Simplification of POSIX-ly finding a Java process wanted
$begingroup$
In this code I find a list all of the running java
processes and give the below function a name to look for, it will do its best. But since I find my approach a little too ugly, could some POSIX shell script writer have a look and possibly give me some simplification recommendations?
#!/bin/sh
# here is an ugly constant vuze java process name
readonly vuze_java_process_name='org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main'
is_java_program_running()
# expected arguments:
# $1 = java program name
{
# there will always be at least one java process:
# jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jps.Jps, which is actually
# the program giving us the list of java processes
java_process_list=$( jps -l | awk '{print $2}' )
# this behaves strangely if there is zero processes (needs verification)
# but since there is always at least one, no problem here
java_process_list_count=$(( $( printf '%sn' "${java_process_list}" | wc -l ) ))
# set the result value as if we did not find it
result=false
# POSIX-ly simulate FOR loop
i=1; while [ "${i}" -le "${java_process_list_count}" ]
do
# here we take one line from the list on $i position
java_process_entry=$( echo "${java_process_list}" | sed --posix --quiet "${i}{p;q}" )
# compare the given process entry with given java program name
if [ "${java_process_entry}" = "${1}" ]
then
# set the result value
result=true
# end this loop
break
fi
# increase iterator
i=$(( i + 1 ))
done
# depending on if we found vuze process running,
# return positive or negative result value
if [ "${result}" = true ]
then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
###
### EXAMPLE on Vuze
###
# keep Vuze alive forever, check in 5 seconds interval
while true
do
sleep 5s
if ! is_java_program_running "${vuze_java_process_name}"
then
my_date_time=$(date +%Y-%m-%d_%H:%M:%S)
printf '%s %sn' "${my_date_time}" "(re-)starting Vuze"
( /home/vlastimil/Downloads/vuze/vuze > /dev/null 2>&1 & )
fi
done
java linux sh posix
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this code I find a list all of the running java
processes and give the below function a name to look for, it will do its best. But since I find my approach a little too ugly, could some POSIX shell script writer have a look and possibly give me some simplification recommendations?
#!/bin/sh
# here is an ugly constant vuze java process name
readonly vuze_java_process_name='org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main'
is_java_program_running()
# expected arguments:
# $1 = java program name
{
# there will always be at least one java process:
# jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jps.Jps, which is actually
# the program giving us the list of java processes
java_process_list=$( jps -l | awk '{print $2}' )
# this behaves strangely if there is zero processes (needs verification)
# but since there is always at least one, no problem here
java_process_list_count=$(( $( printf '%sn' "${java_process_list}" | wc -l ) ))
# set the result value as if we did not find it
result=false
# POSIX-ly simulate FOR loop
i=1; while [ "${i}" -le "${java_process_list_count}" ]
do
# here we take one line from the list on $i position
java_process_entry=$( echo "${java_process_list}" | sed --posix --quiet "${i}{p;q}" )
# compare the given process entry with given java program name
if [ "${java_process_entry}" = "${1}" ]
then
# set the result value
result=true
# end this loop
break
fi
# increase iterator
i=$(( i + 1 ))
done
# depending on if we found vuze process running,
# return positive or negative result value
if [ "${result}" = true ]
then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
###
### EXAMPLE on Vuze
###
# keep Vuze alive forever, check in 5 seconds interval
while true
do
sleep 5s
if ! is_java_program_running "${vuze_java_process_name}"
then
my_date_time=$(date +%Y-%m-%d_%H:%M:%S)
printf '%s %sn' "${my_date_time}" "(re-)starting Vuze"
( /home/vlastimil/Downloads/vuze/vuze > /dev/null 2>&1 & )
fi
done
java linux sh posix
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this code I find a list all of the running java
processes and give the below function a name to look for, it will do its best. But since I find my approach a little too ugly, could some POSIX shell script writer have a look and possibly give me some simplification recommendations?
#!/bin/sh
# here is an ugly constant vuze java process name
readonly vuze_java_process_name='org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main'
is_java_program_running()
# expected arguments:
# $1 = java program name
{
# there will always be at least one java process:
# jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jps.Jps, which is actually
# the program giving us the list of java processes
java_process_list=$( jps -l | awk '{print $2}' )
# this behaves strangely if there is zero processes (needs verification)
# but since there is always at least one, no problem here
java_process_list_count=$(( $( printf '%sn' "${java_process_list}" | wc -l ) ))
# set the result value as if we did not find it
result=false
# POSIX-ly simulate FOR loop
i=1; while [ "${i}" -le "${java_process_list_count}" ]
do
# here we take one line from the list on $i position
java_process_entry=$( echo "${java_process_list}" | sed --posix --quiet "${i}{p;q}" )
# compare the given process entry with given java program name
if [ "${java_process_entry}" = "${1}" ]
then
# set the result value
result=true
# end this loop
break
fi
# increase iterator
i=$(( i + 1 ))
done
# depending on if we found vuze process running,
# return positive or negative result value
if [ "${result}" = true ]
then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
###
### EXAMPLE on Vuze
###
# keep Vuze alive forever, check in 5 seconds interval
while true
do
sleep 5s
if ! is_java_program_running "${vuze_java_process_name}"
then
my_date_time=$(date +%Y-%m-%d_%H:%M:%S)
printf '%s %sn' "${my_date_time}" "(re-)starting Vuze"
( /home/vlastimil/Downloads/vuze/vuze > /dev/null 2>&1 & )
fi
done
java linux sh posix
$endgroup$
In this code I find a list all of the running java
processes and give the below function a name to look for, it will do its best. But since I find my approach a little too ugly, could some POSIX shell script writer have a look and possibly give me some simplification recommendations?
#!/bin/sh
# here is an ugly constant vuze java process name
readonly vuze_java_process_name='org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main'
is_java_program_running()
# expected arguments:
# $1 = java program name
{
# there will always be at least one java process:
# jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jps.Jps, which is actually
# the program giving us the list of java processes
java_process_list=$( jps -l | awk '{print $2}' )
# this behaves strangely if there is zero processes (needs verification)
# but since there is always at least one, no problem here
java_process_list_count=$(( $( printf '%sn' "${java_process_list}" | wc -l ) ))
# set the result value as if we did not find it
result=false
# POSIX-ly simulate FOR loop
i=1; while [ "${i}" -le "${java_process_list_count}" ]
do
# here we take one line from the list on $i position
java_process_entry=$( echo "${java_process_list}" | sed --posix --quiet "${i}{p;q}" )
# compare the given process entry with given java program name
if [ "${java_process_entry}" = "${1}" ]
then
# set the result value
result=true
# end this loop
break
fi
# increase iterator
i=$(( i + 1 ))
done
# depending on if we found vuze process running,
# return positive or negative result value
if [ "${result}" = true ]
then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
###
### EXAMPLE on Vuze
###
# keep Vuze alive forever, check in 5 seconds interval
while true
do
sleep 5s
if ! is_java_program_running "${vuze_java_process_name}"
then
my_date_time=$(date +%Y-%m-%d_%H:%M:%S)
printf '%s %sn' "${my_date_time}" "(re-)starting Vuze"
( /home/vlastimil/Downloads/vuze/vuze > /dev/null 2>&1 & )
fi
done
java linux sh posix
java linux sh posix
edited 7 mins ago
Vlastimil
asked 6 hours ago
VlastimilVlastimil
602318
602318
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213156%2fsimplification-of-posix-ly-finding-a-java-process-wanted%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213156%2fsimplification-of-posix-ly-finding-a-java-process-wanted%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown