OneTimesetup is getting invoked for each Test,I thought OneTimesetup is like BeforeSuite,TestNG annotation
In Nunit C# Im trying to open the application only once and make modification to it, for example i created this demo of Notepad application. In my real time project,i just have to log in to the application just once and execute all 100 test cases and only then close the Desktop application. Kindly tell me what am i doing wrong here,thanks a lot! Btw,im new to C#
using NUnit.Framework;
using OpenQA.Selenium.Remote;
using System;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Threading;
namespace Notepad
{ }
[SetUpFixture]
public class BaseClass
{
public static IWebDriver driver;
[OneTimeSetUp]
public static void AssemblyInitalize()
{
var dc = new DesiredCapabilities();
dc.SetCapability("app", @"C:\Windows\System32\notepad.exe");
driver = new RemoteWebDriver(new Uri("http://localhost:9999"), dc);
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
[OneTimeTearDown]
public static void oneTearDown()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("Close")).Click();
}
}
---First Test---
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class Notepad2:BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void test2()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("My Teacher ");
}
}
}
---- Second Test Class ----
using NUnit.Framework;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class NoteTest : BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("...is Coming now");
}
}
}
c# nunit winium
add a comment |
In Nunit C# Im trying to open the application only once and make modification to it, for example i created this demo of Notepad application. In my real time project,i just have to log in to the application just once and execute all 100 test cases and only then close the Desktop application. Kindly tell me what am i doing wrong here,thanks a lot! Btw,im new to C#
using NUnit.Framework;
using OpenQA.Selenium.Remote;
using System;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Threading;
namespace Notepad
{ }
[SetUpFixture]
public class BaseClass
{
public static IWebDriver driver;
[OneTimeSetUp]
public static void AssemblyInitalize()
{
var dc = new DesiredCapabilities();
dc.SetCapability("app", @"C:\Windows\System32\notepad.exe");
driver = new RemoteWebDriver(new Uri("http://localhost:9999"), dc);
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
[OneTimeTearDown]
public static void oneTearDown()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("Close")).Click();
}
}
---First Test---
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class Notepad2:BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void test2()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("My Teacher ");
}
}
}
---- Second Test Class ----
using NUnit.Framework;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class NoteTest : BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("...is Coming now");
}
}
}
c# nunit winium
add a comment |
In Nunit C# Im trying to open the application only once and make modification to it, for example i created this demo of Notepad application. In my real time project,i just have to log in to the application just once and execute all 100 test cases and only then close the Desktop application. Kindly tell me what am i doing wrong here,thanks a lot! Btw,im new to C#
using NUnit.Framework;
using OpenQA.Selenium.Remote;
using System;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Threading;
namespace Notepad
{ }
[SetUpFixture]
public class BaseClass
{
public static IWebDriver driver;
[OneTimeSetUp]
public static void AssemblyInitalize()
{
var dc = new DesiredCapabilities();
dc.SetCapability("app", @"C:\Windows\System32\notepad.exe");
driver = new RemoteWebDriver(new Uri("http://localhost:9999"), dc);
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
[OneTimeTearDown]
public static void oneTearDown()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("Close")).Click();
}
}
---First Test---
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class Notepad2:BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void test2()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("My Teacher ");
}
}
}
---- Second Test Class ----
using NUnit.Framework;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class NoteTest : BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("...is Coming now");
}
}
}
c# nunit winium
In Nunit C# Im trying to open the application only once and make modification to it, for example i created this demo of Notepad application. In my real time project,i just have to log in to the application just once and execute all 100 test cases and only then close the Desktop application. Kindly tell me what am i doing wrong here,thanks a lot! Btw,im new to C#
using NUnit.Framework;
using OpenQA.Selenium.Remote;
using System;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Threading;
namespace Notepad
{ }
[SetUpFixture]
public class BaseClass
{
public static IWebDriver driver;
[OneTimeSetUp]
public static void AssemblyInitalize()
{
var dc = new DesiredCapabilities();
dc.SetCapability("app", @"C:\Windows\System32\notepad.exe");
driver = new RemoteWebDriver(new Uri("http://localhost:9999"), dc);
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
[OneTimeTearDown]
public static void oneTearDown()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("Close")).Click();
}
}
---First Test---
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class Notepad2:BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void test2()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("My Teacher ");
}
}
}
---- Second Test Class ----
using NUnit.Framework;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
namespace Notepad
{ [TestFixture]
public class NoteTest : BaseClass
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
driver.FindElement(By.Id("15")).SendKeys("...is Coming now");
}
}
}
c# nunit winium
c# nunit winium
edited Nov 25 '18 at 7:39
Im Nobody
asked Nov 25 '18 at 7:27
Im NobodyIm Nobody
186
186
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
From the documentation, OneTimeSetup is called once before all tests in a TestFixture. Your example has two fixtures, so the set up is called twice. You need to have all your tests in the same Fixture.
