Regex for strings containing substring that contains substring
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let's say I have this string:
[section][module_text id="123"]text[/module][module_number id=""]000[/module][/section]
I can find each entire [module...[/module...]
substring with
([module)(.*?)([/module.*?])
But I would like to only match the [module]
string that has a digit in the id=""
parameter. In this case the first [module]
.
I've been trying a bunch of stuff but i cant seem to get any closer.
php regex
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let's say I have this string:
[section][module_text id="123"]text[/module][module_number id=""]000[/module][/section]
I can find each entire [module...[/module...]
substring with
([module)(.*?)([/module.*?])
But I would like to only match the [module]
string that has a digit in the id=""
parameter. In this case the first [module]
.
I've been trying a bunch of stuff but i cant seem to get any closer.
php regex
Are you sure you don't want tu use XML with an XML parser ?
– Blusky
Nov 20 at 7:21
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let's say I have this string:
[section][module_text id="123"]text[/module][module_number id=""]000[/module][/section]
I can find each entire [module...[/module...]
substring with
([module)(.*?)([/module.*?])
But I would like to only match the [module]
string that has a digit in the id=""
parameter. In this case the first [module]
.
I've been trying a bunch of stuff but i cant seem to get any closer.
php regex
Let's say I have this string:
[section][module_text id="123"]text[/module][module_number id=""]000[/module][/section]
I can find each entire [module...[/module...]
substring with
([module)(.*?)([/module.*?])
But I would like to only match the [module]
string that has a digit in the id=""
parameter. In this case the first [module]
.
I've been trying a bunch of stuff but i cant seem to get any closer.
php regex
php regex
asked Nov 20 at 7:20
kylmark
98111
98111
Are you sure you don't want tu use XML with an XML parser ?
– Blusky
Nov 20 at 7:21
add a comment |
Are you sure you don't want tu use XML with an XML parser ?
– Blusky
Nov 20 at 7:21
Are you sure you don't want tu use XML with an XML parser ?
– Blusky
Nov 20 at 7:21
Are you sure you don't want tu use XML with an XML parser ?
– Blusky
Nov 20 at 7:21
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
After matching module
, you can match non-]
characters until you get to the id
part, and after the id
's "
, you can match [^"]*d
to ensure that the id
has a digit in it:
([module[^]]*id="[^"]*d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
https://regex101.com/r/25JcEP/1
If the module
s you want to match have id
s which always start with digits, then you can simplify it a bit to
([module[^]]*id="d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
Note the use of a negative character class rather than .*?
for the final ([/module[^]]*])
- negative character classes are a bit more efficient than lazy repetition when possible.
@kylmark Same regex, just usepreg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
After matching module
, you can match non-]
characters until you get to the id
part, and after the id
's "
, you can match [^"]*d
to ensure that the id
has a digit in it:
([module[^]]*id="[^"]*d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
https://regex101.com/r/25JcEP/1
If the module
s you want to match have id
s which always start with digits, then you can simplify it a bit to
([module[^]]*id="d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
Note the use of a negative character class rather than .*?
for the final ([/module[^]]*])
- negative character classes are a bit more efficient than lazy repetition when possible.
@kylmark Same regex, just usepreg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
After matching module
, you can match non-]
characters until you get to the id
part, and after the id
's "
, you can match [^"]*d
to ensure that the id
has a digit in it:
([module[^]]*id="[^"]*d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
https://regex101.com/r/25JcEP/1
If the module
s you want to match have id
s which always start with digits, then you can simplify it a bit to
([module[^]]*id="d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
Note the use of a negative character class rather than .*?
for the final ([/module[^]]*])
- negative character classes are a bit more efficient than lazy repetition when possible.
@kylmark Same regex, just usepreg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
After matching module
, you can match non-]
characters until you get to the id
part, and after the id
's "
, you can match [^"]*d
to ensure that the id
has a digit in it:
([module[^]]*id="[^"]*d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
https://regex101.com/r/25JcEP/1
If the module
s you want to match have id
s which always start with digits, then you can simplify it a bit to
([module[^]]*id="d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
Note the use of a negative character class rather than .*?
for the final ([/module[^]]*])
- negative character classes are a bit more efficient than lazy repetition when possible.
After matching module
, you can match non-]
characters until you get to the id
part, and after the id
's "
, you can match [^"]*d
to ensure that the id
has a digit in it:
([module[^]]*id="[^"]*d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
https://regex101.com/r/25JcEP/1
If the module
s you want to match have id
s which always start with digits, then you can simplify it a bit to
([module[^]]*id="d)(.*?)([/module[^]]*])
Note the use of a negative character class rather than .*?
for the final ([/module[^]]*])
- negative character classes are a bit more efficient than lazy repetition when possible.
edited Nov 20 at 7:32
answered Nov 20 at 7:23
CertainPerformance
70.5k143453
70.5k143453
@kylmark Same regex, just usepreg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
add a comment |
@kylmark Same regex, just usepreg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
@kylmark Same regex, just use
preg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
@kylmark Same regex, just use
preg_match_all
– CertainPerformance
Nov 20 at 7:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53388048%2fregex-for-strings-containing-substring-that-contains-substring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you sure you don't want tu use XML with an XML parser ?
– Blusky
Nov 20 at 7:21