Validating region/state/province codes for different countries
$begingroup$
I have a large table in which I store region/state/province codes (two letters) from different countries. I use these region codes further downstream for multiple process. One of the steps I do is a cleanup of regions to ensure it is a valid region/state/province code. I have a lookup table consisting of a country vs region code to validate each column.
6 columns are validated separately. Is there a way to do this better?
UPDATE table_region
SET a_region = NULL
WHERE a_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,a_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET b_region = NULL
WHERE b_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,b_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET c_region = NULL
WHERE c_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, c_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET d_region = NULL
WHERE d_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,d_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET e_region = NULL
WHERE e_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, e_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET f_region = NULL
WHERE f_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, f_region) = 0;
The function is like this:
ALTER Function [dbo].[IsValidRegion](@country VARCHAR(20), @value
VARCHAR(20))
Returns INT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @res INT
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM mapping.region WHERE country = @country AND region_code = @value)
SELECT @res = 1
ELSE
SELECT @res = 0
END
RETURN @res
END
sql sql-server
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a large table in which I store region/state/province codes (two letters) from different countries. I use these region codes further downstream for multiple process. One of the steps I do is a cleanup of regions to ensure it is a valid region/state/province code. I have a lookup table consisting of a country vs region code to validate each column.
6 columns are validated separately. Is there a way to do this better?
UPDATE table_region
SET a_region = NULL
WHERE a_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,a_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET b_region = NULL
WHERE b_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,b_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET c_region = NULL
WHERE c_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, c_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET d_region = NULL
WHERE d_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,d_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET e_region = NULL
WHERE e_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, e_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET f_region = NULL
WHERE f_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, f_region) = 0;
The function is like this:
ALTER Function [dbo].[IsValidRegion](@country VARCHAR(20), @value
VARCHAR(20))
Returns INT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @res INT
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM mapping.region WHERE country = @country AND region_code = @value)
SELECT @res = 1
ELSE
SELECT @res = 0
END
RETURN @res
END
sql sql-server
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why don't you just foreign key this table to the table specifying valid country regions?
$endgroup$
– Caius Jard
Jan 4 at 20:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a large table in which I store region/state/province codes (two letters) from different countries. I use these region codes further downstream for multiple process. One of the steps I do is a cleanup of regions to ensure it is a valid region/state/province code. I have a lookup table consisting of a country vs region code to validate each column.
6 columns are validated separately. Is there a way to do this better?
UPDATE table_region
SET a_region = NULL
WHERE a_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,a_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET b_region = NULL
WHERE b_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,b_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET c_region = NULL
WHERE c_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, c_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET d_region = NULL
WHERE d_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,d_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET e_region = NULL
WHERE e_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, e_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET f_region = NULL
WHERE f_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, f_region) = 0;
The function is like this:
ALTER Function [dbo].[IsValidRegion](@country VARCHAR(20), @value
VARCHAR(20))
Returns INT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @res INT
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM mapping.region WHERE country = @country AND region_code = @value)
SELECT @res = 1
ELSE
SELECT @res = 0
END
RETURN @res
END
sql sql-server
$endgroup$
I have a large table in which I store region/state/province codes (two letters) from different countries. I use these region codes further downstream for multiple process. One of the steps I do is a cleanup of regions to ensure it is a valid region/state/province code. I have a lookup table consisting of a country vs region code to validate each column.
6 columns are validated separately. Is there a way to do this better?
UPDATE table_region
SET a_region = NULL
WHERE a_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,a_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET b_region = NULL
WHERE b_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,b_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET c_region = NULL
WHERE c_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, c_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET d_region = NULL
WHERE d_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country,d_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET e_region = NULL
WHERE e_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, e_region) = 0;
UPDATE table_region
SET f_region = NULL
WHERE f_region IS NOT NULL
AND country IS NOT NULL
AND dbo.IsValidRegion(country, f_region) = 0;
The function is like this:
ALTER Function [dbo].[IsValidRegion](@country VARCHAR(20), @value
VARCHAR(20))
Returns INT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @res INT
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM mapping.region WHERE country = @country AND region_code = @value)
SELECT @res = 1
ELSE
SELECT @res = 0
END
RETURN @res
END
sql sql-server
sql sql-server
edited 3 mins ago
Jamal♦
30.3k11116226
30.3k11116226
asked Jan 4 at 17:02
VK_217VK_217
1043
1043
$begingroup$
Why don't you just foreign key this table to the table specifying valid country regions?
$endgroup$
– Caius Jard
Jan 4 at 20:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why don't you just foreign key this table to the table specifying valid country regions?
$endgroup$
– Caius Jard
Jan 4 at 20:33
$begingroup$
Why don't you just foreign key this table to the table specifying valid country regions?
$endgroup$
– Caius Jard
Jan 4 at 20:33
$begingroup$
Why don't you just foreign key this table to the table specifying valid country regions?
$endgroup$
– Caius Jard
Jan 4 at 20:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's a one hit way of doing this:
UPDATE t
SET
a_region = ra.region_code,
b_region = rb.region_code,
c_region = rc.region_code,
d_region = rd.region_code,
e_region = re.region_code,
f_region = rf.region_code
FROM
table_region t
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region ra WHERE t.country = ra.country AND t.a_region = ra.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rb WHERE t.country = rb.country AND t.b_region = rb.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rc WHERE t.country = rc.country AND t.c_region = rc.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rd WHERE t.country = rd.country AND t.d_region = rd.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region re WHERE t.country = re.country AND t.e_region = re.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rf WHERE t.country = rf.country AND t.f_region = rf.region_code
It basically works by left joining the region table 6 times, once for each of the *_region
columns.
- If the relation works out, then the
r*.region_code
will be populated with a value (which means the*_region
column is set to the same value it currently is, i.e. a non-op). - If it doesn't work out, then the join fails, null is present in
r*.region_code
After you run this as a one time fix, to identify the ones that are failed (maybe you should remove them to another table) you should consider making table_region(country,*_region)
have multiple foreign keys to mapping.region(country,region_code)
to ensure that records cannot be inserted into table_region that don't have a valid country/region mapping
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210885%2fvalidating-region-state-province-codes-for-different-countries%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's a one hit way of doing this:
UPDATE t
SET
a_region = ra.region_code,
b_region = rb.region_code,
c_region = rc.region_code,
d_region = rd.region_code,
e_region = re.region_code,
f_region = rf.region_code
FROM
table_region t
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region ra WHERE t.country = ra.country AND t.a_region = ra.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rb WHERE t.country = rb.country AND t.b_region = rb.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rc WHERE t.country = rc.country AND t.c_region = rc.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rd WHERE t.country = rd.country AND t.d_region = rd.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region re WHERE t.country = re.country AND t.e_region = re.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rf WHERE t.country = rf.country AND t.f_region = rf.region_code
It basically works by left joining the region table 6 times, once for each of the *_region
columns.
- If the relation works out, then the
r*.region_code
will be populated with a value (which means the*_region
column is set to the same value it currently is, i.e. a non-op). - If it doesn't work out, then the join fails, null is present in
r*.region_code
After you run this as a one time fix, to identify the ones that are failed (maybe you should remove them to another table) you should consider making table_region(country,*_region)
have multiple foreign keys to mapping.region(country,region_code)
to ensure that records cannot be inserted into table_region that don't have a valid country/region mapping
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a one hit way of doing this:
UPDATE t
SET
a_region = ra.region_code,
b_region = rb.region_code,
c_region = rc.region_code,
d_region = rd.region_code,
e_region = re.region_code,
f_region = rf.region_code
FROM
table_region t
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region ra WHERE t.country = ra.country AND t.a_region = ra.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rb WHERE t.country = rb.country AND t.b_region = rb.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rc WHERE t.country = rc.country AND t.c_region = rc.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rd WHERE t.country = rd.country AND t.d_region = rd.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region re WHERE t.country = re.country AND t.e_region = re.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rf WHERE t.country = rf.country AND t.f_region = rf.region_code
It basically works by left joining the region table 6 times, once for each of the *_region
columns.
- If the relation works out, then the
r*.region_code
will be populated with a value (which means the*_region
column is set to the same value it currently is, i.e. a non-op). - If it doesn't work out, then the join fails, null is present in
r*.region_code
After you run this as a one time fix, to identify the ones that are failed (maybe you should remove them to another table) you should consider making table_region(country,*_region)
have multiple foreign keys to mapping.region(country,region_code)
to ensure that records cannot be inserted into table_region that don't have a valid country/region mapping
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a one hit way of doing this:
UPDATE t
SET
a_region = ra.region_code,
b_region = rb.region_code,
c_region = rc.region_code,
d_region = rd.region_code,
e_region = re.region_code,
f_region = rf.region_code
FROM
table_region t
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region ra WHERE t.country = ra.country AND t.a_region = ra.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rb WHERE t.country = rb.country AND t.b_region = rb.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rc WHERE t.country = rc.country AND t.c_region = rc.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rd WHERE t.country = rd.country AND t.d_region = rd.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region re WHERE t.country = re.country AND t.e_region = re.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rf WHERE t.country = rf.country AND t.f_region = rf.region_code
It basically works by left joining the region table 6 times, once for each of the *_region
columns.
- If the relation works out, then the
r*.region_code
will be populated with a value (which means the*_region
column is set to the same value it currently is, i.e. a non-op). - If it doesn't work out, then the join fails, null is present in
r*.region_code
After you run this as a one time fix, to identify the ones that are failed (maybe you should remove them to another table) you should consider making table_region(country,*_region)
have multiple foreign keys to mapping.region(country,region_code)
to ensure that records cannot be inserted into table_region that don't have a valid country/region mapping
New contributor
$endgroup$
Here's a one hit way of doing this:
UPDATE t
SET
a_region = ra.region_code,
b_region = rb.region_code,
c_region = rc.region_code,
d_region = rd.region_code,
e_region = re.region_code,
f_region = rf.region_code
FROM
table_region t
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region ra WHERE t.country = ra.country AND t.a_region = ra.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rb WHERE t.country = rb.country AND t.b_region = rb.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rc WHERE t.country = rc.country AND t.c_region = rc.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rd WHERE t.country = rd.country AND t.d_region = rd.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region re WHERE t.country = re.country AND t.e_region = re.region_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN mapping.region rf WHERE t.country = rf.country AND t.f_region = rf.region_code
It basically works by left joining the region table 6 times, once for each of the *_region
columns.
- If the relation works out, then the
r*.region_code
will be populated with a value (which means the*_region
column is set to the same value it currently is, i.e. a non-op). - If it doesn't work out, then the join fails, null is present in
r*.region_code
After you run this as a one time fix, to identify the ones that are failed (maybe you should remove them to another table) you should consider making table_region(country,*_region)
have multiple foreign keys to mapping.region(country,region_code)
to ensure that records cannot be inserted into table_region that don't have a valid country/region mapping
New contributor
New contributor
answered 18 hours ago
Caius JardCaius Jard
97
97
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
You have presented an alternative solution, but haven't reviewed the code. Please edit to show what aspects of the question code prompted you to write this version, and in what ways it's an improvement over the original. It may be worth (re-)reading How to Answer.
$endgroup$
– Toby Speight
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210885%2fvalidating-region-state-province-codes-for-different-countries%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why don't you just foreign key this table to the table specifying valid country regions?
$endgroup$
– Caius Jard
Jan 4 at 20:33