This behaviour is different to the old [Setup] on SetupFixture attribute, which ran once for all tests in a namespace.
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
add a comment |
Regarding SetUpFixture
, the first answer is incorrect.
SetUpFixture
works exactly the same way as it has always worked. If you have a SetUpFixture
, it's OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods will run once for all the fixtures under the same namespace.
On the other hand, inside a TestFixture
the OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods run just once for the fixture itself.
In other words, the methods run "one time" within the particular scope in which they are used, namespace or fixture.
The problem is that you are using the same class as both a SetUpFixture
and as the base class for all your TestFixtures
. That means if you have n
test fixtures, it will run n + 1
times! That's what you are seeing.
SetUpFixtures
do not (have never had) anything to do with fixture inheritance. You should either make your class a SetUpFixture
or a TestFixture
base class. If, for whatever reason, you need both, then use two classes. In this case, you need only the SetUpFixture
, without the inheritance.
When to inherit from a base class: When you want the same code to execute many times, once for each fixture. Note that your base class, when used for one-time setup and teardown in this way, should normally not be marked as a TestFixture.
When to use a SetUpFixture: When you want some code to execute only once, before every any fixture runs and again once after all the fixtures have run.
In your example, you are using a SetUpFixture to control the timing of the initialization. You are using inheritance to allow you to share the driver. Problem is that the OneTimeSetUp in the base class is actually part of each test fixture and you don't want that.
I'd be concerned about a hundred or so tests all using the same driver. I've seen some people use one driver per test and others one driver per fixture_. Using one for __everything implies that you are being extraordinarily careful that each test cleans up after itself and restores the driver to the same state. I doubt that's possible.
However, as an exercise, here is how to do it if you really want to:
1. Have a base class with nothing but the driver member.
2. Derive the SetUpFixture from the base class and create / destroy the driver there.
3. Derive the TestFixtures from the same base class. They use but don't change the driver.
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53465501%2fonetimesetup-is-getting-invoked-for-each-test-i-thought-onetimesetup-is-like-bef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the documentation, OneTimeSetup is called once before all tests in a TestFixture. Your example has two fixtures, so the set up is called twice. You need to have all your tests in the same Fixture.
This behaviour is different to the old [Setup] on SetupFixture attribute, which ran once for all tests in a namespace.
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
add a comment |
From the documentation, OneTimeSetup is called once before all tests in a TestFixture. Your example has two fixtures, so the set up is called twice. You need to have all your tests in the same Fixture.
This behaviour is different to the old [Setup] on SetupFixture attribute, which ran once for all tests in a namespace.
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
add a comment |
From the documentation, OneTimeSetup is called once before all tests in a TestFixture. Your example has two fixtures, so the set up is called twice. You need to have all your tests in the same Fixture.
This behaviour is different to the old [Setup] on SetupFixture attribute, which ran once for all tests in a namespace.
From the documentation, OneTimeSetup is called once before all tests in a TestFixture. Your example has two fixtures, so the set up is called twice. You need to have all your tests in the same Fixture.
This behaviour is different to the old [Setup] on SetupFixture attribute, which ran once for all tests in a namespace.
edited Nov 25 '18 at 17:05
answered Nov 25 '18 at 8:47
iakobskiiakobski
1564
1564
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
add a comment |
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
Thanks a lot for the reply, how can i put them in the same Fixture, do i 've to bunk all test cases in the same class?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:00
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
or Make the baseClass as a TestFixture and extend all the test cases.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:09
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
I just now tried by making a BaseClass a TestFixture and extend two test cases, removed the TestFixture attribute from the both tests, still the Notepad is opening twice and tearing down twice. its working only when i put thetest cases inside the same class i.e Base Class. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. But when test cases are in the same class i.e BaseClass, oneTimeSetup and OneTimeTearDown occurring only once before and after all the test cases respectively.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:23
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
It's quite normal to have all the tests that rely on one setup in the same class, even if there are 100 of them.
