limit without l'hopital's rule
I've been having extreme difficulties with evaluating this limit, I've simply tried everything I can think of, I applied l'hopital's rule twice and I got 1, but it is not included in our curriculum.
$$lim_{x to 0} frac {e^x-sqrt{1+2x}}{x^2}$$
calculus limits limits-without-lhopital
add a comment |
I've been having extreme difficulties with evaluating this limit, I've simply tried everything I can think of, I applied l'hopital's rule twice and I got 1, but it is not included in our curriculum.
$$lim_{x to 0} frac {e^x-sqrt{1+2x}}{x^2}$$
calculus limits limits-without-lhopital
1
Myktiply by conjugate numerator and denominator
– Neymar
6 hours ago
I've already tried it but didn't seem to work at all;
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
Do you "know" that $exp(x)=lim_{nto infty}((1+(x/n))^n)$?
– Oscar Lanzi
6 hours ago
You need to use advanced tools like L'Hospital's Rule or Taylor series. Without these the evaluation of limit is difficult. One approach is to use the hint given by @OscarLanzi.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I've been having extreme difficulties with evaluating this limit, I've simply tried everything I can think of, I applied l'hopital's rule twice and I got 1, but it is not included in our curriculum.
$$lim_{x to 0} frac {e^x-sqrt{1+2x}}{x^2}$$
calculus limits limits-without-lhopital
I've been having extreme difficulties with evaluating this limit, I've simply tried everything I can think of, I applied l'hopital's rule twice and I got 1, but it is not included in our curriculum.
$$lim_{x to 0} frac {e^x-sqrt{1+2x}}{x^2}$$
calculus limits limits-without-lhopital
calculus limits limits-without-lhopital
edited 6 hours ago
Rebellos
14.3k31244
14.3k31244
asked 6 hours ago
Lazarus
416
416
1
Myktiply by conjugate numerator and denominator
– Neymar
6 hours ago
I've already tried it but didn't seem to work at all;
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
Do you "know" that $exp(x)=lim_{nto infty}((1+(x/n))^n)$?
– Oscar Lanzi
6 hours ago
You need to use advanced tools like L'Hospital's Rule or Taylor series. Without these the evaluation of limit is difficult. One approach is to use the hint given by @OscarLanzi.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Myktiply by conjugate numerator and denominator
– Neymar
6 hours ago
I've already tried it but didn't seem to work at all;
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
Do you "know" that $exp(x)=lim_{nto infty}((1+(x/n))^n)$?
– Oscar Lanzi
6 hours ago
You need to use advanced tools like L'Hospital's Rule or Taylor series. Without these the evaluation of limit is difficult. One approach is to use the hint given by @OscarLanzi.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
1
1
Myktiply by conjugate numerator and denominator
– Neymar
6 hours ago
Myktiply by conjugate numerator and denominator
– Neymar
6 hours ago
I've already tried it but didn't seem to work at all;
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
I've already tried it but didn't seem to work at all;
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
Do you "know" that $exp(x)=lim_{nto infty}((1+(x/n))^n)$?
– Oscar Lanzi
6 hours ago
Do you "know" that $exp(x)=lim_{nto infty}((1+(x/n))^n)$?
– Oscar Lanzi
6 hours ago
You need to use advanced tools like L'Hospital's Rule or Taylor series. Without these the evaluation of limit is difficult. One approach is to use the hint given by @OscarLanzi.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
You need to use advanced tools like L'Hospital's Rule or Taylor series. Without these the evaluation of limit is difficult. One approach is to use the hint given by @OscarLanzi.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Hint :
$$e^x - sqrt{1+2x} = e^x - sqrt{x^4left(frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}right)}= e^x - x^2sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}$$
Thus, the given limit becomes :
$$lim_{x to 0} left(frac{e^x}{x^2} - sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}right)$$
1
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
2
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
By the binomial theorem, for small x$$e^x-sqrt{1+2x}approx 1+x+frac12 x^2-(1+x-frac12 x^2)=x^2.$$Thus the limit is $1$ as desired.
