making vector push-front improved to O(1) / 8192












-2















Last question, on StackOverflow.com about speeding vector.push_back and push_front was said to have it's place here. So here it is :



Well well well, looks like, after work, my regenerating reserve vector may not be so bad after all ? (in question "44326712/speeding-vector-push-back", I presented a vector with a regenerating reserve, faster at push_back when reserve cant be predicted).



Deque may be cool, but faster is the vector.



So I ameliorated my Vector, with two reserves : one before the begin and another after the end, thus, enabling push_front in a vector very quickly (push_back is still better than normal vector).



With a RESA of 8192, and 1000 push_front, I had this results (computer is a Lenovo Think Center):



duration old push_front == 199 ticks ("insert (v.begin () , s)")



duration new push_front == 5 ticks



And here is the Code of my Vector :



#ifndef __VECTOR2_HPP
#define __VECTOR2_HPP
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include "Concept.hpp"
#include <exception>
#include <algorithm>

template <typename T>
class Vector : public std::vector<T> {
public :
class Error : public std::exception {
public :
Error (std::string val = "") throw () : val_ (val) {}
~Error () throw () {}
const char* what () throw () {
std::string s ("Vector Error :");
s += val_;
return s.c_str();
}
private :
std::string val_;
};
typename std::vector<T>::iterator begin () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator end () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator begin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator end () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rbegin () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rend () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rbegin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rend () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
Vector () : std::vector<T> (2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, T()), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
size_t size () const {
size_t s (std::vector<T>::size ());
s -= lresa_;
s -= rresa_;
return s;
}
Vector (int n, T t0) : std::vector<T> (n + 2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, t0), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
Vector (const Vector& v) : std::vector<T> (v), lresa_ (v.lresa_), rresa_ (v.rresa_) {
}
bool operator == (const Vector& v) const {
return std::equal (begin (), end (), v.begin ());
}
bool operator != (const Vector& v) const {
return !operator == (v);
}
T& operator (const size_t &s) {
return std::vector<T>::operator (s+lresa_);
}
void push_front (const T& t) {
if (!lresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::begin (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
lresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_ -1;
*i = t;
--lresa_;
}
void push_back (const T& t) {
if (!rresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::end (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
rresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
*i = t;
--rresa_;
}
//can be optimized,but that s not the topic
Vector& operator = (const Vector& v) {
std::vector<T>::operator = (v);
lresa_ = v.lresa_;
rresa_ = v.rresa_;
return *this;
}
//intelligent resize to do
//at the moment just stupid
void resize (size_t n) {
std::vector<T>::resize (n + lresa_ + rresa_);
}
private :
size_t lresa_;
size_t rresa_;
};
#endif


What do you think about it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    It cannot be O(1) as you sometime need to grow the vector and move items.. Maybe amortized O(1)?

    – Phil1970
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Folks: Be nice to one another and to everyone else. Make critique not about the person, but about the code.

    – Vogel612
    59 mins ago











  • this Vector insert begin at O(1) / some constant

    – Saint-Martin
    55 mins ago
















-2















Last question, on StackOverflow.com about speeding vector.push_back and push_front was said to have it's place here. So here it is :



Well well well, looks like, after work, my regenerating reserve vector may not be so bad after all ? (in question "44326712/speeding-vector-push-back", I presented a vector with a regenerating reserve, faster at push_back when reserve cant be predicted).



Deque may be cool, but faster is the vector.



So I ameliorated my Vector, with two reserves : one before the begin and another after the end, thus, enabling push_front in a vector very quickly (push_back is still better than normal vector).



With a RESA of 8192, and 1000 push_front, I had this results (computer is a Lenovo Think Center):



duration old push_front == 199 ticks ("insert (v.begin () , s)")



duration new push_front == 5 ticks



And here is the Code of my Vector :



#ifndef __VECTOR2_HPP
#define __VECTOR2_HPP
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include "Concept.hpp"
#include <exception>
#include <algorithm>