– iakobski
Nov 25 '18 at 9:43
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
Thanks for the reply again, test cases are not really small, each test case as you may already know containing more than 50 steps at least. The code will be too lengthy and would become unreadable and very difficult to debug.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 9:56
add a comment |
Regarding SetUpFixture
, the first answer is incorrect.
SetUpFixture
works exactly the same way as it has always worked. If you have a SetUpFixture
, it's OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods will run once for all the fixtures under the same namespace.
On the other hand, inside a TestFixture
the OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods run just once for the fixture itself.
In other words, the methods run "one time" within the particular scope in which they are used, namespace or fixture.
The problem is that you are using the same class as both a SetUpFixture
and as the base class for all your TestFixtures
. That means if you have n
test fixtures, it will run n + 1
times! That's what you are seeing.
SetUpFixtures
do not (have never had) anything to do with fixture inheritance. You should either make your class a SetUpFixture
or a TestFixture
base class. If, for whatever reason, you need both, then use two classes. In this case, you need only the SetUpFixture
, without the inheritance.
When to inherit from a base class: When you want the same code to execute many times, once for each fixture. Note that your base class, when used for one-time setup and teardown in this way, should normally not be marked as a TestFixture.
When to use a SetUpFixture: When you want some code to execute only once, before every any fixture runs and again once after all the fixtures have run.
In your example, you are using a SetUpFixture to control the timing of the initialization. You are using inheritance to allow you to share the driver. Problem is that the OneTimeSetUp in the base class is actually part of each test fixture and you don't want that.
I'd be concerned about a hundred or so tests all using the same driver. I've seen some people use one driver per test and others one driver per fixture_. Using one for __everything implies that you are being extraordinarily careful that each test cleans up after itself and restores the driver to the same state. I doubt that's possible.
However, as an exercise, here is how to do it if you really want to:
1. Have a base class with nothing but the driver member.
2. Derive the SetUpFixture from the base class and create / destroy the driver there.
3. Derive the TestFixtures from the same base class. They use but don't change the driver.
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
|
show 1 more comment
Regarding SetUpFixture
, the first answer is incorrect.
SetUpFixture
works exactly the same way as it has always worked. If you have a SetUpFixture
, it's OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods will run once for all the fixtures under the same namespace.
On the other hand, inside a TestFixture
the OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods run just once for the fixture itself.
In other words, the methods run "one time" within the particular scope in which they are used, namespace or fixture.
The problem is that you are using the same class as both a SetUpFixture
and as the base class for all your TestFixtures
. That means if you have n
test fixtures, it will run n + 1
times! That's what you are seeing.
SetUpFixtures
do not (have never had) anything to do with fixture inheritance. You should either make your class a SetUpFixture
or a TestFixture
base class. If, for whatever reason, you need both, then use two classes. In this case, you need only the SetUpFixture
, without the inheritance.
When to inherit from a base class: When you want the same code to execute many times, once for each fixture. Note that your base class, when used for one-time setup and teardown in this way, should normally not be marked as a TestFixture.
When to use a SetUpFixture: When you want some code to execute only once, before every any fixture runs and again once after all the fixtures have run.
In your example, you are using a SetUpFixture to control the timing of the initialization. You are using inheritance to allow you to share the driver. Problem is that the OneTimeSetUp in the base class is actually part of each test fixture and you don't want that.
I'd be concerned about a hundred or so tests all using the same driver. I've seen some people use one driver per test and others one driver per fixture_. Using one for __everything implies that you are being extraordinarily careful that each test cleans up after itself and restores the driver to the same state. I doubt that's possible.
However, as an exercise, here is how to do it if you really want to:
1. Have a base class with nothing but the driver member.
2. Derive the SetUpFixture from the base class and create / destroy the driver there.
3. Derive the TestFixtures from the same base class. They use but don't change the driver.
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
|
show 1 more comment
Regarding SetUpFixture
, the first answer is incorrect.
SetUpFixture
works exactly the same way as it has always worked. If you have a SetUpFixture
, it's OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods will run once for all the fixtures under the same namespace.
On the other hand, inside a TestFixture
the OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods run just once for the fixture itself.
In other words, the methods run "one time" within the particular scope in which they are used, namespace or fixture.
The problem is that you are using the same class as both a SetUpFixture
and as the base class for all your TestFixtures
. That means if you have n
test fixtures, it will run n + 1
times! That's what you are seeing.
