Type of filesystem to put on USB storage, that is compatible with most OSs












2














I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    4 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    4 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    4 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    4 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    4 hours ago
















2














I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    4 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    4 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    4 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    4 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    4 hours ago














2












2








2







I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1







linux filesystems usb






share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Jeff Schaller

38.7k1053125




38.7k1053125






New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









Stn

163




163




New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    4 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    4 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    4 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    4 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    4 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    4 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    4 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    4 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    4 hours ago








1




1




vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
– ctrl-alt-delor
4 hours ago




vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
– ctrl-alt-delor
4 hours ago












I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
– Stn
4 hours ago




I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
– Stn
4 hours ago












A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
– tink
4 hours ago




A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
– tink
4 hours ago












I believe you duplicated vfat
– Jeff Schaller
4 hours ago




I believe you duplicated vfat
– Jeff Schaller
4 hours ago












I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
– Stn
4 hours ago




I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
– Stn
4 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 1: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






share|improve this answer























  • My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
    – Stn
    41 mins ago










  • Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
    – Stn
    10 mins ago



















3














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    1 hour ago










  • Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    1 hour ago








  • 2




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    1 hour ago



















0














I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    0














    According to your comment at the original question,




    I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my
    room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other
    laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.




    I think that NTFS, FAT32, exFAT and UDF are suitable alternatives. According to my experience all these file systems work well in your Linux operating systems and Windows (in Linux after installing some program packages to manage exFAT and UDF).



    There are more details at this link about file systems and compatibility with operating systems,



    If you intend to store files that are bigger than 4 GiB, you cannot use FAT32. Otherwise it is the old standard for a USB pendrive: An MSDOS partition table and one partition with the FAT32 file system.



    It is easy to use the graphical program gparted to create a fresh partition table and NTFS or FAT32 file system.



    See also this link about restoring a USB stick.






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Stn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491501%2ftype-of-filesystem-to-put-on-usb-storage-that-is-compatible-with-most-oss%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      The answer to your question¹ is simple:



      mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


      Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




      • Maximum file size is 4GB

      • Maximum partition size is 2TB


                         FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
      Amiga x
      MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
      NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
      MacOS x 3 x
      Linux x x x x x x


      Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
      Note 1: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
      Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






      share|improve this answer























      • My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
        – Stn
        41 mins ago










      • Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
        – Stn
        10 mins ago
















      6














      The answer to your question¹ is simple:



      mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


      Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




      • Maximum file size is 4GB

      • Maximum partition size is 2TB


                         FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
      Amiga x
      MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
      NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
      MacOS x 3 x
      Linux x x x x x x


      Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
      Note 1: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
      Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






      share|improve this answer























      • My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
        – Stn
        41 mins ago










      • Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
        – Stn
        10 mins ago














      6












      6








      6






      The answer to your question¹ is simple:



      mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


      Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




      • Maximum file size is 4GB

      • Maximum partition size is 2TB


                         FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
      Amiga x
      MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
      NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
      MacOS x 3 x
      Linux x x x x x x


      Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
      Note 1: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
      Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






      share|improve this answer














      The answer to your question¹ is simple:



      mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


      Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




      • Maximum file size is 4GB

      • Maximum partition size is 2TB


                         FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
      Amiga x
      MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
      NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
      MacOS x 3 x
      Linux x x x x x x


      Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
      Note 1: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
      Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 55 mins ago

























      answered 2 hours ago









      Fabby

      3,41611227




      3,41611227












      • My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
        – Stn
        41 mins ago










      • Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
        – Stn
        10 mins ago


















      • My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
        – Stn
        41 mins ago










      • Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
        – Stn
        10 mins ago
















      My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
      – Stn
      41 mins ago




      My pendrive has 16GB. It's okay?
      – Stn
      41 mins ago












      Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
      – Stn
      10 mins ago




      Now I have more doubts. Thanks for the answers. But I'm going to tell you that the size of the Pendrive is 16GB and the use is to save files with different format. Audio, video, html, etc.
      – Stn
      10 mins ago













      3














      Use NTFS.



      FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



      NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
      Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



      So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 5




        I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
        – Fox
        1 hour ago










      • Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
        – roaima
        1 hour ago








      • 2




        "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
        – ElementW
        1 hour ago
















      3














      Use NTFS.



      FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



      NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
      Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



      So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 5




        I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
        – Fox
        1 hour ago










      • Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
        – roaima
        1 hour ago








      • 2




        "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
        – ElementW
        1 hour ago














      3












      3








      3






      Use NTFS.



      FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



      NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
      Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



      So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






      share|improve this answer












      Use NTFS.



      FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



      NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
      Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



      So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 hours ago









      Jaleks

      1,388422




      1,388422








      • 5




        I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
        – Fox
        1 hour ago










      • Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
        – roaima
        1 hour ago








      • 2




        "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
        – ElementW
        1 hour ago














      • 5




        I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
        – Fox
        1 hour ago










      • Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
        – roaima
        1 hour ago








      • 2




        "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
        – ElementW
        1 hour ago








      5




      5




      I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
      – Fox
      1 hour ago




      I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
      – Fox
      1 hour ago












      Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
      – roaima
      1 hour ago






      Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
      – roaima
      1 hour ago






      2




      2




      "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
      – ElementW
      1 hour ago




      "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
      – ElementW
      1 hour ago











      0














      I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        0














        I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          0












          0








          0






          I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago









          Fabby

          3,41611227




          3,41611227






          New contributor




          Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 2 hours ago









          Михайло Оришич

          113




          113




          New contributor




          Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              0














              According to your comment at the original question,




              I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my
              room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other
              laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.




              I think that NTFS, FAT32, exFAT and UDF are suitable alternatives. According to my experience all these file systems work well in your Linux operating systems and Windows (in Linux after installing some program packages to manage exFAT and UDF).



              There are more details at this link about file systems and compatibility with operating systems,



              If you intend to store files that are bigger than 4 GiB, you cannot use FAT32. Otherwise it is the old standard for a USB pendrive: An MSDOS partition table and one partition with the FAT32 file system.



              It is easy to use the graphical program gparted to create a fresh partition table and NTFS or FAT32 file system.



              See also this link about restoring a USB stick.






              share|improve this answer


























                0














                According to your comment at the original question,




                I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my
                room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other
                laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.




                I think that NTFS, FAT32, exFAT and UDF are suitable alternatives. According to my experience all these file systems work well in your Linux operating systems and Windows (in Linux after installing some program packages to manage exFAT and UDF).



                There are more details at this link about file systems and compatibility with operating systems,



                If you intend to store files that are bigger than 4 GiB, you cannot use FAT32. Otherwise it is the old standard for a USB pendrive: An MSDOS partition table and one partition with the FAT32 file system.



                It is easy to use the graphical program gparted to create a fresh partition table and NTFS or FAT32 file system.



                See also this link about restoring a USB stick.






                share|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  According to your comment at the original question,




                  I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my
                  room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other
                  laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.




                  I think that NTFS, FAT32, exFAT and UDF are suitable alternatives. According to my experience all these file systems work well in your Linux operating systems and Windows (in Linux after installing some program packages to manage exFAT and UDF).



                  There are more details at this link about file systems and compatibility with operating systems,



                  If you intend to store files that are bigger than 4 GiB, you cannot use FAT32. Otherwise it is the old standard for a USB pendrive: An MSDOS partition table and one partition with the FAT32 file system.



                  It is easy to use the graphical program gparted to create a fresh partition table and NTFS or FAT32 file system.



                  See also this link about restoring a USB stick.






                  share|improve this answer












                  According to your comment at the original question,




                  I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my
                  room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other
                  laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.




                  I think that NTFS, FAT32, exFAT and UDF are suitable alternatives. According to my experience all these file systems work well in your Linux operating systems and Windows (in Linux after installing some program packages to manage exFAT and UDF).



                  There are more details at this link about file systems and compatibility with operating systems,



                  If you intend to store files that are bigger than 4 GiB, you cannot use FAT32. Otherwise it is the old standard for a USB pendrive: An MSDOS partition table and one partition with the FAT32 file system.



                  It is easy to use the graphical program gparted to create a fresh partition table and NTFS or FAT32 file system.



                  See also this link about restoring a USB stick.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 41 mins ago









                  sudodus

                  1,08116




                  1,08116






















                      Stn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Stn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Stn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Stn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491501%2ftype-of-filesystem-to-put-on-usb-storage-that-is-compatible-with-most-oss%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

                      How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

                      TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'