template <typename T>
class Vector : public std::vector<T> {
public :
class Error : public std::exception {
public :
Error (std::string val = "") throw () : val_ (val) {}
~Error () throw () {}
const char* what () throw () {
std::string s ("Vector Error :");
s += val_;
return s.c_str();
}
private :
std::string val_;
};
typename std::vector<T>::iterator begin () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator end () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator begin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator end () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rbegin () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rend () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rbegin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rend () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
Vector () : std::vector<T> (2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, T()), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
size_t size () const {
size_t s (std::vector<T>::size ());
s -= lresa_;
s -= rresa_;
return s;
}
Vector (int n, T t0) : std::vector<T> (n + 2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, t0), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
Vector (const Vector& v) : std::vector<T> (v), lresa_ (v.lresa_), rresa_ (v.rresa_) {
}
bool operator == (const Vector& v) const {
return std::equal (begin (), end (), v.begin ());
}
bool operator != (const Vector& v) const {
return !operator == (v);
}
T& operator (const size_t &s) {
return std::vector<T>::operator (s+lresa_);
}
void push_front (const T& t) {
if (!lresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::begin (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
lresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_ -1;
*i = t;
--lresa_;
}
void push_back (const T& t) {
if (!rresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::end (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
rresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
*i = t;
--rresa_;
}
//can be optimized,but that s not the topic
Vector& operator = (const Vector& v) {
std::vector<T>::operator = (v);
lresa_ = v.lresa_;
rresa_ = v.rresa_;
return *this;
}
//intelligent resize to do
//at the moment just stupid
void resize (size_t n) {
std::vector<T>::resize (n + lresa_ + rresa_);
}
private :
size_t lresa_;
size_t rresa_;
};
#endif


What do you think about it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    It cannot be O(1) as you sometime need to grow the vector and move items.. Maybe amortized O(1)?

    – Phil1970
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Folks: Be nice to one another and to everyone else. Make critique not about the person, but about the code.

    – Vogel612
    59 mins ago











  • this Vector insert begin at O(1) / some constant

    – Saint-Martin
    55 mins ago














-2












-2








-2








Last question, on StackOverflow.com about speeding vector.push_back and push_front was said to have it's place here. So here it is :



Well well well, looks like, after work, my regenerating reserve vector may not be so bad after all ? (in question "44326712/speeding-vector-push-back", I presented a vector with a regenerating reserve, faster at push_back when reserve cant be predicted).



Deque may be cool, but faster is the vector.



So I ameliorated my Vector, with two reserves : one before the begin and another after the end, thus, enabling push_front in a vector very quickly (push_back is still better than normal vector).



With a RESA of 8192, and 1000 push_front, I had this results (computer is a Lenovo Think Center):



duration old push_front == 199 ticks ("insert (v.begin () , s)")



duration new push_front == 5 ticks



And here is the Code of my Vector :



#ifndef __VECTOR2_HPP
#define __VECTOR2_HPP
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include "Concept.hpp"
#include <exception>
#include <algorithm>

template <typename T>
class Vector : public std::vector<T> {
public :
class Error : public std::exception {
public :
Error (std::string val = "") throw () : val_ (val) {}
~Error () throw () {}
const char* what () throw () {
std::string s ("Vector Error :");
s += val_;
return s.c_str();
}
private :
std::string val_;
};
typename std::vector<T>::iterator begin () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator end () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator begin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator end () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rbegin () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rend () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rbegin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rend () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
Vector () : std::vector<T> (2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, T()), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
size_t size () const {
size_t s (std::vector<T>::size ());
s -= lresa_;
s -= rresa_;
return s;
}
Vector (int n, T t0) : std::vector<T> (n + 2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, t0), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
Vector (const Vector& v) : std::vector<T> (v), lresa_ (v.lresa_), rresa_ (v.rresa_) {
}
bool operator == (const Vector& v) const {
return std::equal (begin (), end (), v.begin ());
}
bool operator != (const Vector& v) const {
return !operator == (v);
}
T& operator (const size_t &s) {
return std::vector<T>::operator (s+lresa_);
}
void push_front (const T& t) {
if (!lresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::begin (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
lresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_ -1;
*i = t;
--lresa_;
}
void push_back (const T& t) {
if (!rresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::end (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
rresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
*i = t;
--rresa_;
}
//can be optimized,but that s not the topic
Vector& operator = (const Vector& v) {
std::vector<T>::operator = (v);
lresa_ = v.lresa_;
rresa_ = v.rresa_;
return *this;
}
//intelligent resize to do
//at the moment just stupid
void resize (size_t n) {
std::vector<T>::resize (n + lresa_ + rresa_);
}
private :
size_t lresa_;
size_t rresa_;
};
#endif


What do you think about it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Last question, on StackOverflow.com about speeding vector.push_back and push_front was said to have it's place here. So here it is :



Well well well, looks like, after work, my regenerating reserve vector may not be so bad after all ? (in question "44326712/speeding-vector-push-back", I presented a vector with a regenerating reserve, faster at push_back when reserve cant be predicted).



Deque may be cool, but faster is the vector.



