Python nested list comprehension












0















in my code i have created a nested list via list comprehension containing hex numbers. My next step was to calculate the decimal value of these hex numbers.
My last step was removing the () brackets of each element, because my former method created tupels for each list element.
My question here is, can i combine all three steps into one big step and if yes, will it be more efficient in computing ?



My code looks like this:



from struct import unpack
from codecs import decode

self.step1 = [[self.inputlist[self.otherlist[i]+k] for i in range(len(self.otherlist))]
for k in range(asd)]
self.step2 = [[unpack("<B",decode(x,"hex")) for x in y] for y in self.step1]
self.step3 = [[p[0] for p in q] for q in self.step2]


this code worked fine (i shortened it and am not showing how self.inputlist,otherlist,asd are defined). I am just curious if i can put self.step1, self.step2,self.step3 into one nested list comprehension.










share|improve this question























  • You can see it yourself by replacing the self.step1 in the self.step2 and replacing it again in self.step3

    – Sandesh34
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:16






  • 1





    Even if it gets faster (which I doubt), I don't think it is something you should do because the resulting code will look horrendous.

    – eozd
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:17











  • i will try that thank you

    – James
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:38
















0















in my code i have created a nested list via list comprehension containing hex numbers. My next step was to calculate the decimal value of these hex numbers.
My last step was removing the () brackets of each element, because my former method created tupels for each list element.
My question here is, can i combine all three steps into one big step and if yes, will it be more efficient in computing ?



My code looks like this:



from struct import unpack
from codecs import decode

self.step1 = [[self.inputlist[self.otherlist[i]+k] for i in range(len(self.otherlist))]
for k in range(asd)]
self.step2 = [[unpack("<B",decode(x,"hex")) for x in y] for y in self.step1]
self.step3 = [[p[0] for p in q] for q in self.step2]


this code worked fine (i shortened it and am not showing how self.inputlist,otherlist,asd are defined). I am just curious if i can put self.step1, self.step2,self.step3 into one nested list comprehension.










share|improve this question























  • You can see it yourself by replacing the self.step1 in the self.step2 and replacing it again in self.step3

    – Sandesh34
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:16






  • 1





    Even if it gets faster (which I doubt), I don't think it is something you should do because the resulting code will look horrendous.

    – eozd
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:17











  • i will try that thank you

    – James
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:38














0












0








0








in my code i have created a nested list via list comprehension containing hex numbers. My next step was to calculate the decimal value of these hex numbers.
My last step was removing the () brackets of each element, because my former method created tupels for each list element.
My question here is, can i combine all three steps into one big step and if yes, will it be more efficient in computing ?



My code looks like this:



from struct import unpack
from codecs import decode

self.step1 = [[self.inputlist[self.otherlist[i]+k] for i in range(len(self.otherlist))]
for k in range(asd)]
self.step2 = [[unpack("<B",decode(x,"hex")) for x in y] for y in self.step1]
self.step3 = [[p[0] for p in q] for q in self.step2]


this code worked fine (i shortened it and am not showing how self.inputlist,otherlist,asd are defined). I am just curious if i can put self.step1, self.step2,self.step3 into one nested list comprehension.










share|improve this question














in my code i have created a nested list via list comprehension containing hex numbers. My next step was to calculate the decimal value of these hex numbers.
My last step was removing the () brackets of each element, because my former method created tupels for each list element.
My question here is, can i combine all three steps into one big step and if yes, will it be more efficient in computing ?



My code looks like this:



from struct import unpack
from codecs import decode

self.step1 = [[self.inputlist[self.otherlist[i]+k] for i in range(len(self.otherlist))]
for k in range(asd)]
self.step2 = [[unpack("<B",decode(x,"hex")) for x in y] for y in self.step1]
self.step3 = [[p[0] for p in q] for q in self.step2]


this code worked fine (i shortened it and am not showing how self.inputlist,otherlist,asd are defined). I am just curious if i can put self.step1, self.step2,self.step3 into one nested list comprehension.







python-3.x nested






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 '18 at 18:11









James James

628




628













  • You can see it yourself by replacing the self.step1 in the self.step2 and replacing it again in self.step3

    – Sandesh34
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:16






  • 1





    Even if it gets faster (which I doubt), I don't think it is something you should do because the resulting code will look horrendous.

    – eozd
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:17











  • i will try that thank you

    – James
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:38



















  • You can see it yourself by replacing the self.step1 in the self.step2 and replacing it again in self.step3

    – Sandesh34
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:16






  • 1





    Even if it gets faster (which I doubt), I don't think it is something you should do because the resulting code will look horrendous.

    – eozd
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:17











  • i will try that thank you

    – James
    Nov 22 '18 at 18:38

















You can see it yourself by replacing the self.step1 in the self.step2 and replacing it again in self.step3

– Sandesh34
Nov 22 '18 at 18:16





You can see it yourself by replacing the self.step1 in the self.step2 and replacing it again in self.step3

– Sandesh34
Nov 22 '18 at 18:16




1




1





Even if it gets faster (which I doubt), I don't think it is something you should do because the resulting code will look horrendous.

– eozd
Nov 22 '18 at 18:17





Even if it gets faster (which I doubt), I don't think it is something you should do because the resulting code will look horrendous.

– eozd
Nov 22 '18 at 18:17













i will try that thank you

– James
Nov 22 '18 at 18:38





i will try that thank you

– James
Nov 22 '18 at 18:38












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53436319%2fpython-nested-list-comprehension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53436319%2fpython-nested-list-comprehension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'