used to limit the line length, and complies with PEP 8's guidelines about indenting split lines.
Other critiques: Concatenating two lists together is generally something to avoid if you can, because it's somewhat inefficient. Lambda functions should probably be used sparingly unless they offer a utility over functions in your particular situation. Unpacking argument lists is clever, but in this situation, it's probably more clear and efficient to just iterate through a for-loop as shown above.
If you want to learn more Python, I highly recommend starting to read through portions of the Python docs as they become relevant. They're generally very well-written and easy to understand. Reading Stack Overflow questions to find solutions to specific programming problems also helps, but the docs help fill in the gaps.
edited 42 mins ago
answered 48 mins ago
Graham
566113
566113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Samardeep Khurana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Samardeep Khurana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Samardeep Khurana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Samardeep Khurana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209851%2fdisplaying-a-sentence-letter-by-letter-including-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Csn you just suggest an easier version of the first one
– Samardeep Khurana
9 hours ago
2
Have you written this yourself and do you fully understand how it works?
– janos
8 hours ago
1
not exactly to be honest
– Samardeep Khurana
8 hours ago