So I ameliorated my Vector, with two reserves : one before the begin and another after the end, thus, enabling push_front in a vector very quickly (push_back is still better than normal vector).



With a RESA of 8192, and 1000 push_front, I had this results (computer is a Lenovo Think Center):



duration old push_front == 199 ticks ("insert (v.begin () , s)")



duration new push_front == 5 ticks



And here is the Code of my Vector :



#ifndef __VECTOR2_HPP
#define __VECTOR2_HPP
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include "Concept.hpp"
#include <exception>
#include <algorithm>

template <typename T>
class Vector : public std::vector<T> {
public :
class Error : public std::exception {
public :
Error (std::string val = "") throw () : val_ (val) {}
~Error () throw () {}
const char* what () throw () {
std::string s ("Vector Error :");
s += val_;
return s.c_str();
}
private :
std::string val_;
};
typename std::vector<T>::iterator begin () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator end () {
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator begin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator end () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rbegin () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator rend () {
typename std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rbegin () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rbegin ());
i += rresa_;
return i;
}
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rend () const {
typename std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator i (std::vector<T>::rend ());
i -= lresa_;
return i;
}
Vector () : std::vector<T> (2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, T()), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
size_t size () const {
size_t s (std::vector<T>::size ());
s -= lresa_;
s -= rresa_;
return s;
}
Vector (int n, T t0) : std::vector<T> (n + 2*(size_t) Concept::RESA, t0), lresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA), rresa_ ((size_t) Concept::RESA) {
}
Vector (const Vector& v) : std::vector<T> (v), lresa_ (v.lresa_), rresa_ (v.rresa_) {
}
bool operator == (const Vector& v) const {
return std::equal (begin (), end (), v.begin ());
}
bool operator != (const Vector& v) const {
return !operator == (v);
}
T& operator (const size_t &s) {
return std::vector<T>::operator (s+lresa_);
}
void push_front (const T& t) {
if (!lresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::begin (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
lresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::begin ());
i += lresa_ -1;
*i = t;
--lresa_;
}
void push_back (const T& t) {
if (!rresa_) {
std::vector<T>::insert (std::vector<T>::end (), (size_t) Concept::RESA, t);
rresa_ = (size_t) Concept::RESA;
}
typename std::vector<T>::iterator i (std::vector<T>::end ());
i -= rresa_;
*i = t;
--rresa_;
}
//can be optimized,but that s not the topic
Vector& operator = (const Vector& v) {
std::vector<T>::operator = (v);
lresa_ = v.lresa_;
rresa_ = v.rresa_;
return *this;
}
//intelligent resize to do
//at the moment just stupid
void resize (size_t n) {
std::vector<T>::resize (n + lresa_ + rresa_);
}
private :
size_t lresa_;
size_t rresa_;
};
#endif


What do you think about it ?







c++ c++11






share|improve this question









New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 mins ago







Saint-Martin













New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Saint-MartinSaint-Martin

13




13




New contributor




Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Saint-Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2





    It cannot be O(1) as you sometime need to grow the vector and move items.. Maybe amortized O(1)?

    – Phil1970
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Folks: Be nice to one another and to everyone else. Make critique not about the person, but about the code.

    – Vogel612
    59 mins ago











  • this Vector insert begin at O(1) / some constant

    – Saint-Martin
    55 mins ago














  • 2





    It cannot be O(1) as you sometime need to grow the vector and move items.. Maybe amortized O(1)?

    – Phil1970
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Folks: Be nice to one another and to everyone else. Make critique not about the person, but about the code.

    – Vogel612
    59 mins ago











  • this Vector insert begin at O(1) / some constant

    – Saint-Martin
    55 mins ago








2




2





It cannot be O(1) as you sometime need to grow the vector and move items.. Maybe amortized O(1)?

– Phil1970
1 hour ago





It cannot be O(1) as you sometime need to grow the vector and move items.. Maybe amortized O(1)?

– Phil1970
1 hour ago




1




1





Folks: Be nice to one another and to everyone else. Make critique not about the person, but about the code.

– Vogel612
59 mins ago





Folks: Be nice to one another and to everyone else. Make critique not about the person, but about the code.

– Vogel612
59 mins ago













this Vector insert begin at O(1) / some constant

– Saint-Martin
55 mins ago





this Vector insert begin at O(1) / some constant

– Saint-Martin
55 mins ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Saint-Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211398%2fmaking-vector-push-front-improved-to-o1-8192%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Saint-Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Saint-Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Saint-Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Saint-Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211398%2fmaking-vector-push-front-improved-to-o1-8192%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'