Worst Query performance issue on date calculation











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a stored procedure that is taking more than 2 hours to complete and I noticed the below SQL is taking close to 25 mins for updating a million+ values.There are multiple steps like this and all added up takes around 2+ hours to finish.



All it is doing is taking a column value i.e. birth_year and replacing it with age i.e. getdate() - birth_year.



SELECT  id,
birth_month,
birth_year
INTO #birth_date
FROM table_name
WHERE birth_year IS NOT NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE())
OR bd.birth_month IS NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year - 1 )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE())


I replaced the above SQL with the below SQL and now instead of 25 mins, the below SQL takes less than a minute. I've verified the results and all seems good.Is there anything that I am missing? Is there a better or alternate way?



UPDATE  table_name
SET birth_year = case
when birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE()) OR birth_month IS NULL then (YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year)
when birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE()) then ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year - 1 )
else null
end
FROM table_name









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Please include your DB schema.
    – Mast
    Jul 27 at 7:44






  • 1




    Why do you update the age every month instead of calculating it on-the-fly either as calculated column or in a view?
    – dnoeth
    Aug 12 at 14:13










  • Why would you want to replace a birth_year column with the age, without renaming it?
    – 200_success
    Oct 9 at 5:18















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a stored procedure that is taking more than 2 hours to complete and I noticed the below SQL is taking close to 25 mins for updating a million+ values.There are multiple steps like this and all added up takes around 2+ hours to finish.



All it is doing is taking a column value i.e. birth_year and replacing it with age i.e. getdate() - birth_year.



SELECT  id,
birth_month,
birth_year
INTO #birth_date
FROM table_name
WHERE birth_year IS NOT NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE())
OR bd.birth_month IS NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year - 1 )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE())


I replaced the above SQL with the below SQL and now instead of 25 mins, the below SQL takes less than a minute. I've verified the results and all seems good.Is there anything that I am missing? Is there a better or alternate way?



UPDATE  table_name
SET birth_year = case
when birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE()) OR birth_month IS NULL then (YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year)
when birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE()) then ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year - 1 )
else null
end
FROM table_name









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Please include your DB schema.
    – Mast
    Jul 27 at 7:44






  • 1




    Why do you update the age every month instead of calculating it on-the-fly either as calculated column or in a view?
    – dnoeth
    Aug 12 at 14:13










  • Why would you want to replace a birth_year column with the age, without renaming it?
    – 200_success
    Oct 9 at 5:18













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a stored procedure that is taking more than 2 hours to complete and I noticed the below SQL is taking close to 25 mins for updating a million+ values.There are multiple steps like this and all added up takes around 2+ hours to finish.



All it is doing is taking a column value i.e. birth_year and replacing it with age i.e. getdate() - birth_year.



SELECT  id,
birth_month,
birth_year
INTO #birth_date
FROM table_name
WHERE birth_year IS NOT NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE())
OR bd.birth_month IS NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year - 1 )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE())


I replaced the above SQL with the below SQL and now instead of 25 mins, the below SQL takes less than a minute. I've verified the results and all seems good.Is there anything that I am missing? Is there a better or alternate way?



UPDATE  table_name
SET birth_year = case
when birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE()) OR birth_month IS NULL then (YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year)
when birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE()) then ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year - 1 )
else null
end
FROM table_name









share|improve this question















I have a stored procedure that is taking more than 2 hours to complete and I noticed the below SQL is taking close to 25 mins for updating a million+ values.There are multiple steps like this and all added up takes around 2+ hours to finish.



All it is doing is taking a column value i.e. birth_year and replacing it with age i.e. getdate() - birth_year.



SELECT  id,
birth_month,
birth_year
INTO #birth_date
FROM table_name
WHERE birth_year IS NOT NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE())
OR bd.birth_month IS NULL

UPDATE table_name
SET birth_year = ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - bd.birth_year - 1 )
FROM #birth_date bd
INNER JOIN table_name ap ON ap.id= bd.id
WHERE bd.birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE())


I replaced the above SQL with the below SQL and now instead of 25 mins, the below SQL takes less than a minute. I've verified the results and all seems good.Is there anything that I am missing? Is there a better or alternate way?



UPDATE  table_name
SET birth_year = case
when birth_month <= MONTH(GETDATE()) OR birth_month IS NULL then (YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year)
when birth_month > MONTH(GETDATE()) then ( YEAR(GETDATE()) - birth_year - 1 )
else null
end
FROM table_name






performance sql sql-server






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 10 at 3:21









Stephen Rauch

3,76061530




3,76061530










asked Jul 27 at 3:14









VK_217

1063




1063





bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • Please include your DB schema.
    – Mast
    Jul 27 at 7:44






  • 1




    Why do you update the age every month instead of calculating it on-the-fly either as calculated column or in a view?
    – dnoeth
    Aug 12 at 14:13










  • Why would you want to replace a birth_year column with the age, without renaming it?
    – 200_success
    Oct 9 at 5:18


















  • Please include your DB schema.
    – Mast
    Jul 27 at 7:44






  • 1




    Why do you update the age every month instead of calculating it on-the-fly either as calculated column or in a view?
    – dnoeth
    Aug 12 at 14:13










  • Why would you want to replace a birth_year column with the age, without renaming it?
    – 200_success
    Oct 9 at 5:18
















Please include your DB schema.
– Mast
Jul 27 at 7:44




Please include your DB schema.
– Mast
Jul 27 at 7:44




1




1




Why do you update the age every month instead of calculating it on-the-fly either as calculated column or in a view?
– dnoeth
Aug 12 at 14:13




Why do you update the age every month instead of calculating it on-the-fly either as calculated column or in a view?
– dnoeth
Aug 12 at 14:13












Why would you want to replace a birth_year column with the age, without renaming it?
– 200_success
Oct 9 at 5:18




Why would you want to replace a birth_year column with the age, without renaming it?
– 200_success
Oct 9 at 5:18










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













As per my understanding, you are looking for current age for each records. But for that, you should go ahead with datedifference function by year. no need to calculate this much operation.

Make sure you should have index on below columns.

birth_month , birth_year



After all, please check and let us know the execution time readings.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200390%2fworst-query-performance-issue-on-date-calculation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    As per my understanding, you are looking for current age for each records. But for that, you should go ahead with datedifference function by year. no need to calculate this much operation.

    Make sure you should have index on below columns.

    birth_month , birth_year



    After all, please check and let us know the execution time readings.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      As per my understanding, you are looking for current age for each records. But for that, you should go ahead with datedifference function by year. no need to calculate this much operation.

      Make sure you should have index on below columns.

      birth_month , birth_year



      After all, please check and let us know the execution time readings.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        As per my understanding, you are looking for current age for each records. But for that, you should go ahead with datedifference function by year. no need to calculate this much operation.

        Make sure you should have index on below columns.

        birth_month , birth_year



        After all, please check and let us know the execution time readings.






        share|improve this answer












        As per my understanding, you are looking for current age for each records. But for that, you should go ahead with datedifference function by year. no need to calculate this much operation.

        Make sure you should have index on below columns.

        birth_month , birth_year



        After all, please check and let us know the execution time readings.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 10 at 3:15









        JERRY

        1305




        1305






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200390%2fworst-query-performance-issue-on-date-calculation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

            How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

            TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'