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
2
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
add a comment |
If you know how to find a Taylor series, that's the most straightforward way to go, here. If not, let me outline it for you.
The function $f(x)=e^x-sqrt{1+2x}$ is defined on $left[-frac12,inftyright),$ and (infinitely) differentiable on $left(-frac12,inftyright).$ In particular, then, for any $x$ less than $frac12$ away from $0,$ we have that $$f(x)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^k,$$ where $f^{(k)}$ denotes the $k$th derivative of $f.$ At first glance, this seems like it wouldn't be useful at all--after all, finding infinitely-many derivatives seems daunting--but fortunately, we don't have to. Instead we need only go partway, by
Taylor's Theorem: Suppose that $n$ is a positive integer, and let $f$ be a real-valued function on a subset of $Bbb R$ that is $n$ times differentiable on an interval $I=(a-R,a+R)$ for some $ainBbb R$ and $R>0.$ Then there is a real-valued function $h_n$ defined on $I$ such that
$lim_{xto a}h_n(x)=0,$ and
- for all $xin I$ we have $$f(x)=h_n(x)(x-a)^n+sum_{k=0}^nfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}(x-a)^k.$$
Why does this help us? Well first, let's calculate the first few derivatives of $f$ to see what happens. Writing $f(x)=e^x+(1+2x)^{frac12},$ we can use the Power and Chain rules of derivatives to quickly see that
$$f'(x)=e^x-frac12(1+2x)^{-frac12}cdot2=e^x-(1+2x)^{-frac12}$$ and $$f''(x)=e^x+frac12(1+2x)^{-frac32}cdot2=e^x+(1+2x)^{-frac32}.$$ We could keep going fairly easily from here and develop an explicit formula for all the other derivatives of $f,$ but there's no need, as you'll see.
By Taylor's theorem with $n=2,$ $a=0,$ and $R=frac12,$ we have that there is a function $h_2$ defined on $left(-frac12,frac12right)$ such that $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ and such that $$begin{eqnarray}f(x) &=& h_2(x)x^2+sum_{k=0}^2frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}x^k\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+f(0)+f'(0)x+frac{f''(0)}2x^2\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+0+0x+frac22x^2\ &=& x^2+h_2(x)x^2end{eqnarray}$$ whenever $|x|<frac12.$ Thus, for $0<|x|<frac12,$ we then have $$frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1+h_2(x).$$ Since $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ then $$lim_{xto 0}frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1,$$ as desired.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052155%2flimit-without-lhopitals-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hint :
$$e^x - sqrt{1+2x} = e^x - sqrt{x^4left(frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}right)}= e^x - x^2sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}$$
Thus, the given limit becomes :
$$lim_{x to 0} left(frac{e^x}{x^2} - sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}right)$$
1
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
2
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Hint :
$$e^x - sqrt{1+2x} = e^x - sqrt{x^4left(frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}right)}= e^x - x^2sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}$$
Thus, the given limit becomes :
$$lim_{x to 0} left(frac{e^x}{x^2} - sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}right)$$
1
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
2
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Hint :
$$e^x - sqrt{1+2x} = e^x - sqrt{x^4left(frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}right)}= e^x - x^2sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}$$
Thus, the given limit becomes :
$$lim_{x to 0} left(frac{e^x}{x^2} - sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}right)$$
Hint :
$$e^x - sqrt{1+2x} = e^x - sqrt{x^4left(frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}right)}= e^x - x^2sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}$$
Thus, the given limit becomes :
$$lim_{x to 0} left(frac{e^x}{x^2} - sqrt{frac{1}{x^4}+frac{2}{x^3}}right)$$
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Rebellos
14.3k31244
14.3k31244
1
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
2
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
2
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
1
1
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
shouldn't the limit become limn→0(e^x/x² -sqrt(1/x^4 + 2/x^3)) ; forgive me if I'm mistaken but I don't seem to be catching what you're hinting towards
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
2
2
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
How is the evaluation of limit of your last expression simpler than evaluating the original limit? Both expressions are algebraically same and the manipulation does not seem to help here.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
By the binomial theorem, for small x$$e^x-sqrt{1+2x}approx 1+x+frac12 x^2-(1+x-frac12 x^2)=x^2.$$Thus the limit is $1$ as desired.
