Star and Delta Connections using Circuitikz











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



For the Star Connection:



documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
usepackage{circuitikz}
begin{document}
begin{circuitikz} draw

(2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
(0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
(2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
(1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
(2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
(0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
(2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
(0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
(circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
(circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
(circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
(circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
(circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
(circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
(circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

;end{circuitikz}
end{document}


enter image description here



And for the Delta:



documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
usepackage{circuitikz}
begin{document}
begin{circuitikz} draw

(2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
(1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
(2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
(2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
(2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
(0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
(circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
(circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
(circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
(circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
(circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
(circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
;end{circuitikz}

end{document}


enter image description here



I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



    For the Star Connection:



    documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{circuitikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{circuitikz} draw

    (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
    (0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
    (2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
    (1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
    (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
    (0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
    (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
    (0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
    (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
    (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
    (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
    (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
    (circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
    (circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
    (circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

    ;end{circuitikz}
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    And for the Delta:



    documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{circuitikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{circuitikz} draw

    (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
    (1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
    (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
    (2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
    (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
    (0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
    (circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
    (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
    (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
    (circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
    (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
    (circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
    ;end{circuitikz}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



    enter image description here



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



      For the Star Connection:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
      (0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
      (circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
      (circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

      ;end{circuitikz}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      And for the Delta:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
      ;end{circuitikz}

      end{document}


      enter image description here



      I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



      enter image description here



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question













      I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



      For the Star Connection:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
      (0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
      (circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
      (circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

      ;end{circuitikz}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      And for the Delta:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
      ;end{circuitikz}

      end{document}


      enter image description here



      I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



      enter image description here



      enter image description here







      graphics circuitikz circuits






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Delfin

      234




      234






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          enter image description here



          with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows}
          tikzset{
          sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
          minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={Large$sim$}},
          dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}},
          cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}}
          }
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
          -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
          draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
          end{tikzpicture}

          bigskip
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
          -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
          -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
          end{tikzpicture}

          end{document}


          note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            28 mins ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466045%2fstar-and-delta-connections-using-circuitikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote













          enter image description here



          with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows}
          tikzset{
          sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
          minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={Large$sim$}},
          dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}},
          cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}}
          }
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
          -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
          draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
          end{tikzpicture}

          bigskip
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
          -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
          -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
          end{tikzpicture}

          end{document}


          note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            28 mins ago

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          enter image description here



          with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows}
          tikzset{
          sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
          minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={Large$sim$}},
          dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}},
          cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}}
          }
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
          -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
          draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
          end{tikzpicture}

          bigskip
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
          -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
          -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
          end{tikzpicture}

          end{document}


          note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            28 mins ago















          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          enter image description here



          with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows}
          tikzset{
          sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
          minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={Large$sim$}},
          dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}},
          cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}}
          }
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
          -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
          draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
          end{tikzpicture}

          bigskip
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
          -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
          -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
          end{tikzpicture}

          end{document}


          note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






          share|improve this answer












          enter image description here



          with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows}
          tikzset{
          sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
          minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={Large$sim$}},
          dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}},
          cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}}
          }
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
          -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
          draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
          end{tikzpicture}

          bigskip
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
          -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
          -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
          end{tikzpicture}

          end{document}


          note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Zarko

          119k865155




          119k865155












          • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            28 mins ago




















          • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            1 hour ago










          • @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            28 mins ago


















          I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
          – Delfin
          1 hour ago




          I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
          – Delfin
          1 hour ago












          And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
          – Delfin
          1 hour ago




          And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
          – Delfin
          1 hour ago












          @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
          – Zarko
          28 mins ago






          @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
          – Zarko
          28 mins ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466045%2fstar-and-delta-connections-using-circuitikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          404 Error Contact Form 7 ajax form submitting

          How to know if a Active Directory user can login interactively

          TypeError: fit_transform() missing 1 required positional argument: 'X'