SetUpFixtures
do not (have never had) anything to do with fixture inheritance. You should either make your class a SetUpFixture
or a TestFixture
base class. If, for whatever reason, you need both, then use two classes. In this case, you need only the SetUpFixture
, without the inheritance.
When to inherit from a base class: When you want the same code to execute many times, once for each fixture. Note that your base class, when used for one-time setup and teardown in this way, should normally not be marked as a TestFixture.
When to use a SetUpFixture: When you want some code to execute only once, before every any fixture runs and again once after all the fixtures have run.
In your example, you are using a SetUpFixture to control the timing of the initialization. You are using inheritance to allow you to share the driver. Problem is that the OneTimeSetUp in the base class is actually part of each test fixture and you don't want that.
I'd be concerned about a hundred or so tests all using the same driver. I've seen some people use one driver per test and others one driver per fixture_. Using one for __everything implies that you are being extraordinarily careful that each test cleans up after itself and restores the driver to the same state. I doubt that's possible.
However, as an exercise, here is how to do it if you really want to:
1. Have a base class with nothing but the driver member.
2. Derive the SetUpFixture from the base class and create / destroy the driver there.
3. Derive the TestFixtures from the same base class. They use but don't change the driver.
Regarding SetUpFixture
, the first answer is incorrect.
SetUpFixture
works exactly the same way as it has always worked. If you have a SetUpFixture
, it's OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods will run once for all the fixtures under the same namespace.
On the other hand, inside a TestFixture
the OneTimeSetUp
and OneTimeTearDown
methods run just once for the fixture itself.
In other words, the methods run "one time" within the particular scope in which they are used, namespace or fixture.
The problem is that you are using the same class as both a SetUpFixture
and as the base class for all your TestFixtures
. That means if you have n
test fixtures, it will run n + 1
times! That's what you are seeing.
SetUpFixtures
do not (have never had) anything to do with fixture inheritance. You should either make your class a SetUpFixture
or a TestFixture
base class. If, for whatever reason, you need both, then use two classes. In this case, you need only the SetUpFixture
, without the inheritance.
When to inherit from a base class: When you want the same code to execute many times, once for each fixture. Note that your base class, when used for one-time setup and teardown in this way, should normally not be marked as a TestFixture.
When to use a SetUpFixture: When you want some code to execute only once, before every any fixture runs and again once after all the fixtures have run.
In your example, you are using a SetUpFixture to control the timing of the initialization. You are using inheritance to allow you to share the driver. Problem is that the OneTimeSetUp in the base class is actually part of each test fixture and you don't want that.
I'd be concerned about a hundred or so tests all using the same driver. I've seen some people use one driver per test and others one driver per fixture_. Using one for __everything implies that you are being extraordinarily careful that each test cleans up after itself and restores the driver to the same state. I doubt that's possible.
However, as an exercise, here is how to do it if you really want to:
1. Have a base class with nothing but the driver member.
2. Derive the SetUpFixture from the base class and create / destroy the driver there.
3. Derive the TestFixtures from the same base class. They use but don't change the driver.
edited Nov 25 '18 at 20:04
answered Nov 25 '18 at 12:54
CharlieCharlie
6,93411518
6,93411518
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
Thanks for taking time to educate me much appreciated. :) Even when i made the BaseClass as a TestFixture, im still unable to call the tests which are in the the different classes. Order is like this 1)OneTimeSetup 2)DerivedTestClass 3) OneTimeTeardown for every test case. Only when i put all test cases inside the same class it seems to be working in order as expected. which is 1) OneTimeSetup 2)all test cases and then 3) OneTimeTeardown. All i want is to open the application just once and run all test cases ONLY then close the application. how can i do it? thanks once again.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 13:25
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
As I wrote "in this case you need only the SetUpFixture, without the inheritance". I'll add a bit more to the answer...
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:14
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Let's try this... why do you want all your fixtures to use the same driver? I would be concerned that one test could malfunction in a way to break all the other tests.
– Charlie
Nov 25 '18 at 18:20
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Thanks for writing back. SetUpFixture without inheritance, how the driver of the test cases will get initialize, it will throw a null object reference,wouldn't it?
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:41
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
Yes you're right, but Company asked me to log into the application just once and execute all test cases then close the application. What would you suggest, im open to the good advice as im new to writing the test cases in c#. I quite welcome your advice.
– Im Nobody
Nov 25 '18 at 18:47
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53465501%2fonetimesetup-is-getting-invoked-for-each-test-i-thought-onetimesetup-is-like-bef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown