Java Image Processing: Why is the output image smaller in storage than the input image?
I'm learning Java Image Processing. Here is my code:
import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;
import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
public class LoadImage {
public static void main(String args) {
int width = 1280;
int height = 720;
BufferedImage image = null;
// READ IMAGE
try {
File input_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image.jpg");
image = new BufferedImage (width,height,BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB);
image = ImageIO.read(input_image);
System.out.println("Read successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: " + e);
}
// WRITE IMAGE
try {
File output_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image-output.jpg");
ImageIO.write(image, "jpg", output_image);
System.out.println("Writing successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: "+ e);
}
}
}
So the input image is around 300kb. But the output image is only 48kb. Why? Thank you
java image
add a comment |
I'm learning Java Image Processing. Here is my code:
import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;
import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
public class LoadImage {
public static void main(String args) {
int width = 1280;
int height = 720;
BufferedImage image = null;
// READ IMAGE
try {
File input_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image.jpg");
image = new BufferedImage (width,height,BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB);
image = ImageIO.read(input_image);
System.out.println("Read successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: " + e);
}
// WRITE IMAGE
try {
File output_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image-output.jpg");
ImageIO.write(image, "jpg", output_image);
System.out.println("Writing successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: "+ e);
}
}
}
So the input image is around 300kb. But the output image is only 48kb. Why? Thank you
java image
4
WHY THE SHOUTING IN THE TITLE?
– EJoshuaS
Nov 21 '18 at 16:03
1
Did you check whether the written image uses the same level of JPEG compression as the original image?
– VGR
Nov 21 '18 at 17:05
add a comment |
I'm learning Java Image Processing. Here is my code:
import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;
import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
public class LoadImage {
public static void main(String args) {
int width = 1280;
int height = 720;
BufferedImage image = null;
// READ IMAGE
try {
File input_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image.jpg");
image = new BufferedImage (width,height,BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB);
image = ImageIO.read(input_image);
System.out.println("Read successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: " + e);
}
// WRITE IMAGE
try {
File output_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image-output.jpg");
ImageIO.write(image, "jpg", output_image);
System.out.println("Writing successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: "+ e);
}
}
}
So the input image is around 300kb. But the output image is only 48kb. Why? Thank you
java image
I'm learning Java Image Processing. Here is my code:
import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;
import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
public class LoadImage {
public static void main(String args) {
int width = 1280;
int height = 720;
BufferedImage image = null;
// READ IMAGE
try {
File input_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image.jpg");
image = new BufferedImage (width,height,BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB);
image = ImageIO.read(input_image);
System.out.println("Read successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: " + e);
}
// WRITE IMAGE
try {
File output_image = new File("E:\SELF-TAUGHT LEARNING\39. Image Processing with Java\test-image-output.jpg");
ImageIO.write(image, "jpg", output_image);
System.out.println("Writing successfully");
}
catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Error: "+ e);
}
}
}
So the input image is around 300kb. But the output image is only 48kb. Why? Thank you
java image
java image
edited Nov 21 '18 at 17:31
Kevin Workman
33.4k53969
33.4k53969
asked Nov 21 '18 at 16:01
Duc Le Tran
1
1
4
WHY THE SHOUTING IN THE TITLE?
– EJoshuaS
Nov 21 '18 at 16:03
1
Did you check whether the written image uses the same level of JPEG compression as the original image?
– VGR
Nov 21 '18 at 17:05
add a comment |
4
WHY THE SHOUTING IN THE TITLE?
– EJoshuaS
Nov 21 '18 at 16:03
1
Did you check whether the written image uses the same level of JPEG compression as the original image?
– VGR
Nov 21 '18 at 17:05
4
4
WHY THE SHOUTING IN THE TITLE?
– EJoshuaS
Nov 21 '18 at 16:03
WHY THE SHOUTING IN THE TITLE?
– EJoshuaS
Nov 21 '18 at 16:03
1
1
Did you check whether the written image uses the same level of JPEG compression as the original image?
– VGR
Nov 21 '18 at 17:05
Did you check whether the written image uses the same level of JPEG compression as the original image?
– VGR
Nov 21 '18 at 17:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If the image is the same resolution and quality after saving the new version, it's likely just a difference of metadata and formatting. It's also possible, however, that you are getting a lower quality image - if the original image had a high enough quality setting, it may not be noticeable when Java saves it at a lower quality.
Some things to check:
- do the before and after images look different?
- is the after image smaller in size?
I'm not very knowledgeable about Java, and don't know a lot about their image processing, but I would imagine there are methods for setting image size, resolution, and quality. I do, however, work with images a lot, and I know there are a lot of optimizations (especially in JPEG images) that you can do to reduce file size without affecting visual quality noticeably.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53415996%2fjava-image-processing-why-is-the-output-image-smaller-in-storage-than-the-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If the image is the same resolution and quality after saving the new version, it's likely just a difference of metadata and formatting. It's also possible, however, that you are getting a lower quality image - if the original image had a high enough quality setting, it may not be noticeable when Java saves it at a lower quality.
Some things to check:
- do the before and after images look different?
- is the after image smaller in size?
I'm not very knowledgeable about Java, and don't know a lot about their image processing, but I would imagine there are methods for setting image size, resolution, and quality. I do, however, work with images a lot, and I know there are a lot of optimizations (especially in JPEG images) that you can do to reduce file size without affecting visual quality noticeably.
add a comment |
If the image is the same resolution and quality after saving the new version, it's likely just a difference of metadata and formatting. It's also possible, however, that you are getting a lower quality image - if the original image had a high enough quality setting, it may not be noticeable when Java saves it at a lower quality.
Some things to check:
- do the before and after images look different?
- is the after image smaller in size?
I'm not very knowledgeable about Java, and don't know a lot about their image processing, but I would imagine there are methods for setting image size, resolution, and quality. I do, however, work with images a lot, and I know there are a lot of optimizations (especially in JPEG images) that you can do to reduce file size without affecting visual quality noticeably.
add a comment |
If the image is the same resolution and quality after saving the new version, it's likely just a difference of metadata and formatting. It's also possible, however, that you are getting a lower quality image - if the original image had a high enough quality setting, it may not be noticeable when Java saves it at a lower quality.
Some things to check:
- do the before and after images look different?
- is the after image smaller in size?
I'm not very knowledgeable about Java, and don't know a lot about their image processing, but I would imagine there are methods for setting image size, resolution, and quality. I do, however, work with images a lot, and I know there are a lot of optimizations (especially in JPEG images) that you can do to reduce file size without affecting visual quality noticeably.
If the image is the same resolution and quality after saving the new version, it's likely just a difference of metadata and formatting. It's also possible, however, that you are getting a lower quality image - if the original image had a high enough quality setting, it may not be noticeable when Java saves it at a lower quality.
Some things to check:
- do the before and after images look different?
- is the after image smaller in size?
I'm not very knowledgeable about Java, and don't know a lot about their image processing, but I would imagine there are methods for setting image size, resolution, and quality. I do, however, work with images a lot, and I know there are a lot of optimizations (especially in JPEG images) that you can do to reduce file size without affecting visual quality noticeably.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 16:07
brandonmack
215
215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53415996%2fjava-image-processing-why-is-the-output-image-smaller-in-storage-than-the-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
WHY THE SHOUTING IN THE TITLE?
– EJoshuaS
Nov 21 '18 at 16:03
1
Did you check whether the written image uses the same level of JPEG compression as the original image?
– VGR
Nov 21 '18 at 17:05