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
2
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
add a comment |
By the binomial theorem, for small x$$e^x-sqrt{1+2x}approx 1+x+frac12 x^2-(1+x-frac12 x^2)=x^2.$$Thus the limit is $1$ as desired.
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
2
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
add a comment |
By the binomial theorem, for small x$$e^x-sqrt{1+2x}approx 1+x+frac12 x^2-(1+x-frac12 x^2)=x^2.$$Thus the limit is $1$ as desired.
By the binomial theorem, for small x$$e^x-sqrt{1+2x}approx 1+x+frac12 x^2-(1+x-frac12 x^2)=x^2.$$Thus the limit is $1$ as desired.
answered 6 hours ago
J.G.
22.2k22034
22.2k22034
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
2
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
add a comment |
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
2
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
This theorem isn't included in the curriculum aswell,
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
@Lazarus Then determine $a,,b$ in $(1+ax+bx^2)^2approx 1+2x$ by requiring the $x,,x^2$ coefficients to match.
– J.G.
6 hours ago
2
2
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
+1 This is essentially "look at the first few terms of the Taylor series" - in my opinion the best way to start on this kind of problem. L'Hopital is a last resort.
– Ethan Bolker
6 hours ago
add a comment |
If you know how to find a Taylor series, that's the most straightforward way to go, here. If not, let me outline it for you.
The function $f(x)=e^x-sqrt{1+2x}$ is defined on $left[-frac12,inftyright),$ and (infinitely) differentiable on $left(-frac12,inftyright).$ In particular, then, for any $x$ less than $frac12$ away from $0,$ we have that $$f(x)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^k,$$ where $f^{(k)}$ denotes the $k$th derivative of $f.$ At first glance, this seems like it wouldn't be useful at all--after all, finding infinitely-many derivatives seems daunting--but fortunately, we don't have to. Instead we need only go partway, by
Taylor's Theorem: Suppose that $n$ is a positive integer, and let $f$ be a real-valued function on a subset of $Bbb R$ that is $n$ times differentiable on an interval $I=(a-R,a+R)$ for some $ainBbb R$ and $R>0.$ Then there is a real-valued function $h_n$ defined on $I$ such that
$lim_{xto a}h_n(x)=0,$ and
- for all $xin I$ we have $$f(x)=h_n(x)(x-a)^n+sum_{k=0}^nfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}(x-a)^k.$$
Why does this help us? Well first, let's calculate the first few derivatives of $f$ to see what happens. Writing $f(x)=e^x+(1+2x)^{frac12},$ we can use the Power and Chain rules of derivatives to quickly see that
$$f'(x)=e^x-frac12(1+2x)^{-frac12}cdot2=e^x-(1+2x)^{-frac12}$$ and $$f''(x)=e^x+frac12(1+2x)^{-frac32}cdot2=e^x+(1+2x)^{-frac32}.$$ We could keep going fairly easily from here and develop an explicit formula for all the other derivatives of $f,$ but there's no need, as you'll see.
By Taylor's theorem with $n=2,$ $a=0,$ and $R=frac12,$ we have that there is a function $h_2$ defined on $left(-frac12,frac12right)$ such that $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ and such that $$begin{eqnarray}f(x) &=& h_2(x)x^2+sum_{k=0}^2frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}x^k\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+f(0)+f'(0)x+frac{f''(0)}2x^2\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+0+0x+frac22x^2\ &=& x^2+h_2(x)x^2end{eqnarray}$$ whenever $|x|<frac12.$ Thus, for $0<|x|<frac12,$ we then have $$frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1+h_2(x).$$ Since $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ then $$lim_{xto 0}frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1,$$ as desired.
add a comment |
If you know how to find a Taylor series, that's the most straightforward way to go, here. If not, let me outline it for you.
The function $f(x)=e^x-sqrt{1+2x}$ is defined on $left[-frac12,inftyright),$ and (infinitely) differentiable on $left(-frac12,inftyright).$ In particular, then, for any $x$ less than $frac12$ away from $0,$ we have that $$f(x)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^k,$$ where $f^{(k)}$ denotes the $k$th derivative of $f.$ At first glance, this seems like it wouldn't be useful at all--after all, finding infinitely-many derivatives seems daunting--but fortunately, we don't have to. Instead we need only go partway, by
Taylor's Theorem: Suppose that $n$ is a positive integer, and let $f$ be a real-valued function on a subset of $Bbb R$ that is $n$ times differentiable on an interval $I=(a-R,a+R)$ for some $ainBbb R$ and $R>0.$ Then there is a real-valued function $h_n$ defined on $I$ such that
$lim_{xto a}h_n(x)=0,$ and
- for all $xin I$ we have $$f(x)=h_n(x)(x-a)^n+sum_{k=0}^nfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}(x-a)^k.$$
Why does this help us? Well first, let's calculate the first few derivatives of $f$ to see what happens. Writing $f(x)=e^x+(1+2x)^{frac12},$ we can use the Power and Chain rules of derivatives to quickly see that
$$f'(x)=e^x-frac12(1+2x)^{-frac12}cdot2=e^x-(1+2x)^{-frac12}$$ and $$f''(x)=e^x+frac12(1+2x)^{-frac32}cdot2=e^x+(1+2x)^{-frac32}.$$ We could keep going fairly easily from here and develop an explicit formula for all the other derivatives of $f,$ but there's no need, as you'll see.
By Taylor's theorem with $n=2,$ $a=0,$ and $R=frac12,$ we have that there is a function $h_2$ defined on $left(-frac12,frac12right)$ such that $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ and such that $$begin{eqnarray}f(x) &=& h_2(x)x^2+sum_{k=0}^2frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}x^k\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+f(0)+f'(0)x+frac{f''(0)}2x^2\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+0+0x+frac22x^2\ &=& x^2+h_2(x)x^2end{eqnarray}$$ whenever $|x|<frac12.$ Thus, for $0<|x|<frac12,$ we then have $$frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1+h_2(x).$$ Since $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ then $$lim_{xto 0}frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1,$$ as desired.
add a comment |
If you know how to find a Taylor series, that's the most straightforward way to go, here. If not, let me outline it for you.
The function $f(x)=e^x-sqrt{1+2x}$ is defined on $left[-frac12,inftyright),$ and (infinitely) differentiable on $left(-frac12,inftyright).$ In particular, then, for any $x$ less than $frac12$ away from $0,$ we have that $$f(x)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^k,$$ where $f^{(k)}$ denotes the $k$th derivative of $f.$ At first glance, this seems like it wouldn't be useful at all--after all, finding infinitely-many derivatives seems daunting--but fortunately, we don't have to. Instead we need only go partway, by
Taylor's Theorem: Suppose that $n$ is a positive integer, and let $f$ be a real-valued function on a subset of $Bbb R$ that is $n$ times differentiable on an interval $I=(a-R,a+R)$ for some $ainBbb R$ and $R>0.$ Then there is a real-valued function $h_n$ defined on $I$ such that
$lim_{xto a}h_n(x)=0,$ and
- for all $xin I$ we have $$f(x)=h_n(x)(x-a)^n+sum_{k=0}^nfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}(x-a)^k.$$
Why does this help us? Well first, let's calculate the first few derivatives of $f$ to see what happens. Writing $f(x)=e^x+(1+2x)^{frac12},$ we can use the Power and Chain rules of derivatives to quickly see that
$$f'(x)=e^x-frac12(1+2x)^{-frac12}cdot2=e^x-(1+2x)^{-frac12}$$ and $$f''(x)=e^x+frac12(1+2x)^{-frac32}cdot2=e^x+(1+2x)^{-frac32}.$$ We could keep going fairly easily from here and develop an explicit formula for all the other derivatives of $f,$ but there's no need, as you'll see.
By Taylor's theorem with $n=2,$ $a=0,$ and $R=frac12,$ we have that there is a function $h_2$ defined on $left(-frac12,frac12right)$ such that $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ and such that $$begin{eqnarray}f(x) &=& h_2(x)x^2+sum_{k=0}^2frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}x^k\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+f(0)+f'(0)x+frac{f''(0)}2x^2\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+0+0x+frac22x^2\ &=& x^2+h_2(x)x^2end{eqnarray}$$ whenever $|x|<frac12.$ Thus, for $0<|x|<frac12,$ we then have $$frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1+h_2(x).$$ Since $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ then $$lim_{xto 0}frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1,$$ as desired.
If you know how to find a Taylor series, that's the most straightforward way to go, here. If not, let me outline it for you.
The function $f(x)=e^x-sqrt{1+2x}$ is defined on $left[-frac12,inftyright),$ and (infinitely) differentiable on $left(-frac12,inftyright).$ In particular, then, for any $x$ less than $frac12$ away from $0,$ we have that $$f(x)=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!}x^k,$$ where $f^{(k)}$ denotes the $k$th derivative of $f.$ At first glance, this seems like it wouldn't be useful at all--after all, finding infinitely-many derivatives seems daunting--but fortunately, we don't have to. Instead we need only go partway, by
Taylor's Theorem: Suppose that $n$ is a positive integer, and let $f$ be a real-valued function on a subset of $Bbb R$ that is $n$ times differentiable on an interval $I=(a-R,a+R)$ for some $ainBbb R$ and $R>0.$ Then there is a real-valued function $h_n$ defined on $I$ such that
$lim_{xto a}h_n(x)=0,$ and
- for all $xin I$ we have $$f(x)=h_n(x)(x-a)^n+sum_{k=0}^nfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}(x-a)^k.$$
Why does this help us? Well first, let's calculate the first few derivatives of $f$ to see what happens. Writing $f(x)=e^x+(1+2x)^{frac12},$ we can use the Power and Chain rules of derivatives to quickly see that
$$f'(x)=e^x-frac12(1+2x)^{-frac12}cdot2=e^x-(1+2x)^{-frac12}$$ and $$f''(x)=e^x+frac12(1+2x)^{-frac32}cdot2=e^x+(1+2x)^{-frac32}.$$ We could keep going fairly easily from here and develop an explicit formula for all the other derivatives of $f,$ but there's no need, as you'll see.
By Taylor's theorem with $n=2,$ $a=0,$ and $R=frac12,$ we have that there is a function $h_2$ defined on $left(-frac12,frac12right)$ such that $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ and such that $$begin{eqnarray}f(x) &=& h_2(x)x^2+sum_{k=0}^2frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}x^k\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+f(0)+f'(0)x+frac{f''(0)}2x^2\ &=& h_2(x)x^2+0+0x+frac22x^2\ &=& x^2+h_2(x)x^2end{eqnarray}$$ whenever $|x|<frac12.$ Thus, for $0<|x|<frac12,$ we then have $$frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1+h_2(x).$$ Since $lim_{xto 0}h_2(x)=0,$ then $$lim_{xto 0}frac{f(x)}{x^2}=1,$$ as desired.
answered 5 hours ago
Cameron Buie
84.8k771155
84.8k771155
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052155%2flimit-without-lhopitals-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Myktiply by conjugate numerator and denominator
– Neymar
6 hours ago
I've already tried it but didn't seem to work at all;
– Lazarus
6 hours ago
Do you "know" that $exp(x)=lim_{nto infty}((1+(x/n))^n)$?
– Oscar Lanzi
6 hours ago
You need to use advanced tools like L'Hospital's Rule or Taylor series. Without these the evaluation of limit is difficult. One approach is to use the hint given by @OscarLanzi.
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago